Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons^™

Insert Coins To Slay - Regulating Children's Access To Violent Arcade Games, Elizabeth A. Previte

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

The Government Tunes In To Tune Out The Marketing Of Violent Entertainment To Kids, Shannon Mccoy

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

This Note examines the recent investigation conducted by the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission") and its 2001 Follow-Up to that inquiry. The September 2000 Report ("Report") concluded that the entertainment industry intentionally and aggressively advertises both R and PG-13 movies to children under the age of 18. As a solution, the FTC recommended self-regulation by the entertainment industry. The 2001 Follow-Up to the Report ("Follow-Up") found that although the movie industry has made progress, a greater effort must be exerted to successfully eliminate the marketing of violent entertainment to children.' Both the Report and the Follow-Up demonstrate that self-regulation …

The Deep Pocket Dilemma: Setting The Parameters Of Talk Show Liability, Jason S. Schlessel

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Too Close To Call: The Sufficiency Of Alternative Relocation Sites In Diamond V. City Of Taft, Pauline P. Clark

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

No Room For Cheers: Schizophrenic Application In The Realm Of Right Of Publicity Protection, Jennifer Y. Choi

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Framing And Blaming In The Culture Wars: Marketing Murder Or Selling Speech?, Clay Calvert

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

This Article uses the Pahler legal battle as a case study to examine the current culture wars that have placed the Hollywood recording and entertainment industries in the legal crosshairs of both legislative and judicial efforts to redefine popular teen culture. The first section demonstrates how the theories at issue in Pahler mirror the tactics used in the recent war against tobacco industry advertising that also allegedly targeted minors. Next, the Article situates Pahler within the context of Congressional hearings in the fall of 2000 that focused attention on the alleged Hollywood marketing of products featuring violent content to minors. …

Art: To Fund Or Not To Fund? That Is Still The Question, Sarah F. Warren

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Reconsidering The Federal Journalist's Privilege For Non-Confidential Information: Gonzales V. Nbc, Anthony L. Fargo

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

For Entertainment Purposes Or Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam: Televangelism In The Marketplace Of Ideas, Juan G. Villasenor

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

This Note discusses the proposed legal responses to the problem of fraud by televangelists. Finding the solutions constitutionally deficient, politically unsound, or practically ineffective as deterrents, it then explores the possibility of a content-based restriction on televangelists' speech. The Note concludes that such a deliberate restriction on speech cannot withstand First Amendment scrutiny, regardless of the dishonesty or disingenuousness one may find in televangelists' tactics. Accordingly, despite the great potential for deception, televangelists' activities are, and should be, absolutely protected by the First Amendment. Any proposed remedy to deal with televangelism must occur in the marketplace of ideas, which is …

Alan Isaacman And The First Amendment: A Candid Interview With Larry Flynt's Attorney, Clay Calvert, Robert D. Richards

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Concerts: Rated Or Raided? First Amendment Implications Of Concert-Rating, Deborah Cazan

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

This Note examines the constitutionality as well as practicality of two different concert-rating statutes. San Antonio ordinance 61,850, the first attempt at concert-rating, has never been challenged constitutionally. This Note asserts that if the ordinance were challenged, the Court would find it constitutionally valid on its face, despite the possibility of unconstitutional applications. However, some unconstitutional consequences remain. The second statute examined is one recently proposed by Senator Shugars in the Michigan state legislature. Like the San Antonio ordinance, this Note concludes that Senate Bill 239 would also withstand a constitutional challenge.

This Note examines the history and structure of …

Table Dancing Around The First Amendment: The Constitutionality Of Distance Requirements In Colacurcio V. City Of Kent, Jenna Doviak

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Video Voyeurism, Privacy, And The Internet: Exposing Peeping Toms In Cyberspace, Clay Calvert, Justin Brown

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

National Endowment Of The Arts V. Finley: The Propriety Of Viewpoint In Arts Funding Still Unknown, Melissa S. Vignovic

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Zoning Restrictions On Location Of Adult Businesses, Alan C. Weinstein

All Maxine Goodman Levin School of Urban Affairs Publications

This year's report concentrates on recent legal developments concerning regulation of the location of "adult entertainment businesses." Such regulations raise serious constitutional issues because the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of expression extends to non-obscene sexually oriented media. The U.S. Supreme Court, however, has established that local government may single out adult businesses for special regulatory treatment in the form of locational restrictions if the local government can show a substantial public interest in regulating such businesses unrelated to the suppression of speech and if the regulations allow for "reasonable alternative avenues of communication," which essentially translates into a reasonable …

Viewpoint Discrimination In The Military Context: Defining The Difference Due To The Military Honor And Decency Act Of 1996 In General Media Communications, Inc. V. Cohen, Dirk Simpson

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Silencing The Past: Public Monuments And The Tutelary State, Sanford Levinson

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Right To Know?: Delimiting Database Protection At The Juncture Of The Commerce Clause, The Intellectual Property Clause And The First Amendment, Malla Pollack

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Art, Distribution & The State: Perspectives On The National Endowment For The Arts, Amy Schwartzman, John Tuskey, Robert W. Peters, Hope O'Keeffe, Roberto Bedoya, David Cole, Marci Hamilton

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Antidiscrimination Laws & Artistic Expression, Steven H. Shiffrin, Gregory R. Smith

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

Rice V. Paladin Enterprises, Inc.: Does The First Amendment Protect Instruction Manuals On How To Commit Murder, Emma Dailey

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Newsgathering After The Death Of A Princess: Do American Laws Adequately Punish And Deter Newsgathering Conduct That Places Individuals In Fear Or At Risk Of Bodily Harm, Alissa Eden Halperin

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Yet Another Fox In The Hen House: Government Protection Of Artistic Expression Within Privately Owned Public Spaces, David Rudenstine

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Voyeurism Value In First Amendment Jurisprudence, Clay Calvert

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Bery V. New York: Do Artists Have A First Amendment Right To Sell And Display Art In Public Places, Christina A. Mathes

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

National Endowment For The Arts V. Finley: Challenging The Facial Challenge, Gloria F. Taft

Campbell Law Review

This Note examines the facial challenge in National Endowment for the Arts ("NEA") v. Finley and how an as-applied challenge may have produced a different outcome. In particular, this Note will analyze the inadequacy of a facial challenge to the "decency & respect" provision, and in the alternative how an asapplied challenge would have invalidated the provision when applied to artists such as the Respondents in Finley.

The Conflict Between The First Amendment And Copyright Law And Its Impact On The Internet, Stephen Fraser

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Commercial Speech On The Internet: Spain And The First Amendment, Joshua A. Marcus

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Public Interest Regulation In The Digital Tv Era, Henry Geller

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Deception In Political Advertising: The Clash Between The First Amendment And Defamation Law, Evan Richman

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.