Consumer Protection Law Commons^™

Ali's Restatement Of The Law Of Consumer Contracts: Perpetuating A Legal Fiction?, Dee Pridgen

Loyola Consumer Law Review

The American Law Institute's proposed Restatement of the Law of Consumer Contracts has undergone a lengthy process of drafts and discussions, but the road to completion has been rocky. Indeed, only one of nine proposed sections have thus far been adopted by the ALI membership, despite years of work on the project. Much of the criticism centered on the proposal's definition of consumer assent to (or adoption of) standard contract terms, which as currently drafted states that consumers are bound by contract terms of which they have had notice and an opportunity to review, and have manifested assent in some …

How To Make A Dead Armadillo: Consumer Contracts And The Perils Of Compromise, Jeffrey W. Stempel

Loyola Consumer Law Review

The ALI's proposed Restatement of the Law, Consumer Contracts ("RLCC") has managed to alarm both corporate America and consumer advocates, including half the nation's attorneys general. To some extent, the RLCC is yet another victim of the nation's increasing polarization and the rise of partisanship within the legal profession. But the RLCC suffers from self-inflicted wounds through questionable endorsement of problematic case law on contract formation as well as its goal of a well-intentioned but flawed "Grand Bargain" that arguably seized a middle ground disliked, for different reasons, by both consumer and business advocates. The RL CC stepped into this …

Cfpb Seeks To Further Strategy To Prevent Consumer Harm, Rebecca Garcia

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reds, Whites, And Sulfites: Examining Different Organic Wine Regulation Practices In The United States And The European Union, Ryan Puszka

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

Abstract:

This note examines the history of regulation within the organic wine industry in the U.S. and the E.U. and explores the motivations behind the production of organic wine in these two regions. The variance in the historical significance of wine between these two regions is reflected in the contemporary differences between the two regions’ rules for organic wine certification. In 2012, the U.S. and the E.U. entered into a comprehensive organic equivalency agreement that covered nearly all organic agricultural products but due to significant differences in the two regions’ regulatory schemes concerning the inclusion of added sulfites in wine, …

Sandbox Boundaries, Hilary J. Allen

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

Around the world, subnational and national regulatory sandboxes are being adopted in an effort to promote fintech innovation. These regulatory sandboxes seek to achieve this by rolling back some of the consumer protection and prudential regulations that would otherwise apply to the firms trialing their financial products and services in the sandbox. While sacrificing such protections in order to promote innovation is problematic, such sacrifice may nonetheless be justifiable if, by working with innovators in the sandbox, regulators are educated about new technologies in a way that enhances their ability to effectively promote consumer protection and financial stability in other …

Disabling Fascism: A Struggle For The Last Laugh In Trump’S America, Madeleine M. Plasencia

Articles

Six years before the start of the Second World War and seven months after Hitler’s appointment as Chancellor of Germany, the German government instituted the “Law for the Prevention of Progeny with Hereditary Diseases.” The moral depravity that started as a sterilization program targeting “useless eaters” and lives “unworthy of life” degenerated into a “euthanasia” program that murdered at least 250,000 people with mental and physical dis/abilities as an “open secret” until 1941, when the Bishop of Munster, Clemens August Count von Galen, delivered a sermon protesting the killing of “unproductive people.”2 Although the Trump Administration has not yet driven …

Unfair-But-Not-Deceptive: Confronting The Ambiguity In Washington State’S Consumer Protection Act, Emily Beale

Seattle University Law Review

This Comment will argue that Washington state courts must promulgate a new, workable definition of “unfair-but-not-deceptive” under Washington’s Consumer Protection Act. Washington courts have acknowledged that a business act or practice can be unfair but not deceptive, but a simple recognition does not fulfill the liberal intentions of the Consumer Protection Act. By continuously declining to define unfair- but-not-deceptive, Washington courts have left consumers vulnerable and without recourse. This Comment will highlight the approaches developed by the federal government and other state governments on how to confront the ambiguity of unfair-but-not-deceptive and will propose a concrete definition for the term.

Revisiting The Enforceability Of Online Contracts: The Need For Unambiguous Assent To Inconspicuous Terms, Tom Mozingo

Seattle University Law Review

In determining the enforceability of online contracts, namely those formed from the use of smartphone applications, courts typically look to whether the contract terms were reasonably conspicuous or communicated to the consumer. With the rise of “browse-wrap” contracts, where terms are not directly communicated to the consumer or where the consumer is not required to click the equivalent of an “I agree” button clearly manifesting assent to the terms, courts have inconsistently applied the reasonable communicativeness standard to the detriment of consumers and application developers alike. This Comment will explore the development of browse-wrap contracting jurisprudence and the need to …

In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth

Seattle University Law Review

Janet Ainsworth, Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law: In Memory of Professor James E. Bond.

Attorney–Client Privilege In Bad Faith Insurance Claims: The Cedell Presumption And A Necessary National Resolution, Klien Hilliard

Seattle University Law Review

Attorney–client privilege is one of the most important aspects of our legal system. It is one of the oldest privileges in American law and is codified both at the national and state level. Applying to both individual persons and corporations, this expanded privilege covers a wide breadth of clients. However, this broad privilege can sometimes become blurred in relationships between the corporation and the individuals it serves. Specifically, insurance companies and those they cover have complex relationships, as the insurer possesses a quasi-fiduciary relationship in relation to the insured. This type of relationship requires that the insurer act in good …

Demystifying Unconscionability: An Historical And Empirical Analysis, Brian Mccall

Faculty Articles

The doctrine of unconscionability is encrusted with myths. First year law students are taught that the doctrine was created in the twentieth century. Unconscionability is often presented as a novel one, born in the Uniform Commercial Code’s adoption of Section 2-302 in the mid-twentieth century. Even those scholars who are willing to look a bit further afield than the twentieth century for the origins of the unconscionability doctrine typically only reach the mid eighteenth century. In addition to myths surrounding its origin, the doctrine has been presented as a dangerously vague and imprecise concept. Commentators and scholars have likewise characterized …

Why The Vppa And Coppa Are Outdated: How Netflix, Youtube, And Disney+ Can Monitor Your Family At No Real Cost, Anna O’Donnell

Georgia Law Review

Video-streaming services like Netflix, YouTube, and Disney+
dominate the current media landscape. This Note explains why
current laws likely cannot effectively prevent these streaming
services from collecting and sharing users’ private information.
The Video Privacy Protection Act (the VPPA) contains language
that has baffled courts when applying its text to streaming
services, resulting in multiple circuit splits. The Children’s
Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) has a clearer
application to streaming services, yet its enforcement has
resulted in small settlements with companies that have been
charged with collecting children’s private information. Both the
VPPA and COPPA need to be updated to …

Planting The Seed: A Proposal For A Farm Operation Test Under The Fsma Produce Safety Rule, Sophia Kruszewski, Samuel Ingraham

Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law

No abstract provided.

The American Law Institute's Unsound Bid To Reinvent Contract Law In The Proposed Restatement Of The Law, Consumer Contracts, Christopher E. Appel

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Restatement Of The Law Of Consumer Contracts: The American Law Institute's Impossible Dream, Mark E. Budnitz

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ideology, Coercion, And The Proposed Restatement Of The Law Of Consumer Contracts, Nancy S. Kim

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

Limits Of Assent In Consumer Contracts: A (Regulatory) View From The South, Nicolas Rojas Covarrubias

Loyola Consumer Law Review

The Restatement of the Law Consumer Contracts project has proved to be controversial. The current published draft of the Restatement diminishes the role of assent as a fundamental element to determine the content of an agreement, limiting its influence to the "core deal terms" and accepting that proper notice and reasonable opportunity to review proposed standard terms (pre or post transaction) is enough to adopt them as part of the contract. This has been questioned from empirical and normative perspectives, being qualified as detrimental to consumers' rights. In fact, the draft proposal actually incurs in the same defect that it …

The Need For Reform: Discharging Student Loan Debts In Bankruptcy Proceedings Under The Brunner Test, Jacob M. Kupferman

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents, Loyola Consumer Law Review

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

The General Data Protection Regulation And California Consumer Privacy Act: The Economic Impact And Future Of Data Privacy Regulations, Christopher Bret Alexander

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

Privacy Or Protection: The Catch-22 Of The Ccpa, Diane Y. Byun

Loyola Consumer Law Review

On June 28, 2018, the California Legislature passed the nation's strictest data privacy law, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 ("CCPA"). Although effective January 1, 2019, the provisions of the CCPA did not become operative until January 1, 2020. The CCPA enforces compliance obligations on any business that collects covered personal information about California residents ("Consumers") and exceeds one of three thresholds: (i) annual gross revenues of $25 million, (ii) collection of personal information for commercial purpose of 50,000 or more covered consumers, or (iii) 50% or more annual revenue from selling Consumers' personal information. This low threshold demonstrates …

Algorithms Take Flight: Modern Pricing Algorithms' Effect On Antitrust Laws In The Aviation Industry, David Krieghbaum Jr.

Loyola Consumer Law Review

What happens when an inevitable moving force collides with an immovable object? Either the force finds a way around the object or the object must adapt to contain the force. Over a century has passed since the federal government passed the Sherman Act, Clayton Act, and Federal Trade Commission Act. As times change, the three reigning laws have had very little reform. Federal antitrust laws remain immovable through the past century as civilization has made astounding advancements. The advancement of technology in business is inevitably becoming a large part of how corporations are securing advantages against their competition. Artificial intelligence …

The Pallone-Thune "Traced Act": Expanding Consumer Protection In The Fight Against Robocalls, Caitlin Figueroa

Loyola Consumer Law Review

No abstract provided.

Collective Preclusion And Inaccessible Arbitration: Data, Non-Disclosure, And Public Knowledge, Judith Resnik, Stephanie Garlock, Annie J. Wang

Lewis & Clark Law Review

When courts enforce mandates to arbitrate, jurists describe themselves as respecting the individuals’ autonomy to enter into contracts that route claimants to a process that is more user-friendly than adjudication. But those rationales are disjunctive with the practices of providers of goods and services and of employers. These companies neither offer individuals choices about dispute resolution mechanisms nor welcome the exchange of information about experiences with arbitration. Instead, companies impose obligations to arbitrate and set the terms. In addition to the increasingly commonplace bans on joint and collective actions in any forum, many providers and employers also seek to mandate …

Holding Oregon Benefit Companies Accountable For Greenwashing And Faux Csr, Sophia Von Bergen

Lewis & Clark Law Review

The notion of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has gained popularity in recent years with both consumers and businesses, leading to Oregon and currently 35 other states adopting benefit company statutes that allow companies to elect status as a benefit corporation. CSR, however, can be marred by what is known as “greenwashing” and “faux CSR,” which occur when a company falsely claims that it engages in environmentally friendly or socially responsible practices to boost sales or improve its brand. Oregon’s benefit company statute contains features designed to protect against greenwashing and faux CSR, but the statute’s accountability mechanisms are lackluster. Enforcement …

Shadow Credit And The Devolution Of Consumer Credit Regulation, Nathalie Martin, Lydia Pizzonia

Lewis & Clark Law Review

Shadow credit is trending. Shadow credit has all the essential attributes of regular credit except that it is unregulated. It operates in a world in which products and services that look, act, and feel like credit products are deemed to be something that is not actually credit. This legal sidestep is accomplished either by passing industry-friendly legislation or by tweaking the shadow credit product just enough to not be defined as credit, but “something else.” That “something else” is often called a “lease,” an “advance,” or in the case of After- pay, simply a “service.” At its essence, however, it …

The Specific Consumer Expectations Test For Product Defects, Clayton J. Masterman, W. Kip Viscusi

Indiana Law Journal

In this Article, we propose that courts adopt an amended version of the consumer expectations test that we call the “specific consumer expectations test.” The specific consumer expectations test would apply to any product or product component for which consumers have clear, articulable ex ante expectations about the function of the product. Under the specific consumer expectations test, a defendant is liable if consumers expected such a product to reduce a particular risk, and the product in fact increased that risk. Similarly, if a product was intended to convey a particular benefit, but in fact harmed consumers along the same …

Consumer Protections In The Context Of Holistic Healthcare, Rachel Pauerstein

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Friday Night “Who Is Driving?” Debate Will Soon Come To An End: How Autonomous Vehicles Are Changing Our Lives And Societal Norms, Nicholas Calabria

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Trimming The Fat: The Gdpr As A Model For Cleaning Up Our Data Usage, Kassandra Polanco

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.