Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons^™

Labeling “The Last Prisoners:” New Legislation Requires New York Museums To Identify Nazi-Looted Artwork, Stephanny Avshalomov

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

“[S]he walked through the apartment and she turned to the SS men and she said, ‘Ich habe gernes. Alles.’ – ‘I like it. All of it.’ … they took everything out of [ ] our house.” The “greatest art theft in history” was executed alongside the largest mass murder in history. In 1940, Hitler established the Einsatztab Reichsleither Rosenberg (ERR) solely to confiscate and destroy art in German-occupied territories. When discussing the Holocaust, which included the grueling systematic annihilation of European Jews, the importance of artwork seems trivial. It, however, must be recognized: “You can wipe out an entire generation, …

Book Ban Opponents Face An Uphill Battle With Current Discretionary Review Standards, Zach Cihlar

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

On October 25th, 2021, Texas State Representative Matt Krause, in his capacity as Chairman of the Committee on General Investigating, circulated a letter addressed to the Texas Education Agency and school-district superintendents. The letter requested that superintendents identify and investigate a list of 800 books possibly held in their districts’ libraries that might contain topics ranging from human sexuality to HIV/AIDS to any material that “might make students feel discomfort, guilt, anguish . . . or psychological distress because of their race or sex . . . .”

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law …

70 Years Of Dance: Copyrighting Choreography Since 1952, Annie Planker

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

Choreography has long been a subject of controversy in the world of copyright. Despite its significance in the artistic community and the rise of social media in our everyday lives, choreography has not received the same property protections as other artforms, such as music, painting or sculpture. This is partly due to the transient nature of choreography; copyright law requires “fixed expressions” of works. It is also due to a legal hesitation to limit “social” arts. Lawmakers have little desire to prohibit large masses from participating in cultural activities.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment …

Anticipating The New “Green Guides”: Ftc Promises Review Of Environmental Marketing Guidance, Frances Bandas

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) is poised to review its “Green Guides,” a series of guidelines issued to help marketers make nondeceptive environmental claims that comply with federal regulations. Guidance is supplied for claims about a product or its packaging, claims made in connection with a sale or service, and all forms of marketing claims.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal website on September 20, 2022. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above.

Can The Big Five Of Publishing Become The Big Four?, Olivia Nacionales

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

On March 4, 2020, ViacomCBS announced its intention to sell its book-publishing subsidiary, Simon & Schuster. This announcement came less than a year after the merger between Viacom and CBS. Since the 2019 merger, ViacomCBS decided to focus on television and video and began selling its smaller companies that do not have a “significant connection for [its] broader business.” Prior to the announcement to buy Simon & Schuster, ViacomCBS had received “unsolicited inbound calls” regarding the sale of the book publishing company.

This post was originally published on the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal website on September 20, 2022. …

Cardozo Aelj’S Statement On Yu’S Appeal To Scotus, Editorial Board

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ) Blog

The Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (“AELJ”) strongly and unequivocally condemns Yeshiva University’s treatment of its LGBTQ+ undergraduate students. New York courts found that Yeshiva University’s refusal to recognize and fund the undergraduate LGBTQ+ group, Pride Alliance, was in violation of NYC Human Rights Law because Yeshiva University is chartered as an educational corporation, receives public funds, and is, therefore, not eligible for the Human Rights Law religious corporation exemption. Yeshiva now petitions the Supreme Court of the United States to stay that judgment so it may continue to discriminate against LGBTQ+ students in the name of religious freedom. …