Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Rodriguez De Quijas V. Shearson/American Express, Inc.: Is Securities Arbitration Finally Above Suspicion?, Leslie William Moore

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Comparable Worth In Arbitration, Christine D. Ver Ploeg

Faculty Scholarship

In 1992 Minnesota became a pioneer in the arena of equal pay for equal work by enacting the Minnesota Local Government Pay Equity Act/Comparable Worth Law (“CWL”), which allocated nearly $22 million to remedy wage disparities between female dominated and male dominated classes at the state level. Each local government had to determine a new pay level for public employees taking into account whether it was a male or female dominated field. Many of these determinations were challenged by unions basing their challenges on two primary themes: (1) the methodologies used were flawed; (2) the determinations were invalid because the …

Table Of Contents - Issue 1

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

The Steelworkers Trilogy In The Public Sector, Ann C. Hodges

Law Faculty Publications

This article will examine the role of the Trilogy principles, including the public policy exception, in judicial enforcement of arbitration agreements in the public sector. First the article will review the applicable law in the private sector regarding judicial arbitration enforcement. Then, the article will discuss the role of the courts in public sector arbitration, concluding that while courts frequently pay lip service to the Trilogy principles, in reality they often fail to apply them. Finally, the article will analyze the arguments for and against application of the deferential Trilogy standards in the public sector in light of the distinctive …

Securities Arbitration Appeal: An Oxymoron No Longer?, C. Evan Stewart

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Pitfalls Of Public Policy: The Case Of Arbitration Agreements, Jeffrey W. Stempel

Scholarly Works

As the juxtaposition of these quotations suggests, judges have long held disparate views on the legitimacy and value of “public policy” considerations as a basis for legal decision making. The popular notion posits that Justice Holmes and legal realists carried the day, making public policy analysis an ordinary part of the adjudication process. The story, of course, is more complex than this legal version of Don Quixote. Many judges and lawyers, including Justice Holmes in other writings, continued to speak of adjudication in more formalist and positivist terms, with most laypersons in apparent agreement. Judge Burroughs' view of public policy …

Making The Justice System Balance: Beyond The Zuber Report, Frederick H. Zemans

Articles & Book Chapters

The civil and criminal justice systems rely on a highly individualized dispute resolution process in which each litigant must both prosecute and present his or her own case with limited intervention by the court system and no direct involvement by the judiciary. Neil Brooks has noted that the adversarial system reflects the "political and economic ideology of classic English liberalism in three ways: by its emphasis upon self-interest and individual initiative; by its apparent distrust of the state; and, by the significance it attaches to the participation of the parties." Much of the current discussion of access to justice is …

Contemporary Efforts To Guarantee Indigenous Rights Under International Law, Andre Lawrey

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

This Article examines recent attempts to improve international standards governing the rights of indigenous peoples. In this context, Ms. Lawrey analyzes the Australian Government's 1988 commitment to negotiate a treaty with Australia's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

Ms. Lawrey discusses the strained relationship between international law and indigenous peoples. At present, indigenous groups are not guaranteed special rights under international law. Furthermore, traditional individual rights are inadequate to effectively protect indigenous land rights and the right to self-determination. Ms. Lawrey identifies developments in indigenous rights since World War II, including International Labor Organization Convention Number 107 (Convention 107) and …

Steering Away From The Arbitration Process: Recognizing State Law Tort Actions For Unionized Employees, David C. Gardiner Jr.

University of Richmond Law Review

When an employer and a labor union negotiate over an employment contract, their agreements are usually set forth in a collective bargaining agreement. The collective bargaining agreement defines the relationship between the employer and the unionized employees and addresses such matters as wages, hours, and other conditions of employment. Additionally, collective bargaining agreements usually include grievance procedures and arbitration clauses to resolve disputes between the employer and the unionized employees.

Arbitration And The U.S. Supreme Court: A Plea For Statutory Reform, Thomas E. Carbonneau

Faculty Scholarship

This Article argues for stabilizing and preserving arbitration's necessary and valuable vocation in dispute resolution. It outlines the basic stages in the evolution of the American law of arbitration and studies the underlying motivation of each of its historical phases. It attributes vital significance to the legislative and decisional law developments that led to an early rehabilitation of arbitration in American law, beginning with the enactment of the United States Arbitration Act (FAA) in 1925 and continuing with the ratification of the New York Arbitration Convention and the elaboration of a "hospitable" federal caselaw. Eventually, these developments gave rise to …

Table Of Contents - Issue 2

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Context, Properties, And Constitutionality Of Nonconsensual Arbitration: A Study Of Four Systems, The, John R. Allison

Journal of Dispute Resolution

The purpose of this article is to analyze the context, properties, and constitutionality of these instances of nonconsensual arbitration. Although FIFRA data arbitration and the constitutional challenges to which it has been subjected will receive the most extensive study, the other examples also will be explored in some detail. It is first necessary, however, to lay some groundwork. Each of the nonconsensual arbitration systems to be studied, including FIFRA data arbitration, draws the inspiration for its design and operation from contract-based commercial arbitration. To aid in the understanding of the former, Part II discusses the fundamental nature and legal framework …

Student Projects

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Consumers Swallow Another Lemon: Agency Consent Order Preemption Of State Lemon Law Standards For Informal Dispute Resolution - General Motors V. Abrams, Gregory L. Barnes

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Note will first examine the background of GM v. Abrams, which involves a successful attempt by General Motors (GM) to use a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) consent order to block the application of New York's "Lemon Law" 6 to the arbitration program contained in the order.7 Second, it will discuss the legal context of the dispute (chiefly the extension of the federal preemption doctrine to "implicitly preemptive" agency consent orders). Third, it will outline the court's application of that doctrine in the instant case. Finally, it will offer a critical evaluation of both the legal and policy grounds of …

Five-Year Index To Volumes 1984-1989: Contents

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Table Of Leading Comments-Authors

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Surveys-Authors

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Client-Centered Counseling: Reappraisal And Refinement, Robert Dinerstein

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.

Title Page

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Chipping Away At Lawyer Veracity: The Aba's Turn Toward Situation Ethics In Negotiations, Ruth Fleet Thurman

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Article questions the wisdom of the Model Rule's exceptions to honest dealings in negotiations on several grounds: (1) Proponents of the exceptions have not offered empirical evidence or professional justification for this approach; 16 (2) The approach will further tarnish the profession's image; (3) The approach will create a slippery slope that leads to unintended ethical violations; and (4) The approach will erode the high degree of trust, veracity and integrity required of lawyers as "officer[s] of the legal system."1 7 For these reasons, the Model Rule's exceptions to honesty in negotiations should be abolished by the ABA and …

Just Saying No: Avoiding Predispute Agreements To Arbitrate In Securities Cases, Jim Parks

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Comment will explore the current state of securities arbitration and will examine the advisability of arbitration in a securities context. In addition, this Comment will consider avenues of relief open to the securities plaintiff who is seeking to avoid arbitration.

Catch-22 Of Mandatory Summary Jury Trials, The, Daniel K. O'Toole

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Since its inception nearly ten years ago, the summary jury trial has received almost unanimous acclaim as an extremely effective means of inducing settlement and avoiding protracted litigation.' The settlement technique continued to be used with virtually no opposition2 until some courts began using the summary jury trial as a mandatory settlement mechanism. 3 Within the federal court system, a split of authority has developed as to the permissibility of a trial judge imposing a summary jury trial settlement procedure on litigants.4 Strandell v. Jackson County, Ill.5 and McKay v. Ashland Oil, Inc.6 are two of the more recent cases …

Public's Need To Know Vs. Effective Settlement Techniques: The First Amendment Confronts The Summary Jury Trial - Cincinnati Gas And Electric Co. V. General Electric Co., The, Anne E. Billings

Journal of Dispute Resolution

With the proliferation of alternative dispute resolution, the summary jury trial (SJT) has become popular in many federal courts as an alternative to litigation. 2 Because of the SJT's trial-like nature, members of the press argue that the first amendment 3 gives the press the right to report on SJT proceedings. In Cincinnati Gas and Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.,4 the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals addressed the issue of whether the first amendment right of access attaches to a SJT proceeding.

Constitutionally Recognizing Court Mandated Arbitration: Paradise Found Or Problems Abound - Firelock Inc. V. District Court, Scott M. Badami

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Note will argue that notwithstanding any criticism of the court-annexed arbitration procedure, the Colorado Supreme Court is taking a leadership position in upholding and expanding the role for arbitration, by recognizing that this form of alternative dispute resolution is less expensive, saves judicial time, provides for confidentially, and most importantly, provides the parties with a sense of fairness in the outcome.

Bridging The Procedural Gap: Arbitration Decisions As A Basis For Collateral Estoppel - Benjamin V. Traffic Executive Association Eastern Railroads, Robert M. Bain

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Courts have long used the doctrine of collateral estoppel to preclude relitigation of previously determined issues. The fora for the previous determination is of importance in deciding whether to apply the doctrine. This Note will examine the application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel to arbitration decisions. In deciding the question, the courts' major consideration is the degree of procedural differences between the arbitration proceeding and a judicial proceeding. The more closely an arbitration resembles litigation in the procedural safeguards employed, the more likely that the arbitral decision will be accorded a preclusive effect. Unfortunately, as arbitration proceedings become more …

Book Reviews, Michele S. G. Hermann

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Two new introductory books on mediation have been published within the last year. ANATOMY OF MEDIATION1 is co-authored by veteran labor arbitrator Sam Kagel, who has been practicing and writing about resolving labor-management disputes for 45 years,2 and Kathy Kelly, also a labor arbitrator and author in the field.3 MEDIATE, DON'T LITIGATE4 is written by Peter Lovenheim, a New York lawyer who is former legal counsel and program director for the Center for Dispute Settlement, a public mediation center in Rochester, New York

Five-Year Index To Volumes 1984-1989

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Table Of Leading Articles-Authors

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Table Of Leading Notes-Authors

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Afterword To Chicago-Kent Law Review, Theodore J. St. Antoine

Articles

A unifying theme of this Symposium is as old and enduring as the common law: when and how can a well-established, successful adjudicative institution be adapted to meet the demands of new and substantially different situations? There have been splendid triumphs of transference, such as Lord Mansfield's appropriation of the law merchant in the eighteenth century as a major building block of modem commercial law. There have also been embarrassing failures, like the abortive effort to transport American labor law concepts en masse into the alien British environment of the early 1970s. The common question confronting the participants in this …