Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (218)
- International Law (126)
- Labor and Employment Law (108)
- Contracts (94)
- Courts (74)
-
- Litigation (61)
- International Trade Law (57)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (55)
- Commercial Law (54)
- Civil Procedure (48)
- Securities Law (47)
- Legislation (35)
- Other Law (32)
- Business Organizations Law (30)
- Consumer Protection Law (30)
- Law and Society (27)
- Transnational Law (27)
- Legal History (25)
- Supreme Court of the United States (25)
- Civil Law (23)
- Jurisdiction (23)
- Jurisprudence (22)
- Constitutional Law (21)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (20)
- Banking and Finance Law (19)
- Legal Remedies (19)
- Law and Economics (16)
- Intellectual Property Law (15)
- Institution
-
- Notre Dame Law School (212)
- University of Missouri School of Law (190)
- Pepperdine University (116)
- University of Michigan Law School (80)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (52)
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (50)
- American University Washington College of Law (33)
- University of Georgia School of Law (31)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (30)
- Pace University (27)
- Boston University School of Law (26)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (21)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (20)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (16)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (15)
- Columbia Law School (14)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (14)
- Fordham Law School (13)
- Singapore Management University (13)
- St. John's University School of Law (12)
- University of Miami Law School (11)
- United Arab Emirates University (10)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (10)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (9)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (8)
- Cleveland State University (7)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (7)
- BLR (6)
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
- University of Kentucky (6)
- Publication
-
- Journal of Dispute Resolution (144)
- Arbitrator Charts (107)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (84)
- Faculty Scholarship (83)
- Scholarly Works (66)
-
- Faculty Publications (54)
- Articles (37)
- Team - Player Results (30)
- Team Hearing Charts (30)
- Annual Hearings Charts (27)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (23)
- Pepperdine Law Review (23)
- Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present) (21)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (18)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (17)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (14)
- Michigan Law Review (12)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (12)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (12)
- Cardozo Law Review (10)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (10)
- UAEU Law Journal (10)
- Journal Articles (9)
- American University Business Law Review (8)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (8)
- Indiana Law Journal (8)
- Nevada Law Journal (8)
- Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Staff Publications (7)
- Other Publications (7)
- Touro Law Review (7)
- Publication Type
Articles 991 - 1020 of 1165
Full-Text Articles in Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
The Law Of Arbitration, Theodore J. St. Antoine
The Law Of Arbitration, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Book Chapters
The law did not look kindly on arbitration in its infancy. As a process by which two or more parties could agree to have an impartial outsider resolve a dispute between them, arbitration was seen as a usurpation of the judiciary' sown functions, as an attempt to "oust the courts of jurisdiction." That was the English view, and American courts were similarly hostile. They would not order specific performance of an executory (unperformed) agreement to arbitrate, nor grant more than nominal damages for the usual breach. Only an arbitral award actually issued was enforceable at common law. All this began …
Arbitration: Kentucky Courts Should Not Liberally Vacate Awards--Carrs Fork V. Kodak Mining, William G. Fowler Ii
Arbitration: Kentucky Courts Should Not Liberally Vacate Awards--Carrs Fork V. Kodak Mining, William G. Fowler Ii
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Gateway Widens Doorway To Imposing Unfair Binding Arbitration On Consumers, Jean R. Sternlight
Gateway Widens Doorway To Imposing Unfair Binding Arbitration On Consumers, Jean R. Sternlight
Scholarly Works
Hill v. Gateway, is but the most extreme example of a series of court decisions that allow large companies to impose potentially unfair binding arbitration agreements on unwitting consumers. The outcome in Gateway, however, is questionable on federal statutory, common law, and constitutional grounds.
Rethinking The Constitutionality Of The Supreme Court's Preference For Binding Arbitration: A Fresh Assessment Of Jury Trial, Separation Of Powers, And Due Process Concerns, Jean R. Sternlight
Rethinking The Constitutionality Of The Supreme Court's Preference For Binding Arbitration: A Fresh Assessment Of Jury Trial, Separation Of Powers, And Due Process Concerns, Jean R. Sternlight
Scholarly Works
Courts and commentators have typically assumed that binding arbitration is both private and consensual, and that it therefore raises no constitutional concerns. This Article challenges both assumptions and goes on to consider arguments that arbitration agreements may unconstitutionally deprive persons of their right to a jury trial, to a judge, and to due process of law. The author argues first that courts' interpretation of seemingly private arbitration agreements may often give rise to "state action," particularly where courts have used a "preference favoring arbitration over litigation" to construe a contract in a non-neutral fashion. The author next draws on the …
Arbitration: Shaffer V. Jeffery: The Oklahoma Supreme Court Rejects The Separability Doctrine And Takes A Step Back In The Enforcement Of Arbitration Clauses Under Oklahoma Law, John Douglas Stiner
Arbitration: Shaffer V. Jeffery: The Oklahoma Supreme Court Rejects The Separability Doctrine And Takes A Step Back In The Enforcement Of Arbitration Clauses Under Oklahoma Law, John Douglas Stiner
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Contracting For Judicial Review Of Arbitration Awards: Can An Errors Of Law Clause Provide Two Bites Of The Apple - Gateway Technologies, Inc. V. Mci Telecommunications Corp., Brian T. Mccartney
Contracting For Judicial Review Of Arbitration Awards: Can An Errors Of Law Clause Provide Two Bites Of The Apple - Gateway Technologies, Inc. V. Mci Telecommunications Corp., Brian T. Mccartney
Journal of Dispute Resolution
This Note will proceed in five sections. Section II will set forth the factual framework of the Gateway case and the holding of the Fifth Circuit. Section III will briefly examine the legal background behind the standard of review for arbitration awards. Section IV will explore the analysis and decision of the Fifth Circuit in Gateway. Finally, section V will comment on the Gateway court's holding and discuss its policy implications. This Note will conclude that arbitration agreements which purport to provide judicial review for "errors of law" violate separation of powers and the public policy which underlies arbitration. Consequently, …
Appeals Of Orders Compelling Arbitration In Embedded Proceedings Must Wait - Altman Nursing, Inc. V. Clay Capital Corp., Carla Kemp
Journal of Dispute Resolution
The enactment of § 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) afforded courts with specific guidelines to follow in determining whether an order dealing with the arbitrability of a dispute is appealable. One issue, however, was not settled by the language of this statute. Altman Nursing, Inc. v. Clay Capital Corp. addresses this unresolved issue of whether an order compelling arbitration in the context of an embedded claim can be classified as final and immediately appealable
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act, Dana A. Chamblee, Matthew S. Darrough, Reachel A. Jennings, Trina R. Ricketts
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act, Dana A. Chamblee, Matthew S. Darrough, Reachel A. Jennings, Trina R. Ricketts
Journal of Dispute Resolution
This Article is an overview of recent court decisions that interpret state versions of the Uniform Arbitration Act ("U.A.A.").' Arbitration statutes patterned after the U.A.A. have been adopted by thirty-four states and the District of Columbia.2 The goal of this project is to promote uniformity in the interpretation of the U.A.A. by analyzing the various underlying policies and rationales of recent court decisions interpreting the U.A.A. '
Determining The Timeliness Of A Securities Claim Filed For Arbitration: Substantive Eligibility Requirement Or Procedural Statute Of Limitations, Carla K. Williams
Determining The Timeliness Of A Securities Claim Filed For Arbitration: Substantive Eligibility Requirement Or Procedural Statute Of Limitations, Carla K. Williams
Journal of Dispute Resolution
This Comment will focus on the development of this debate, the positions taken by the courts, and a possible resolution of these issues by the SROs themselves.9 Specifically, Part II briefly discusses the development of arbitration in the United States; Part III discusses the issues surrounding the debate, including what positions the courts have taken; and Part IV discusses the possible resolution of this debate by amendment to the SRO codes.
Claiming Private Law For The Left: Exploring Gilmer's Impact And Legacy, Roberto L. Corrada
Claiming Private Law For The Left: Exploring Gilmer's Impact And Legacy, Roberto L. Corrada
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
The left should not be so quick to condemn private arbitration of statutory rights for two primary reasons. First, although these processes have historically been seized by employers as an efficient, less costly alternative to litigation devoid of due process safeguards, there is nothing inherent in private arbitration to prevent making the process fairer for employees. Second, there is a substantial payoff that justifies the work required by those on the left to transform these processes for the betterment of employees. That payoff is greater access to justice. Private arbitration holds the potential to eliminate institutional barriers that block access …
Sica: The First Twenty Years, Constantine N. Katsoris
Sica: The First Twenty Years, Constantine N. Katsoris
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This Article provides a broad overview of the topic of securities arbitration. It expresses the views of litigants from both sides of the spectrum. It argues that the public must trust in the integrity of the SRO (self-regulatory organization) arbitration process for securities arbitration to remain the basically mandatory system that it is today. The Article traces the evolution of arbitration rules in effect at various SROs. It then examines the Uniform Code of Arbitration in detail, and the SRO Codes. It explores the role of the American Arbitration Association (AAA), the NYSE Symposium, the Ruder Report and the Role …
Who's Watching Out For The Children - Making Child Custody Determinable By Binding Arbitration - Dick V. Dick, Barbara E. Wilson
Who's Watching Out For The Children - Making Child Custody Determinable By Binding Arbitration - Dick V. Dick, Barbara E. Wilson
Journal of Dispute Resolution
"Many is the custody case which almost seems to outlive the parents .... To remedy this problem, many members of the legal profession advocate greater utilization of arbitration to include determination of child custody.' As state courts struggle to incorporate and interpret the Uniform Arbitration Act ("UAA") into child custody case law, the Dick case stands as the latest decision demonstrating the advantages and pitfalls of using binding arbitration to resolve custody disputes.
Models Of Quality For Third Parties In Alternative Dispute Resolution, Carole Silver
Models Of Quality For Third Parties In Alternative Dispute Resolution, Carole Silver
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Panacea Or Corporate Tool?: Debunking The Supreme Court's Preference For Binding Arbitration, Jean R. Sternlight
Panacea Or Corporate Tool?: Debunking The Supreme Court's Preference For Binding Arbitration, Jean R. Sternlight
Scholarly Works
This article examines the increasing use of contracts of adhesion in which companies require consumers, employees, franchisees and other "little guys" to submit disputes with the company to binding arbitration. The article argues that the Supreme Court's current preference for such agreements is not statutorily well-founded. Specifically, it contends that the Federal Arbitration Act was not intended to make such agreements binding on unknowing consumers or employees. Turning next to policy analysis, the article asserts that the Supreme Court has erred in expressing a preference for binding arbitration in cases where such arbitration was not knowingly and voluntarily accepted by …
Bootstrapping And Slouching Toward Gomorrah: Arbitral Infatuation And The Decline Of Consent, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Bootstrapping And Slouching Toward Gomorrah: Arbitral Infatuation And The Decline Of Consent, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
The Seventh Amendment to the Constitution preserves for litigants a right to a jury trial in actions at law. The right to a jury trial does not attach for equitable actions, but in cases presenting claims for both legal and equitable relief a right to a jury trial exists for common questions of fact. Although many modern statutes and claims did not exist in 1791, the Amendment has been interpreted to require a jury trial of statutory claims seeking monetary damages, the classic form of legal relief, so long as there is a relatively apt analogy between the modern statutory …
Amazon Burning And The World Bank: Lessons From The Second World Bank Inspection Panel Claim, David Hunter
Amazon Burning And The World Bank: Lessons From The Second World Bank Inspection Panel Claim, David Hunter
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Arbitration: Back To The Future, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Arbitration: Back To The Future, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Other Publications
A strong new ideological current is sweeping through much of the Western World. At one extreme it manifests itself as a deep distrust of big government. In more modest form, it is a sense of skepticism or disillusionment about the capacity of big government to deal effectively with the problems confronting our society. In continental Europe today there is much talk of the principle of "subsidiarity," the notion that social and economic ills should be treated at the lowest level feasible, usually the level closest to the people directly affected. In the United States there is much talk of "privatization," …
Globalisation Of Contract Law: Rules For Commercial Contracts In The 21st Century, Whitmore Gray
Globalisation Of Contract Law: Rules For Commercial Contracts In The 21st Century, Whitmore Gray
Articles
This is a paper given at the Asia-Pacific Lawyers Association meeting held in Bangkok in November 1995. The author describes the principles of international commercial contracts published in 1994 by the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. Professor Gray sees a new era of harmonisation of contract law. An appendix gives an abstract of a contract law decision given by an Austrian Court in 1994.
Due Process Review Under The Railway Labor Act, Christopher L. Sagers
Due Process Review Under The Railway Labor Act, Christopher L. Sagers
Michigan Law Review
This Note contends that the RLA prohibits due process review and further argues that such a result is constitutional. Part I examines the statutory language of the RLA itself and contends that it limits district court review to the three statutory grounds. Part II argues that the Supreme Court's opinion in Sheehan reaffirms this interpretation because the Court's language unmistakably conveys an intent to bar due process review. Part III explains that such a limitation does not violate the Constitution. The only constitutional provision that could be implicated in an RLA proceeding, the right of procedural due process, is protected …
Is Arbitration Final & (And) Binding - Public Policy Says, Not Necessarily - Exxon Shipping Company V. Exxon Seamen's Union, Todd M. Siegel
Is Arbitration Final & (And) Binding - Public Policy Says, Not Necessarily - Exxon Shipping Company V. Exxon Seamen's Union, Todd M. Siegel
Journal of Dispute Resolution
In the realm of employment law, management and labor unions enter in collective bargaining agreements to establish employment terms including wages, hours, benefits and grievance procedures.' A typical grievance procedure provides that labor disputes will be resolved through arbitration. Courts are encouraged to defer to collective bargaining agreements. When disputes arise, employees and employers attempt to resolve matters themselves, and if this fails, labor unions intervene and submit grievances to arbitration. Generally, an arbitrator's decision is final and binding, but in limited circumstances the matter is ultimately litigated. One such limited circumstance arose when the courts developed a public policy …
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act, Kimberly Gibbens, Cathleen A. Martin, Peter Sumners, Stephen Witte
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act, Kimberly Gibbens, Cathleen A. Martin, Peter Sumners, Stephen Witte
Journal of Dispute Resolution
The Uniform Arbitration Act is an annual project of the Journal of Dispute Resolution.2 The project examines court opinions from the past year which have interpreted state versions of the Uniform Arbitration Act ("U.A.A.").' Currently, thirty-four states and the District of Columbia have adopted arbitration statutes based on the U.A.A.' The goal of the Journal of Dispute Resolution in creating this project is to promote uniformity in interpretation of the U.A.A. by describing the decisions and rationales of recent court opinions.
Representation Of Parties In Arbitration By Non-Attorneys, Constantine N. Katsoris
Representation Of Parties In Arbitration By Non-Attorneys, Constantine N. Katsoris
Fordham Urban Law Journal
The issue of the representation of clients in legal or quasi legal proceedings by non-attorneys has been a troubling one. Not only are such services being offered by non-attorneys in the form of transactional services, i.e., advising, drafting deeds and documents, etc., but has spread to actual representation of parties before administrative agencies. Moreover, as more and more disputes are being resolved through alternative dispute mechanisms, such as arbitration, non-attorneys are also representing clients in such proceedings in civil litigation-often involving complex issues and significant sums of money-against other litigants who are usually represented by skilled attorneys. The ABA recently …
Report Of The Securities Industry Conference On Arbitration On Representation Of Parties In Arbitration By Non-Attorneys
Fordham Urban Law Journal
The following is a Report prepared by the Securities Industry Conference on Arbitration ("SICA" or "Conference") concerning non-attorney representation in arbitration. The report is the result of a study, conducted by SICA over the past two years, on the practices and activities of individuals and organizations ("Non-Attorney Representatives" or "NARs") that provide public customers an alternative to representation by attorneys in disputes between customers and broker/dealers. The study was prompted by complaints concerning the quality of such representation; and, raised questions as to whether the activities of NARs constituted the unauthorized practice of law, and whether the interests of investors …
Predisposed With Integrity: The Elusive Quest For Justice In Tripartite Arbitrations, Deseriee A. Kennedy
Predisposed With Integrity: The Elusive Quest For Justice In Tripartite Arbitrations, Deseriee A. Kennedy
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Arbitral Justice: The Demise Of Due Process In American Law, Thomas E. Carbonneau
Arbitral Justice: The Demise Of Due Process In American Law, Thomas E. Carbonneau
Faculty Scholarship
Arbitration consists of a process for resolving disputes in a final and binding manner outside the traditional court system. The rules that govern arbitration provide for flexible proceedings and do not require the strict application of legal rules.
Owing largely to the holdings of the U.S. Supreme Court, arbitration law and procedure have emerged from the obscurity of specialized practice and entered the adjudicatory mainstream.
In 1925, with the enactment of the U.S. Arbitration Act, the U.S. Congress declaredthe rehabilitation of arbitral justice and dispute resolution. These provisionsanticipated, in effect, the modern, world-wide legislative legitimization ofarbitration. Primarily because of the …
Enforcing Arbitration With A Nonsignatory: Equitable Estoppel And Defense Piercing Of The Corporate Veil - Sunkist Soft Drinks, Inc. V. Sunkist Growers, Inc., Scott M. Mckinnis
Enforcing Arbitration With A Nonsignatory: Equitable Estoppel And Defense Piercing Of The Corporate Veil - Sunkist Soft Drinks, Inc. V. Sunkist Growers, Inc., Scott M. Mckinnis
Journal of Dispute Resolution
Since Congress enacted the Federal Arbitration Act,2 courts have liberally enforced a strong national policy favoring arbitration of commercial disputes In furtherance of this goal, courts have refused to stay arbitration proceedings simply because they may involve parties who are nonsignatories to an arbitration agreement.4 Courts have accomplished this objective through the doctrine of equitable estoppel; Sunkist exemplifies that trend. However, Sunkist also represents a corporate scenario in which the emerging legal theory of "defensive piercing"' could be established as another avenue from which to compel commercial arbitration.
International Arbitration And Procedures To Enforce Awards In The Relationship Between The United States And Germany, Michael Kronenburg
International Arbitration And Procedures To Enforce Awards In The Relationship Between The United States And Germany, Michael Kronenburg
LLM Theses and Essays
Arbitration has long been regarded as a process that combines finality of decision with speed, low expense, and flexibility in solving problems. For these reasons, arbitration is often favored over litigation for dispute resolution. Particularly in international cases, a businessman may avoid litigation in a foreign country for various reasons: he may be unfamiliar with the proceedings; he may be afraid to find a “forum hostile” because of the different legal and cultural background of the judges; and he may wish to avoid the uncertainty concerning the law arising from the contract. Arbitration proceedings have been held constitutional by the …
From Star To Supernova To Dark, Cold Neutron Star: The Early Life, The Explosion And The Collapse Of Arbitration, Michael Hunter Schwartz
From Star To Supernova To Dark, Cold Neutron Star: The Early Life, The Explosion And The Collapse Of Arbitration, Michael Hunter Schwartz
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Arbitration Or Stipulation: Playing Word Games In The Federal Courts - Ddi Seamless Cylinder Int'l V. Gen. Fire Extinguisher Corp., Jeffrey T. Davis
Arbitration Or Stipulation: Playing Word Games In The Federal Courts - Ddi Seamless Cylinder Int'l V. Gen. Fire Extinguisher Corp., Jeffrey T. Davis
Journal of Dispute Resolution
In both its private and more recently, public (court-annexed) forms, arbitration has proven to be an effective tool in fighting the explosion of litigation. In certain contexts, however, some dispute has arisen as to who can actually be an arbitrator. DDI Seamless Cylinder provides an excellent example of this newly disputed area in the framework of the federal courts.
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act, Dawn Chapman, Carol Creamer, Cynthia Davenport, Tim Gorman
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act, Dawn Chapman, Carol Creamer, Cynthia Davenport, Tim Gorman
Journal of Dispute Resolution
Recent Developments: The Uniform Arbitration Act, a project prepared annually since 1983, is a survey of recent court decisions that interpret state versions of the Uniform Arbitration Act ("U.A.A."). 3 Currently, thirty-four states and the District of Columbia have adopted arbitration statutes patterned after the U.A.A. 4 The purpose of this project is to promote uniformity in interpretation of the U.A.A. by explaining the underlying policies and rationales of recent court decisions.'