Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Torts (153)
- Property Law and Real Estate (142)
- Estates and Trusts (108)
- Constitutional Law (107)
- Insurance Law (106)
-
- Banking and Finance Law (96)
- Evidence (86)
- Bankruptcy Law (80)
- Commercial Law (79)
- Labor and Employment Law (77)
- Securities Law (61)
- Family Law (54)
- Criminal Law (51)
- State and Local Government Law (49)
- Jurisdiction (47)
- Litigation (46)
- Law and Economics (41)
- Transportation Law (41)
- Agency (40)
- Legal Remedies (37)
- Business Organizations Law (35)
- Courts (32)
- Tax Law (32)
- Common Law (30)
- Conflict of Laws (30)
- Legal History (28)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (23)
- Land Use Law (22)
- Keyword
-
- Liability (44)
- Fraud (42)
- Breach of contract (37)
- Negligence (34)
- Michigan (28)
-
- Obligations (23)
- Conveyances (18)
- Intent (18)
- Uniform Commercial Code (17)
- Minnesota (16)
- Mortgages (16)
- Symposia (16)
- Fault in Contract Law (15)
- Performance (15)
- Boilerplate: Foundations of Market Contracts Symposium (13)
- Breaches of contract (13)
- Wisconsin (13)
- Default (12)
- New York (12)
- Fault (11)
- Good faith (11)
- Recovery (11)
- Restitution (11)
- Strict liability (11)
- Statute of frauds (10)
- Void (10)
- Arbitration (9)
- Book reviews (9)
- Breach (9)
- Damages (9)
- Publication Year
Articles 391 - 420 of 846
Full-Text Articles in Contracts
Contracts - Sales - Effect Of Reasonable Belief In Buyer's Insolvency On Seller's Duty To Perform, W. Wallace Kent
Contracts - Sales - Effect Of Reasonable Belief In Buyer's Insolvency On Seller's Duty To Perform, W. Wallace Kent
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff ordered goods from the defendant, for immediate delivery, terms $1,500 down, balance covered by notes of three and six months. The check given for the down payment was dishonored because of insufficient funds but was subsequently honored. On investigation the defendant discovered that there were unpaid judgments outstanding against the plaintiff, some of which were upwards of three years old. Inferring that the plaintiff was insolvent, the defendant refused to deliver the goods unless cash was paid therefor and when plaintiff refused this offer defendant attempted to return the down payment. Held, plaintiff's affairs were in such …
Public Policies Underlying The Law Of Mental Incompetency, Milton D. Green
Public Policies Underlying The Law Of Mental Incompetency, Milton D. Green
Michigan Law Review
Mental incompetency, or legal insanity, has usually been studied in the patchquilt fashion. It appears as a sub-heading of incidental interest in such widely diversified subjects as crimes, contracts, domestic relations, torts and wills. It can, however, be conceived of as a single strand in the seamless web. So viewed, it may appear to wind in and out of the various artificial subdivisions of the law, cutting across each at one particular place or another. And so conceived, it can be studied according to the second and less orthodox method of analysis. Few are the isolated areas in the law …
Corporations - Preincorporation Contracts Of Promoters And Incorporators - Effect Of Statute On Personal Liability Of Incorporators, Roy L. Rogers
Corporations - Preincorporation Contracts Of Promoters And Incorporators - Effect Of Statute On Personal Liability Of Incorporators, Roy L. Rogers
Michigan Law Review
It seems difficult to draw such a conclusion directly from the terms of the statute. Indeed, the section is not very definite as to the liability either of the incorporators or of the corporation on contracts of the designated class. However, in Hart Potato Growers' Association v. Grenier, it was intimated that this section made the corporation liable upon the contracts of the incorporators immediately upon incorporation. Toward this conclusion certain provisions of the section are rather persuasive. The clause providing that all property held by the incorporators for the benefit of the corporation shall be deemed to be …
Vendor And Purchaser-Vendor's Release Of Sub-Assignee Held A Discharge Of All Prior Assignees, Robert M. Warren
Vendor And Purchaser-Vendor's Release Of Sub-Assignee Held A Discharge Of All Prior Assignees, Robert M. Warren
Michigan Law Review
The bank for which plaintiff is receiver sold land on contract. There followed four successive assignments of the vendee's interest, in each of which the assignee expressly assumed the contract obligation. After the fourth assignment, default occurred as to payments and taxes, and plaintiff began negotiations to sell the property to an intermediate assignee, R. To effectuate this sale, plaintiff procured an assignment in blank from the fourth assignee, W, in consideration of a release of W from further liability on the contract. The negotiations with R having failed, plaintiff brought suit against the vendee and all the …
Contracts - Assignment - Authority To Pay Out Of A Particular Fund, Michigan Law Review
Contracts - Assignment - Authority To Pay Out Of A Particular Fund, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff had a contract to receive a commission from the defendant based on the number of shares of stock sold by the defendant. Plaintiff subsequently made an agreement with Gray in which it was stipulated, "that the first $2,500 received by the said George Allardyce [plaintiff] shall be given to John C. Gray, and the said George Allardyce hereby gives the said Dart & Company [defendant] authority to issue a check to John C. Gray in that amount." Because the state securities commission authorized fewer shares of stock for sale than was anticipated, plaintiff's commission amounted to only $2,250. Defendant's …
Contracts - Third Party Beneficiary - Power Of Promisee To Discharge Promisor - Necessity For Consideration, Roy L. Rogers
Contracts - Third Party Beneficiary - Power Of Promisee To Discharge Promisor - Necessity For Consideration, Roy L. Rogers
Michigan Law Review
Stanfield recovered judgment against W. C. McBride, Inc. for personal injuries suffered in an automobile accident which was occasioned by the negligence of Strunk, employee of the McBride company, who at the time of the accident was driving (with the owner's consent) an automobile owned by the Miller-Morgan Auto Company. The McBride company in turn recovered a judgment against its employee, Strunk, and now as garnishor seeks to reach an insurance policy issued to the Miller-Morgan company which at the time of its issuance contained an omnibus clause insuring all persons driving the insured car with the consent of the …
Damages - Contracts - Recovery For Mental Suffering, G. Randall Price
Damages - Contracts - Recovery For Mental Suffering, G. Randall Price
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff bought a loaf of bread at defendant's bakery. After she had eaten half of one of the slices, plaintiff discovered a dead cockroach near the upper crust of the bread whereupon she became ill and suffered serious emotional disturbances. Held, no recovery for mental suffering arising out of breach of an implied warranty of wholesomeness. Wheeler v. Balestri, (Mass. 1939) 23N.E. (2d) 132.
Contracts - Discharge - Accord And Satisfaction With A Third Person, W. Wallace Kent
Contracts - Discharge - Accord And Satisfaction With A Third Person, W. Wallace Kent
Michigan Law Review
Action by P against D on an alleged oral promise to pay a debt owed to P by D's mother. P had agreed to discharge the mother from liability. There was no direct evidence that the mother was a party to the transaction. Apparently the defense was that D's promise was within the statute of frauds if the agreement to discharge was executory, or, if it was executed, that there was no consideration for D's promise because the discharge of D's mother was not legally binding since it was an accord and satisfaction with a third …
Contracts - Wills - Third Party Beneficiary Contract As Testamentary Disposition, Harold M. Street
Contracts - Wills - Third Party Beneficiary Contract As Testamentary Disposition, Harold M. Street
Michigan Law Review
The defendant executed a bond and mortgage to one Catherine McCarthy Jackman. Subsequently the parties entered into an extension agreement wherein it was provided that in the event of the death of the mortgagee prior to the .maturity of the mortgage, the interest and principal were to be paid one-half to a brother of the mortgagee and one-half to the heirs of a deceased sister. After the death of the mortgagee prior to the maturity of the mortgage, the plaintiffs (the brother and heirs of the deceased sister) claimed a right to the payment of interest as third party beneficiaries. …
Municipal Corporations - Liability For Services Performed Under Invalid Contract, Michigan Law Review
Municipal Corporations - Liability For Services Performed Under Invalid Contract, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff was employed by the board of overseers of defendant city to supervise obtaining employment for recipients of welfare relief, thus relieving the city of the expense of providing for them. The powers of the board were restricted by an ordinance which provided that before any increase should be made in the number of subordinates, a report thereof would be sent to the mayor for his approval. It appeared that the original employment of the plaintiff was in violation of this provision, although the mayor subsequently approved it up to April 5, 1936, when plaintiff's civil service appointment expired. Plaintiff …
Contracts - Illegality - Collateral Agreements Under Home Owners' Loan Act, Roy L. Steinheimer
Contracts - Illegality - Collateral Agreements Under Home Owners' Loan Act, Roy L. Steinheimer
Michigan Law Review
In transactions under the Home Owners' Loan Act it is customary for the holder of the mortgage on the property on which a new loan is sought to agree with the H. O. L. C. to accept in full settlement of his claim bonds of the H. O. L. C. of a face value often times less than the amount of the obligation secured by the old mortgage. However, not infrequently the mortgagee also exacts from the home owner a collateral agreement under which the home owner gives him a new second mortgage on the property as security for an …
Labor Law - Collective Agreements- Validity After Change Of Union Affiliation By Employees, William F. Andersen
Labor Law - Collective Agreements- Validity After Change Of Union Affiliation By Employees, William F. Andersen
Michigan Law Review
Among the problems raised in magnified form by the AFL-CIO schism is the determination of rights and duties under a collective agreement when there is a change in affiliation of the members of the union which negotiated the agreement. Suppose that union A, as sole bargaining representative for the employees in the particular unit, has negotiated an agreement with the employer, that thereafter a majority of union A shift their allegiance to union B. Does the agreement continue to canter rights upon employees who have changed their affiliation? Upon the employees who have not changed their affiliation? This …
Eminent Domain - Covenants - Violation Of Building Restrictions By Exercise Of Public Authority - Necessity For Compensation, Edmund R. Blaske
Eminent Domain - Covenants - Violation Of Building Restrictions By Exercise Of Public Authority - Necessity For Compensation, Edmund R. Blaske
Michigan Law Review
It is the purpose of this comment to examine the contract and the property theories of restrictive covenants; and to suggest other possible grounds upon which to decide whether or not a public agency should compensate owners in the subdivision for interference with their restrictive covenants.
Quasi-Contracts -- Unsolicited Performance Of A Statutory Duty, Edward S. Biggar
Quasi-Contracts -- Unsolicited Performance Of A Statutory Duty, Edward S. Biggar
Michigan Law Review
An Indiana statute required county officers to publish reports of public business in two newspapers, representing the leading political parties of the county. Plaintiff, one of the two newspapers in Decatur county, printed the required notices without first obtaining official authorization. After defendant had disallowed the claim for this service, plaintiff appealed to the circuit court, there obtaining a verdict. Defendant appealed from the denial of its motion for a new trial. Held, that plaintiff had performed an obligation created by law and was entitled to recover on quasi-contract principles. On motion for rehearing, defendant urged the statute prohibiting recovery …
Contracts - Vendor's Agreement Not To Compete - Construction Of The Areement, Michigan Law Review
Contracts - Vendor's Agreement Not To Compete - Construction Of The Areement, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A South Carolina statute prohibited labor of employees in enumerated manufacturing and mercantile establishments for more than fifty-six hours per week or more than twelve hours in any one day. Plaintiffs were druggists who brought suit to restrain the commissioner of labor from enforcing the statute. A temporary restraining order was issued and the commissioner of labor appealed. Held, the statute was unconstitutional as in violation of the due process and equal protection clauses in both state and federal constitutions. Gasque, Inc. v. Nates, (S. C. 1939) 2 S. E. (2d) 36.
Limitation Of Actions - What Is A "Written" Contract Within Statute?, Michigan Law Review
Limitation Of Actions - What Is A "Written" Contract Within Statute?, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff sued on a clause in a deed in which the grantee assumed and agreed to pay a mortgage indebtedness therein specified. This obligation in the deed, being unsigned by the party to be charged, was held to be an unwritten contract by the lower court, and therefore barred by the six-year statute of limitations. Plaintiff appealed. Held, the contract, though unsigned by the party to be charged, was "in writing," and therefore the statutory fifteen-year period of limitations applied. McCormick v. Taft, (Ohio App. 1938) 22 N. E. (2d) 510.
Contracts - Measure Of Damages For Anticipatory Breach Of Contract For Future Delivery Of Goods Having A Futures Market, Ralph E. Helper
Contracts - Measure Of Damages For Anticipatory Breach Of Contract For Future Delivery Of Goods Having A Futures Market, Ralph E. Helper
Michigan Law Review
Defendant agreed to buy part of plaintiff's annual crop of hops for three years. Several months before the first delivery was due, defendant repudiated. Held, the measure of damages was the difference between the contract price and the market price at the time of repudiation, rather than at the times delivery was called for in the contract. Renner Co. v. McNeff Bros., (C. C. A. 6th, 1939) 102 F. (2d) 664.
Bankruptcy - Corporate Reorganization - Validity Of Process Outside Territorial Confines Of Federal District Court, Edmund O'Hare
Bankruptcy - Corporate Reorganization - Validity Of Process Outside Territorial Confines Of Federal District Court, Edmund O'Hare
Michigan Law Review
Debtor corporation had contracted with defendant, operator of a retail store, whereby defendant agreed to sell debtor's products exclusively and to buy all of his supplies from debtor. While debtor was in the course of section 77 B reorganization proceedings, defendant refused to continue to comply with the contract, Defendant resided and did business in the same state and federal judicial circuit in which the reorganization court was located, but not within the territorial confines of the court, nor was process served upon defendant within the court's territorial jurisdiction. Debtor moved for specific performance of the contract. Held, debtor's …
Contracts - Anticipatory Breach - Right To Recover In Advance On A Unilateral Obligation To Pay Money, John M. Ulman
Contracts - Anticipatory Breach - Right To Recover In Advance On A Unilateral Obligation To Pay Money, John M. Ulman
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff brought suit on an accident insurance policy. He alleged that the defendant insurer wholly repudiated the policy and informed plaintiff that it would not in any event pay him the monthly indemnity according to the terms of the policy even though a doctor of its own choice advised that the plaintiff was permanently disabled. Held, that under the Texas law, when one who is obligated by contract to make money payments to another absolutely repudiates and abandons the obligation without just excuse, the obligee is entitled to maintain his action in damages at once for the entire breach. …
Principal And Agent - Liability Of Agent On A Written Contract In His Own Name, Henry L. Pitts
Principal And Agent - Liability Of Agent On A Written Contract In His Own Name, Henry L. Pitts
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff, a football coach, entered into a written contract with the defendant whereby the plaintiff was employed to act as coach and director of athletics for a period of ten years at any college in the city of New Orleans designated by the defendant. In the event of non-employment of the plaintiff by any of such colleges, the plaintiff was to advise the defendant in any athletic matters with which the defendant might be concerned. The defendant covenanted to pay a stipulated salary. In pursuance of this contract, the plaintiff served as coach at Loyola University in New Orleans …
Sales - Implied Warranties Running To Ultimate Consumer - Is Privity Of Contract Necessary?, William K. Jackson
Sales - Implied Warranties Running To Ultimate Consumer - Is Privity Of Contract Necessary?, William K. Jackson
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff's husband purchased from defendant, a large retailer, minced ham and liverwurst manufactured by another concern. Plaintiff with other members of the family became ill after eating the liverwurst. An appeal was taken from a directed verdict for defendant. Held, when food is sold, there is no implied warranty of wholesomeness running from the retailer to the ultimate consumer; for the remedy is based on contract and limited to parties and privies thereto. Borucki v. MacKenzie Bros. Co., Inc., (Conn. 1938) 3 A. (2d) 224.
Contracts - Consideration - The Rule Of Foakes V. Beer Discarded, Arthur A. Greene Jr.
Contracts - Consideration - The Rule Of Foakes V. Beer Discarded, Arthur A. Greene Jr.
Michigan Law Review
In an action on a promissory note, by an indorsee who was not a holder in due course, the defendant pleaded the following facts. In 1930 the payee held the promissory note of the defendant, who was known to be hopelessly insolvent. An agreement was thereupon made and executed between the payee, the plaintiff and defendant, whereby the plaintiff agreed to purchase the note from the payee in exchange for his automobile. The defendant in turn agreed to turn over to the plaintiff certain livestock or produce, to pay a certain balance in cash, and also to pay the license …
The Legal Significance Of Labor Contracts Under The National Labor Relations Act, William Gorham Rice Jr.
The Legal Significance Of Labor Contracts Under The National Labor Relations Act, William Gorham Rice Jr.
Michigan Law Review
The National Labor Relations Act was passed, as it declares in its first section, to encourage "the practice and procedure of collective bargaining'' and to give workers freedom to designate "representatives of their own choosing, for the purpose of negotiating the terms and conditions of their employment"; and the last of the unfair labor practices named in section 8 is for an employer "to refuse to bargain collectively." Bargaining and negotiating, the National Labor Relations Board has repeatedly declared, must be done in good faith. Discussion is not true negotiation or bargaining. For the employer to bargain in good faith …
Contracts -- Right Of A Physician To Recover On An Implied-In-Fact Contract, Seward R. Stroud
Contracts -- Right Of A Physician To Recover On An Implied-In-Fact Contract, Seward R. Stroud
Michigan Law Review
At one time, under the Roman civil law, neither a physician nor an advocate could recover in an ordinary action at law for services rendered. The philosophical interpretation put upon such services was that, each case being sui generis both as to the value of the service to the patient and as to the skill and attainment required of the physician, a fixed and invariable salary could not be predicated upon this basis and therefore the compensation must depend upon the case. This compensation was not a matter of right but a gratuity or honorarium, as it was called, paid …
Contracts - Third Party Beneficiary - Right Of Promisor To Set Off Claim Againt Promisee In A Suit By Beneficiary, Arthur A. Greene Jr.
Contracts - Third Party Beneficiary - Right Of Promisor To Set Off Claim Againt Promisee In A Suit By Beneficiary, Arthur A. Greene Jr.
Michigan Law Review
A and B mortgaged real estate to the plaintiff to secure their notes aggregating $9,000. Six months later A and B exchanged this property to the defendant for certain real estate owned by her. By the deed the defendant assumed the mortgage indebtedness owed to the plaintiff. As a further consideration for the exchange, A and B executed a note for $13,050 to the defendant. The plaintiff instituted this action against A and B, seeking to recover the balance, and by amended petition joined the defendant. The defendant claimed the right of set-off on the uncollected judgment against A …
Statute Of Frauds - Estoppel At Law As A Substitute For Part Performance In Equity, John M. Ulman
Statute Of Frauds - Estoppel At Law As A Substitute For Part Performance In Equity, John M. Ulman
Michigan Law Review
In 1930, plaintiff, as administratrix, mortgaged real estate to defendant. In 1933, plaintiff acquiesced in a foreclosure by defendant in pursuance of an oral agreement between the parties whereby it was understood that defendant would convey the land to plaintiff individually to hold for herself and others, plaintiff to give to defendant another mortgage for the same amount and to pay the costs. Defendant obtained title by foreclosure in March, 1934. Extensive repairs and improvements were made by plaintiff between September, 1934 and the spring of 1935. In October, 1934, defendant gave notice to plaintiff that it would not be …
Contracts - Restraint Of Trade - Legality Of Covenant Restricting Use Of Land By The Purchaser Where No Goodwill Transferred, Thomas K. Fisher
Contracts - Restraint Of Trade - Legality Of Covenant Restricting Use Of Land By The Purchaser Where No Goodwill Transferred, Thomas K. Fisher
Michigan Law Review
Defendants' intestate, who owned large interests in two lime companies operating in Washington and California, entered into a contract for the sale of a tract of land to plaintiff's predecessor in title. The contract contained a restrictive covenant to the effect that the grantee, or those claiming under him, would not use any of the limerock in said land for the purpose of making lime. Subsequently the grantor died, and the conveyance and execution of a deed, which included within its provisions the restrictive covenant, were made by the administrator of grantor's estate, pursuant to court order. Plaintiff brought an …
Contracts - Assignment Of A Debt Arising Under A Contract To Be Made In The Future, Stanton J. Schuman
Contracts - Assignment Of A Debt Arising Under A Contract To Be Made In The Future, Stanton J. Schuman
Michigan Law Review
The M Milk Co. was negotiating a sale of its business to the defendant, who did not want to purchase the business unless M Co. could deliver the personal property free of incumbrances. G, who held a mortgage on these properties, was present at the first negotiations between M Co. and the defendant, and at this time he released his mortgage in consideration of an assignment to him by M Co. of all the debts now due or to become due to it. Shortly thereafter a sale of the property was negotiated to the defendant, the result of which …
Contracts - Illegality - Right Of Surety Of Bank Officer To Recover Embezzled Bank Funds Lost In Gambling, James W. Mehaffy
Contracts - Illegality - Right Of Surety Of Bank Officer To Recover Embezzled Bank Funds Lost In Gambling, James W. Mehaffy
Michigan Law Review
A, president of B bank in South Dakota, embezzled funds which he used in trading in grain futures with D, a broker. Neither A nor D intended any actual delivery of the grain. P, surety for A, after having paid the bank for A's defalcation, sued D to recover the money A lost. Held, P can recover. Burke Grain Co. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., (C. C. A. 8th, 1938) 94 F. (2d) 458.
Fixtures - Uniform Conditional Sales Act - Interpretation Of The Word "Freehold", Robert E. Sipes
Fixtures - Uniform Conditional Sales Act - Interpretation Of The Word "Freehold", Robert E. Sipes
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff installed elevators in an apartment house under construction. The elevators were covered by a conditional sale contract with the general contractor. Prior to the sale of the elevators the apartment house had been mortgaged. Upon the contractor's default in payment for the elevators, plaintiff asserted his right to remove the elevators as against the owner of the apartment and the mortgagee. Held, the elevators could be removed. Otis Elevator Co. v. Arey-Hauser Co., (D. C. Pa. 1938) 22 F. Supp. 4.