Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Birth and Reproduction (1)
- Children (1)
- Cloud computing (1)
- Crimes Against the Person (1)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (1)
-
- Data (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Homicide (1)
- Marriage and Couples (1)
- Parents and Children (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Procedural protections (1)
- Reproduction and the Law (1)
- Rights of the accused (1)
- Same-Sex Marriage (1)
- Search and seizure (1)
- Search incident to valid arrest (1)
- Sex (1)
- Sexual assault (1)
- Smith v. Maryland (1)
- Students (1)
- Technology (1)
- Third party consent (1)
- Third party search doctrine (1)
- Third-Party Doctrine (1)
- U.S. v. Miller (1)
- Universities (1)
- Warrant (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Criminal Law
An Argument Against Civil Marriage, J. David Bleich
Ready, Fire, Aim: How Universities Are Failing The Constitution In Sexual Assault Cases, Tamara Rice Lave
Ready, Fire, Aim: How Universities Are Failing The Constitution In Sexual Assault Cases, Tamara Rice Lave
Articles
This Article looks critically at the procedural protections American universities give students accused of sexual assault. It begins by situating these policies historically, providing background to Title IX and the different guidelines promulgated by the Department of Education. Next, it presents original research on the procedural protections provided by the fifty flagship state universities. In October 2014, university administrators were contacted and asked a series of questions about the rights afforded to students, including the standard of proof right to an adjudicatory hearing, right to confront and cross examine witnesses, right to counsel, right to silence, and right to appeal. …
Riley V. California And The Beginning Of The End For The Third-Party Search Doctrine, David A. Harris
Riley V. California And The Beginning Of The End For The Third-Party Search Doctrine, David A. Harris
Articles
In Riley v. California, the Supreme Court decided that when police officers seize a smart phone, they may not search through its contents -- the data found by looking into the call records, calendars, pictures and so forth in the phone -- without a warrant. In the course of the decision, the Court said that the rule applied not just to data that was physically stored on the device, but also to data stored "in the cloud" -- in remote sites -- but accessed through the device. This piece of the decision may, at last, allow a re-examination of …