Contracts Commons^™

In Re: Manhattan West Mechanic’S Lien Litigation, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 70 (Sept. 24, 2015), Kristian Kaskla

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

The Court determined that (1) a general subordination agreement effects a partial subordination; and (2) NRS 108.225 does not preclude parties from contracting for a partial subordination.

Mika V. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 71 (Sep. 24, 2015), Kory Koerperich

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

The court denied extraordinary writ relief from the district court’s decision to compel arbitration between Petitioners and their employer based on a long-form arbitration agreement signed only by the Petitioners, and federal law favoring arbitration agreements.

Tallman V. Eight Judicial District Court, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 60673 (Sep. 24, 2015), Marta Kurshumova

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

The Court held that an employment arbitration agreement, which contains a clause waiving the right to initiate or participate in class actions, constitutes a valid contract, even though it is not signed by the employer. The Court further determined that the Federal Arbitration Act applies to all transactions involving commerce and does not conflict with the National Labor Relations Act, which permits and requires arbitration. Finally, the Court found that a party does not automatically waive its contractual rights to arbitration by removing an action to federal court.

Am. First Fed. Credit Union V. Soro, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 73 (Sep. 24, 2014), Katherine Maher

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

The Court determined that a contract clause in which the parties “submit themselves to the jurisdiction of” another state, without more exclusive language, is permissive and does not result in a mandatory forum selection clause.

Illegal Agreements And The Lesser Evil Principle, Chunlin Leonhard

Catholic University Law Review

When parties enter into an illegal agreement and bring a dispute arising from the transaction before a court, the court finds itself in a difficult position. The court is faced with two competing interests: the importance of both upholding and protecting the dignity of the law and honoring inherent principles of U.S. contract law - freedom of contract and individual autonomy. There exists a common misconception that courts, when presented with illegal contracts, follow the rule of non-enforcement. However, an examination of case law indicates that courts are instead concerned with the consequences of their choices, and have consistently followed …

State Of Georgia Order On Defendants Alan Yeager And Aes Claims Partners, Llc's Motion To Stay Proceedings And Compel Arbitration, Melvin K. Westmoreland

Superior Court of Fulton County: Metro Atlanta Business Case Division Opinions

No abstract provided.

Land Baron Invs. V. Bonnie Springs Family Lp, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 69 (Sept. 17, 2015), Rob Schmidt

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

This case is an appeal arising from a failed land sale contract. The Court considered three issues of first impression, holding that (1) when a party bears the risk, mutual mistake is not a basis for rescission; (2) an abuse of process claim may not be supported by a complaint to an administrative agency; (3) a nuisance claim seeking only emotional distress damages must be supported by proof of physical harm. Ultimately, The Court affirmed in part and reversed in part.

The Group Of 77 Draft Provisions Concerning Supplier Guarantees For The Proposed International Code Of Conduct On Transfer Of Technology, Kevin Conboy

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Brief Of Restitution And Remedies Scholars As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondent: Spokeo V. Robins, Doug Rendleman, Douglas Laycock, Mark P. Gergen

Scholarly Articles

Both consumer protection and restitution may be casualties in a collision with the constitutional law of standing.
/="/">
/="/">Spokeo collects information from the internet and publishes it; however, Spokeo neither verifies the facts nor confirms which same-named person it refers to. Robins alleges that Spokeo violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by disseminating false information about him. He seeks class certification and up to $1,000 in statutory minimum damages instead of compensatory damages. Spokeo argues that Robins lacks standing because he suffered no “injury in fact,” no “concrete harm.”
/="/">
/="/">Statutory minimum recoveries for defendants’ violations of plaintiffs’ …

Dikai Emporikai: A Response To Alberto Maffi, Mark J. Sundahl

Law Faculty Articles and Essays

No abstract provided.

Out Of Sight, Out Of Mind: Hidden Disclaimers And Ucc § 2-316’S Conspicuousness Requirement, Gavin Thole

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Caveat

Money now, terms later” agreements, or rolling contracts, are commonplace in consumer transactions. Courts frequently allow these agreements to stand. But problems arise when product manufacturers disclaim a warranty that protects consumers, such as the implied warranty of merchantability, without disclosing the disclaimer upfront—effectively rendering the warranty useless. Suppose, for example, a consumer purchases a refrigerator or computer where the implied warranty of merchantability disclaimer is printed on the last page of a thick instruction booklet. The booklet is hidden deep inside the box, buried in a morass of cords and paperwork. The consumer has no way of knowing about …

Contract Remedies In Action: Specific Performance, Yonathan A. Arbel

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Customized Procedure In Theory And Reality, W. Mark C. Weidemaier

Washington and Lee Law Review

Contract theory has long posited that parties can maximize contract value by manipulating the procedural rules that will apply if there is a dispute. Beyond choosing a litigation or arbitration forum, parties can allocate costs and fees, alter pleading standards, adjust evidentiary and discovery rules, and customize nearly every aspect of the adjudication process. In time, this theoretical insight became a matter of faith. The assumption that contracts routinely alter procedural rules spawned debate over the normative implications of allowing parties to dictate procedure. Only recently have a few studies suggested that this debate may lack a firm empirical foundation. …

Global Aerospace, Inc. Final Judgment And Order On Motions For Summary Judgment, Elizabeth E. Long

Superior Court of Fulton County: Metro Atlanta Business Case Division Opinions

No abstract provided.

Incorporating The Third Party Beneficiary Principle In Natural Resource Contracts, James T. Gathii

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Relief Under A Defective Municipal Contract In Ohio, George D. Vaubel

Akron Law Review

Th rapidly increasing tempo of concern for urban problems is giving rise to an ever-expanding range of literature devoted to their possible solution. Even in what might be considered a backwater of interest, the problems of municipal contracting, periodic examinations have taken place. Unfortunately, these have been undertaken almost exclusively by legal commentators, as most courts have been reluctant to make reassessments in a field in which the law at best must be considered to be largely an outgrowth of nineteenth century problems, thinking, and decisions. A recent case decided by the Ohio Supreme court, Pincelli v. Ohio Bridge Corp. …

Contracts Of Adhesion In Light Of The Bargain Hypothesis: An Introduction, Edward A. Dauer

Akron Law Review

In short, if Contract is viewed as a system of dealing with consensual obligations, then the premise of a bargain is both necessary and desirable. The difficulty is that under the current state of the law, operative facts sufficient to establish the existence of the requisite "bargain" often fall far short of guaranteeing the existence of real assent to the exchange. It is in this gap that the adhesive form contract, because it often removes the knowledge and choice essential to real assent, thrives best.

Constitutional Law And Secured Transactions: State Action V. Private Action - Uniform Commercial Code Self-Help; Repossession Provisions - Do Not Violate Due Process Requirements; Adams V. Southern California First National Bank, David M. Hunter

Akron Law Review

Several years ago, the United States Supreme Court, in Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp.,' signaled what has been eventually interpreted in subsequent decisions as the strict measurement of creditors' rights against the requirements of due process set forth in the fourteenth amendment. What has since transpired has been an onslaught of litigation in this area of such magnitude that the due process requirements of prior notice and hearing found in Sniadach have been extended to virtually all forms of prejudgment remedies available to the aggrieved creditor. Despite all of this, the rationale of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth …

Negotiable Instruments - Forged Indorsements - Liability Of Payor And Collecting Banks - Uniform Commercial Code §3-419; Cooper V. Union Bank, James A. Wagner

Akron Law Review

The holding in Cooper v. Union Bank' is based on the court's interpretation of Uniform Commercial Code (hereinafter Code) section 3-4192 and the application of this section to collecting and payor banks.

Joseph Stell brought an action in conversion s as payee and true owner to recover funds paid by defendant banks on checks cashed by Stell's secretary. The secretary forged plaintiff's indorsement on twenty-nine checks over a sixteen-month period, cashing the checks at both payor and collcting banks. In an opinion affirmed by the appellate court the trial court held that the defendant banks qualified as representatives, acted in …

From Hierarchies To Markets: Fedex Drivers And The Work Contract As Institutional Marker, Julia Tomassetti

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

Judges are often called upon today to determine whether certain workers are “employees” or “independent contractors.” The distinction is important, because only employees have rights under most statutes regulating work, including wage and hour, anti-discrimination, and collective bargaining law. Too often judges exclude workers from statutory protection who resemble what legal scholars have described as typical, industrial employees — long-term, full-time workers with set wages and routinized responsibilities within a large firm. To explain how courts reach these counterintuitive results, the article examines recent federal decisions finding that FedEx delivery drivers are independent contractors rather than employees. It argues that …

Wrongful Dishonor Under The Ucc: A Trip Through The Maze Of 4-402, David J. Leibson

Akron Law Review

WHEN MY NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS CLASS is ready to consider Section 4-402 of the Uniform Commercial Code, I always like to start out by asking if anyone would have worded the language differently had they been drafting the section. Usually one of the first responses is to the effect that 4-402 is fine just the way it is because a bank should be made to answer to its customer if it fails to honor a properly payable item drawn upon it. My response to such an answer is twofold. First, I wholeheartedly agree that a bank should be held responsible for …

A Look At A Strict Construction Of Section 2-207 Of The Uniform Commercial Code From The Seller's Point Of View Or What's So Bad About Roto-Lith?, Thomas E. Liggett

Akron Law Review

This is an examination of the workings of section 2-207 of the Uniform Commercial Code in the form contract between merchants. More specifically, the literal interpretation of the Section is to be investigated as to its effect on the practical formation of the sales contract A basic assumption of this comment is that the terms of the Code which may, under section 2-207 be "read into" a contract, are repugnant to the seller. This, I think, is obvious. It should, however, be kept in mind that, between merchants, both parties may be assumed to be "big boys." Therefore, the problem …

Contractual Wills: Misplaced Marital Loyalties: Eunsuing Litigation: Increased Federal Estate Taxes, Addison E. Dewey

Akron Law Review

A MYSTIFYING PLETHORA OF RECENT CASES indicates that husbands and and wives seem to be placing much more euphoric confidence in the judicial enforcement of their contractual wills than they do in unbargained-for assurances by the spouse that the provisions of such will never be changed. Many cases indicate that married couples feel that while mutual trust and confidence may be a revered tradition resulting from matrimonial bliss, they prefer to superimpose upon testamentary dispositions of their estates the common law concept of contract as an agreement which the courts will enforce. The repeated pattern of the various cases is …

Default Proceedings Under Article 9: Problems, Solutions, And Lessons To Be Learned, Leonard Lakin

Akron Law Review

This article will explore in detail the relevant Code provisions relating to default proceedings and the impact of the significant court decisions which have interpreted this most important area of secured transactions as well as the changes made by -the 1972 Official Text of Article 9, which has already been adopted in ten states as of this writing.

Ohio's Newest Consumer Protection: The Prepaid Entertainment Contract Act, Sandra S. Braden

Akron Law Review

The Prepaid Entertainment Contract Act is not complex in its drafting and should be readily understandable by the consumer in informing him of his rights under a future service contract. There are, however, several aspects of PECA which will require clarification. First, the definition of "first service" will present problems in construction if a practical application of the Act is to be realized. Second, the extent to which a violation of this Act constitutes a per se deceptive act under the Consumer Sales Practices Act may require interpretation.' Third, a proposed Trade Regulation Rule by the Federal Trade Commission concerning …

Disentangling Choice Of Law For Torts And Contracts, Rick Kirgis

Washington and Lee Law Review Online

In a federal system with state lines that are easily crossed, physically and electronically, legal disputes often raise choice-of-law issues. Common among those disputes are torts and contracts cases. The courts have taken a variety of approaches to these cases, leading to inconsistent results that depend largely on which forum the plaintiff selects. Judicial fairness and economy dictate, or should dictate, that the choice-of-law issues be resolvable consistently and without unnecessarily tying up the courts or imposing large litigation costs, if it can be done in a principled manner. This article shows how it could be done.

The Availability Of Benefit Of The Bargain Expectancy-Based Damages For Buyers Defrauded In California Real Estate Transactions, Laurence A. Steckman, Robert E. Conner, Kris Steckman Taylor

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Banks, Break-Ins, And Bad Actors In Mortgage Foreclosure, Christopher K. Odinet

Faculty Scholarship

During the housing crisis banks were confronted with a previously unknown number mortgage foreclosures, and even as the height of the crisis has passed lenders are still dealing with a tremendous backlog. Overtime lenders have increasingly engaged third party contractors to assist them in managing these assets. These property management companies — with supposed expertise in the management and preservation of real estate — have taken charge of a large swathe of distressed properties in order to ensure that, during the post-default and pre-foreclosure phases, the property is being adequately preserved and maintained. But in mid-2013 a flurry of articles …

Apartments And Houses: The Warranty Of Habitability, Walter H.E. Jaeger

Akron Law Review

“The trend towards greater consumer protection so evident in the products liability field is clearly discernible in the sale of new homes by the builder-vendor, and in the leasing of apartments by landlords. Some of the fundamental concepts of real property law, especially those which make no sense in modern society, have been, or are being, overruled and superseded by more enlightened and public policy-minded decisions of both the federal and state courts. It seems safe to predict that the warranty of habitability which governs the sale of new homes by the builder-vendor, adopted by a substantial majority of jurisdictions, …

Quasi In Rem Jurisdication; Minimum Contacts; State Statutes; Intermeat, Inc. V. American Poultry, Inc., John D. Frisby Jr.

Akron Law Review

"The decision of Intermeat, Inc. v. American Poultry, Inc. is the first decision rendered by a federal appeals court based on the United States Supreme Court decision of Shaffer v. Heitner. The Shaffer Court handed down a landmark decision in 1977 that appeared at first light to aim the principles of quasi in rem jurisdiction in a new direction. From the date of the decision it appeared that a court could no longer take jurisdiction of a lawsuit based merely on the fact that property of the defendant was located in the state in which the suit was filed. However, …