Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Opting Out Of The Procedural Morass: A Solution To The Class Arbitration Problem, Emanwel Josef Turnbull

Student Articles and Papers

American class actions are internationally regarded as a procedural form to avoid and widely criticized in the United States. They have been narrowed and restricted by U.S. statutes and case law. Plaintiffs' lawyers in consumer class actions are portrayed as greedy and fraudulent, while businesses are increasingly acting to avoid class actions through mandatory pre-dispute arbitration clauses. Even class arbitration is criticized as leading to a “procedural morass.”

This Article proposes that parties and arbitral fora opt out of the American procedural morass (and the attendant long-running disputes about American class actions) by adopting an English procedural rule for aggregation. …

A Presumptively Better Approach To Arbitrability, John A. E. Pottow, Jacob Brege, Tara J. Hawley

Articles

One of the most complex problems in the arbitration field is the question of who decides disputes over the scope of an arbitrator's purported authority. Courts in Canada and the United States have taken different approaches to this fundamental question of "arbitrability" that necessarily arises when one party disputes the contractual validity of the underlying "container" contract carrying the arbitration clause. If arbitration is a creature of contract, and contract is a product of consensual agreement, then any dispute that impugns the underlying consent of the parties to the container contract implicates the arbitration agreement itself (i.e., no contract, no …

The Restatement Of The U.S. Law Of International Commercial Arbitration: An Interim Report, George A. Bermann

Faculty Scholarship

Despite its title, the American Law Institute's Restatement (Third) of the U.S. Law of International Arbitration is the ALI's first Restatement ever on the subject of international commercial arbitration. The ALI commissioned this Restatement not merely because the subject has become so important in international commerce, but because the American law on the subject is deeply unsettled. After all, the purpose of Restatements is to bring clarity and coherence and, where necessary, improvement to the law. Historically, Restatements have concentrated on state rather than federal law subjects precisely because of the discrepancies among the laws of the several states on …

Lessons From Teaching Students To Negotiate Like A Lawyer, John Lande

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This article reports my observations from teaching those courses and offers suggestions for future efforts to improve legal education, particularly through negotiation and other dispute resolution courses. This article also describes experiments with other teaching techniques in my courses. My experience supports the benefits of the (1) focus on negotiation in a wide range of situations in addition to the final resolution of disputes and transactions ("final negotiation"); (2) addition of "ordinary legal negotiation" stage simulations in addition to traditional single-stage simulations. These approaches were critical in providing students with a more realistic understanding of negotiation.

Of course, one should …

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 15, Iss. 1

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Masthead, Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 15 (2013-14)

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Conflicts Between Arbitration Agreements And Arbitration Rules, Steven C. Bennett

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Arbitration is a "creature of contract." As a result, under the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") and equivalent state laws, both the obligation to arbitrate and the specific terms under which arbitration will occur are typically determined by the agreement of the parties. In many instances, parties choose to adopt the rules of an arbitration-sponsoring organization such as the American Arbitration Association ("AAA"). But parties are also free to adopt their own ad hoc procedures (sometimes based on elements of the rules of an arbitration-sponsoring organization) or to use the rules of an arbitration-sponsoring organization as a base and modify those …

Response To Condlin's Critique Of Transformative Mediation, Robert A. Baruch Bush, Joseph P. Folger

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

We welcome thoughtful critical analysis of the transformative framework because we believe such comments further substantive discussion and debate. Some prior critiques of the framework have been beneficial in helping to clearly map the ideological divide in the ADR field-a divide that separates very different approaches to conflict intervention. Cogent and honestly substantiated critiques of the transformative approach have strengthened the discourse about conflict intervention practice by building stronger arguments on all sides of the debate over the various goals and expectations for mediation.

No Longer Left To Their Own Devices: Utilizing And Facilitating Mediation To Give Students Access To Assistive Technology, Eric Slepak

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note seeks to fill that void by examining the unique role AT plays in a student's development and how mediation succeeds (and fails) in helping the student secure desired equipment and services. Part II of this Note examines the background law and facts governing the dissemination of AT devices and services and the mechanisms for resolving disputes surrounding that dissemination. Part III provides an illustrative example to demonstrate the complex legal issues that arise in the determination of technology appropriate for students with disabilities.

Part IV then examines why mediation offers a superior mode of resolution to both parents …

Mickey Goes To France: A Case Study Of The Euro Disneyland Negotiations, Lauren A. Newell

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In 1984, The Walt Disney Company ("Disney") was riding the wave of success from its newest Resort, Tokyo Disney Resort ("Tokyo Disney"), which attracted 10 million guests in the first year alone, and its thoughts turned to further international expansion-this time, in Europe. After careful consideration of potential locations and preliminary negotiations with two European governments, Disney decided in 1984 to launch Euro Disneyland ("Euro Disneyland" or "EDL") in Marne-la-Vall6e, France. The realities of opening and operating EDL in France were far different than Disney's expectations when it began negotiations-so much so that the Resort narrowly escaped bankruptcy. For an …

Family Court Mediation After The Financial Crisis: A Struggle Worth New York's Attention, Jessica G. Mayer

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note examines the effects of the recession on the use of mediation in New York State's family courts and argues that mediation ought to be used more, rather than less, to combat the effects of budget cuts. Section I discusses New York State's Family Court System, highlighting the system's rising caseload and dearth of resources. Section II briefly describes mediation and its use within the family court context. Section III describes the impact of the recession on NY State's Family Courts. In addition, detailed information is provided about the impact of the recession on the following programs: (1) the …

Lafler And Frye: A New Constitutional Standard For Negotiation, Rishi Batra

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The Sixth Amendment guarantees "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense." In 1984 the Supreme Court in Strickland v. Washington established the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel that is a violation of this right. In a pair of decisions handed down in 2012, Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye, the Supreme Court extended the holding in Strickland to cover ineffective assistance by defense counsel in the plea-bargaining phase. Recognizing that pleas account for ninety-five percent of all criminal convictions, the court stated that "the negotiation …

The Impact Of Gender On Negotiation Performance, Charles B. Craver

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In 2009, Professors Russell Korobkin and Joseph Doherty published an article suggesting that male law students are more proficient negotiators than female law students. Their study was based upon student negotiation performance on a single employment discrimination hypothetical in which the only issue was money-a classic zero sum exercise, where there was no way the participants could engage in integrative bargaining based upon the different degrees to which the parties valued diverse issues. The exercise was given to 136 first-year law students at University of California-Los Angeles (U.C.L.A.) and University of Southern California (U.S.C.). The participants were not taking a …

State Courts Or Adr In Nazi-Era Art Disputes: A Choice "More Apparent Than Real"?, Christa Roodt

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This article explores the first and arguably most important procedural choice a party can make when instituting a claim in respect to Nazi-era art, namely between alternative dispute resolution ("ADR") and state court litigation. A sound analysis of the meeting points and potential conflicts of processes involving administrative bodies, ADR fora and the judiciary can contribute to more effective law reform.

The "State Of Necessity" Defense: A Burden, Not A Blessing To The International Investment Arbitration System, Kelley Chubb

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note discusses how the necessity defense, in the context of the Argentinian financial crisis arbitrations, has undermined the legitimacy of the international investment arbitration system. A discussion of the Argentinean cases listed above reveals that its application is inconsistent. A successful claim for necessity requires the following factors: (1) an essential interest must be at stake, (2) that interest must be threatened by grave and imminent peril, (3) the wrongful conduct must be the only method to protect the threatened interest, and (4) the offending government must have considered a balance of interests and must not have contributed to …

The Rise In Judicial Hostility To Arbitration: Revisiting Hall Street Associates, Thomas E. Carbonneau

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

When the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Hall Street Associates, LLC v. Mattel, Inc., commentators expected the Court to resolve the split among the federal circuits regarding the validity and enforceability of 'opt-in' agreements. Since the late 1990s, these agreements had become a means through which contracting parties could obtain enhanced judicial supervision of arbitral awards by providing for judicial review of the merits of arbitrator rulings. While commentators got a resolution to the split, they received a great deal more than they had been promised. In effect, the Court concluded that the statutory framework for enforcement …

The Curious Case Of Transformative Dispute Resolution: An Unfortunate Marriage Of Intransigence, Exclusivity, And Hype, Robert J. Condlin

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Why do proponents of Transformative Dispute Resolution ("TDR") defend the Theory in such intransigent, exclusivist, and grandiose terms? TDR is a mature theory, and a relatively sophisticated one, and qualities of this sort usually go hand in hand with a balanced, refined, and well-modulated sense of self, but TDR proponents will have none of that. They make ambitious (some would say outlandish) assertions about the Theory's capacity to develop moral and political character, reform deliberative government, and resolve ethno-political conflict, while simultaneously rejecting overtures from sympathetic outsiders to rein in the overstated aspects of these claims, and craft a more …

What If You Build It And No One Comes?: The Introduction Of Mediation To Russia, Kathryn Hendley

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Russia joined the community of countries where disputes can legally be diverted to mediation in early 2011. Russian court officials and judges were optimistic that mediation would alleviate the nagging problem of overloaded dockets; however, initial experience has shown that Russian litigants are skeptical of mediation. The reasons for this skepticism are a complex mix of institutional disincentives and a lack of familiarity with alternative dispute resolution. The relatively low costs associated with going to court in Russia, measured in terms of money, time, and relational damage, have done little to encourage litigants to opt for mediation. The absence of …

Dispute System Design: A Comparative Study Of India, Israel And California, Janet Martinez, Sheila Purcell, Hagit Shaked-Gvili, Mohan Mehta

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Alternative dispute resolution ("ADR") is practiced around the world with myriad approaches, though not without common ground. In an increasingly interconnected world, the sharing of this knowledge and experience has become a natural and even necessary step in the evolution of ADR. Professor Frank Sander, of Harvard Law School, spoke at the Pound Conference in 1976 and posed the notion of the multi-door courthouse, a concept that led to the development of ADR process options in courts throughout the country.

Ensuring Remedies To Cure Cramming, Amy J. Schmitz

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

On July 23, 2012, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") called wireless telephone bill cramming "a significant consumer problem," and both the FTC and Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") have been delving into the morass of concerns regarding cramming with respect to landline (or wired) telephone billing. "Cramming" occurs when a third party unaffiliated with a customer's telephone company adds charges to the telephone bills that the company sends to the customer. These charges can be for anything from horoscopes to long-distance telephone services.

Arbitration And The Future Of Delaware's Corporate Law Franchise, Brian Jm Quinn

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

On September 9, 2011, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. ("Skyworks") and Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporation ("AATI") entered into a merger agreement. The agreement included an uncommon provision with respect to dispute resolution. In part, that provision stated, "the parties hereto agree that any and all disputes arising under or related in any way to this Agreement or the Transactions shall be resolved solely in arbitration before the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. " Until AATI later sought specific performance of the merger agreement via arbitration pursuant to that provision, little notice had been paid by outside observers to the …

2013 International Advocate For Peace Award Acceptance Speech, Jimmy Carter

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

On April 10, 2013, the Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution presented its annual International Advocate for Peace Award to Jimmy Carter, 39th President of the United States. What follows is a transcription of his public address at the Law School, entitled "America as Global Mediator."

The Savior Of Aggregate Litigation: The Giving Green Tree, Matthew Maggiacomo

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Section I of this Note summarizes the general background and fundamental aspects of present-day federal arbitration law. Section II highlights the recent developments in federal arbitration law, the rise of mandatory arbitration clauses, collective or class action waivers, and the Supreme Court's decision in Concepcion. Section III addresses the current confusion in the law, analyzing both the holdings of the Second and Ninth Circuits. Section IV provides guidance to the Supreme Court on how courts should handle claims in federal arbitration law's changing environment to ensure the validation of individuals' rights and predicts how the federal arbitration landscape will …

Lessons From Mediators' Stories, John M. Lande

Faculty Publications

This article is part of a symposium discussing the book, Stories Mediators Tell, edited by Eric Galton and Lela Love. The book consists of accounts of 31 actual mediations, followed by reflections of each mediator-author. Some of the chapters tell of extraordinary cases and others are more routine.

Discovery Under 28 U.S.C. §1782: Distinguishing International Commercial Arbitration And International Investment Arbitration, S. I. Strong

Faculty Publications

For many years, courts, commentators and counsel agreed that 28 U.S.C. §1782 – a somewhat extraordinary procedural device that allows U.S. courts to order discovery in the United States “for use in a proceeding in a foreign or international tribunal” – did not apply to disputes involving international arbitration. However, that presumption has come under challenge in recent years, particularly in the realm of investment arbitration, where the Chevron-Ecuador dispute has made Section 1782 requests a commonplace procedure. This Article takes a rigorous look at both the history and the future of Section 1782 in international arbitration, taking care to …

American Exceptionalism In Consumer Arbitration, Amy J. Schmitz

Faculty Publications

“American exceptionalism” has been used to reference the United States’ outlier policies in various contexts, including its love for litigation. Despite Americans’ reverence for their “day in court,” their zest for contractual freedom and efficiency has prevailed to result in U.S. courts’ strict enforcement of arbitration provisions in both business-to-business (“B2B”) and business-to-consumer (“B2C”) contracts. This is exceptional because although most of the world joins the United States in generally enforcing B2B arbitration under the New York Convention, many other countries refuse or strictly limit arbitration enforcement in B2C relationships due to concerns regarding power imbalances and public enforcement of …

Managing Inner And Outer Conflict: Selves, Subpersonalities, And Internal Family Systems, Leonard L. Riskin

UF Law Faculty Publications

This article describes potential benefits of considering certain processes within an individual that take place in connection with external conflict as if they might be negotiations or other processes that are routinely used to address external disputes, such as mediation or adjudication. In order to think about internal processes in this way, it is necessary to employ a model of the mind that includes entities capable of engaging in such processes. The Internal Family Systems (IFS) model, developed by Richard C. Schwartz, works well for this purpose. The IFS model is grounded on the construct that the mind is composed …

Screening For Intimate Partner Violence In Mediation, Kelly Browe Olson

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Hidden Curriculum Of Legal Education: Toward A Holistic Model For Reform, The, David M. Moss

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The following section of this article directly addresses the notion of the hidden curriculum and why this construct is essential for legal educators to consider as they contemplate reforms. Core principles of curriculum theory will then be briefly discussed as a precursor to the subsequent section that addresses the notion of a transdisciplinary curriculum. A transdisciplinary perspective will offer a holistic lens for considering law school curriculum. Finally, such notions as curriculum mapping offer tangible solutions to addressing the challenge of preparing practice-ready graduates in the legal profession.

Training The Heads, Hands And Hearts Of Tomorrow's Lawyers: A Problem Solving Approach , Lisa A. Kloppenberg

Journal of Dispute Resolution

I hope this essay on preparing practice-ready graduates is a useful resource for those considering circular reform or for those in legal education undertaking assessment and strategic planning processes. I begin with four goals: (a) to offer a brief synopsis of the two major critiques of legal education which have influenced deeply recent curricular reforms by many law schools and the challenges facing law schools today; (b) to summarize recently published data from the ABA Curriculum Committee on trends in law school curricula, showing some significant areas of reform in legal education over the past decade, and offering some thoughts …