Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Banking and Finance Law (94)
- Internet Law (86)
- Law and Economics (82)
- Science and Technology Law (82)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (81)
-
- Law and Society (81)
- Commercial Law (79)
- Contracts (79)
- Intellectual Property Law (78)
- Legislation (78)
- Administrative Law (75)
- Business Organizations Law (74)
- Computer Law (74)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (73)
- Supreme Court of the United States (73)
- Constitutional Law (72)
- Privacy Law (71)
- Securities Law (71)
- International Trade Law (70)
- Law and Politics (70)
- Bankruptcy Law (69)
- Disability Law (69)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (69)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (69)
- Marketing Law (69)
- Property Law and Real Estate (69)
- Civil Law (68)
- Health Law and Policy (68)
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (58)
- Brooklyn Law School (12)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (11)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (11)
- Fordham Law School (7)
-
- University of Maine School of Law (7)
- American University Washington College of Law (5)
- Columbia Law School (5)
- Boston University School of Law (4)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (4)
- Winthrop University (4)
- Wydział Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego/Faculty of Management University of Warsaw (4)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- DePaul University (3)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (3)
- University of Miami Law School (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- Pepperdine University (2)
- The University of San Francisco (2)
- Universitas Indonesia (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (1)
- Nova Southeastern University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Consumer protection (10)
- Artificial intelligence (7)
- Privacy (6)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Technology (5)
-
- AI (4)
- Addiction (4)
- Antitrust (4)
- Data (4)
- Discrimination (4)
- ESG (4)
- Public health (4)
- Regulation (4)
- Banking (3)
- Constitution (3)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) (3)
- Consumer Protection (3)
- Consumer law (3)
- Corporate (3)
- FAA (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Mortgage (3)
- Sec (3)
- Shareholder (3)
- Social media (3)
- Antitrust law (2)
- Arbitration (2)
- Banking services (2)
- CCPA (2)
- Censorship (2)
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (58)
- Faculty Scholarship (13)
- Loyola Consumer Law Review (11)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (8)
- Maine Law Review (7)
-
- Fordham Law Review (5)
- Cardozo Law Review (4)
- Journal of Legal Studies in Business (4)
- internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny (internet Quarterly on Antitrust and Regulation) (4)
- Articles (3)
- BYU Law Review (3)
- Brooklyn Law Review (3)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (3)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (3)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (3)
- Amicus Briefs & Court Filings (2)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (2)
- Center for Law and the Economy (2)
- Journal of Legislation (2)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (2)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (2)
- University of Miami Business Law Review (2)
- Washington Law Review (2)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (2)
- American University Business Law Review (1)
- Arbitration Brief (1)
- Arts and Design (1)
- Cardozo Law Review de•novo (1)
- Connecticut Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 181 - 191 of 191
Full-Text Articles in Consumer Protection Law
How To Beat The Nfl’S Best Defense: Attacking The Mass Arbitration Phenomenon With Class Arbitration, Thomas Riley
How To Beat The Nfl’S Best Defense: Attacking The Mass Arbitration Phenomenon With Class Arbitration, Thomas Riley
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
During his seventeen-year tenure as Commissioner of the National Football League (NFL), Roger Goodell never testified at trial. However, that changed when a class of plaintiffs sued the NFL for antitrust violations, alleging the League artificially inflated the cost of its viewership package—NFL Sunday Ticket—and thereby harmed consumers. NFL Sunday Ticket is described as a “premium sports package” that allows fans to watch out-of-market games they otherwise would not be able to view in their current market. This David and Goliath moment was a chance to discipline the pricing of one of the most popular television products in the United …
Brief Of Amici Curiae In Support Of Reversal On Question One, James Gibson
Brief Of Amici Curiae In Support Of Reversal On Question One, James Gibson
Law Faculty Publications
The Fourth Circuit’s decision to impose contributory liability Cox Communications, Inc. rests on a fundamental misapprehension of Cox’s role as a “conduit” Internet Service Provider. Conduits merely transmit data between endpoints; unlike content-hosting platforms like YouTube or search engines like Google, conduits do not store, curate, or control user content. They merely transmit data on behalf of third parties, and they have no ability to monitor the data they transmit. By treating Cox’s passive provision of Internet access and data transmission as a knowing, material contribution to infringement, the Fourth Circuit collapsed the crucial legal distinction between conduits and hosts, …
The Federal General Counsel, Law, And Our Democracy At A Crossroads, Seth Frotman
The Federal General Counsel, Law, And Our Democracy At A Crossroads, Seth Frotman
Michigan Law Review Online
This speech, given by the general counsel of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) on January 7, 2025, examines how federal government lawyers can help ensure that laws are faithfully administered to address the contemporary challenges facing American citizens. Despite the CFPB’s successes in protecting consumers from predatory financial practices—particularly amid the rapid digital transformation of the economy—undemocratic forces have increasingly rigged the legal system to serve as both sword and shield for the powerful. The speech describes how judge-made doctrines like “major questions” have been weaponized to disempower Congress from writing statutes with enduring relevance. These challenges represent an …
Ai Disgorgement Or Ai Recalls: A Trip Down Remedy Lane, Margot Kaminski
Ai Disgorgement Or Ai Recalls: A Trip Down Remedy Lane, Margot Kaminski
Publications
No abstract provided.
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
Voting Matters: Materiality Considerations And The Shareholder Vote, Renee M. Jones
Voting Matters: Materiality Considerations And The Shareholder Vote, Renee M. Jones
Seattle University Law Review
For the shareholder franchise to have meaning, shareholders must have access to relevant information to inform their voting decisions. The securities laws’ disclosure requirements play an essential role in informing the shareholder vote.
This Essay focuses on the question of the materiality of information in the context of shareholder voting. It addresses the question of whether ESG-related information is material, positioning the materiality inquiry within the context of shareholders’ voting decisions. It explores the definition of materiality with a focus on the “reasonable investor” concept embedded within the definition. The Essay argues that the implicit expectations of many commentators that …
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals, Jeff Schwartz, Jefferson Jensen
Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals, Jeff Schwartz, Jefferson Jensen
Seattle University Law Review
Because of their substantial equity portfolios, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street (the Big 3) are central players in corporate governance. It is, therefore, critical to understand how they vote. One puzzle is that their support for shareholder proposals on environmental and social matters appears to waiver. In 2020, for instance, BlackRock supported 11.1% of environmental proposals at S&P 500 firms. In 2021, it seemingly reversed course, supporting 55.2%. It then flipped again, supporting 32.1% in 2022. Such statistics suggest that the Big 3 are constantly changing their views on these topics. This Article seeks to better understand whether this is …
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Volume 48 Masthead
Consumer Agents, Rory Van Loo
Consumer Agents, Rory Van Loo
Faculty Scholarship
In the twenty-first century economy, individuals need market help that they are not getting. The technology has long existed for a browser plug-in that would filter out toxic social media content or a virtual shopping assistant that would find and even purchase the best deals online without having to go to many different websites and product pages. Yet tech platforms have used lawsuits and data control to stifle such tools. The lack of digital helpers has potentially profound consequences. Social media use is linked to alarming increases in teenage depression and anxiety. Businesses’ ability to manipulate consumers into paying higher …
Dark Patterns In The Opt-Out Process And Compliance With The California Consumer Privacy Act (Ccpa), Jens Frankenreiter, Van Hong Tran, Aarushi Mehrotra, Ranya Sharma, Marshini Chetty, Nick Feamster, Lior Strahilevitz
Dark Patterns In The Opt-Out Process And Compliance With The California Consumer Privacy Act (Ccpa), Jens Frankenreiter, Van Hong Tran, Aarushi Mehrotra, Ranya Sharma, Marshini Chetty, Nick Feamster, Lior Strahilevitz
Scholarship@WashULaw
To protect consumer privacy, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) mandates that businesses provide consumers with a straightforward way to opt out of the sale and sharing of their personal information. However, the control that businesses enjoy over the opt-out process allows them to impose hurdles on consumers aiming to opt out, including by employing dark patterns. Motivated by the enactment of the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), which strengthens the CCPA and explicitly forbids certain dark patterns in the opt-out process, we investigate how dark patterns are used in opt-out processes and assess their compliance with CCPA regulations. Our …