Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- State and Local Government Law (6)
- Administrative Law (4)
- Agency (4)
- Litigation (3)
- Other Law (3)
-
- Torts (3)
- Insurance Law (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Marketing Law (2)
- Medical Specialties (2)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (2)
- Sports Medicine (2)
- Trauma (2)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Courts (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- European Law (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Housing Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Juvenile Law (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Medical Jurisprudence (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Secured Transactions (1)
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- AB 168 (4)
- AB 1382 (3)
- AB 1893 (3)
- SB 961 (3)
- AB 1555 (2)
-
- CPSC (2)
- Consumer (2)
- Helmets (2)
- Market share liability (2)
- Risk-utility balancing (2)
- 1990) (1)
- AB 1827 (1)
- Acceptance and refund (1)
- Across-the-board liability without defect (1)
- Advertising (1)
- Alternative liability (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Awards (1)
- Bad faith (1)
- Breach of warranty (1)
- CPA (1)
- Collateral estoppel effect (1)
- Concussion (1)
- Congress (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutionally guaranteed (1)
- Consumer Product Safety Act (1)
- Consumer Protection (1)
- Consumer protection act (1)
- Consumers (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 73 of 73
Full-Text Articles in Consumer Protection Law
The Second Circuit Holds That An Anti-Discrimination Provision Of The Fair Housing Act Applies To Human Models In Advertisements, Richard E. Nawracaj
The Second Circuit Holds That An Anti-Discrimination Provision Of The Fair Housing Act Applies To Human Models In Advertisements, Richard E. Nawracaj
Loyola Consumer Law Review
No abstract provided.
Eighth Circuit Holds That Insurer's Duty To Make Certain Coverage Available Was Not Breached By Failure To Explain Such Coverage, Frank J. Troppe
Eighth Circuit Holds That Insurer's Duty To Make Certain Coverage Available Was Not Breached By Failure To Explain Such Coverage, Frank J. Troppe
Loyola Consumer Law Review
No abstract provided.
Indices To Volume 3 - Author Index
Insurance Agent May Have Bound Company To Temporary Insurance Policy Despite Misrepresentation By Insured, Astrid E. Ellis
Insurance Agent May Have Bound Company To Temporary Insurance Policy Despite Misrepresentation By Insured, Astrid E. Ellis
Loyola Consumer Law Review
No abstract provided.
Suretyship Principles In The New Articles 3: Clarifications And Substantive Changes, Neil B. Cohen
Suretyship Principles In The New Articles 3: Clarifications And Substantive Changes, Neil B. Cohen
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Dimensions Of The Product Liability Crisis, W. Kip Viscusi
The Dimensions Of The Product Liability Crisis, W. Kip Viscusi
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Examination of a variety of sources of statistics indicates that the product liability crisis is real, and it is not simply imagined or contrived by the insurance industry. Litigation in the product liability area has escalated dramatically, but to some extent the industry was able to mute the effect of this escalation because of the influence of rising interest rates in the early 1980s as well as because the shrinking market for product liability insurance masked much of the explosion that was occurring in terms of the costs of product liability coverage. The dominant pattern in the early 1980s was …
Reporting Substantial Product Safety Hazards Under The Consumer Product Safety Act: The Products Liability Interface, Timothy Zick
Reporting Substantial Product Safety Hazards Under The Consumer Product Safety Act: The Products Liability Interface, Timothy Zick
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Need For Revisiting The Imposition Of Bad Faith Liability: Industrial Indemnity Co. V. Kallevig, J. Benson Porter, Jr.
The Need For Revisiting The Imposition Of Bad Faith Liability: Industrial Indemnity Co. V. Kallevig, J. Benson Porter, Jr.
Seattle University Law Review
This Note posits two recommendations. First, in order to harmonize the bad faith standards applied in Kallevig and Gingrich, the Kallevig reasonable justification standard should be applied in situations involving questions similar to those confronted by the Gingrich court. Second, this Note contends that the Kallevig court's analysis imposing liability under the CPA was defective because it failed to take proper account of the frequency requirement within the unfair trade practices regulations. By ignoring the frequency provision, the Kallevig decision allows inconsistent treatment of similar factual situations depending on whether the decision is being made by an agency or …
Department Of Consumer Affairs, M. Walker
Department Of Consumer Affairs, M. Walker
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.