Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Torts (20)
- Commercial Law (14)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (13)
- Business Organizations Law (9)
- Intellectual Property Law (7)
-
- Legal Remedies (7)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (7)
- Computer Law (6)
- Courts (6)
- Law and Society (6)
- Consumer Protection Law (5)
- International Law (5)
- Law and Economics (5)
- Legal History (5)
- Securities Law (5)
- Banking and Finance Law (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (4)
- Internet Law (4)
- Civil Procedure (3)
- Common Law (3)
- Evidence (3)
- Property Law and Real Estate (3)
- Agency (2)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (2)
- Asian Studies (2)
- Bankruptcy Law (2)
- Civil Law (2)
- Conflict of Laws (2)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (21)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (10)
- Columbia Law School (9)
- Singapore Management University (9)
- Cornell University Law School (5)
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- UIC School of Law (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Barry University School of Law (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- West Virginia University (2)
- California Western School of Law (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Symposia (16)
- Contracts (15)
- Fault in Contract Law (15)
- Strict liability (11)
- Fault (10)
-
- Contract (9)
- Breach of contract (8)
- Damages (6)
- Willful breach (6)
- Contract law (5)
- Good faith (4)
- Liability (4)
- Negligence (4)
- Second Restatement of Contracts (4)
- Efficiency (3)
- Mitigation (3)
- No fault (3)
- Performance (3)
- Warranties (3)
- Agency costs (2)
- Class actions (2)
- Columbia Law Review (2)
- Commercial Law (2)
- Common law (2)
- Consent (2)
- Consumers (2)
- Contract design (2)
- Contract liability (2)
- Contract theory (2)
- Corporations (2)
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (19)
- Faculty Scholarship (16)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (9)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (5)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
-
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Cardozo Law Review (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- NYLS Law Review (3)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (3)
- Articles (2)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (2)
- Scholarly Publications (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- West Virginia Law Review (2)
- Working Paper Series (2)
- Architectural Engineering (1)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (1)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (1)
- Contributions to Books (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers (1)
- Court Decisions (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 121 of 121
Full-Text Articles in Contracts
Flipping The Script: Contra Proferentem And Standard Form Contracts, David Horton
Flipping The Script: Contra Proferentem And Standard Form Contracts, David Horton
University of Colorado Law Review
Virtually all modern contracts are standard forms. Although courts have long interpreted ambiguities in such agreements strictly against the drafter, they have struggled to explain why they do so. Under sustained academic fire, states are beginning to abandon the strict against-the-drafter doctrine. Recent cases have even refused to certify class actions on the grounds that a corporate defendant's nonnegotiated, unilaterally-dictated contract is ambiguous and thus cannot be construed without individualized extrinsic evidence. This Article claims that the rejection of the strict against-the-drafter rule stems from confusion about its normative foundation. Judges and commentators have offered three rationales for the doctrine: …