Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Labor and Employment Law (25)
- Contracts (24)
- Supreme Court of the United States (19)
- Civil Procedure (18)
- Courts (18)
-
- International Law (13)
- Legislation (12)
- Litigation (11)
- Securities Law (11)
- Commercial Law (7)
- Consumer Protection Law (7)
- Jurisprudence (7)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (6)
- Jurisdiction (5)
- Religion Law (5)
- Business Organizations Law (4)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Judges (4)
- Legal Remedies (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Civil Law (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Other Law (3)
- Transnational Law (3)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (2)
- Bankruptcy Law (2)
- Conflict of Laws (2)
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (21)
- University of Georgia School of Law (15)
- University of Michigan Law School (14)
- University of Missouri School of Law (12)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (12)
-
- Pace University (10)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (5)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (5)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- Emory University School of Law (4)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (4)
- St. John's University School of Law (3)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (3)
- University of Miami Law School (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
- Marquette University Law School (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- BLR (1)
- Brigham Young University (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Scholarly Works (17)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (15)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (10)
- Faculty Publications (7)
- Nevada Law Journal (6)
-
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (5)
- Journal of Dispute Resolution (5)
- Oklahoma Law Review (5)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (5)
- Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present) (4)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Faculty Articles (4)
- Pepperdine Law Review (4)
- Articles (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- St. John's Law Review (3)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (3)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (2)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (2)
- Cleveland State Law Review (2)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Lewis & Clark Law Review (2)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (2)
- University of Miami Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- American University Business Law Review (1)
- Arbitration Brief (1)
- Arkansas Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 151 - 152 of 152
Full-Text Articles in Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
The Arbitrability Of Domestic Antitrust Claims: An Evaluation Of The American Safety Doctrine, Edward G. Heilig
The Arbitrability Of Domestic Antitrust Claims: An Evaluation Of The American Safety Doctrine, Edward G. Heilig
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Incorporation Of State Law Under The Federal Arbitration Act, Michigan Law Review
Incorporation Of State Law Under The Federal Arbitration Act, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note proposes a solution to this choice-of-law problem. Section I surveys the courts' response to Congress's silence and finds confusion and disarray. Section II argues that courts should apply the state law pertinent to arbitration unless that law places heavier burdens on arbitration contracts than on other contracts; where state law does discriminatorily burden arbitration, the courts should apply the pertinent state rules applicable to "any contract." It concludes that the "grounds . . . for the revocation of any contract," although determined as a matter of federal policy, are to be found in state law rather than in …