Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Stronger - Not Together: The Needed Elimination Of Mandatory Arbitration For Sexual Misconduct Claims Against The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee & International Olympic Committee, Peri L. Ayzidor

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Mandatory arbitration clauses have acted as litigation blocks in employment and commercial contracts for decades. The downfall of such clauses was catalyzed by the infamous trial of Olympic doctor, Larry Nassar. The grueling evidence and testimony sparked the creation of acts such as the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act ("EFSASHA"), which barred the enforcement of mandatory arbitration clauses in claims involving sexual misconduct. Mandatory/forced arbitration clauses keep any claims made by employees or individuals private and limits their right to take a claim to court. Such clauses make it almost impossible for sexual misconduct survivors …

Settlement As Construct: Defining And Counting Party Resolution In Federal District Court, Charlotte S. Alexander, Nathan Dahlberg, Anne M. Tucker

Scholarly Works

Most civil cases settle. Yet generating a definitive settlement rate presents complex definitional and empirical problems, both in what should count as a settlement and how to count it. This Essay makes three contributions to better understanding and defining settlement. First, we propose a flexible, empirically informed, operationalizable definition of settlement as party resolution. Second, we exploit a new federal litigation data source to count party resolutions using machine learning models trained on 11 million docket sheet entries. Third, we offer new findings on party resolution frequency and distribution in the federal courts. Settlement is more widely and differently deployed …

The Impact Of Banning Confidential Settlements On Discrimination Dispute Resolution, Joni Hersch, Blair D. Bullock

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

The #MeToo movement exposed how workplace harassment plagues employment in the United States. Several states responded by passing legislation aimed at curbing harassment and employment discrimination in the workplace. One of the most common legislative efforts was to ban confidentiality provisions in certain settlement agreements. These bans, in part, attempted to stop “secret settlements” by shining light on workplace discrimination and exposing serial harassers as a means to motivate firms to actively deter workplace discrimination.

But do bans on confidentiality agreements deter the bad act? For these laws to have a deterrent effect, claims must be revealed in a public …

Students For Fair Admissions: Affirming Affirmative Action And Shapeshifting Towards Cognitive Diversity?, Steven A. Ramirez

Seattle University Law Review

The Roberts Court holds a well-earned reputation for overturning Supreme Court precedent regardless of the long-standing nature of the case. The Roberts Court knows how to overrule precedent. In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (SFFA), the Court’s majority opinion never intimates that it overrules Grutter v. Bollinger, the Court’s leading opinion permitting race-based affirmative action in college admissions. Instead, the Roberts Court applied Grutter as authoritative to hold certain affirmative action programs entailing racial preferences violative of the Constitution. These programs did not provide an end point, nor did they require assessment, review, periodic expiration, or revision for greater …

The Act For Collaborative Law, Sun Kim

Lewis & Clark Law Review

Collaborative law is an alternative dispute resolution method that helps families across the world divorce cooperatively and amicably, but it faces critiques for its unique practices, such as automatic, mandatory disqualification of attorneys for failure to reach settlement agreements. To withstand critiques and remain a successful alternative dispute resolution method, collaborative law should be codified. Hence, all states should adopt the Uniform Collaborative Law Act (UCLA). The UCLA demystifies the practice of collaborative law and establishes a reliable framework that sets critiques of collaborative law to rest. This Comment explains the key provisions of the UCLA and discusses how the …

What Happens When The Conflicts Of Interest Board Does Not Prevent Conflicts? Examining New York City Charter Chapter 68, Abigail Damsky

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note critiques the New York Board's advisory opinion on elected officials' use of personal social media accounts, arguing that it contravenes Chapter 68 and Board Rule Section 113 by allowing the use of city resources for political gain, undermining government integrity, and creating transparency issues under the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL). The analysis advocates for revising the advisory opinion to align with existing ethical standards and ensure accountability.

The Chicken Or The Egg: The Proper Order Of Analysis When Determining The Enforceability Of A Delegation Clause And The Broader Arbitration Agreement In Consumer Contexts, Parker Reynolds

American University Business Law Review

First, this Comment will provide pertinent background on the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) to better understand the intent of the legislation and how it has historically been applied. Second, this Comment will seek to not only explain the underlying cause of the circuit split but also offer a framework for the proper order of analysis in situations with both a delegation claim and an unenforceability claim. Specifically, this Comment will argue that although a delegation clause’s enforceability must be analyzed separately from the entire agreement’s enforceability, the delegation clause must be examined within the context of the arbitration agreement to …

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 26, Iss. 1

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

"Bricolage" As Comparative Research Method For Critical Legislative Innovation, Marie-Claire Belleau

FIU Law Review

Comparative law incentivize imagination to create new solutions to social problems intrinsically linked to different parts of the world. It consists in the analysis of multiple legal solutions revealed by research. Meanwhile, the understanding of the documentation put forward is influenced by the social, cultural, linguistic, political, and economic context where it evolved in the first place. Consequently, the interpretation of those elements leads to varying results. In response to this reality, we offer a modest comparative methodology rooted in creativity inspired by the concept of “bricolage” for the purpose of legislative innovations. In light of some descriptive examples pertaining …

The Efficacy Of Mandatory Mediation In Courts Of Limited Jurisdiction: A Case Study From The Missoula Justice Court, Paul F. Kirgis, Brock L. Flynn

Faculty Law Review Articles

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), particularly mediation, has become an integral component of the judicial system, promising efficiency, cost savings, and enhanced litigant satisfaction. Courts of limited jurisdiction, which handle high volumes of landlord-tenant disputes, debt collection cases, and small claims, have increasingly adopted mandatory mediation programs to alleviate docket congestion and promote settlement. This article contributes to the growing body of research on mediation in courts of limited jurisdiction by analyzing case outcomes in the Justice Court for Missoula County, Montana. Through a review of public court records from 2019-2023, we examine settlement rates, compliance with mediated agreements, and the …

Canada's Withdrawal From Investor-State Arbitration In The Usmca: Implications And Alternative Dispute Reslution Mechanisms For Investors, Temitope Badejo

Canada-United States Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Geoeconomics Of Belt And Road Disputes: A Case Study On The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, Mark Mclaughlin

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

This article argues that the dovetailing economic, geopolitical, and security interests that underpin the Belt and Road Initiative demands a dispute resolution mechanism that focuses on broader interests and legal rights. Using the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as a case study, it identifies the conditions in which Chinese investors could have initiated an investment arbitration but did not. This can be explained by the rights-based orientation of investment treaties failing to reflect the interests of multi-project initiatives. Instead, alternative methods of home state intervention, such as state-funded political risk insurance, are used to protect investors. In other words, the political …

International Arbitration Of Sep Frand Royalties, Steven Pepe, Samuel Brenner, Michael Morales

Touro Law Review

Standard-essential patent royalty disputes have typically been litigated in U.S. federal district courts, but patent owners have recently started to file suit in courts across the globe, leading to issues of comity, anti-suit injunctions, and increased litigation costs. International arbitration provides a unique forum for parties to litigate these royalty disputes and avoid, or at least lessen the burden, of these issues. This Article explores the advantages and disadvantages of using international arbitration to resolve standard-essential patent royalty disputes.

Negotiation Map For Teaching And Practice, Harold I. Abramson

Scholarly Works

Negotiations can move at lightning speed in unpredictable directions, leaving you seconds to instinctively act. Your instinct can be informed by first-hand experiences, formal education, and mistakes. You can boost your instinct by using the negotiation map in this article for tracking where you are and guiding where you and others should go to reach a resolution. This three-part map solves a puzzle that has confounded me for a couple decades. It offers a succinct and practical schematic that has the capacity to incorporate much of the exponential growth in literature and learning since Getting to Yes was published in …

The Seven Elements Of Dispute Systems Design, Lisa K. Dicker, Neil Mcgaraghan

Faculty Publications

In this article, clinical instructors at the Harvard Law School Dispute Systems Design (“DSD”) Clinic propose adapting an old analytical framework — The Seven Elements of Interest-Based Negotiation — for a new context, dispute systems design (“DSD”). A relatively young field, DSD is the “applied art and science of designing the means to prevent, manage, and resolve streams of disputes or conflict.” DSD can feel broad and opaque to newcomers and thus is in need of a foundational framework, especially for beginners. The Seven Elements of DSD — alternatives, interests, options, criteria, communication, relationship, and commitment — can serve a …

Securities Arbitration Case Law Updates 2023-2024 (June 2024), Elissa Germaine, Nikki Junda

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

This article summarizes leading arbitration cases and related issues that are of particular relevance to the securities arbitration practitioner.

North American Energy In The Crossfire, Guillermo J. Garcia Sanchez, James W. Coleman

Faculty Scholarship

North America is the beating heart of global energy markets un-dergoing a terrible energy crisis that threatens to upend both the economy and global security. The clearest path out of this global crisis is increasing energy supplies from North America, which can restore energy security and drive a transition to cleaner energy sources. The U.S., Mexico, and Canada have abundant and varied resources to surmount this challenge but are in dire need of stronger cooperation across borders, and between private and public actors to achieve this goal. This Article shows how energy law changes in the U.S. and Mexico present …