Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 22, Iss. 2

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

New Kid On The Block: An Introduction To The Hague Rules On Business And Human Rights Arbitration, Bhavya Mahajan

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In the medieval European states, Lex Mercatoria, literally "Merchant Law," was a prevalent custom, which developed out of the norms and needs of the market and influenced the transborder trade practices among merchants. For redressal of trade-related disputes, arbitration was the popular method and the merchants elected their own judges in the courts of arbitration that they established. These courts developed a reputation for swift resolution of disputes using high moral standards. Non-compliance with practiced norms, or with the arbitral decisions of the courts, would solidify pariah status for the defaulting merchant in the trading community. Gradually, with the …

Mediating Mediation Itself: The Easy Opt-Out Model Settles The Perennial Dispute Between Voluntary And Mandatory Mediation, Giuseppe De Palo

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The year 2020 forced all of us to confront the notion of what "voluntary" means, and whether society should mandate behaviors that experts acknowledge as beneficial for individuals and society or leave people to choose such behaviors on a "voluntary" basis. While we do not always talk about the concept of voluntariness at its most fundamental level, most of us would agree, I think, that before you can choose whether to act, you need to know something about the action requested and how it can benefit you. You also need to check in with yourself: is what you think you …

Arbitration In The Age Of Covid: Examining Arbitration's Move Online, Amy J. Schmitz

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Arbitration has been moving online over time with the growth of the Internet and Online Dispute Resolution ("ODR"), which includes use of technology to assist online negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and variations thereof Online Arbitration ("OArb ") is nonetheless a unique subset of ODR because it usually culminates in a final and binding award by a neutral third party that is enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"). Indeed, I have written about OArb on prior occasions, due to its unique status under the FAA and other arbitration laws. However, OArb was relatively limited until the COVID-19 pandemic sparked the acceleration …

2020 International Advocate For Peace Award, Melanie Leslie, Lela P. Love, Zachary Kriesberg, Prabha Sankaranarayan, Ken Cloke, Dave Joseph, Gwendolyn Meyers, Mary Montague, Shadia Marhaban

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

On September 23, 2020, the Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution presented its annual International Advocate for Peace Award to Mediators Beyond Borders International. What follows is a transcript of the event.

If You Build It, Will They Come? An Empirical Study Of The Voluntary Use Of Mediation And Its Implications, Dwight Golann

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

A generation ago, American litigants did not often go to mediation voluntarily. Advocates of the process predicted, however, that as lawyers and parties became more familiar with mediation, they would opt to use it more often. But, is this true? Virtually no data exists about how often litigants voluntarily choose to mediate legal disputes, whether use varies in different kinds of cases, and what motivates litigants' decisions whether to mediate or not. This Article presents data about each of these issues and analyzes its meaning.

Client-Centered Communication: How Effective Lawyering Requires Emotional Intelligence, Active Listening, And Client Choice, Heather Heavin, Michaela Keet

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

For the lawyer-client relationship to work effectively, lawyers need to provide clients with competent, understandable, and relevant legal advice. This proposition is so central to the lawyer's role that it is difficult to challenge. Yet, we suggest, this proposition belies the complexity of the responsibility, given the decision-making process that clients are going through (or should be going through) when deciding to litigate or to settle through negotiation or mediation. The educational literature contains much advice for lawyers on the benefits of dispute resolution processes, how to select and navigate through them, but much less on how lawyers should guide …

The Use Of Mediation To Resolve Conflicts Arising From Cultural Appropriation By Western Fashion Brands, Faith Adongo

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The Cambridge Dictionary defines cultural appropriation as "the act of taking or using things from a culture that is not your own, especially without showing that you understand or respect this culture." It is sometimes referred to as cultural misappropriation, and also defined as taking intellectual property, traditional knowledge, cultural expressions, or artifacts from a culture other than one's own, without permission. Supporters of cultural appropriation see it as the only realistic way of developing, spreading and integrating cultures, while critics see it as a means through which dominant cultures "borrow" from the cultures of minority groups.

Applying Mediation To The Complexities Of Surrogacy Agreements, Aude-Mazarine Lestienne

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In the late part of the twentieth century, assisted reproductive technologies ("ART") offered new hope to individuals who were infertile, could not carry a pregnancy, or whose attempts to form non-biological families were rejected. At the same time, advances in ART transformed and strained the traditional notions of family, as well as the legal concepts surrounding it. If utilized for the negotiation of the terms of surrogacy agreements, mediation could provide a creative alternative to time-worn legalistic approaches to solving the problems raised by these complex new family dynamics.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 22, Iss. 3

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

But Is It Good: The Need To Measure, Assess, And Report On Court-Connected Adr, Nancy A. Welsh

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

We know that very few civil matters reach disposition through trial-but what do we really know about how civil cases DO reach disposition? What number of civil cases reach disposition through settlement? What number of civil cases reach settlement through court-connected "alternative" dispute resolution (ADR)? Do we know enough about the results of court-connected ADR to be able to detect potential patterns of systemic discrimination? This Article examines what we know from federal and state court systems' public reporting and finds: 1) only a minority of federal district courts and state court systems report regarding dispositions through settlement; 2) there …

Mediation: Embedded Assumptions Of Whiteness?, Sharon Press, Ellen E. Deason

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Article began with the murder of George Floyd by an officer of the Minneapolis Police Department on May 25, 2020, after a convenience store employee reported that Floyd used a counterfeit $20 bill to purchase cigarettes. Seventeen minutes after the police arrived, Floyd was unconscious, pinned beneath them. The events were recorded by bystanders and the public was confronted with visual evidence of what has been happening to Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) especially Black men-for centuries. It was dramatic testimony that law enforcement is based on a system that is the product of systemic racism and …

Visions For The Future: Diversity And Inclusion Initiatives In Court-Annexed Adr Programs, Robyn Weinstein, Lance Bond

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

At the Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution's recent symposium, speakers were asked to dream about court systems of the future. When we dream of a court system of the future, we dream of one that is truly representative of the litigants we serve. This should not only be true of the judiciary and court staff, but also of the alternative dispute resolution programs that are embedded in many state and federal court systems.

Reimagining Adr In New York Courts, Edwina G. Mendelson, Diana Colón, Thomas V. O'Neill

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic made a swift and devastating impact in New York State. Virtually all of life's routines-working, socializing, commuting-were affected, subject to mask mandates, strictly reduced occupational capacities, and widespread working from home for those fortunate to do so. The state court system was no exception to the pandemic's reach. Constitutional guarantees and the preservation of essential legal rights necessitated that the courts always remain available to court users, but the protection of public health mandated that court processes that were traditionally conducted in-person could only remain operational by adapting those processes to new virtual formats.

Designing A State Court Small Claims Odr System: Hitting A Moving Target In New York During A Pandemic, David Allen Larson

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

When I began helping the New York State Unified Court System design a pilot online dispute resolution ("ODR") system back in October 2016, I never imagined more than four years would pass before a system was implemented. One reason our journey was so long is because our target kept moving. After completing a detailed credit card debt collection ODR platform, we had to change direction before implementation and focus instead on small claims cases. Then like the rest of the world, we suddenly had to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic. Although it took longer than anticipated, we achieved our goal …

A Case For Diversionary Restorative Justice In Cases Involving The Embezzlement Of Funds From Small Businesses, Amanda Cooper

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In 2015, John Tschol, the owner of a small advising business in Bloomington, Minnesota, thought that he had a wonderful work life. His business was successful-enough to make a modest profit-and his employees were loyal, hard workers, who had been with him for years. Then he found out that his bookkeeper, Laura Scholz, had been embezzling funds, stealing more than $317,000 over two years.

Hong Kong And China: Building Bridges Between Two Systems In One Country, Harold Kang

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In 1984, Britain and China negotiated an agreement that resulted in Hong Kong's reunification with China over one hundred years after it was surrendered to Britain following the Opium War. The Sino-British Joint Declaration stipulated that although China would exercise territorial sovereignty over Hong Kong, Hong Kong would still maintain a high degree of autonomy until the year 2047. This meant that Hong Kong would have independent executive, legislative, and judicial powers while maintaining its capitalist system and way of life. However, these promisesdespite codification in the Basic Law, which is a quasi-Constitution-do not escape the inherent contradiction in "one …

Website Accessibility Lawsuits: Using Online Dispute Resolution To Provide More Efficient Outcomes Within The Second Circuit, Zachary Kriesberg

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

As Long As You Love Me: The Effects Of Enforcing Prenuptial Agreements On Intimate Partner Violence, Annie L. Zagha

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Marriage is a sacrament. Marriage is the life-long commitment of one person to another. Marriage is a safely guarded right, a constitutional protection that has been continually reaffirmed to protect the inviolability of unions. But what happens when a marriage fails to live up to its idealized and fantastical notion and begins to develop into a primary source of mental, physical, and emotional pain for an individual? What takes place when marriage is being used as a shield for coercive-and potentially lethal behavior?

Dear 1l: Five Guideposts For Your Future Professional Practice, Lela P. Love, Thomas J. Stipanowich

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

2019 Camp Courthouse Colloquy United States Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit: Leadership And Mediation, Colin Powell

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

A mediator serves many roles during the course of a mediation, including facilitator, listener, problem-solver, and agent of reality testing. Often understated is the mediator's role as a leader. To conduct an effective mediation, a mediator must be able to lead counsel and the parties on a path where they will be open to engage in frank risk assessment and consideration of options other than continued litigation. A mediator can learn how to be a better leader by studying leadership in others.

This year's Colloquy focuses on leadership and mediation. The powerful and insightful lessons on leadership drawn from General …

Rethinking The Role Of Courts In Resolving Family Conflicts, Jane C. Murphy

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Family courts have been a central focus of the national problem-solving courts movement over the last three decades.' These courts have sought to replace the law and process-oriented adversary model with a more collaborative and interdisciplinary regime that de-emphasizes legal norms and focuses on therapeutic goals. While the new paradigm may be an improvement over its more adversarial predecessor, it presents significant risks for many who appear in these courts.2 A growing consensus is emerging among scholars, policy makers, and family law practitioners that the focus for much of family dispute resolution should shift from courts to the community.

This …

Get Out Of Jail Free Testimony And Other Examples Of Interest-Based Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System, Michael Rogers, Maria Garrett, Aaron Dekel

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

If you do the crime, you must do the time. Well, upon reflection, maybe not always. In the O.J. Simpson Las Vegas robbery case, his accomplices (the "O.Js") who cooperated with the prosecutor following their arrests were all sentenced to probation. The crime of robbery, particularly aggravated robbery, usually results in a lengthy prison sentence. So, why not here? That is because a criminal's most valuable, tradable currency is information. And, in this case, the O.J.s furthered the prosecutor's interest of convicting the bigger fish, or the higher priority defendant, by providing information and testimony to materially assist in convicting …

The Past, Present, And Future Of Christian Adr, Ronald J. Colombo

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Many religious traditions recommend (if not require) that their adherents bring some if not all of their disputes with co-adherents before a religious tribunal for resolution. The Christian religious tradition is no exception. That said, the dramatic history of the Church in the West, from that of a persecuted Jewish sect, to the official state religion of Imperial Rome, to an international authority competing with that of local monarchs, to its modern status of merely tolerated, has yielded a variety of evolving perspectives on the question of intra-faith dispute resolution within Christianity. This article examines that question and the historical …

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Journal Of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 21, Iss. 2

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Have Problem-Solving Courts Changed The Practice Of Law?, Cynthia Alkon

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Adr: Disputing With A Modern Face, Or Bargaining For The Bargaining Impaired?, Robert J. Condlin

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") movement might turn out to be one of the most important chapters in the history of the American judicial system. Or, it might not. In its most grandiose form, ADR turns disputing on its head, transferring control over outcome from third-party decision-makers to the disputants themselves, and defining disputing procedure in ad hoc, party-constructed guidelines tailored to the circumstances rather than fixed, generic, and categorical rules applicable uniformly in all situations. In its less grandiose form, ADR simply institutionalizes a system of multi-party bargaining in which third-party neutrals help disputants identify individual interests and find …

Competition Between State Courts And Private Tribunals, Horst Eidenmüller

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In this essay, I investigate the competition between state courts and private tribunals for dispute resolution. I distinguish between different market segments: business to business ("B2B") and business to consumer ("B2C") transactions and, in each case, small-, mediumand high-stakes disputes. The analysis is informed by a survey of the dispute resolution preferences of "case placers" carried out in 2015. I find that competition between state courts and arbitral tribunals is currently most intense with respect to high-stakes B2B disputes. A significant portion of the total dispute resolution volume in this market segment goes to arbitration. If parties decide to arbitrate, …

Peer Mediation: Equipping Student Leaders With The Ability To Resolve Internal Conflicts, Leonora Gogos

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Crime and youth violence are a major problem facing the United States today. The United States has developed the reputation of being a country that nurtures young minds and promises them a holistic education. Currently, there are around 54.8 million students enrolled in grades K-12 in the United States. However, crime rates are rising among juveniles-children in the aforementioned grade range. Teenagers are currently being arrested for violent crimes more often than young adults are.

How A Good Idea Became A Bad Idea: Universities And The Use Of Non-Disclosure Agreements In Terminations For Sexual Misconduct, Julie Macfarlane

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

One of the challenges that face every third-party intervenor in a conflict is what the parties shall agree about the public nature of an agreed outcome. In private dispute resolution, in contrast to adjudication by courts, there is neither a requirement nor (with a few exceptions) a legal compulsion to reveal those outcomes, if one or more parties prefer to keep the matter private.