Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

The Effects Of Mediation In A Juvenile Incarceration Facility: Reduction Of Violence Through Transformation, Linda H. Morton, Floralynn Einesman

Faculty Scholarship

Using Bush and Folger’s transformative framework and psychological theory, the authors posit that mediation can play a role in changing the behavior of incarcerated juveniles by its focus on empathy and self-empowerment. After a brief description of their mediation clinic in Juvenile Hall, the authors assess the effects of the clinic in transforming its participants through data gathered.

Dispute Resolution And Dementia: Seeking Solutions, Erica F. Wood

Georgia Law Review

With the rise in dementia, 2nd and 3rd party disputes will be more frequent. The elderly population with cognitive impairments is growing rapidly. By 2030, the population aged 65 years and older is expected to reach 70 million, more than double the number in 1998.1 Moreover, the older population itself is getting older. While a decline in mental function is not an inevitable part of the normal aging process, the likelihood of dementia or related brain disorders increases with advancing age. The prevalence of dementia doubles every five years in the elderly, growing from a disorder that affects one percent …

The Changing Role Of Labor Arbitration, Theodore J. St. Antoine

Indiana Law Journal

Symposium: New Rules for a New Game: Regulating Employment Relationships in the 21st Century, held at the Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington.

Table Of Leading Notes -Authors Prior Issue Index To Volumes 1990-2000

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Table Of Symposia Prior Issue Index To Volumes 1990-2000

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Is The Use Of Mediation Appropriate In Adult Guardianship Cases?, Mary F. Radford

Faculty Publications By Year

No abstract provided.

Investor-State Disputes Under Nafta: A Tale Of Fear And Equilibrium, Charles Hendrickson Brower Ii

Law Faculty Research Publications

No abstract provided.

Arbitration Of Statutory Claims In The Unionized Workplace: Is Bargaining With The Union Required?, Ann C. Hodges

Law Faculty Publications

This article analyzes the question of whether arbitration of statutory claims should be classified as a mandatory or permissive subject of bargaining under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). First, this article reviews the post-Wright cases that hold that a union-negotiated waiver is permissible. Second, this article reviews the only decision to consider the issue of classification of the bargaining subject, Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., a case arising in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia under the Railway Labor Act. In that case, the court concluded that the …

Ulysses Tied To The Generic Whipping Post: The Continuing Odyssey Of Discovery "Reform", Jeffrey W. Stempel

Scholarly Works

One need not be a charter member of the Critical Legal Studies Movement (“CLS”) to see a few fundamental contradictions in litigation practice in the United States. A prominent philosophical tenet of the CLS movement is that law and society are gripped by a “fundamental contradiction” and simultaneously seek to embrace contradictory objectives. Civil litigation, particularly discovery, is no exception: New amendments to the discovery rules are the latest example of this contradiction. Although the new changes are not drastic, they continue the post-1976 pattern of making discovery the convenient scapegoat for generalized complaints about the dispute resolution system. One …

Mandatory Binding Arbitration And The Demise Of The Seventh Amendment Right To A Jury Trial, Jean R. Sternlight

Scholarly Works

How can the body of law which protects the federal constitutional jury trial right be reconciled with a body of arbitration law which often states such propositions as (1) arbitration is favored; (2) arbitration clauses may be upheld absent a showing of voluntary, knowing, or intentional consent; (3) the party opposing arbitration bears the burden of proof; (4) arbitration can sometimes be imposed using unsigned envelope "stuffers," handbooks, and warranties; and (5) ambiguous contracts should be construed broadly to support arbitration? To be valid, in most courts the waiver and whether it was actually state arbitration clauses need not be …

Mediation And Adr: Insights From The Jewish Tradition, Robert A. Baruch Bush

Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship

Two initial points will provide some context for these remarks. First, my primary professional involvement has been not in legal practice as such, but in alternative dispute resolution ("ADR") and mediation, which has been my field of concentration over the last twenty-five years, both before and after coming to Hofstra Law School. Therefore, my comments will focus on how my view of this field has been affected by my religious tradition.

Second, the perspective reflected in these comments grows out of my own particular experience in relation to the Jewish tradition. Specifically, my involvement in Jewish traditional life and thought …

Finding A Sense Of Self In The World: A Process For Overcoming Personal And Collective Alienation After Institutional Abuse, Seetal Kaur Sunga

LLM Theses

The author examines three aspects of dispute resolution involving cases of physical and sexual abuse in institutions and other environments. She focuses on judicial and alternative processes that deal with identity formation, empowerment and monetary compensation. She argues that sexual abuse and physical abuse create specific harms to the identity and power of abused persons. These harms should be addressed through a process that can allow for identity-formation and re-configuration of the power relationship between the parties. The author concludes that judicial processes recognize identity formation that occurs outside the legal arena, and are capable of recognizing the power of …

The Employment Law Decisions Of The October 2000 Term Of The Supreme Court: A Review And Analysis, Ann C. Hodges, Douglas D. Scherer

Scholarly Works

During the October 2000 Term, the Supreme Court delivered major setbacks for employees in Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams,' which upheld mandatory and binding arbitration of federal and state employment discrimination claims through arbitration clauses forced upon employees as a condition of employment, and in Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, which shielded state employers from federal court law suits brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act by victims of disability discrimination in employment. Employees escaped harm in Pollard v. E.I du Pont de Nemours & Co., in which the Court followed nearly unanimous circuit …

1977 Code Of Ethics For Arbitrators: An Outside Perspective, The Symposium: Ethics In A World Of Mandatory Arbitration, John D. Feerick

Faculty Scholarship

If ADR is to remain a vibrant part of the judicial landscape, it is essential that efforts further shape ethical standards and guidelines, as well as their practical connotations. The framers of the United States Constitution were very careful to establish a public justice system comprised of judges and juries operating within a framework of standards and protections designed to assure justice and fairness while simultaneously promoting public confidence. We should give similar care to developing processes through which we purportedly intend to accomplish similar objectives in resolving disputes and controversies. At the very least, the private nature of these …

Aha? Is Creativity Possible In Legal Problem Solving And Teachable In Legal Education?, Carrie Menkel-Meadow

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

This article continues and expands on my earlier project of seeking to describe how legal negotiation should be understood conceptually and undertaken behaviorally to produce better solutions to legal problems. As structured problem solving requires interests, needs and objectives identification, so too must creative solution seeking have its structure and elements in order to be effectively taught. Because research and teaching about creativity and how we think has expanded greatly since modern legal negotiation theory has been developed, it is now especially appropriate to examine how we might harness this new learning to how we might examine and teach legal …

Dispute Resolution In The Boundaryless Workplace, Katherine V.W. Stone

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

Since the Supreme Court's decision Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. which compelled an employee to submit his age discrimination claim to arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), there has been a dramatic increase in the number of nonunion firms adopting arbitration systems. At the same time, there has been a flood of lawsuits challenging these employment systems, and a corresponding avalanche of judicial opinions addressing the legal issues left open in Gilmer – issues such as the problematic nature of consent in employment arbitration, the deficiencies in due process, and the applicability of the FAA to employment contracts. These …

The Young Cybersquatter’S Handbook: A Comparative Analysis Of The Icann Dispute, Kevin J. Heller

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This article will examine how the UDRP and the ACPA are implemented to enjoin the use of trademarks and service marks as Internet domain names in the United States and throughout the world. Part I of this paper provides background information regarding ICANN and its role in Internet domain name governance and an analysis of the UDRP. Part II will discuss the background of the ACPA, how it has expanded prior trademark law, and how it is currently applied. Finally, Part III will discuss the pros and cons of the UDRP and the ACPA, with regard to jurisdictional issues and …

Addressing The “Redress”: A Discussion Of The Status Of The United States Postal Service’S Transformative Mediation Program

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Second Annual International Advocate For Peace Award, Honoring President William Jefferson Clinton, Spring 2001

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Symposium On Sports Law And Alternative Dispute Resolution

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In this symposium, practitioners in the field of sports law discuss current and future uses of alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) processes in the sports industry. Panelists examine how ADR is frequently used to settle salary disputes and injury cases in professional football, baseball, basketball, hockey, and the Olympic games. Further, the practitioners compare the similarities of ADR procedures in each of the sports industries as well as highlight the differences.

Mandatory Dispute Resolution: New York's Recall On Welfare Recipients' Due Process Rights, Rachael Dehner

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note will discuss the unconstitutionality of the MDR initiative. Part II will describe the implementation of MDR procedures currently in place. Part III will discuss the necessity of a protected interest in a due process analysis, how Goldberg defined the protected interest and how it has changed since the implementation of PRWORA. Part IV will explore due process and its relation to welfare benefits, focusing on Goldberg v. Kelly. It will also describe the fair hearing process and procedures. Part V will apply the due process analysis developed in Goldberg and Mathews to the MDR interview. Finally, Part VI …

Attempts To Solve The Udrp’S Trademark Holder Bias: A Problem That Remains Unsolved Despite The Introduction Of New Top Level Domain Names, Pamela Segal

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Section I of this note will trace the history of the Internet as well as the development of ICANN and the UDRP. Section II will provide an in depth discussion of ICANN’s process in selecting the new top level domain names. Section III will furnish a general overview of ICANN’s Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy and its implications. Section IV will specifically examine the effects of the new TLD application process in light of the UDRP’s trademark holder bias. Finally, in Section V it is suggested that it is necessary to revise the UDRP through implementing one of the proposed solutions. …

The Institutionalization Of Mediation Developments In The Usa, Australia And Germany (In German), Nadja Alexander

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

No abstract provided.

Waiver - Not Yet: After More Than Eight Years Of Pre-Trial Litigation The Second Circuit Orders Arbitration - Crysen/Montenay Energy Co. V. Shell Oil Co. And Scallop Petroleum Co., David A. Geisler Ii.

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Arbitration clauses, like most terms in a contract, are enforceable against either party and, unless expressly or impliedly waived, should be enforced. While the federal courts and Congress have a policy that strongly favors arbitration, in some situations the factual nature of the case leads the court to conclude that the right to arbitrate the matter has been waived. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals, in In re Crysen/Montenay Energy Co. v. Shell Oil Co. and Scallop Petroleum Co., addressed this issue; however the court concluded that the policy favoring the enforcement of arbitration provisions outweighed the prejudice to Crysen/Montenay …

Foreign Law Year In Review: 2000, Roger P. Alford

Journal Articles

Contents

• Introduction

Foreign Law Year In Review: 2001, Roger P. Alford

Journal Articles

Contents

• Introduction

International Legal Developments In Review: 2000, Roger P. Alford

Journal Articles

Contents

• Editor's Preface
• Introduction

Federal Preemption And Vacatur: The Bookend Issues Under The Revised Uniform Arbitration Act, Stephen L. Hayford

Journal of Dispute Resolution

As one of the two Academic Advisors to the Drafting Committee appointed by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws ("NCCUSL") to revise the Uniform Arbitration Act, I was assigned primary responsibility for the two most important issues pertinent to the Drafting Committee's framing of the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act ("RUAA"). The first-the issue of federal preemption-set the baseline for the scope and character of the RUAA by defining for the Drafting Committee the areas of the substantive law of arbitration in which the states are free to regulate, the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") notwithstanding. The second-the issue …

Class Action Vs. Arbitration: Does Tila Support Class Actions In Arbitration Where Statutory Rights Are Concerned - Johnson V. West Suburban Bank, Christina S. Lewis

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Johnson v. West Suburban Bank is an important case in American jurisprudence because it combines several United States Supreme Court cases to establish a test for whether arbitration provisions relating to statutory rights should be upheld when they essentially preclude class actions. This Casenote will examine the progression the courts have taken and Johnson's subsequent test. Finally, an evaluation of this test will follow.

Mandatory Arbitration Of An Employee's Statutory Rights: Still A Controversial Issue Or Are We Beating The Proverbial Dead Horse - Penn V. Ryan's Family Steakhouse, Inc., Andrea L. Myers

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Since the early 1980s, the Supreme Court has espoused a strong preference for arbitration in the employment setting. Despite this general preference, the Supreme Court has never clearly stated that mandatory arbitration of statutory rights is always reasonable. This omission has led to much controversy about whether this preference permits the mandatory arbitration of all statutory rights or only those that are amenable to arbitration as defined by the Supreme Court.