Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (1)
- American Indian Law; Indian Law; American Indian Law Journal; Native American Names as Marks (1)
- Billy Frank Jr. (1)
- Boldt decision (1)
- Climate change (1)
-
- David Getches (1)
- Disparaging marks (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Elouise Cobell (1)
- Historic litigation (1)
- Indian Child Welfare Act (1)
- Indian tribes (1)
- John Echohawk (1)
- Lanham Act (1)
- Menominee Restoration (1)
- Morality (1)
- NARF (1)
- Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (1)
- Native American Rights Fund (1)
- Native Americans (1)
- Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission (1)
- Northwest Washington (1)
- Pacific Northwest (1)
- Pyramid Lake Paiutes (1)
- Redskins (1)
- Salmon fishing (1)
- Scandalous (1)
- Trademark law (1)
- Trademark registration (1)
- Treaty rights (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Cultural Heritage Law
Use Of Native American Tribal Names As Marks, Brian Zark
Use Of Native American Tribal Names As Marks, Brian Zark
American Indian Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Music As Cultural Heritage: Analysis Of The Means Of Preventing The Exploitation Of Intangible Cultural Heritage, 14 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 228 (2015), Ronald Inawat
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
What started out as a law school requirement quickly snowballed into an analysis of the relationship between intellectual property and cultural heritage. I am a music guy at heart, having played piano since I was five years old, having composed one song (after multiple tries), and now working directly with musicians and artists. So when I began researching a topic for an article that would connect the dots between the cultural heritage and its respective music, I could only come across legal doctrine and articles that focused heavily on tangible art and artifacts. So what happened to the music? After …
Registering Offense: The Prohibition Of Slurs As Trademarks, Christine Farley
Registering Offense: The Prohibition Of Slurs As Trademarks, Christine Farley
Contributions to Books
Since 1967, Pro-Football has registered six marks that include the term “redskins,” a derogatory racial epithet that refers to Native Americans. The use of disparaging marks dates back to the 19th century when brands commercialized racial stereotypes, such as Aunt Jemima. Today, offensive marks, including those that ridicule race, ethnicity, gender and religion are proliferating prompting the question of what role trademark law plays in protecting the interests of diverse communities. Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act prohibits the registration of marks that consist of matter that may disparage or bring into contempt or disrepute any person, institution, or belief. …
They Had Nothing, Charles Wilkinson