Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Empty Rhetoric: The Failings Of The Lcia's Ethical Rules For Legal Counsel And Alternatives, Christina Bustos

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Improving Claims Resolution: Alternative Processes In Canada's Immigration System, Nicole M. Melanson

LLM Theses

This thesis argues that alternative dispute resolution processes form a vital part of Canada's immigration and refugee claims determination system. Using an analytical framework that draws on dispute resolution and relational feminist theory, it explores how alternative processes provide advantages over adversarial ones for claims that engage issues of power and relationships. By aligning claims with appropriate processes, system administrators can improve the fairness, efficiency and durability of resolutions. Introductory Chapters describe the administrative law structure that governs immigration and refugee claims in Canada, and the Immigration Appeal Division's Early Resolution program. This unique initiative integrates alternative processes into the …

Disappearing Claims And The Erosion Of Substantive Law, J. Maria Glover

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

The Supreme Court’s arbitration jurisprudence from the last five years represents the culmination of a three-decade-long expansion of the use of private arbitration as an alternative to court adjudication in the resolution of disputes of virtually every type of justiciable claim. Because privatizing disputes that would otherwise be public may well erode public confidence in public institutions and the judicial process, many observers have linked this decades-long privatization of dispute resolution to an erosion of the public realm. Here, I argue that the Court’s recent arbitration jurisprudence undermines the substantive law itself.

While this shift from dispute resolution in courts—the …

Minding The Gap: A Call For Standardizing Pre-Dispute Arbitration Clauses In Otc Derivative Transactions, Zachary E. Davison

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Future Of International Mediated Settlement Agreements: Of Conventions, Challenges And Choices, Eunice Chua

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

In 2002, UNCITRAL developed the Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation.1 Although at that stage there was a strong effort to develop a uniform enforcement mechanism, the ultimate conclusion was that because of the great variance in the technicalities of domestic procedural laws, harmonisation by way of uniform legislation was not feasible (UNCITRAL 2004: 55). Eventually, Article 15 merely provided that: If the parties reach and sign an agreement settling a dispute, that settlement agreement is binding and enforceable … [the enacting State inserts a description of the method of enforcing settlements agreements or refers to provisions governing such enforcement].

Ethics And Matrimonial Representation Annotated Bibliography, Barbara Glesner Fines, Nancy Levit

Faculty Works

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Issue 1

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Table of Contents - Issue 1

Towards A New Paradigm Of Judicial Education, Mary R. Russell

Journal of Dispute Resolution

When talking about judicial education, a central question emerges: What is the goal of judicial education for judges? A simple answer springs to mind: To make us better judges, of course. This of course is a deceptively simple question with a deceptively simple answer, until there is an attempt to specifically identify how to accomplish this worthy judicial education goal, and that is where simplicity disappears

Judging As Judgment: Tying Judicial Education To Adjudication Theory, Robert G. Bone

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The thesis of this Article, simply stated, is that judicial education makes sense only against the backdrop of general ideas and beliefs about law, courts, and adjudication. These ideas and beliefs motivate a focus on educating judges and help guide more specific pedagogical choices. I explore this broad thesis from both a historical and a normative perspective. Historically, I argue that interest in judicial education caught fire in the 1960s in large part because of prevailing beliefs about law and the proper function of courts. Normatively, I argue that the connection between judicial education and normative views of courts and …

Educating Judges—Where To From Here?, Livingston Armytage

Journal of Dispute Resolution

In this article, I present a critique of the emerging global practice of judicial education, which has been established and grown substantially over the past thirty years. There are four challenges relating to vision, pedagogy, knowledge and leadership that confront the continuing development of judicial education.

Judicial Education: Pedagogy For A Change, T. Brettel Dawson

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Canadian judges have maintained a steadfast, long-term commitment to judicial education. Through teaching one another, judges renew their vision over time, and more concretely, address their concerns and challenges today. Since its inception in 1985, the National Judicial Institute (NJI) has sought to be a partner and a resource to judges and Courts in a shared endeavour to create relevant, practical, and effective judicial education. Working together, the NJI, judges, and Courts have built a “Canadian model” of judicial education widely respected and emulated.

Let Me In: The Right Of Access To Business Disputes Conducted In State Courts, David W. Brown

Journal of Dispute Resolution

After examining the history of the First Amendment right of access to civil proceedings, this note will analyze how the two-pronged historical test applies to arbitrations conducted in a state court. The prongs of the test — experience and logic — provide the framework for the analysis conducted in this note.6 This note argues the analysis conducted in Strine was the correct approach, and suggests the implementation of Sunshine Laws similar to those in other states as a constitutionally permissible alternative that would satisfy the holding in Strine.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 16, Iss. 2

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Quintessential Intractability: Attractors And Barriers In The Palestinian-Israeli Conflict, Samuel (Muli) Peleg

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Intractable conflicts are those that linger despite the parties' understanding that they would be better off resolving their disagreements in negotiation. The obvious ensuing question is why these conflicts persist when rational considerations indicate they should cease. A valuable way to examine this ostensible paradox is through the lens of Dynamical Systems Theory ("DST") and specifically by applying the concept of conflict attractors, which are "patterns of thinking, feeling and acting ... pulling ... toward a negative, destructive state that becomes self-organizing and selfperpetuating." The DST frame is particularly useful to observe intractable conflicts since it focuses on nonlinear, multi-dimensional …

"It Doesn't Seem Very Fair, Because We Were Here First": Resolving The Sioux Nation Black Hills Land Dispute And The Potential For Restorative Justice To Facilitate Government-To-Government Negotiations, Rita Lenane

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Part II of this Note outlines the historical background of the Black Hills land claim. Part III describes the legal avenues taken by the Sioux in the past and those currently open to them, examining the different ways that Native Americans can pursue land claims and the potential each branch of government has to resolve the conflict. Part IV discusses President Barack Obama's unique relationship to the Indian community, and explores the ideals and goals of restorative justice, proposing that these ideas can usefully be incorporated into a comprehensive negotiation between the federal government and the Sioux, comparing the positive …

The Bomb Keeps The Lights On: The Use Of Final-Offer Arbitration In Failed Retransmission Consent Negotiations, Daniel J. Weiss

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note will consider the imposition of binding arbitration in instances of failed retransmission consent negotiations between broadcasters and cable companies. It will first consider the FCC's authority to do so under the Communication Act of 1934 and the ADRA. Central to this discussion will be the debate and legislative history surrounding the 1992 Act and the way that mandatory binding arbitration has been used other contexts by the Commission. Further, this Note will explore the specific type of arbitration to be employed by the FCC in event the Commission finds they have the authority to mandate such a procedure. …

The Mediation Witches, Eric R. Galton

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

At first, the relationship probably seemed like a good idea. The law, bellicose, arrogant, and generally unloved, needed a kinder, gentler, more humanistic side. Mediation, the lah-di-dah flower child of peace rallies and community centers, needed a more serious and credible business angle if it was to continue its gettingpeople-together endeavors.

The Repeat Player Effect In Child Protection Mediation: Dangers Of And Protections Against Second-Class Justice For Marginalized Parties, Donna Erez-Navot

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Article will be structured as follows: Part I of this Article will introduce some of the basic and problematic phenomenon including the repeat player effect, cooptation and others that arise in the legal system. In Part II, there will be specific attention to these phenomenon applied in various well-researched dispute resolution areas including criminal, child protection, employment and arbitration contexts. Part III of this Article gives a broad introduction into court annexed mediation and child protection mediation in general. Part IV of this Article will focus on the specific effects of repeat player, cooptation, and others in Family Court …

Judicial Conflict Resolution (Jcr): A New Jurisprudence For An Emerging Judicial Practice, Michal Alberstein

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In the past few decades, the role of judges has changed dramatically, yet its nature has remained largely unexplored. To date, most cases settle or reach plea-bargaining, and the greater part of judges' time is spent on managing cases and encouraging parties to reach consensual solutions. Adjudication based on formal rules is a rare phenomenon which judges mostly avoid. This Article argues that the various Conflict Resolution methods, which are used outside the courtroom, as alternatives to adjudication, could have a strong and positive influence, both theoretical and practical, on judicial activities inside the courts. Theoretically, the Article develops a …

Copyright Alert System: Six-Strikes And Forced Arbitration Might Not Be The Answer, Brett Schiff

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Ongoing technological advancements are imminent and new forms of media will increasingly be created further broadening one's ability to share both his or her own intellectual property and the intellectual property of others almost instantaneously. Rising piracy and the growing use of peer-to-peer ("P2P") file-sharing resulted in representatives from the Motion Picture Association of America ("MPAA"), the Recording Industry Association of America ("RIAA"), and the nation's five largest Internet Service Providers ("ISPs")-AT&T, Cablevision, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, and Verizon-joining forces. The Copyright Alert System ("CAS"), similar to foreign copyright enforcement graduated response systems, is the privatized, contractual United States graduated …

Masthead, Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 17 (2015-16)

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

How To Conduct Effective Telephone And E-Mail Negotiations, Charles B. Craver

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In this article, we will explore the ways in which negotiators use telephone and e-mail exchanges to consummate deals. Which factors should they consider when they talk on the telephone? What issues do cell phones raise that are not associated with traditional landlines? How do e-mail interactions differ from in-person and telephonic dealings? What can individuals do to optimize their use of these bargaining channels?

Jury Glasses: Wearable Technology And Its Role In Crowdsourcing Justice, Anjanette H. Raymond, Scott J. Shackelford

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Article explores the growing development of wearables and immersive technology within the field of dispute resolution. It provides a hypothetical example of how these existing technologies could be used in combination with data gathering, analytics, and artificial intelligence to transform the justice system. The Article then explores the age-old limitations and biases that exist within the justice system and suggests the use of the newest technology could lessen the impact of these limitations and biases. Finally, the Article suggests a marriage of technology, dispute resolution, and the crowd that may produce outcomes that should be supported by the judiciary …

"Pay-For-Delay" Settlements Post-Actavis: Why Mediation Can Tackle The "Unreasonable" Antitrust Settlements, Sheena Ching

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note discusses the benefits that mediation can have on the reverse payment settlement and antitrust debate, and how it can satisfy the "rule of reason" requirement post-Actavis. Accordingly, Section II discusses the legislative history and policy of the Hatch-Waxman Act. It elaborates on the pioneer drug development process and how the combination of legislation and the inherent nature of drug development resulted in "pay-for-delay" settlements. Section III discusses majority and dissenting opinions in the landmark Supreme Court case FTC v. Actavis as well as the circuit split decisions that led up to the Court's ultimate ruling and …

Reconceptualizing Non-Article Iii Tribunals, Jaime Dodge

Scholarly Works

The Supreme Court’s Article III doctrine is built upon an explicit assumption that Article III must accommodate non-Article III tribunals in order to allow Congress to “innovate” by creating new procedural structures to further its substantive regulatory goals. In this Article, I challenge that fundamental assumption. I argue that each of the types of non-Article III innovation and the underlying procedural goals cited by the Court can be obtained through our Article III courts. The Article then demonstrates that these are not theoretical or hypothetical solutions, but instead are existing structures already in place within Article III. Demonstrating that the …

When “Yes” May Actually Mean “No”: Rethinking Informed Consent To Adr Processes, Elayne E. Greenberg

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

It is time for us to rethink how to achieve meaningful party consent to ADR processes such as mediation and arbitration. I, along with my colleagues Professors Jeff Sovern, Paul F. Kirgis and Yuxiang Liu, recently contributed to the growing body of research finding that a party’s consent to use an ADR process rather than utilizing a court to resolve the dispute is too often neither informed nor consensual. In our empirical study “’Whimsy Little Contracts’ With Unexpected Consequences: An Empirical Analysis of Consumer Understanding of Arbitration Agreements,” we found a paucity of consumer awareness and understanding of arbitration …

The Smith Case: Is The Glass Half Full?, Elayne E. Greenberg

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

Many in our ADR community have already chosen to side with one of the choruses of polarized voices that are either supportive of or critical of the recent judicial decision In re Cody W. Smith. In that decision, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge Jeff Bohm disallowed the trustee’s appointment of a mediator, because, inter alia, the trustee didn’t first secure the approval of the presiding bankruptcy judge. A cursory read of Judge Bohm’s decision mistakenly leads us to believe that the case is just about a bankruptcy trustee’s obligation to follow section 327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, …

Federal Civil Litigation At The Crossroads: Reshaping The Role Of The Federal Courts In Twenty-First Century Dispute Resolution, Edward D. Cavanagh

Faculty Publications

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were promulgated in 1938 to provide the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination” of all civil actions. The underlying theme of the Federal Rules is that meritorious litigants should have their day in court. To that end, the Federal Rules eliminated procedural pitfalls, including highly technical forms of action inherited from common law, that rewarded mastery of pleading techniques over the substantive merits of claims. The Federal Rules also introduced a simplified pleading system, commonly denominated as “notice pleading,” thereby easing the heavy burden imposed on the parties. The factual details of the case could …

Repatriation Of Korean Cultural Property Looted By Japan-Can A Sincere Apology Resolve The Centuries-Old Korea/Japan Disputes?, Melissa (Youngjae) Koo

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note will focus on the disputes between Korea, both North and South Korea, and Japan surrounding Korean cultural property looted by Japan and will explore concrete solutions for resolving such issues through alternative dispute resolution-more specifically, an apology. It will consider two predominant exampies of cultural property looting, which occurred during Japanese invasions of Korea-first, at the end of the sixteenth century and, the second, from 1910 to 1945. Additionally, Japan has frequently been characterized as being a "significant market" for stolen cultural property. It is reported that there are at least 34,157 objects of Korean origin in Japan, …

Involved, Empowered And Inspired: How Mediating Halakhic Prenuptial Agreements Honors Jewish And American Law And Builds Happy Families, Lara Traum

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note discusses the pitfalls of existing halakhic prenuptial protocols and advances the use of mediation in the prenuptial drafting process. Section II of this Note provides a history of Jewish marital and divorce law, explaining the significance of halakhic legal documents and religious arbitration units. Section III examines the unresolved relationship between Jewish and American systems, discusses the advent of American prenuptial agreements, and highlights the shortcomings of existing prenuptial agreements in the Orthodox Jewish community. Section IV proposes that prenuptial mediation best honors halakha, American law, and individual interests.