Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons^™

Re-Striping: Predatory Trademarks And Common Signs, Lior Zemer, Or Morag, Yochai Rosner

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Trademark laws were traditionally designed based on the belief that there was an infinite supply of eligible registrable signs. However, current studies show that trademark supply is finite, and that we are close to exhausting it. While trademark protection allows proprietors to distinguish between their goods or services from others, and allowing the public to do the same, the extent of such protection requires constant legal attention and reconsideration which, as contemporary trademark policies show, does not take place in the expected frequency.

One of the immediate consequences from this lack of attention is the rapid growth in strength of …

Should The Ncaa Be Subject To Title Ix?, Sarah Allen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) should be held accountable under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, despite its current exemption, due to its significant role in college athletics and the persistent gender disparities in treatment of male and female athletes. It advocates for overturning the Supreme Court's decision in NCAA v. Smith to bring the NCAA under Title IX purview.

Net Positive: Imposing A Duty To Warn On Baseball Stadium Operators, Eric Rothman

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the Baseball Rule, which shields stadium operators from liability for foul ball injuries if they provide minimal protections, is outdated and inadequate given modern conditions. It proposes modifying the rule to include a duty to warn spectators of each foul ball as it is hit, drawing on Japan's successful implementation of a real-time warning system. This approach balances spectator safety with the preservation of baseball's unique fan experience.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 41, Iss. 3

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Panel 1: Race, Gender & Equity, Len Elmore, Jo Potuto, Kassandra Ramsey, Felix Wu

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article discusses the evolution of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights in college athletics, focusing on the challenges these rights present for race, gender, and equity. It highlights the need for legal and regulatory reforms to address disparities in NIL opportunities and ensure equitable treatment of student-athletes.

Why And What Federal Nil Rights Legislation Is Needed, Matthew J. Mitten

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article argues that federal Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights legislation is essential to maintain the amateur/educational model of intercollegiate sports, preserve the distinction between college and professional athletics, and ensure competitive balance. It emphasizes the need for national uniformity to prevent conflicting state laws and address antitrust concerns.

Nil Collectives - Title Ix's Latest Challenge, Kassandra Ramsey

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article explores the intersection of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) Collectives and Title IX, arguing that while NIL Collectives are not directly subject to Title IX, colleges and universities must ensure these organizations comply with Title IX to maintain gender equity. Schools are responsible due to their federal funding and their promotion of these collectives, necessitating guidelines, education, and audits to prevent disparities in opportunities for male and female athletes.

The Supreme Court's Decision In Ncaa V. Board Of Regents: Did The Ncaa Really Misread It So Badly?, John Wolohan

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Today, college athletes like LSU gymnast Olivia Dunne and Alabama quarterback Bryce Young can earn hundreds of thousands of dollars a year from social media and product endorsements. However; it was only a couple of years ago that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) declared University of Central Florida football player Donald De La Haye ineligible to play because he refused to stop monetizing his videos on YouTube, thereby losing his scholarship. The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact the Supreme Court's 1984 decision in NCAA v. Board of Regents has had in the NCAA, going from …

The Nil Revolution: What's Next?, Andrew Zimbalist

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article examines the transformative impact of the NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) revolution on college athletics, highlighting its legal, economic, and educational implications. It traces the evolution from historical amateurism to recent legal challenges, such as White v. NCAA and O'Bannon v. NCAA, which have reshaped compensation rules for student-athletes. The NIL revolution has introduced a new market where athletes can earn money, but it also raises concerns about equity, financial sustainability for colleges, and the educational welfare of athletes. The author argues that while the NCAA has struggled to lead reforms effectively, Congressional intervention may be necessary …

Ambushing Nil Restrictions: How Nil "Conflict Language" Policies Conflict With The First Amendment, Sam C. Ehrlich, Neal C. Ternes

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article argues that state NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) laws and institutional policies restricting college athletes from signing sponsorship deals conflicting with school sponsors infringe upon athletes' First Amendment rights. These restrictions, often broad and imprecise, fail to meet constitutional standards, particularly under the Central Hudson test for commercial speech, and risk being struck down as unconstitutional prior restraints.

The Legality Of The Removal Of The Parthenon Marbles. Truth Or Fiction? Archival Research Reveals The Facts About The Removal Of The Parthenon Marbles By Lord Elgin, Elena Korka

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article argues that the removal of the Parthenon Marbles by Lord Elgin in the early nineteenth century was illegal, as Elgin never obtained official Ottoman authorization, contrary to British claims. The analysis reveals that Elgin fabricated legal justifications, including the misuse of an unofficial letter from the Kaymakam, to legitimize his actions. The British government's acquisition of the marbles is thus questioned on legal and ethical grounds.

Panel 2: Modern Trends And Internet Speech, Enrique Armijo, Paul M. Barrett, Michael A. Cheah, Zahra Takhshid, Felix Wu

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article explores the complexities and future of Section 230, focusing on its role in protecting online platforms from liability for user-generated content. Panelists argue that Section 230 is an immunity, not a subsidy, and discuss its implications for content moderation, new technologies, and regulatory oversight. They propose various reforms, including FTC regulation and clarifying Section 230's scope for emerging harms.

A Personal Essay: The Parthenon Marbles And The British Museum's Fairy Tale, David Rudenstine

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The British Museum's retention of the Parthenon Marbles is justified by a narrative that the author describes as a "fairy tale," unsupported by historical evidence. The museum claims that Lord Elgin obtained prior written permission from Ottoman authorities to remove the sculptures, but the author argues that this claim is false and contradicted by available evidence. The article contends that the museum's narrative lacks an evidentiary foundation, amounting to deliberate misrepresentation, and calls for the return of the marbles to Athens.

The Parthenon Marbles Case: Background And The Arguments Of Greece And The Uk, Irini Stamatoudi

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article examines the longstanding dispute over the Parthenon Marbles, focusing on the legal, ethical, and policy arguments between Greece and the UK. It critiques the UK's reliance on the "Universal Museum" theory and legal constraints, arguing that the Marbles' return to Greece is justified on ethical and cultural grounds. The article emphasizes the importance of reuniting the Marbles in their original context and challenges the UK's position as outdated and contrary to modern principles of cultural heritage law.

Opening Remarks, Christopher J. Buccafusco, Matthew Vernace

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Section 230 And The Right To Remove Vaccine Misinformation, Michael A. Cheah

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Recognizing its clear propensity to cause serious public harm, many online platforms have restricted vaccine misinformation. This essay argues that these platforms are protected from liability when they remove such content under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The essay conducts a textual and policy-based analysis of the "publisher" immunity conferred by Section 230(c) (1) and the immunity for restricting objectionable materials under Section 230(c)(2) and concludes that both protect the removal of vaccine misinformation. The essay further argues that repealing Section 230 will not encourage platforms to combat vaccine misinformation as some policymakers have suggested. That is because …

Crying Cda Immunity: Tech Companies' Knee-Jerk Defense To Child Sexual Exploitation & Product Liability Claims, Carrie Goldberg, Naomi Leeds

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article argues that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is being misapplied by tech companies like Omegle to avoid liability in cases involving child sexual exploitation and product liability. It contends that Section 230 immunity should not shield companies when claims pertain to product design flaws and trafficking, emphasizing the need for courts to recognize the distinction between content moderation and product-related harms.

Opening Remarks, Melanie Leslie, David Rudenstine

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article addresses the controversy surrounding the Parthenon Marbles, sculptures removed from Greece by Lord Elgin over 200 years ago and currently held by the British Museum. The symposium explores the ethical, legal, and political dimensions of their potential repatriation to Greece, emphasizing the broader implications for cultural property disputes and the role of museums in addressing colonial legacies.

Five Reflections From Five Years Of Fosta/Sesta, Kendra Albert

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article critically examines the impact of the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA) and the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (SESTA), arguing that these laws have disproportionately harmed sex workers by leading to widespread deplatforming and increased criminalization. While FOSTA/SESTA aimed to combat sex trafficking, the author contends that the legislation conflated sex work with trafficking, resulting in the shutdown of harm reduction platforms and exacerbating risks for sex workers. The article emphasizes the need to center the voices of marginalized communities in policy-making and advocates for decriminalization as a more effective approach to preventing exploitation.

Copyright Neutrality? Lessons From Mein Kampf, Michal Shur-Ofry, Noy Lion

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

This Article explores the copyright story of Hitler's Mein Kampf over the past century and uses this case study to shed new light on one of copyright's foundational doctrines: the principle of copyright neutrality. Relying on primary archival materials from German archives, combined with legal proceedings from the 1930s onwards, secondary historical sources, and in-depth interviews, we trace the copyright trails of Mein Kampf across several jurisdictions and periods of time. This intricate inquiry unravels the surprisingly central role that copyright played in spreading the Nazi ideology and illuminates a structural imbalance within the neutrality principle, which may legitimize and …

Panel 1: Sexual Exploitation, Sex Workers, And Section 230, Mary Graw Leary, Kendra Albert, Carrie Goldberg, Felix Wu

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article examines the implications of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, focusing on its impact on sexual exploitation, sex workers, and online speech. Panelists discuss the unintended consequences of legislative changes like FOSTA-SESTA and propose reforms such as the EARN IT Act to address child sexual abuse material (CSAM). They emphasize the need to balance protecting victims with safeguarding legitimate speech, particularly for marginalized communities, and advocate for comprehensive reforms rather than piecemeal changes.

Fourth Amendment Issues And Covid-19 Tracking, Brooke A. Banks

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the special needs doctrine does not justify warrantless government access to cell site location information (CSLI) for COVID-19 tracking, as individual privacy interests outweigh public health benefits. It advocates for voluntary, privacy-protective measures, such as opt-in apps, to balance privacy and pandemic response.

#Freebritney: The Importance Of Public Access To The Guardianship System, Cecily D'Amore

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note examines the systemic issues in the U.S. guardianship system, highlighted by Britney Spears' highly publicized conservatorship case, and advocates for increased transparency and accountability. It argues that while guardianship laws are designed to protect vulnerable individuals, cases like Spears' reveal gaps in oversight, inconsistent public access to records, and the need for less restrictive alternatives. The note proposes reforms, including enhanced public access to guardianship case information and the creation of a centralized database, to address these shortcomings and prevent abuse.

Mechanical Licenses And The Willing Buyer/Willing Seller Standard: Establishing Royalty Rates In A Vacuum Of Knowledge, Natalie Linn

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The Music Modernization Act (MMA) introduced a significant shift in determining mechanical royalty rates by replacing the 801(b)(1) standard with the willing buyer-willing seller standard. This change, while aiming to establish fair market value, presents challenges for the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) due to the lack of a comparable market and the influence of statutory licensing. The transition is expected to increase royalty rates, impacting various stakeholders, including copyright owners, streaming services, and consumers, and may lead to heightened disputes and uncertainty in the industry.

Any Port In A Storm: What Social Media Platforms Should Do To Address The Shifting Legal Tides Governing Content Embedding, Laura Cohen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Masthead - Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 40 (2022-23)

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 40, Iss. 1

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Uncovering Patent Prosecution: An Obvious(Ness) Negotiation, Orit Fischman-Afori, Yifat Nahmias, Iris Soroker

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Because a patent is a license for a monopoly affecting the public good, the process of patent prosecution deserves close scrutiny. Yet, significant aspects of this process remain unexplored. In particular, two central thresholds for patent eligibility, "novelty" and "nonobviousness," regarded as the bedrock of patent law worldwide, have rarely been examined on an empirical basis. Investigating how these requirements are invoked during the patent prosecution process is critical to understanding how the application of patent law's central tenets affects the quantity and quality of the resulting patents and, ultimately, the public interest.

In this empirical study, we examine a …

Autumn Is Coming: A Novel Liability Theory That May Kill Pharmaceutical Evergreening, Uri Y. Hacohen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Pharmaceutical evergreening-attempts by brand-name manufacturers to leverage patent rights to artificially extend legal protection for drugs-is among the most pressing and unresolved public policy challenges of our time. On July 14, 2021, in Sanofi et al. vs. Unipharm Ltd., the Israeli Supreme Court adopted a novel and internationally unprecedented legal policy to combat the evergreening pandemic. By using its equitable powers, the Israeli court empowered a generic manufacturer, Unipharm, to claim on behalf of the public interest the wrongly obtained monopoly profits that a brand-name manufacturer, Sanofi, obtained by improperly leveraging its improvement patent to impair generic market entry. This …

Examining The Fourth Amendment And Biometric Data Privacy Law Implications Of Ncaa Athletes' Mandated Use Of Athlete Biometric Data Tracking Devices, Alicia Jessop

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

This Article presents the first in-depth analysis of the privacy law implications, under both the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and individual states' biometric data privacy laws, resulting from National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) member institutions mandating that athletes wear athlete biometric data (ABD) tracking devices. The Article provides the NCAA' and its member institutions, athletes, and Congress with recommendations of how to respond to the privacy law concerns that exist in a period of expanded ABD collection, use, and storage. Part I discusses the growing practice of athletics departments requiring intercollegiate athletes to wear ABD tracking devices. …