Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (188)
- University of Colorado Law School (81)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (54)
- Pepperdine University (33)
- DePaul University (25)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (25)
- University of Georgia School of Law (17)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (16)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (13)
- BLR (11)
- Singapore Management University (8)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (7)
- UIC School of Law (7)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (7)
- Saint Joseph University of Beirut (6)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (6)
- University of Missouri School of Law (6)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (6)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (6)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (5)
- Pace University (5)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (5)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (5)
- American University in Cairo (4)
- Roger Williams University (4)
- University of Miami Law School (4)
- University of Washington School of Law (4)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Brooklyn Law School (3)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- Arbitration (95)
- Contracts (63)
- Dispute resolution (29)
- United States (27)
- Federal Arbitration Act (24)
-
- Dispute Resolution (23)
- Law (20)
- Contract (19)
- Litigation (16)
- California (14)
- Colorado (14)
- Colorado River (14)
- ADR (13)
- Contract law (13)
- Courts (13)
- New Mexico (13)
- Arbitration agreements (12)
- Economics (12)
- Mediation (12)
- Alternative dispute resolution (11)
- Arizona (11)
- International Law (11)
- Remedies (11)
- Arbitration contracts (10)
- Commercial Law (10)
- Contract terms (10)
- Jurisdiction (10)
- Secretary of the Interior (10)
- Supreme Court (10)
- Arbitration clauses (9)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (188)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (37)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (26)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (25)
- Water Resources Allocation: Laws and Emerging Issues: A Short Course (Summer Conference, June 8-11) (23)
-
- Scholarly Works (17)
- Public Lands Mineral Leasing: Issues and Directions (Summer Conference, June 10-11) (16)
- Articles (13)
- Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource (Summer Conference, June 5-7) (13)
- Faculty Scholarship (13)
- Navigating the Future of the Colorado River (Martz Summer Conference, June 8-10) (13)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (12)
- Michigan Law Review (12)
- ExpressO (10)
- Natural Gas Symposium: Contract Solutions for the Future of Regulatory Environment (March 24-25) (10)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (8)
- Touro Law Review (8)
- Faculty Publications (6)
- Faculty Works (6)
- Pepperdine Law Review (6)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (6)
- Publications (6)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (5)
- Oklahoma Law Review (5)
- UIC Law Review (5)
- Cardozo Law Review (4)
- LLM Theses and Essays (4)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (4)
- Theses and Dissertations (4)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (4)
- Publication Type
Articles 511 - 540 of 631
Full-Text Articles in Contracts
The (Pre) (As) Sumed "Consent" Of Commercial Binding Arbitration Contracts: An Empirical Study Of Attitudes And Expectations Of Transactional Lawyers, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 589 (2003), Celeste M. Hammond
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Fiction Of Freedom Of Contract - Nursing Home Admission Contract Arbitration Agreements: A Primer On Preserving The Right Of Access To Court Under Florida Law, Robert Hornstein
The Fiction Of Freedom Of Contract - Nursing Home Admission Contract Arbitration Agreements: A Primer On Preserving The Right Of Access To Court Under Florida Law, Robert Hornstein
St. Thomas Law Review
The primary purpose of this article is to provide a litigation paradigm on how the use of compelled nursing home arbitration agreements in Florida can be successfully challenged and a patient's right of access to the courts preserved. This article includes an examination of the use of compelled arbitration agreements under Florida law and their treatment by the courts. It also includes an analysis of how Florida's courts have generally responded to the widespread use of arbitration provisions. Further, it contains a review of the defenses available under Florida law that can be used to defend against compelled arbitration provisions. …
Agreeing To Disagree: A Balanced Solution To Whether Parties May Contract For Expanded Judicial Review Beyond The Faa, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1005 (2003), Anthony J. Longo
Agreeing To Disagree: A Balanced Solution To Whether Parties May Contract For Expanded Judicial Review Beyond The Faa, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1005 (2003), Anthony J. Longo
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Contractarian Economics And Mediation Ethics: The Case For Customizing Neutrality Through Contingent Fee Mediation, Scott R. Peppet
Contractarian Economics And Mediation Ethics: The Case For Customizing Neutrality Through Contingent Fee Mediation, Scott R. Peppet
Publications
No abstract provided.
Renegotiation And Adaptation Of International Investment Contracts, Klaus P. Berger
Renegotiation And Adaptation Of International Investment Contracts, Klaus P. Berger
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
In modern-day international investment practice, especially in connection with the exploitation of natural resources, Production Sharing Agreements have come to take over the role of the classic concession agreement. Like their predecessors, these contracts are particularly vulnerable to disturbances in the commercial balance agreed to, or assumed by, the parties at the conclusion of the contract. This vulnerability has three primary causes.
First, these are classic examples of long term contracts. In the petroleum industry, the commitment of significant capital for exploration, particularly in development, and the assumption of considerable risk, particularly in exploration, require contracts covering up to and …
Transactional Mediation: Using Mediators In Deals, Scott Peppet
Transactional Mediation: Using Mediators In Deals, Scott Peppet
Publications
This article addresses whether third-party mediators could be helpful in deal-making, just as they are in resolving disputes. It makes a theoretical case for such use of mediators and presents preliminary evidence that transactional mediation already is taking place.
"Show Me The Money": In Lucrative Sports Contracts, An Adr Clause Makes All The Difference, Peter A. Carfagna
"Show Me The Money": In Lucrative Sports Contracts, An Adr Clause Makes All The Difference, Peter A. Carfagna
Articles
No abstract provided.
Securities Regulation As Lobster Trap: A Credible Commitment Theory Of Mandatory Disclosure, Edward Rock
Securities Regulation As Lobster Trap: A Credible Commitment Theory Of Mandatory Disclosure, Edward Rock
Cardozo Law Review
What functions does the existing mandatory disclosure system serve? In this Article, I argue that the existing SEC system can be understood as providing issuers with a mechanism for making a credible commitment to high quality, comprehensive disclosure for an indefinite period into the future. This credible commitment device is particularly useful to new domestic issuers and to foreign issuers seeking to tap the U.S. capital markets. This credible commitment justification explains the striking but little discussed practical and formal asymmetry between the ease of entry into the SEC system and the difficulty of exit from it. I then consider …
Should The Law Ignore Commercial Norms? A Comment On The Bernstein Conjuncture And Its Relevance For Contract Law Theory And Reform, Jason Scott Johnston
Should The Law Ignore Commercial Norms? A Comment On The Bernstein Conjuncture And Its Relevance For Contract Law Theory And Reform, Jason Scott Johnston
Michigan Law Review
Professor Bernstein's study of the interaction between private law and norms in the cotton industry is the latest installment in her ongoing investigation into the relationship between law and norms in trades ranging from the diamond market to grain and feed markets. Her incredibly detailed and thorough exploration of private lawmaking and commercial norms - and their interaction - stands as one of the most significant contributions to contract and commercial law scholarship made in the last half-century. The cotton industry study upon which I focus in this Comment not only reports fascinating findings about dispute resolution practices, but also …
Private Commercial Law In The Cotton Industry: Creating Cooperation Through Rules, Norms, And Institutions, Lisa Bernstein
Private Commercial Law In The Cotton Industry: Creating Cooperation Through Rules, Norms, And Institutions, Lisa Bernstein
Michigan Law Review
The cotton industry has almost entirely opted out of the public legal system, replacing it with one of the oldest and most complex systems of private commercial law. Most contracts for the purchase andsale of domestic cotton, between merchants or between merchants andmills, are neither consummated under the Uniform Commercial Code("Code") nor interpreted and enforced in court when disputes arise. Rather, most such contracts are concluded under one of several privately drafted sets of contract default rules and are subject to arbitration in one of several merchant tribunals. Similarly, most international sales of cotton are governed neither by state-supplied legal …
When Do Rights Arise Under The Contracts (Rights Of Third Parties) Act 1999 (Uk)?, Tiong Min Yeo
When Do Rights Arise Under The Contracts (Rights Of Third Parties) Act 1999 (Uk)?, Tiong Min Yeo
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
There are two aspects to the common law doctrine of privity of contract. The first, that a contract cannot impose liabilities on a third party, is not very controversial. The second, that in general a contract can only confer rights on parties to the contract even if it is clearly the intention of the contracting parties to benefit a third party, is highly controversial, and has been the subject of much judicial criticism.
Reinventing The Deal: A Sequential Approach To Analyzing Claims For Enforcement Of Modified Sales Contracts, Irma S. Russell
Reinventing The Deal: A Sequential Approach To Analyzing Claims For Enforcement Of Modified Sales Contracts, Irma S. Russell
Faculty Works
This article explores the legal and economic complexities surrounding the enforcement of modified sales contracts under Section 2-209 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). While contract modification allows parties to adapt agreements to changing circumstances, courts have struggled with the absence of a consistent standard for determining when such modifications should be enforced. The discussion critiques the ambiguity of the UCC’s “good faith” requirement and the unpredictability it creates in judicial decision-making. To address these issues, the article proposes a “sequential approach” that examines each stage of the modification process, requiring the initiating party to demonstrate reasonable grounds for seeking …
Fighting Arbitration Clauses In Franchisor Contracts, Jean R. Sternlight
Fighting Arbitration Clauses In Franchisor Contracts, Jean R. Sternlight
Scholarly Works
Purporting to serve justice, efficiency, and freedom of contract, business interests are increasingly attempting to use binding arbitration clauses to secure unfair advantages over unknowing parties. Courts seemingly have been eager to enforce arbitration clauses that appear in franchise agreements. This article discusses courts’ enforcement of arbitration clauses, undermining protections to the franchisee, and how franchisees can create a more level playing field.
Protecting Franchisees From Abusive Arbitration Clauses, Jean R. Sternlight
Protecting Franchisees From Abusive Arbitration Clauses, Jean R. Sternlight
Scholarly Works
This article sets out a number of legal arguments that franchisees can potentially use to defeat arbitration clauses that seek to accomplish ends that would not be permissible in litigation. Drawing from decisions protecting consumers and employees from unfair arbitration clauses, as well as from opinions in the franchise context, this article analyzes arguments that can be based on the U.S. Constitution, federal statutes, state statutes, and common law. By way of this analysis, it suggests that some courts are misapplying arbitration precedents and preemption arguments to support decisions that allow franchisors to effectively exempt themselves from legislation and even …
Mandatory Arbitration: Bane Or Boon?, Theodore St. Antoine
Mandatory Arbitration: Bane Or Boon?, Theodore St. Antoine
Other Publications
Buy a new car that turns out to be a lemon and you may find you can't sue. Fine print in the sales contract often restricts you to arbitration. That means presenting your case before a private person instead of a judge and jury. And the arbitrator may be someone drawn from a panel compiled by the car seller.
Presidential Address: Contract Reading Revisited, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Presidential Address: Contract Reading Revisited, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Book Chapters
A quarter century ago, in a presentation at the Academy’s annual meeting, I used the phrase “contract reader” to characterize the role an arbitrator plays in construing a collective bargaining agreement. That two-word phrase may be the only thing I ever said before this body which has been remembered. Unfortunately, it is almost invariably misunderstood. Time and again members have reproached me: “What’s the big deal about contract reading, anyway? Isn’t it just the same as contract interpretation?” Or, more substantively scathing: “Do you really think, Ted, that all you have to do to interpret a labor agreement is to …
Arbitration, Labor Contracts, And The Ada: The Benefits Of Pre-Dispute Arbitration Agreements And An Update On The Conflict Between The Duty To Accommodate And Seniority Rights, Jan William Sturner
Arbitration, Labor Contracts, And The Ada: The Benefits Of Pre-Dispute Arbitration Agreements And An Update On The Conflict Between The Duty To Accommodate And Seniority Rights, Jan William Sturner
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Involuntary Sale: Banishing An Owner From The Condominium Community, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 429 (1998), Michael C. Kim
Involuntary Sale: Banishing An Owner From The Condominium Community, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 429 (1998), Michael C. Kim
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Interpretation Of The Remedial Provisions Of The Cisg, Evelina Wilhelmina Innocentia Visser
The Interpretation Of The Remedial Provisions Of The Cisg, Evelina Wilhelmina Innocentia Visser
LLM Theses and Essays
The drafting process of the most successful international uniform law of the last decades, the 1980 United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG) reflected that in order to become a set of "well-balanced subsidiary rules," international uniform must be drafted and implemented carefully. It is essential that an international uniform law is adapted to diverse cultures. The different needs and demands of the varied socio-economic systems and legal structures, perceptions, procedures, and cultures of the distinct legal systems of this world are a main and omnipresent consideration and must be capable of absorbing the unified law. Either …
Aspects Of The Uncitral Regimes For Procurement And For International Commercial Arbitration, And Government International Commercial Contracts In The Commonwealth Caribbean, Hugh A. Rawlins
Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy
No abstract provided.
The Use Of Mediation And Arbitration For Resolving Family Conflicts: What Lawyers Think About Them, Mary Kay Kisthardt
The Use Of Mediation And Arbitration For Resolving Family Conflicts: What Lawyers Think About Them, Mary Kay Kisthardt
Faculty Works
The use of alternative methods for resolving family conflict has increased significantly in the past few years, but many attorneys are still wary. In an effort to discover some of the sources of this hesitation as well as identify support for "alternative" processes, the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers surveyed its members concerning the use of dispute resolution methods. The purpose of this study was to ascertain attorneys' perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of the two most commonly used alternative dispute resolution mechanisms: mediation and arbitration. Whether clients will continue to use these methods depends in great part on …
Gateway Widens Doorway To Imposing Unfair Binding Arbitration On Consumers, Jean R. Sternlight
Gateway Widens Doorway To Imposing Unfair Binding Arbitration On Consumers, Jean R. Sternlight
Scholarly Works
Hill v. Gateway, is but the most extreme example of a series of court decisions that allow large companies to impose potentially unfair binding arbitration agreements on unwitting consumers. The outcome in Gateway, however, is questionable on federal statutory, common law, and constitutional grounds.
Maximizing Mediation And Arbitration Opportunities, Oregon Law Institute, William M. Mcallister, Sam J. Imperati, Richard G. Spier, Noreen K. Saltviet, Eric B. Lindauer, Ingrid E. Slezak, Lyle C. Velure, Judy S. Henry, Raymond R. Bagley Jr, Don A. Dickey, Kristena A. Lamar, Eve L. Miller
Maximizing Mediation And Arbitration Opportunities, Oregon Law Institute, William M. Mcallister, Sam J. Imperati, Richard G. Spier, Noreen K. Saltviet, Eric B. Lindauer, Ingrid E. Slezak, Lyle C. Velure, Judy S. Henry, Raymond R. Bagley Jr, Don A. Dickey, Kristena A. Lamar, Eve L. Miller
Oregon Law Institute, 1996
Course Materials from the May 23, 1996 Program in Portland
Taking The Public Out Of Determining Government Policy: The Need For An Appropriate Scope Of Bargaining Test In The Illinois Public Sector, 29 J. Marshall L. Rev. 531 (1996), Eric C. Scheiner
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bootstrapping And Slouching Toward Gomorrah: Arbitral Infatuation And The Decline Of Consent, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Bootstrapping And Slouching Toward Gomorrah: Arbitral Infatuation And The Decline Of Consent, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
The Seventh Amendment to the Constitution preserves for litigants a right to a jury trial in actions at law. The right to a jury trial does not attach for equitable actions, but in cases presenting claims for both legal and equitable relief a right to a jury trial exists for common questions of fact. Although many modern statutes and claims did not exist in 1791, the Amendment has been interpreted to require a jury trial of statutory claims seeking monetary damages, the classic form of legal relief, so long as there is a relatively apt analogy between the modern statutory …
Globalisation Of Contract Law: Rules For Commercial Contracts In The 21st Century, Whitmore Gray
Globalisation Of Contract Law: Rules For Commercial Contracts In The 21st Century, Whitmore Gray
Articles
This is a paper given at the Asia-Pacific Lawyers Association meeting held in Bangkok in November 1995. The author describes the principles of international commercial contracts published in 1994 by the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. Professor Gray sees a new era of harmonisation of contract law. An appendix gives an abstract of a contract law decision given by an Austrian Court in 1994.
The Federal Arbitration Act And Individual Employment Contracts: A Better Means To An Equally Just End, William F. Kolakowski Iii
The Federal Arbitration Act And Individual Employment Contracts: A Better Means To An Equally Just End, William F. Kolakowski Iii
Michigan Law Review
This Note argues that courts should adopt a narrow reading of the employment contract exception to the FAA, thus making arbitration agreements in most individual employment contracts enforceable under the Act. Part I argues that a textual analysis of the FAA supports a narrow interpretation of the exception. Because some courts and commentators have argued that the text favors a broad interpretation, Part II examines the legislative history of the exception and demonstrates that no firm conclusions can be drawn about congressional intent regarding the exception's scope. Finally, Part III demonstrates that a narrow reading of the exception best serves …
Interpreting Insurance Policies, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Interpreting Insurance Policies, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
Like any other contract, an insurance policy may become the subject of a legal dispute. When disputes arise over insurance coverage, lawyers must combine their skill in contract interpretation with their knowledge of insurance law, bringing both to bear on the special problems related to this type of contract. Each dispute has unique traits, but a few basic ground rules of contract law and insurance law can help you interpret insurance policies and resolve disputes over insurance coverage.
Forum Selection And Choice Of Law Clauses In International Contracts: A United States Viewpoint With Particular Reference To Maritime Contracts And Bills Of Lading, Phillip A. Buhler
Forum Selection And Choice Of Law Clauses In International Contracts: A United States Viewpoint With Particular Reference To Maritime Contracts And Bills Of Lading, Phillip A. Buhler
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
This Article approaches the topic of forum selection from a U.S. perspective. It is reasonable to expect, however, particularly with regard to bills of lading and maritime trade, that the approach of other nations toward international contracts is, or soon will be, very similar. For the sake of simplicity, "choice of law" and "choice of forum" will be addressed together, and referred to as either "choice of forum" or "forum selection." Many contracts only specify a particular forum, while others specify only the application of a particular law. U.S. courts and international conventions have generally taken the same approach to …
International Arbitration And Procedures To Enforce Awards In The Relationship Between The United States And Germany, Michael Kronenburg
International Arbitration And Procedures To Enforce Awards In The Relationship Between The United States And Germany, Michael Kronenburg
LLM Theses and Essays
Arbitration has long been regarded as a process that combines finality of decision with speed, low expense, and flexibility in solving problems. For these reasons, arbitration is often favored over litigation for dispute resolution. Particularly in international cases, a businessman may avoid litigation in a foreign country for various reasons: he may be unfamiliar with the proceedings; he may be afraid to find a “forum hostile” because of the different legal and cultural background of the judges; and he may wish to avoid the uncertainty concerning the law arising from the contract. Arbitration proceedings have been held constitutional by the …