Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Analysis Of The Efficacy Of Criminal Court Mediation As A Tool Of Restorative Justice, Teresa Hoerres

Capstone Collection

This capstone research paper aims to capture the personal narratives of how participants of criminal court mediation in Brooklyn, New York actual experience the program. The program, which is facilitated by New York Peace Institute, is a cornerstone of the organization’s restorative justice program. Restorative justice has been gaining traction over the last few decades, and its application to criminal matters as an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) service, is unprecedented.

The research was conducted using a mixed methodology approach, relying on the researcher’s ethnographic observations of the criminal court mediation program from August 2013 through March 2014, as well as …

Patent Prosecution As Dispute Resolution: A Negotiation Between Applicant And Examiner, Jaron Brunner

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The phrase "negotiation is ubiquitous" has been used countless times by negotiation scholars, corporate executives, and cognitive psychologists.' At its most basic level, negotiation is simply a communication between parties when one party wants something from the other. In the legal setting, parties use negotiation to attempt to divide up limited resources, reach a settlement and attempt to execute a contract. Even procedures as mundane as filing for a patent in the United States can, and have been, described as a complex negotiation.4 However, while many practitioners describe responding to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) as a …

Good Pretrial Lawyering: Planning To Get To Yes Sooner, Cheaper, And Better, John Lande

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Article summarizes the views of respected lawyers about how they negotiate, which were collected as described in Part II. Part III recommends that lawyers develop a strategic approach to negotiation, including general negotiation goals and plans to negotiate at the earliest appropriate time. Part IV outlines recommendations for lawyers to take charge of their cases from the outset, including getting a clear understanding of clients' interests, developing good relationships with counterpart lawyers, carefully investigating the cases, making strategic decisions about timing, and enlisting mediators and courts when needed. Part V provides two general suggestions for improving the quality of …

Wachovia Securities, Llc V. Brand (2012): The Fourth Circuit's Dubious Position In The Ongoing Federal Circuit Split In The Application Of "Manifest Disregard Of The Law" As A Basis For Vacatur Of Arbitration Awards Following The U.S. Supreme Court's Hall Street Decision (2008), Jonas Cullemark

University of Miami Business Law Review

No abstract provided.

Parallel Justice: Creating Causes Of Action For Mandatory Mediation, Marie A. Failinger

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

The American common law system should adopt court-connected mandatory mediation as a parallel system of justice for some cases that are currently not justiciable, such as wrongs caused by constitutionally protected behavior. As evidence that such a system is practical, this Article describes systemic and ethical parallels between court-connected mediation and the rise of the equity courts in medieval England, demonstrating that there are no insurmountable practical objections to the creation of “mediation-only” causes of action. The Article then explores the constitutional concerns surrounding the idea of “mandatory mediation-only” causes of action, using constitutional hate speech and invasion of privacy …

The Critical Nature Of Verbal Leaks And Nonverbal Signals During Bargaining Interactions, Charles B. Craver

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

When individuals negotiate, they communicate with each other in person, over the telephone, or through e-mail and text exchanges. Proficient negotiators carefully prepare for such interactions, and they endeavor to choose their words carefully to convey the precise messages they intend to communicate. Despite these efforts, however, they frequently include inadvertent modifiers that undermine what they appear to be saying. Persons who listen carefully for such "verbal leaks" can gain a significant bargaining advantage.

Opening The Floodgates Of Small Customer Claims In Finra Arbitration: Finra V. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Teresa J. Verges

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

When the Supreme Court held over twenty-five years ago that customers could be compelled to arbitrate their federal securities claims against their brokers, the vast majority of financial firms in the U.S. inserted pre-dispute arbitration provisions ("PDAAs") in agreements with their customers requiring them to arbitrate any claims arising out of their brokerage relationship. Since Sheerson/ Am. Express, Inc. v. McMahon, investor advocacy groups, scholars, and legislators have called for Congressional action to eliminate mandatory arbitration in securities cases, but the closest Congress has come to such elimination has been to punt this issue to the Securities and Exchange …

Room For Me? - An Analysis Of Whether Mediation Is A Viable Solution To School Bullying, Angelique Palmer

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Article will review recent efforts to utilize mediation as a solution to bullying, and evaluate whether common approaches to its use and implementation have proven to be an effective solution to the bullying epidemic. Part I of this Article provides an overview of bullying and the current state of the problem in America today. Part II discusses the current legal climate and underlying motivations in legislative change and development. It goes on to offer a synopsis of the state of the law and the scope of its reach to address and remedy the problem of bullying. Part III offers …

The Trouble With Categories: What Theory Can Teach Us About The Doctrine-Skills Divide, Linda H. Edwards

Scholarly Works

We might not need another article decrying the doctrine/skills dichotomy. That conversation seems increasingly old and tired. But like it or not, in conversations about the urgent need to reform legal education, the dichotomy’s entailments confront us at every turn. Is there something more to be said? Perhaps surprisingly, yes. We teach our students to examine language carefully, to question received categories, and to understand legal questions in light of their history and theory. Yet when we talk about the doctrine/skills divide, we seem to forget our own instruction.

This article does not exactly take sides in the typical skills …

Informed Consent In Mediation: Promoting Pro Se Parties’ Informed Settlement Choice While Honoring The Mediator’S Ethical Duties, Michael T. Colatrella Jr.

McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles

No abstract provided.

Mediator Ethical Breaches: Implications For Public Policy, Sharon Press

Faculty Scholarship

Court-connected mediation, which includes both court mandated and court encouraged mediation, has become a well-established part of the judicial system in the United States. There are many public policy implications of this phenomenon. These include the underlying goals of the development of court-connection mediation and the responsibility to the public once a court-connected mediation program is established to ensure that the public has access to quality providers of mediation services. Once a court-connected mediation program has established qualifications and ethical standards for mediators, there is a public policy obligation for there also to be a mechanism to educate, reprimand or …

Symposium Issue Introduction And Dedication, Shawna Benston

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The 2013 Jed D. Melnick Annual Symposium, which took place on November 18th, 2013, was entitled "Bioethics, Healthcare Policy, and Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Age of Obamacare." Scholars and practitioners of bioethics alternative dispute resolution came together to discuss the likely impact of a healthcare overhaul born of an ethical challenge: to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number while continuing to honor the value of the individual. Collectively, the Symposium participants anticipated the particular importance of mediation and bioethical debate within the complex health-delivery system that has been drafted under this biomedical imperative.

Ethics Consultations And Conflict Engagement In Health Care, Charity Scott

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This article explores the intersection of two professional fields-bioethics and clinical ethics consultation in health care on one hand, and alternative dispute resolution ("ADR") and conflict management on the other-which until recent years remained relatively unknown to each other. It marries the literatures and lessons of these two fields in order to promote the quality of ethics consultations in hospitals and other health care organizations.

Increasingly, health care ethics committees and consultants acknowledge the need to employ the frameworks, approaches, and tools of good conflict management to do their work effectively. Similarly, conflict specialists and ADR professionals are becoming increasingly …

The Growing Power Of Healthcare Ethics Committees Heightens Due Process Concerns, Thaddeus Mason Pope

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Complex ethical situations, such as end-of-life medical treatment disputes, occur on a regular basis in healthcare settings. Healthcare ethics committees (HECs) have been a leading dispute resolution forum for many of these conflicts. But while the function of HECs has evolved from mediation to adjudication, the form of HECs has not evolved to adapt to this expanded and more consequential function.

Bioethics Mediation & The End Of Clinical Ethics As We Know It, Autumn Fiester

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In this Article, I will not only argue that bioethics mediation is a superior approach for resolving ethics conflicts, but I will also defend the controversial position that it is the only ethically justifiable method for resolving values-based conflicts in a pluralistic society. Although it has so far been relegated to the status of mere handmaiden to conventional consultation, bioethics mediation-as its detractors have surmised-has the potential to end clinical ethics consultation as we know it.

Chapter 9 Bankruptcy In California: The Efficacy Of Mandating Alternative Dispute Resolution In Municipal Bankruptcy Filings, Michael Galen

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The subject of this Note is of importance to ADR practitioners: the incorporation of ADR into a new state law can mitigate a heated legal struggle involving state and federal law, while balancing the competing interests of powerful parties like local governments and large unions. This subject demonstrates the efficacy of ADR as applicable to bankruptcy law, a realm with which many ADR practitioners may be unfamiliar. This Note's case study focuses solely on California law and cases because California stands alone in its approach of mandating ADR as a precondition to a municipal bankruptcy filing. Since all states have …

(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction: Using Restorative Justice To Satisfy Victims' Rights, Jessica M. Marshall

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The responsibility of sentencing defendants is the most difficult task within the criminal justice system. As the Honorable Jed S. Rakoff noted above, a sentencing judge is faced with the role of taking a guilty defendant and determining what punishment her crime warrants. Incarceration? Probation? Time served? Each judge evaluates the specific offense's characteristics, such as the number of victims, amount of loss, and violence of the offense, against the specific offender's characteristics, such as family history, age, and military service. As part of this evaluation, the defendant, the Government, the Probation Office in the form of a Presentence Report, …

The Improbable Birth And Conceivable Death Of The Securities Arbitration Clinic, Jill Gross

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Article explores the birth, life, and possible death of SACs in the United States. Part II of this Article describes the history of the securities arbitration clinic in the United States. Part III describes how a SAC operates and how SAC students help investors. Part IV reviews the pedagogical advantages and disadvantages of a SAC, and addresses the reluctance of many law schools to embrace this type of clinic. Part V concludes by predicting whether these clinics have a future in light of the modern challenges to clinical legal education.

An Empirical Study Of Arbitrators Acting As Mediators In China, Fan Kun

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Whether an arbitrator can and should act as a mediator in a pending arbitration is one of the most controversial issues in international arbitration. While mediation is not a new concept for the West, the practice of having the same person acts as both an arbitrator and a mediator in one proceeding has aroused great debate in theory and practice. The debate gives rise to delicate ethical issues, and touches the very core of arbitration, i.e., the mission of arbitrators.

Section II of the Article reviews relevant literature on the general attitudes of arbitrators in settlement facilitation. Section III defines …

Masthead, Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 16 (2014–15)

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 16, Iss. 1

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Prisoner Facilitated Mediation: Bringing Peace To Prisons And Communities, Laurel Kaufer, Douglas E. Noll, Jessica Mayer

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Prisons are too often places of conflict, violence, and fear. After spending years in such an environment Susan Russo and a group of like-minded inmates decided that they needed to take action. In 2007, Ms. Russo began sending over fifty handwritten letters to mediators throughout California, asking for assistance in setting up a conflict resolution program at the prison where she resided. Eventually, in 2009, one of her letters reached Laurel Kaufer, who, with her colleague Doug Noll, responded to Ms. Russo's request. Through their collaboration Prison of Peace ("POP") was born. POP employs an innovative method of prison conflict …

Brazil's Legacy Of International Parental Child Abduction: Mediation Under The Hague Abduction Convention As A Solution, Paula Shulman

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note argues that Brazil's failures to comply with the commands of the Hague Convention, to expeditiously return children abducted by a parent from their habitual residence to Brazil, can be remedied with the adoption of a new mediation model in lieu of its current system. This new mediation protocol can be modeled on those adopted in the United Kingdom and Germany. Section II of this Note provides a history of IPCA and an analysis of the problems unresolved or springing from the Hague Convention. Section III examines Brazil's accession to the Hague Convention, the Brazilian Central Authority, the body …

The War On Drugs Is Over (If You Want It): State Drug Courts As An Alternative To Criminal Courts For Low-Level Nonviolent Drug Offenders, Blake Courlang

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Part I of this Note describes the social, political, and legal reasons behind the rise of mandatory minimum sentencing in the 1980s and their path towards becoming advisory in the 2000s, as held by the Supreme Court in United States v. Booker. Part II provides a description of drug courts and argues for the use of drug courts as an alternative to the criminal sanctions for all nonviolent, low-level drug offenders. As part of this discussion, this Note examines the use of mandatory minimum sentencing post-Booker and the procedural method of divesting federal jurisdiction of nonviolent, low-level drug offenses …

Frcp 26 Vs. Fre 408: Why Settlement Negotiations Should Be Privileged Against Third-Party Discovery, Andrew Sher

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note proposes that courts should recognize a settlementnegotiation privilege because it will incentivize parties to settle. Settling disputes is beneficial to the judicial system as it is more efficient and effective at resolving disputes than trying cases. Recognizing a settlement-negotiation privilege will increase the number of settlements by avoiding the free-rider problem that the Federal Circuit's approach in In re MSTG will create. Similarly, creating a settlement-negotiation privilege will avoid the uncertainty caused by not recognizing a privilege or requiring heightened standards for discovery. The confidentiality and certainty of a settlement-negotiation privilege will encourage parties to settle as well …

Beyond International Commercial Arbitration? The Promise Of International Commercial Mediation, S. I. Strong

Faculty Publications

Although international commercial arbitration has long been the preferred means of resolving cross-border business disputes, the international corporate community has become increasingly concerned about increasing costs, delays and procedural formalities. As a result, parties are looking for other means of resolving cross-border business disputes. One of the more popular alternatives is mediation. Advocates of mediation extol its many benefits, including its ability to resolve disputes more quickly and with fewer costs and formalities than other alternatives. However, very little research exists on how mediation operates in the international commercial context. This Essay therefore considers whether and to what extent international …

Anti-Arbitration Injunctions In Cases Involving Investor-State Arbitration: British Caribbean Bank Ltd. V. The Government Of Belize, S. I. Strong

Faculty Publications

Over the last few years, the international legal community has become increasingly interested in anti-arbitration injunctions, which are analogous to antisuit injunctions except that the former prohibits the initiation or continuation of an arbitration while the latter focuses on judicial actions. At this point, very few courts have actually issued an injunction of this type. Nevertheless, a number of commentators have expressed concern about these mechanisms, since they can wreak havoc with contractual or treaty-based expectations about how a particular dispute is to be resolved. Indeed, some scholars and practitioners would prefer that these sorts of injunctions be made universally …

Barnacles, Aristocracy And Truth Denial: Three Not So Beautiful Aspects Of Contemporary Mediation, James Coben

Faculty Scholarship

In this article, I examine the themes of self-determination, mediator neutrality, and party empowerment by exploring three separate topics: barnacles, aristocracy and truth denial.

The first topic, barnacles, refers to the surprising and myriad number of ways that mediation has fully integrated (insinuated) itself into the U.S. litigation system. Institutionalization, some might argue, is "beautiful;" indeed, widespread, systematic use of mediation is often offered evidence of success. But I want to explore a different perspective on the same development-how institutionalization leads to rule exploitation and spawns its own unique litigation ironies. The second topic, aristocracy, refers to the documentation and …

Innovation, Dispute Resolution & Access To Justice: Needs Assessment 2014, Nicole Aylwin, Trevor C. W. Farrow

Commissioned Reports, Studies and Public Policy Documents

The Winkler Institute is pleased to announce the launch of an innovation, dispute resolution and access to justice needs assessment. This needs assessment, funded primarily by the Law Foundation of Ontario, will examine current innovation practices and future needs in dispute resolution — all with a view to bridging the current knowledge gap around justice sector innovation in Canada.

A Framework For Advancing Negotiation Theory: Implications From A Study Of How Lawyers Reach Agreement In Pretrial Litigation, John Lande

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The prevailing negotiation theory tries to fit lots of square pegs into just two round holes-adversarial or cooperative bargaining. In the real world, negotiation comes in many different shapes, not just circles and squares. This Article demonstrates that the two "round holes" in current negotiation theory are poorly defined and do not reflect the reality of much pretrial negotiation. It argues that it is time to replace the system of theoretical models with a flexible framework that can accommodate virtually all legal negotiations, including those that do not fit into any pre-defined model.