Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (75)
- Legal Profession (59)
- Constitutional Law (53)
- Criminal Law (37)
- International Law (36)
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (35)
- Criminal Procedure (31)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (28)
- Jurisprudence (27)
- Law and Society (27)
- Civil Procedure (25)
- Jurisdiction (24)
- Legislation (23)
- Litigation (23)
- State and Local Government Law (23)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (22)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (17)
- Human Rights Law (17)
- Intellectual Property Law (17)
- Family Law (16)
- Law and Politics (16)
- Legal History (14)
- Administrative Law (13)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (13)
- First Amendment (13)
- Evidence (12)
- Law and Race (11)
- Political Science (11)
- Institution
-
- University of Tennessee College of Law (41)
- University of Michigan Law School (38)
- University of Richmond (21)
- Roger Williams University (20)
- University of Georgia School of Law (16)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (12)
- Duke Law (11)
- Georgetown University Law Center (10)
- Pepperdine University (10)
- American University Washington College of Law (9)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (9)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (9)
- Notre Dame Law School (9)
- The University of Akron (9)
- Brigham Young University Law School (8)
- Seattle University School of Law (8)
- St. Mary's University (7)
- University of Dayton (7)
- William & Mary Law School (7)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (6)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (6)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- UIC School of Law (5)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (5)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (5)
- University of Washington School of Law (5)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (4)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- Barry University School of Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- Courts (23)
- Supreme Court (21)
- United States Supreme Court (21)
- Judges (14)
- Constitutional law (10)
-
- Separation of powers (10)
- State courts (10)
- Congress (9)
- Federal courts (9)
- Jurisdiction (9)
- Law reform (8)
- Juries (7)
- Standing (7)
- Statutory interpretation (7)
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Court (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Jurisprudence (6)
- Same-sex marriage (6)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (6)
- Civil procedure (5)
- Constitution (5)
- Discrimination (5)
- Due process (5)
- Federalism (5)
- Judicial review (5)
- Justice (5)
- United States v. Windsor (5)
- Administrative law (4)
- Appeals (4)
- Publication
-
- Tennessee Law Review (41)
- Faculty Scholarship (20)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (14)
- Articles (13)
- Law Faculty Publications (13)
-
- Faculty Publications (12)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (12)
- Michigan Law Review (12)
- Faculty Articles (10)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (9)
- Northwestern University Law Review (9)
- Akron Law Review (8)
- University of Richmond Law Review (8)
- BYU Law Review (7)
- Pepperdine Law Review (7)
- Educational Leadership Faculty Publications (6)
- Law School Blogs (6)
- Touro Law Review (6)
- American University Law Review (5)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (4)
- Catholic University Law Review (4)
- Indiana Law Journal (4)
- Journal Articles (4)
- Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law (4)
- Scholarly Articles (4)
- Seattle University Law Review (4)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 394
Full-Text Articles in Courts
Constraining Charming Betsy: Textual Ambiguity As A Predicate To Applying The Charming Betsy Doctrine, Andrew H. Bean
Constraining Charming Betsy: Textual Ambiguity As A Predicate To Applying The Charming Betsy Doctrine, Andrew H. Bean
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Forced Marriage At The Cambodian Crossroads: Eccc Can Develop A New Crime Against Humanity, Cameron Christensen
Forced Marriage At The Cambodian Crossroads: Eccc Can Develop A New Crime Against Humanity, Cameron Christensen
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trending @ Rwu Law: 12/29/2015: Dean Yelnosky's Post: Fourteen Weeks, Michael Yelnosky
Trending @ Rwu Law: 12/29/2015: Dean Yelnosky's Post: Fourteen Weeks, Michael Yelnosky
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
Authoritarian Member States In International Organizations, Matt Barg
Authoritarian Member States In International Organizations, Matt Barg
Master's Theses
This thesis investigates under which conditions do authoritarian Member States exist in International Organizations that require democratic governance in their treaty law. The European Union is used as a case study along with two of its Member States that are in the process of transitioning to democracy from previous authoritarian regimes—Hungary and Romania. This thesis employs stealth authoritarian theory to analyze how a democratizing Member State may violate these laws and revert to authoritarian governance. It also critiques international enforcement mechanisms to consider their effectiveness to enforce their laws and norms as well as prevent an authoritarian reversal. Finally, cultural …
The Role Of The State, Multinational Oil Companies, International Law & The International Community: Intersection Of Human Rights & Environmental Degradation Climate Change In The 21st Century Caused By Traditional Extractive Practices, The Amazon Rainforest, Indigenous People And Universal Jurisdiction To Resolve The Accountability Issue, Marcela Cabrera Luna
Master's Theses
Local, national and international conventions that protect indigenous sovereignty and their territories, where many of the resources are extracted from by multinational corporations (MNCs) particularly oil, the number one commodity of the world and cause of climate change, continue to be jeopardized because of the lack of a clear international legal framework that can protect them and potentially hold multinationals accountable for their actions. These practices are causing not only environmental issues to the indigenous and surrounding communities, but climate change is in fact, the real human rights issue of the 21st century and it affects everyone. By using …
Newsroom: Yelnosky On Diversifying State Judiciary, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Newsroom: Yelnosky On Diversifying State Judiciary, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Extralegal Supreme Court Policy-Making, Joëlle Anne Moreno
Extralegal Supreme Court Policy-Making, Joëlle Anne Moreno
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
The Colbert Report aired its final episode on December 18, 2014.1 Nine years earlier, on the first episode, Stephen Colbert coined the word “truthiness.” Truthiness satirized contemporary disinterest in empirical information in a country increasingly “divided between those who think with their head and those who know with their heart.” Truthiness was not just the Merriam-Webster word of the year. Over the past decade, it has been the unspoken mantra of reporters who give equal time to climate science denialists, faith healers, and vaccine refusers. When Justices of the Supreme Court decide questions of scientific or empirical fact—such as whether …
Filling The D.C. Circuit Vacancies, Carl W. Tobias
Filling The D.C. Circuit Vacancies, Carl W. Tobias
Indiana Law Journal
Partisanship undermines judicial nominations to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. With three of eleven judgeships vacant during Barack Obama’s first term, he was the only President in a half century not to appoint a jurist to the nation’s second-most important court. Confirming accomplished nominees, thus, became imperative for the circuit’s prompt, economical, and fair case disposition. In 2013, Obama submitted excellent candidates. Patricia Millett had argued thirty-two Supreme Court appeals; Cornelia Pillard successfully litigated numerous path-breaking matters; and Robert Wilkins had served on the D.C. District bench for three years. The purportedly shrinking tribunal …
A Streamlined Model Of Tribal Appellate Court Rules For Lay Advocates And Pro Se Litigants, Gregory D. Smith J.D.
A Streamlined Model Of Tribal Appellate Court Rules For Lay Advocates And Pro Se Litigants, Gregory D. Smith J.D.
American Indian Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Defining The Indian Civil Rights Act's "Sufficiently Trained" Tribal Court Judge, Jill Elizabeth Tompkins
Defining The Indian Civil Rights Act's "Sufficiently Trained" Tribal Court Judge, Jill Elizabeth Tompkins
American Indian Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Newsroom: Yelnosky On Judge Investigation, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Newsroom: Yelnosky On Judge Investigation, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Unfair Trade Practices In Imports - Section 337 Of The Tariff Act Of 1930 And The Meaning Of "Domestic Industry", Kathy Bond
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Officiating Removal, Leah Litman
Officiating Removal, Leah Litman
Articles
For the last several years, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has quietly attempted to curtail capital defendants' representation in state postconviction proceedings. In 2011, various justices on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court began to call for federally funded community defender organizations to stop representing capital defendants in state postconviction proceedings. The justices argued, among other things, that the organizations' representation of capital defendants constituted impermissible federal interference with state governmental processes and burdened state judicial resources. The court also alleged the community defender organizations were in violation of federal statutes, which only authorized the organizations to assist state prisoners in federal, but …
A Matter Of Trial And Error, Or Betting On Appeals, Radek Goral
A Matter Of Trial And Error, Or Betting On Appeals, Radek Goral
Notre Dame Law Review Reflection
Sampling from the actual portfolio of a leading third-party litigation financier, this Essay demonstrates that making systematic bets on pending appeals is a viable business model applicable to a wide range of cases. “Appellate investments” may include both consumer and commercial cases, including also public-interest actions where prevailing plaintiffs are permitted attorney’s fees—even if they themselves do not seek monetary relief. Additionally, the analyzed sample indicates that appellate funders buy both from plaintiffs and plaintiffs’ attorneys, often in the same case.
The overview of the business strategy of appellate financing contributes to a larger theme: the role and impact of …
Taxing Legalized Marijuana: How Courts Should Treat Drug Tax Statutes In Light Of The Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause And Executive Non-Enforcement Of The Controlled Substances Act, Joseph A. Goldstein
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Is An Agency A Court? A Modified Functional Approach To State Agency Removal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1441, Nicholas Jackson
When Is An Agency A Court? A Modified Functional Approach To State Agency Removal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1441, Nicholas Jackson
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Note argues that courts should interpret 28 U.S.C. § 1441, which permits removal from state court to federal court, to allow removal from state administrative agencies when the agency performs “court-like functions.” Circuits that apply a literal interpretation of the statute and forbid removal from state agencies should adopt this “functional” approach. The functional approach, which this Note calls the McCullion-Floeter test, should be modified to comport with legislative intent and public policy considerations: first, state agency adjudications should not be removable when the adjudication requires technical expertise, which federal courts cannot obtain because they adjudicate cases in a …
The Ethical Limits Of Discrediting The Truthful Witness: How Modern Ethics Rules Fail To Prevent Truthful Witnesses From Being Discredited Through Unethical Means, Todd A. Berger
Marquette Law Review
Whether the criminal defense attorney may ethically discredit the truthful witness on cross-examination and later during closing argument has long been an area of controversy in legal ethics. The vast majority of scholarly discussion on this important ethical dilemma has examined it in the abstract, focusing on the defense attorney’s dual roles in a criminal justice system that is dedicated to searching for the truth while simultaneously requiring zealous advocacy even for the guiltiest of defendants. Unlike these previous works, this particular Article explores this dilemma from the perspective of the techniques that criminal defense attorney’s use on cross-examination and …
Praise Defenders, Not Just Prosecutors, Stephen Henderson
Praise Defenders, Not Just Prosecutors, Stephen Henderson
Other Faculty Publications
In this letter to the editor, I discuss the problems when a district court judge becomes a graduate and class spokesperson for a Citizens' Police Academy.See article here.See letter here.
Communicating The Canons: How Lower Courts React When The Supreme Court Changes The Rules Of Statutory Interpretation, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Communicating The Canons: How Lower Courts React When The Supreme Court Changes The Rules Of Statutory Interpretation, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Five Days In June When Values Died In American Law, Bruce Ledewitz
The Five Days In June When Values Died In American Law, Bruce Ledewitz
Akron Law Review
During a five day period in June, 1992, every Justice on the United States Supreme Court joined one or the other of two opinions that denied the objectivity of values—either Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in Lee v. Weisman or Justice Scalia’s dissent in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Both of these opinions expressed the view that normative judgments are merely human constructions. This moment represents symbolically the death of values in American law. The arrival of nihilism at the heart of American law is a world-changing event for law that must be acknowledged.
The death of values was announced by …
Scout’S Honor: The Boy Scouts, Judicial Ethics, And The Appearance Of Partiality, Daniel Ortner
Scout’S Honor: The Boy Scouts, Judicial Ethics, And The Appearance Of Partiality, Daniel Ortner
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trending @ Rwu Law: Mikela Almeida's Post: Esther Clark Competition Held In R. I. Supreme Court, Mikela Almeida
Trending @ Rwu Law: Mikela Almeida's Post: Esther Clark Competition Held In R. I. Supreme Court, Mikela Almeida
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
A Look Back: Developing Indiana Law; Post-Bench Reflections Of An Indiana Supreme Court Justice; Selected Developments In Indiana Administrative Law (1989-2012), Frank Sullivan Jr.
A Look Back: Developing Indiana Law; Post-Bench Reflections Of An Indiana Supreme Court Justice; Selected Developments In Indiana Administrative Law (1989-2012), Frank Sullivan Jr.
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Striving For Efficiency In Administrative Litigation: North Carolina's Office Of Administrative Hearings, Julian Mann Iii
Striving For Efficiency In Administrative Litigation: North Carolina's Office Of Administrative Hearings, Julian Mann Iii
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Transparency In Administrative Courts: From The Outside Looking In, Elizabeth Figueroa
Transparency In Administrative Courts: From The Outside Looking In, Elizabeth Figueroa
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Hashavim H.P.S. Business Information, Ltd. V. The Courts' Administration, Elyakim Rubinstein, Esther Hayut, Uzi Vogelman
Hashavim H.P.S. Business Information, Ltd. V. The Courts' Administration, Elyakim Rubinstein, Esther Hayut, Uzi Vogelman
Translated Opinions
[This abstract is not part of the Court's opinion and is provided for the reader's convenience. It has been translated from a Hebrew version prepared by Nevo Press Ltd. and is used with its kind permission.]
This case concerned a petition challenging the decision of the Courts Administration (the Respondent) making access to its judgment database contingent upon signing a “guarantee” that comprised, inter alia, a prohibition upon indexing the information in a manner that would allow it to be found through web search engines such as Google and Bing. The Petitioner is a commercial company whose primary activity is …
Current Circuit Splits, Circuit Review Staff
Current Circuit Splits, Circuit Review Staff
Seton Hall Circuit Review
No abstract provided.
First Impressions, Circuit Review Staff
First Impressions, Circuit Review Staff
Seton Hall Circuit Review
No abstract provided.
The Semi-Retirement Of Senior Supreme Court Justices: Examining Their Service On The Courts Of Appeals, Jon A. Gryskiewicz
The Semi-Retirement Of Senior Supreme Court Justices: Examining Their Service On The Courts Of Appeals, Jon A. Gryskiewicz
Seton Hall Circuit Review
No abstract provided.
Rwu Law Launches Legal Clinic For Disabled Veterans, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Rwu Law Launches Legal Clinic For Disabled Veterans, Roger Williams University School Of Law
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.