Election Law Commons^™

At The Crossroads: Private Litigation And The Fate Of Sections 2 And 208 Of The Voting Rights Act, Aviva D. Kohn

Fordham Law Review

For six decades, private plaintiffs have stood at the center of Voting Rights Act (VRA) enforcement, bringing an overwhelming majority of the suits challenging discriminatory voting practices nationwide. Most federal courts have allowed private plaintiffs to sue for relief under the VRA. However, in 2023 and 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit broke from this pattern, holding that neither section 2 nor section 208 of the VRA permits private litigants to sue for relief. The Eighth Circuit’s decisions rest on a narrow reading of congressional intent, a rigid application of Alexander v. Sandovaland Gonzaga University …

Vacancies Filled By Voters’ Voices: A Call For Open Special Elections With Ranked Choice Voting In New York, Fordham Law School Rule Of Law Clinic, Dani D'Annunzio, Dawn Edelman, David Zwick

Rule of Law Clinic

New York’s special election system for filling vacancies in the U.S. House of Representatives and the State Legislature excludes voters from the candidate selection process. Instead of voters selecting nominees, political party leaders designate their parties’ respective candidates. In this report, the Fordham Law School Rule of Law Clinic recommends reforming this system by implementing open special elections using ranked choice voting. All candidates who meet petition signature requirements, regardless of party affiliation, would compete in a single election. This reform would improve participation, representation, and accountability without sacrificing efficiency.

An Electoral College Compromise Constitutional Amendment: Bridging Partisan Divides To Improve Presidential Elections, John Rogan

Fordham Law Review Online

Abolishing the Electoral College in favor of using a national popular vote to elect the president and vice president is unlikely to attract sufficient bipartisan support to reach the high thresholds for amending the U.S. Constitution. However, the Electoral College has flawed features that both Democrats and Republicans might support reforming because those defects can undermine either party’s candidates. This Essay highlights three such defects. First, contingent elections—a process by which Congress selects the president and vice president if no ticket wins a majority of electoral votes—are deeply unrepresentative of the American electorate while also being subject to unpredictable dysfunction …

Why Top-Two Primaries Can't Be Fixed, Quinn Yeargain

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.

Residency Requirements In Initiative Ballot Access: The Limits Of First Amendment Rights And The Fight Against Atlanta's 'Cop City', Ross Levin

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

When election procedure is challenged, courts must balance First Amendment rights against states’ prerogative to regulate elections. Residency requirements are an election procedure that require petition circulators be a resident of the jurisdiction. Residency restrictions on petition circulators—who collect signatures to achieve ballot access—weigh too heavily against First Amendment rights. In jurisdictions where residency requirements remain in place for initiative ballot access, voters are unconstitutionally shut out of the political process.

In this Article, I examine two cases in which the Supreme Court extended its First Amendment ballot access jurisprudence to ballot initiatives, Meyer v. Grant and Buckley v. American …

Voter Confidence And The World Of Appearances: Where Campaign-Finance And Election-Administration Law Collide, Kishore S. Chundi

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

Scholarship on election-administration measures (like voter ID laws) and campaign-finance laws has been siloed. American political affiliations, in their current form, dictate that liberals support campaign-finance restrictions and oppose voter ID laws, and vice versa for conservatives. But the Court has analyzed both measures using the similarly odd lens of appearances—the perception of electoral integrity in voter ID cases and the perception of corruption in campaign-finance cases. Yet despite the nearly identical justifications for campaign-finance and election-administration measures, the Court has treated these claims quite differently. Election-administration laws receive nearly automatic deference, whereas campaign-finance laws are routinely overturned. This Article …

Preparing For Election Disruptions In 2024, Norman J. Ornstein

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.

The U.S. Electoral System And Foreign Interference, Jeremi Suri

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.

The Electoral Count Reform Act In 2024, Adav Noti

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.

The County Certification Problem, Jenny Gimian

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.

Litigating The 2024 Election, Richard Pildes

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.

Impending Peril: Rethinking The Future Of Democracy, Karen J. Greenberg

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

In their new books, Anne Applebaum and Timothy Snyder explore the vulnerabilities that plague democracies globally and in the United States. Documenting the elements that threaten democracy, they share a vision of the future that demands a deepened understanding of the forces that oppose democracy—among them, corruption, disinformation and isolation. Offering visions of a more enlightened public space, and a heightened sense of empathy, they each attempt to provide a roadmap to a more equitable, just, and life-affirming future.

The Burden To Reach The Ballots: Tackling Eleventh Circuit Line-Warming Bans And Their Intersectional Harm Under An Ada Framework, Alyssa Clune

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

Line-warming bans present an additional hurdle for voters across America, especially in an era of historically few polling locations and historically long lines to reach the ballot. Particularly in Eleventh Circuit states like Georgia and Florida, line-warming bans, in conjunction with long wait times, have had a disparate impact on Black communities and their ability to cast ballots in key swing districts. Nevertheless, attempts to bring racial discrimination claims against these bans have not been successful in the Eleventh Circuit. This Essay proposes a new strategy to tackle line-warming bans under an ADA framework. It analyzes the harm that these …

Reforms For Filling Vacancies In The U.S. Senate And House Of Representatives, Nora Donnelly, Alexa Green, Lea Vallone

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

Many states’ laws for filling vacancies in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives weaken democratic legitimacy. Vacancies in the House are increasingly prolonged, leaving constituents without representation for extended periods. Senate vacancies are filled more quickly, but gubernatorial appointees often gain a significant incumbency advantage when they later seek election. In this report, the Fordham Law School Rule of Law Clinic recommends holding open, nonpartisan elections, without primaries or runoffs, within three months of most Senate and House vacancies, with earlier initiation when vacancies are anticipated. The report further proposes limiting interim Senate appointments to “caretakers” who serve only …

Section 1983 And Voting Rights: A Case Study On The Materiality Provision And The Future Of Private Enforcement, Paul Feingold

Fordham Law Review

A recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit stating that § 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is not enforceable by private litigants under an implied private right of action has many voting rights advocates rightfully concerned about the future of federal voting rights protections. Indeed, that ruling appears partly motivated by signals from the U.S. Supreme Court. However, not all hope is lost. In Health and Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. Talevski, the Supreme Court recently reaffirmed its Gonzaga University v. Doe test for enforcing a statute under § 1983. …

State Laws For Administering Presidential Elections: Recommendations And Considerations For Reform, Fordham Law School Rule Of Law Clinic, Seamus Crowley, Molly Johnston, Alexander Paget, William Russell

Rule of Law Clinic

States have a critical role in administering presidential elections, and there are currently a range of emergent challenges that they must confront. In this report, the Fordham Law School Rule of Law Clinic outlines reform recommendations and considerations to assist states in crafting their presidential election administration policies in key areas, including (1) implementation of provisions of the federal Electoral Count Reform Act; (2) preparation for natural or human-caused election disruptions; (3) prevention of faithless and fake electors; (4) accommodation of third-party and independent candidates; and (5) preparation for implementation of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.

The California Supreme Court Replaces Gingles Prong One, Bruce A. Wessel, Jason D. D'Andrea

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.

Spies, Trolls, And Bots: Combating Foreign Election Interference In The Marketplace Of Ideas, Nahal Kazemi

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

Foreign disinformation operations on social media pose a significant and rapidly evolving risk, particularly when aimed at American elections. We must urgently and effectively address this form of election interference. This Article examines potential responses to those risks, through a review of the unique characteristics, both practical and legal, of political advertising on social media platforms. This Article analyzes proposed legislative responses to foreign disinformation, noting that no single proposed law to date adequately addresses the threats and challenges posed by foreign disinformation. This Article considers the election law landscape in which the proposed laws would operate. It evaluates the …

Fraudulent Vote Dilution, Jason Marisam

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

In recent years, the Republican Party and conservative groups have brought lawsuits that advance a novel type of voting claim, which this Article calls fraudulent vote dilution. This claim asserts that an election rule is unconstitutional because it makes it too easy to cast fraudulent ballots that, when tabulated, will dilute the strength of valid and honest ballots. With the 2024 election nearing, the Republican Party may again test fraudulent vote dilution claims in court, as it seeks injunctions to make liberal election rules stricter in ways that make it harder for Democratic voters to cast ballots. This Article advances …

Americans For Prosperity Foundation V. Bonta: Protecting Free Speech And Its Implications For Campaign Finance Disclosures, Sara Lindsay Neier

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

In 2021, the United States Supreme Court in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta considered the anonymous speech rights of charitable donors against the California Attorney General’s interest in preventing wrongdoing by charitable organizations. The Court applied exacting scrutiny, a standard traditionally applied to campaign finance disclosure laws, determining that California’s requirement was facially invalid as a violation of associational rights. Bonta did not concern campaign finance, making this application of exacting scrutiny novel. This Article considers the open questions raised by Bonta regarding how exacting scrutiny should be applied and what it means for the future of campaign finance …

The Case For Federal Deference To State Court Redistricting Rulings: Lessons From Ohio’S Districting Disaster, John Sullivan Baker

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

In a watershed 2015 referendum, Ohioans decisively approved a state constitutional amendment that prohibited partisan gerrymandering of General Assembly districts and created the Ohio Redistricting Commission. Though the amendment mandated that the Commission draw proportional maps not primarily designed to favor or disfavor a political party, the Commission—composed of partisan elected officials—repeatedly enacted unconstitutional, heavily gerrymandered districting plans in blatant defiance of the Ohio Supreme Court.

After the Ohio Supreme Court struck down four of the Commission’s plans, leaving Ohio without state House and Senate maps just months before the 2022 general election, a group of voters sued in the …

Why We Can’T Have Nice Things: Equality, Proportionality, And Our Abridged Voting Rights Regime, Michael Latner

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

What constraints should the protection of political equality place on the design of electoral systems? With the exception of requiring approximate population equality across a jurisdiction’s districts, the U.S. voting rights regime accepts substantial disproportionality in voting strength. This Article addresses the current Supreme Court’s abandonment of the Second Reconstruction’s “one person, one vote” standard with regard to both racial and partisan gerrymandering, and assesses the role that Congress and political science have played in this transition. This Article argues that an unabridged voting rights regime must recognize a standard of proportional representation derived from the protection of individual political …

Discriminatory Intent Claims Under Section 2 Of The Voting Rights Act, Amandeep S. Grewal

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

This Article addresses a new controversy over whether Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act prohibits laws that exhibit “only” discriminatory intent, in the absence of discriminatory results. Lower courts have long embraced an intent approach for Section 2. And the Department of Justice has rested its entire ongoing case against Georgia’s controversial voting bill on an intent approach.

However, this Article shows that the Supreme Court’s decision in Brnovich v. DNC effectively rejects the intent approach to Section 2. In April 2023, the Eleventh Circuit reversed its prior cases and now rejects an intent theory. This puts in peril …

Voting Rights And The Electoral Process: Resolving Representation Issues Due To Felony Disenfranchisement And Prison Gerrymandering, Andrew Calabrese, Tim Gordon, Tianyi Lu

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

Felony disenfranchisement and prison gerrymandering distort democratic representation by excluding incarcerated and formerly incarcerated individuals from political participation while artificially inflating representation in prison-hosting districts. In this report, the Fordham Law School Rule of Law Clinic recommends restoring voting rights to individuals with felony convictions once they are released from prison and ending prison-based gerrymandering by counting incarcerated persons with a certain number of years left in their sentences as residents of the districts where they intend to reside after their release, in addition to other reforms to effectively carry out these policies.

Third Parties And The Electoral College: How Ranked Choice Voting Can Stop The Third-Party Disruptor Effect, Hillary Bendert, Jacqueline Hayes, Kevin Ruane

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

Third-party candidates have at times altered the outcomes of presidential elections by drawing votes away from major-party candidates. This “disruptor” effect is largely a product of states’ winner-take-all allocation of electoral votes, which awards all of a state’s electors to the plurality winner. The system discourages support for third-party candidates and can produce results that fail to reflect majority preferences. This report by the Fordham Law School Rule of Law Clinic recommends that states adopt ranked-choice voting for presidential elections to ensure that winners command majority support. It also outlines complementary reforms, including best practices for implementing ranked-choice voting and …

Presidential Election Disruptions: Balancing The Rule Of Law And Emergency Response, Jason D'Andrea, Sonia Montejano, Matthew Vaughan

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

Unexpected disruptions, such as natural disasters and terrorist attacks, could interfere with presidential elections. In this report, the Fordham Law School Rule of Law Clinic advances recommendations for how states should implement the federal law that allows them to extend the time for voting in response to catastrophic events. States should authorize local and state-level officials to trigger extensions, while providing for expedited judicial review of those decisions, whether to grant or deny additional voting time. By dispersing decision-making authority and ensuring prompt judicial oversight, these reforms aim to protect voters’ ability to cast ballots and to guard against the …

Candidates Of Their Choice? Paradoxical Impact Of The Voting Rights Act In Virginia, Mark E. Rush

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.

Title I Of The Civil Rights Act In Contemporary Voting Rights Litigation, Helen L. Brewer

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.

The New Laboratories Of Democracy, Gerald S. Dickinson

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.

Epic Fail: Harkenrider V. Hochul And New York's 2022 Misadventure In "Independent" Redistricting, Richard Briffault

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.