Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Law (14)
- Climate change (9)
- Environment (7)
- Environmental law (7)
- SFFA (7)
-
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- Environmentalism (6)
- Indian law (6)
- Supreme Court (6)
- Alexander Blewett III School of Law (5)
- Climate Change (5)
- Diversity (5)
- EPA (5)
- Environmental (5)
- Montana (5)
- NEPA (5)
- Natural resources law (5)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (5)
- Regulation (5)
- Renewable energy (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- CERCLA (4)
- Judicial review (4)
- Montana Law (4)
- Native American law (4)
- Natural Resources (4)
- Ninth Circuit (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 331 - 360 of 448
Full-Text Articles in Cultural Heritage Law
Pakootas V. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd., Connlan W. Whyte
Pakootas V. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd., Connlan W. Whyte
Public Land & Resources Law Review
Throughout the twentieth century, Teck Cominco Metals leaked metal pollutants into the Upper Columbia River that ultimately entered the United States and the Colville Indian Reservation. In 2004, after almost a decade of working with the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Colville Tribes initiated a citizen suit under CERCLA against Teck for damaging the ecosystem of the Upper Columbia River. In 2018, the Ninth Circuit affirmed judgment against Teck for recovery costs and attorney’s fees.
Fmc Corp. V. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Seth T. Bonilla
Fmc Corp. V. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Seth T. Bonilla
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In 1998, FMC Corporation agreed to submit to the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes’ permitting processes, including the payment of fees, for clean-up work required as part of consent decree negotiations with the Environmental Protection Agency. Then, in 2002, FMC refused to pay the Tribes under a permitting agreement entered into by both parties, even though the company continued to store hazardous waste on land within the Shoshone-Bannock Fort Hall Reservation in Idaho. FMC challenged the Tribes’ authority to enforce the $1.5 million permitting fees first in tribal court and later challenged the Tribes’ authority to exercise civil regulatory and adjudicatory jurisdiction over …
Navajo Nation V. United States Department Of The Interior, Adam W. Johnson
Navajo Nation V. United States Department Of The Interior, Adam W. Johnson
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Navajo Nation sued the United States government alleging the government breached its trust obligation over the allocation of water rights in the Colorado River Basin. On remand, the district court denied the Navajo Nation leave to file its third amended complaint for futility, holding that the general trust relationship was insufficient to support the Nation’s breach of trust claim.
Preview—United States Forest Service V. Cowpasture River Preservation Association: Can The Pipeline Cross The Trail?, Alizabeth Bronsdon
Preview—United States Forest Service V. Cowpasture River Preservation Association: Can The Pipeline Cross The Trail?, Alizabeth Bronsdon
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in this matter on Monday, February 24, 2020, at 10 a.m. in the Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C. Anthony Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, will likely argue for the United States. In a divided oral argument, Paul D. Clement will likely appear for Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, the petitioner in consolidated case No. 18-1587, Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association. Michael K. Kellogg will likely appear for the Respondents.
Living Heritage, Stolen Meaning: Protecting Intangible Native American Cultural Resources Through The Right Of Publicity, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 31 (2020), Shannon Price
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
Seattle University Law Review
Janet Ainsworth, Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law: In Memory of Professor James E. Bond.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Preview—Atlantic Richfield Company V. Christian: The Intersection Of Superfund And State-Law Restoration Claims, Emily M. Mcculloch
Preview—Atlantic Richfield Company V. Christian: The Intersection Of Superfund And State-Law Restoration Claims, Emily M. Mcculloch
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments in this matter on Tuesday, December 3, 2019, at 11:00 a.m. in the Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C. Lisa S. Blatt will likely appear for the Petitioner. Joseph R. Palmore will likely appear for the Respondents. Solicitor General Noel J. Francisco will likely argue on behalf of the United States.
Wildearth Guardians V. Zinke, Emily M. Mcculloch
Wildearth Guardians V. Zinke, Emily M. Mcculloch
Public Land & Resources Law Review
WildEarth Guardians v. Zinke marks an important decision prompting the Bureau of Land Management to seriously consider greenhouse gas emissions when performing environmental assessments for oil and gas leasing. WildEarth Guardians and Physicians for Social Responsibility, two non-profit organizations, asserted BLM improperly failed to recognize greenhouse gas emissions and their impacts on climate change when issuing oil and gas leases in three western states. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia agreed, finding that by failing to take a hard look at environmental impacts from its leasing decisions, BLM violated the National Environmental Policy Act’s requirements.
Preview—Murray V. Bej Minerals, Llc: Finding A Home For Fossils, Layne L. Ryerson
Preview—Murray V. Bej Minerals, Llc: Finding A Home For Fossils, Layne L. Ryerson
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Montana Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in this matter on Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 9:30 AM in the courtroom of the Montana Supreme Court, Joseph P. Mazurek Building, Helena, Montana. The Honorable Olivia Rieger will hear the case in place of Justice Jim Rice, who recused himself. Eric B. Wolff is expected to argue for the Appellants. Harlan B. Krogh is expected to argue for the Appellees.
Who Cares About The Modern Creator?, Jacqueline Malzone
Who Cares About The Modern Creator?, Jacqueline Malzone
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Commodity Futures Trading Com'n V. Mcdonnell 287 F.Supp.3d 213 (E.D.N.Y. 2018), Zach Johnston
Commodity Futures Trading Com'n V. Mcdonnell 287 F.Supp.3d 213 (E.D.N.Y. 2018), Zach Johnston
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Rockwell V. Trustees Of The Berkshire Museum No. 1776cv00253, 2017 Wl 6940932 (Mass. Sup. Ct. Nov. 7, 2017), Kahlia Halpern
Rockwell V. Trustees Of The Berkshire Museum No. 1776cv00253, 2017 Wl 6940932 (Mass. Sup. Ct. Nov. 7, 2017), Kahlia Halpern
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
A Tough Pill To Swallow: Increasing Complexity For Drug Developers In The Federal Circuit, Jacob Michalakes
A Tough Pill To Swallow: Increasing Complexity For Drug Developers In The Federal Circuit, Jacob Michalakes
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
The Federal Circuit: Thwarting Software Innovation, Bernardo Rocha
The Federal Circuit: Thwarting Software Innovation, Bernardo Rocha
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Reinterpreting The Authenticity Of Reconstructed World Heritage Properties For The Twenty-First Century, Joy Naifeh
Reinterpreting The Authenticity Of Reconstructed World Heritage Properties For The Twenty-First Century, Joy Naifeh
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Striking The Balance: How States Can Protect Both Str Advocates And Opponents, James Stumpf
Striking The Balance: How States Can Protect Both Str Advocates And Opponents, James Stumpf
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Maloney V. T3media, Inc. 853 F. 3d 1004, (9th Cir. 2017), Ralph Loyola
Maloney V. T3media, Inc. 853 F. 3d 1004, (9th Cir. 2017), Ralph Loyola
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Cassirer V. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation 862 F. 3d 951, (9th Cir. 2017), Alyssa Pullara
Cassirer V. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation 862 F. 3d 951, (9th Cir. 2017), Alyssa Pullara
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Leapers, Inc. V. Smts, Llc, Melissa Cole
Leapers, Inc. V. Smts, Llc, Melissa Cole
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Sophia: Exploring The Ways Ai May Change Intellectual Property Protections, Elizabeth Rocha
Sophia: Exploring The Ways Ai May Change Intellectual Property Protections, Elizabeth Rocha
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Systematic Cultural Appropriation And The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Luma Zayad
Systematic Cultural Appropriation And The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Luma Zayad
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Elliot V. Google, Inc., 860 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2017), Kayla Jewell
Elliot V. Google, Inc., 860 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2017), Kayla Jewell
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Joseph Matal V. Tam 137 S. Ct. 1744 (2017), Elly Goettelman
Joseph Matal V. Tam 137 S. Ct. 1744 (2017), Elly Goettelman
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Y U No Let Me Share Memes?! - How Meme Culture Needs A Definitive Test For Noncommercial Speech, Elizabeth Rocha
Y U No Let Me Share Memes?! - How Meme Culture Needs A Definitive Test For Noncommercial Speech, Elizabeth Rocha
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Repurposing Old Drugs For New Uses, Kathryn Brown
Repurposing Old Drugs For New Uses, Kathryn Brown
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.