Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Finkin, Matthew Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Collins, Daniel Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Concepcion, David Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Gentile, Joe Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Goetz, Raymond Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Agenda: Navigating The Future Of The Colorado River, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, Western Water Policy Program

Navigating the Future of the Colorado River (Martz Summer Conference, June 8-10)

Competition for scarce Colorado River water resources is nothing new, but the conflicts that prompted the seven basin states to negotiate the 1922 Colorado River Compact have grown considerably fiercer and more complex in recent decades. In 2007, responding to the challenges of increasing demand and sustained drought, the seven basin states and a number of other affected interests agreed to a set of interim guidelines for allocating Colorado River water in the event of shortages. This agreement represents an important evolution in the governance of the Colorado River, suggesting that the many interests in the basin can work together …

Report Surveys Colorado River Basin Leaders: Collaborative Approaches To Dwindling Supplies Are Highlighted, Sarah Bates, University Of Montana Missoula. Center For Natural Resources And Environmental Policy

Navigating the Future of the Colorado River (Martz Summer Conference, June 8-10)

4 pages.

Press release "April 14, 2011"

"Executive Summary April 2011" of report, Thinking Like a River Basin: Leaders' Perspectives on Options and Opportunities in Colorado River Management

Full report available at:

http://www.carpediemwest.org/wp-content/uploads/Thinking_Like_A_River_Basin_8-20-13.pdf

Arbitration Case Law Update 2011, Jill I. Gross

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

Parties to arbitration agreements sometimes invoke the judicial system to litigate collateral issues arising out of the arbitration process, such as arbitrability of some or all of the claims, arbitrator bias, and award enforcement or vacatur. When deciding these collateral issues arising out of securities arbitration, courts interpret and apply the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. (2010) (FAA). In this chapter, we identify recent judicial decisions in the area of arbitration law, and analyze their impact on securities arbitration practice.

Alleyne, Reginald Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Duff, James Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Gaunt, Janet Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Helburn, Beber Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

2011 Exchanged Figures Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Annual Exchanged Figures Charts

No abstract provided.

Clarke, Jack Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Sinicropi, Anthony Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Medical Malpractice And Compensation In Germany, Marc S. Stauch

Chicago-Kent Law Review

This paper offers an overview of the rules under German law for securing accountability and redress in cases of medical injury. It is divided into three main parts. Part I looks at the various legal consequences that may apply in such circumstances, including criminal and professional liability of the doctor, the bases for a private law claim by the patient, and the existence of pockets of non-fault based liability for injury from medical products. Part II then considers in greater detail the elements to be satisfied in respect to the two key forms of private law malpractice claim, namely faulty …

The Limits Of Procedural Private Ordering, Jaime L. Dodge

Scholarly Works

Civil procedure is traditionally conceived of as a body of publicly-set rules, with limited carve-outs – most commonly, forum selection and choice of law provisions. I argue that these terms are mere instantiations of a broader, unified phenomenon of procedural private ordering, in which civil procedure is no longer irrevocably defined by law, but instead is a mere default that can be waived or modified by contract. Parties are no longer merely selecting between publicly-created procedural regimes but customizing the rules of procedure to be applied by the court – from statutes of limitations, discovery obligations and the admissibility of …

Tigers Players Arbitration Results, Edmund P. Edmonds

Team - Player Results

No abstract provided.

Detroit Tigers Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Team Hearing Charts

No abstract provided.

Anderson, Arvid Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Hogan, John Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Mills, Quinn Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Zumas, Nicholas Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Angels Players Arbitration Results, Edmund P. Edmonds

Team - Player Results

No abstract provided.

Los Angeles Angels Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Team Hearing Charts

No abstract provided.

Gross, James Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Ross, Jerome Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Texas Rangers Arbitration Hearings Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Team Hearing Charts

No abstract provided.

Mann, Keith Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.

Aaron, Benjamin Arbitration Chart, Edmund P. Edmonds

Arbitrator Charts

No abstract provided.