Contracts Commons^™

Article Two Warranties In Commercial Transactions: An Update, Kathryn L. Moore, Debra L. Goetz, Douglas E. Perry, David S. Rabb

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

In 1978 the Cornell Law Review published a Special Project devoted to Article Two commercial warranties. Nine years have since elapsed, and we have decided to update and reassess this important area of the law. We have discovered that although judicial treatment of many aspects of Article Two warranty law has remained stable, in some instances the courts' treatment has progressed and in other instances it has become unclear. This Special Project is our attempt to assemble these changes, interpret the progress, and suggest new lines of analysis to clarify areas of conflict.

Farm Crop Energy V. Old National Bank: A Meaningful Test For Damages Under Promissory Estoppel?, Glen Andrew Anderson

Seattle University Law Review

This Note proposes that an award of lost profits under promissory estoppel should be made only when the circumstances surrounding the making of the promise justify enforcing it as if it were a contract. Operating on the assumption that a promise is found to be a reasonable basis for reliance, this Note will propose some criteria by which a court can determine when a promise justifies a damage award in excess of the costs of reliance. These criteria will then be applied to the Farm Crop facts to demonstrate that remedies can be administered under a standard that is rational …

The Law Of Construction Bonds In Arkansas: A Review, David G. Paul

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Unfair And Deceptive Legislation: The Case For Finding North Carolina General Statutes Section 75-1.1 Unconstitutionally Vague As Applied To An Alleged Breach Of A Commercial Contract, Thomas A. Farr

Campbell Law Review

The North Carolina General Assembly enacted the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act in 1969. The original purpose of the act was to protect consumers from predatory business practices. Nonetheless, the North Carolina Supreme Court has sanctioned an expanded application of the act to cases involving sophisticated commercial parties. This article will attempt to demonstrate that it is poor public policy to apply section 75-1.1 to cases based upon an alleged breach of a commercial contract and that in at least those instances section 75-1.1 is unconstitutionally vague.

Bad Faith In First Party Insurance Contracts—What's Next, Paula J. Casey

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Notes On The Reliance Interest, Robert Birmingham

Washington Law Review

The topic is Contract Damages. The interests are defined by how we protect them. Imagine a breaching promisor. We protect the reliance interest of the promisee by requiring the promisor to put her in a position as good as she would have been in had the parties not contracted. The other interests are the restitution interest, which we protect by requiring the promisor to give back what the promisee has given him; and the expectation interest, which we protect by requiring the promisor to put the promisee in a position as good as she would have been in had he …

Recovery Of Consequential Damages For Product Recall Expenditures, Bradford Stone

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

U.C.C. § 2-713: Anticipatory Repudiation And The Measurement Of An Aggrieved Buyer's Damages

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Interlocking Death And Rebirth Of Contract And Tort, Jeffrey O'Connell

Michigan Law Review

The first portion of this article will examine the growing inclination of courts to apply tort principles to cases based on contracts; at the same time, the defects of tort will be discussed insofar as they militate against the wisdom of so extending tort principles. In the last half of the article, an alternative contractual method for allocating losses in one particular area will briefly be presented; this method does not contain the defects in loss allocation that have impelled courts to reject traditional contractual principles, but it also avoids many inefficiencies of traditional tort remedies.

Uniform Commercial Code - Section 2-719(3) - Presumption Of Unconscionability On The Part Of Tire Manufacturer For Exclusion Of Liability For Personal Injuries Under Express Warranty Against Blowouts Is Not Rebutted By Proof That The Tire Was Not Defective, Katherine A. Bomba

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Breach Of Contract, Damage Measures, And Economic Efficiency, Robert L. Birmingham

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments In Products Liability Law In Pennsylvania, Warren W. Faulk

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Damage Measures And Economic Rationality: The Geometry Of Contract Law, Robert L. Birmingham

Articles by Maurer Faculty

The question of damage measures presented by the conscious decision of a promisor to breach a losing contract raises one of the most perplexing conceptual problems in contract law. Recognizing the present inability of the courts rationally to resolve the problem, as illustrated by the opposing decisions in Groves v. John Wunder Company and Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal and Mining Company, the author undertakes to examine the premises of contract law with afresh perspective-economic analysis.

Products Liability In Pennsylvania, William E. Benner, Thomas C. Riley, Joseph A. Torregrossa

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Patents, Technical Data And International Defense Agreements, Harry M. Saragovitz, James A. Dobkin

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Remedies Of The Vendor And Purchaser Under A Contract For The Sale Of Realty In Pennsylvania, Michael H. Hynes

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Sales - Implied Warranty - Final Parts Assembler But Not Parts Manufacturer Liable For Death Of Passenger In Airplane Crash, Malcolm J. Gross

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Foreword: Damages In Contract, William Burnett Harvey

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Contracts-Measure Of Damages-Life Insurance Contract, Howard Van Antwerp

Michigan Law Review

When the plaintiff was expelled from defendant Brotherhood an insurance policy issued to the plaintiff by the defendant was canceled and the cash surrender value paid to him in accordance with the terms of his policy. The directors of the Brotherhood later decided that this expulsion had been wrongful, whereupon the plaintiff returned the cash surrender value of the policy and demanded the return of all premiums paid. When this demand was refused, the plaintiff sued to recover damages for wrongful cancellation of his policy. The trial court instructed the jury to return a verdict for the premiums paid with …

The Awarding Of Punitive Damages For Breach Of Insurance Contracts In South Carolina, Hugh C. Howser

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Damages-Extent To Which Earnings Of Employee After Wrongful Discharge Apply In Mitigation Of Damages For Breach Of Contract

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Damages-Measure Of Damages In Contract And Tort Actions For Destruction Of Growing Crops

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Measure Of Damages For Breach Of An Alternative Contract - Zalis V. Walter

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Decisions, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

The abstracts consist merely of summaries of the facts and holdings of recent cases and are distinguished from the notes by the absence of discussion.

The 'Right' To Break A Contract, Willard T. Barbour

Articles

It is common knowledge that the fully developed common law affords no means to compel the performance of a contract according to its terms. Does it follow from this that there is no legal obligation to perform a contract, or if obligation there be, that it is alternative: to perform or pay damages? A note in the XIV MICH. L. REV. 480 appears to give an affirmative answer to this question and at least one court (Frye v. Hubbell, 74 N. H. 358, at p. 374) has taken the same view. Probably the most forcible exposition of this position is …

The 'Right' To Break A Contract, Willard T. Barbour

Articles

It is common knowledge that the fully developed common law affords no means to compel the performance of a contract according to its terms. Does it follow from this that there is no legal obligation to perform a contract, or if obligation there be, that it is alternative: to perform or pay damages? A note in the XIV MICH. L. REV. 480 appears to give an affirmative answer to this question and at least one court (Frye v. Hubbell, 74 N. H. 358, at p. 374) has taken the same view. Probably the most forcible exposition of this position is …

Recovery Of The Purchase Price Before Title Has Passed, John B. Waite

Articles

In an action recently instituted by The General Electric Co. to recover on a contract to manufacture certain machinery for the defendant, which machinery the defendant had refused to accept, the trial court adopted the contract price as the measure of damages. The upper court approved this measure of damages, rejecting the argument that the measure should have been the difference between the market value and the contract price, and dismissed, as no longer appropriate to modern conditions, the decisions in Bement v. Smith, 15 Wend. (N. Y.) 493, and Shawhan v. Van Nest. 25 Oh. St. 490. The court …

Liquidated Damages And Estoppel By Contract, Joseph H. Drake

Articles

In the last edition of "Sedgwick's Elements of the Law of Damages" the author says (p. 232) that the subject of liquidated damages has been put in a new light by the two cases of the Sun Printing and Publishing Association v. Moore1 and the Clydebank R. &S. Co. v. Castaneda,2 and that they may be expected to have a considerable effect upon the further development of the law on the subject. The learned author then presents the old canons of interpretation with full illustration from the cases, followed by the citation of the decisions above mentioned, and concludes that …

Cases On The Law Of Damages, Floyd R. Mechem

Books

Note to the Second Edition: “The following selection of cases in the law of Damages has been made primarily for use in connection with the lectures upon that subject given in the Law department of the University of Michigan. The purpose has been particularly to supply illustration of the application of principles referred to in the lectures, and partly to supplement the lectures by rounding out the view of certain fields not otherwise completely developed.”

Note to the Third Edition: “While the general features remain the same, the number of cases in this edition has been considerably increased in the …

Cases On The Law Of Damages, Floyd R. Mechem

Books

"The following cases have been printed at the request of Professor Mechem, of the Law Department of the University of Michigan, for use in connection with his lectures in that law school."-- Title page.