Consumer Protection Law Commons^™

Separations, Blow-Outs, And Fallout: A Treadise On The Regulatory Aftermath Of The Ford-Firestone Tire Recall, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1073 (2004), Kevin M. Mcdonald

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Precision In Statutory Drafting: The Qualitech Quagmire And The Sad History Of § 365(H) Of The Bankruptcy Code, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 97 (2004), Robert M. Zinman

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Creditors' Rights Risk: A Title Insurer's Perspective, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 223 (2004), Paul L. Hammann, John C. Murray

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Mass Toxic Tort Litigation And Class Action Rule Reform In The United States, Jason L. Betts

ExpressO

The paper advances the proposition that mass toxic tort litigation has been the predominant driver of class action rule reform in the Unites States. Through three distinct phases of proposals to reform Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the judicial and academic attitude to the certification of mass toxic torts has influenced the reform debate in radically different ways – initially by providing the catalyst for efforts to reform Rule 23; then as a dampener against significant reforms to Rule 23 in the wake of mass toxic tort “settlement-only” classes; and ultimately as an explanation for the …

How Low Can You Go (Down The Ladder): The Vertical Reach Of Rico, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2003), Scott Paccagnini

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ethics Of Enterprise Liability In Product Design And Marketing Litigation, James A. Henderson Jr.

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

American courts talk as though they are imposing strict enterprise liability on product manufacturers, but in truth they do so only with respect to manufacturing defects. In product design and marketing litigation, manufacturers' liability is based on fault. The reason why strict liability is inappropriate for the generic product hazards associated with design and marketing is that, in sharp contrast to manufacturing defects, the conditions necessary for insurance to function are not satisfied. Users and consumers control generic product risks to a sufficiently great extent that any insurance scheme based on strict enterprise liability would be destroyed by combinations of …

E.R.I.S.A. Subrogation As Interpreted Within The Seventh Circuit - A Roadmap For Managing First Dollar Recovery, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 765 (2002), Gregory Pitts

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Bad Medicine: Erisa's Equitable Remedies And The Preemption Of Fundamental Legal Rights, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 583 (2001), Marilyn Lablaiks

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Game Of High Stakes Roulette: Credit Card Companies Cash In On Gamblers' Bad Luck, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1197 (1999), Maya Hoffman

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Commodities Rulings Appealable To Circuit (New York Law Journal), Daniel Wise

News Articles

No abstract provided.

Dashing Consumer Hopes: Strict Products Liability And The Demise Of The Consumer Expectations Test, Rebecca Korzec

All Faculty Scholarship

The threshold issue in American products liability litigation is whether the product was defective at the time it left the manufacturer's control. Traditionally, courts and scholars define “defect” in three functional categories: manufacturing defects, design defects and marketing defects. American products liability doctrine employs two major tests to determine whether a "defect” exists: the seller-oriented risk-utility test and the buyer-oriented consumer expectations test. The Draft of the Restatement Third of Torts: Products Liability, like some American jurisdictions, rejects the “consumer expectations” test as an independent standard in defective warning and design cases. Ironically, this limitation of the use of the …

Do You Feel The Sunshine? Government In The Sunshine Act: Its Objectives, Goals, And Effect On The Fcc And You, Kathy Bradley

Federal Communications Law Journal

This Note posits that the Sunshine Act should be narrowed to allow the FCC to operate in the same way as Congress and the Federal courts. The FCC should be allowed to engage in open and frank discussion of issues facing the Commission without rigid restrictions on collegial conversation between Commission members.

"Weightier Than A Mountain": Duty, Hierarchy, And The Consumer In Japan, Anita Bernstein, Paul Fanning

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

The authors analyze the 1994 Japanese products liability law from a national-culture perspective. After examining the historical backdrop of the consumer's social role in both the United States and Japan, the authors argue that the new law cannot create a strict liability system like that of the United States in Japan, because the unique Japanese cultural context and its manipulation discourage the use of the legal process to advance consumer interests.

Representing The Unrepresented In Class Action Settlements, Brian Wolfman

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

Class actions are important and useful both to deter wrongful conduct and to provide compensation for injured plaintiffs. In complex cases, however, the existing class action structure falters. In this article, Messrs. Wolfman and Morrison argue that in "settlement class actions" the current class action rules do not adequately protect class members whose interests do not coincide with those of the class representatives and the class attorneys. Through a survey of recent, prominent settlement class actions, the authors show that the current system does not fairly treat subgroups in a class with respect to matters as diverse as future injury, …

Reviewing Loan Files For Evidence Of Discrimination, 28 J. Marshall L. Rev. 351 (1995), Zina Gefter Greene

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Investigating Claims Of Discrimination In Housing Finance, 28 J. Marshall L. Rev. 371 (1995), Stephen M. Dane

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Liability Of Blood Banks And Manufacturers Of Clotting Products To Recipients Of Hiv-Infected Blood: A Comparison Of The Law And Reaction In The United States, Canada, Great Britain, Ireland, And Australia, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 465 (1994), Joseph Kelly

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Stargazing: The Future Of American Products Liability Law, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Closing The American Products Liability Frontier: The Rejection Of Liability Without Defect, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

For over one hundred years American courts expanded the rights of plaintiffs in products liability cases. First the courts eliminated the privity requirement, next the necessity of proving fault, and finally, the necessity of proving a production defect. The next logical step in this progression would be to eliminate the need to show any type of defect at all. In this Article, Professors Henderson and Twerski assert that this step cannot and will not be taken. They explore both the possibility of across-the-board liability without defect and the more limited idea of product-category liability without defect. They describe how a …

Trial By Jury

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Doctrinal Collapse In Products Liability: The Empty Shell Of Failure To Warn, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

Liability for a manufacturer's failure to warn of product-related risks is a well-established feature of modern products liability law. Yet many serious doctrinal and conceptual problems underlie these claims. Professors Henderson and Twerski explore these problems and argue that failure-to-warn jurisprudence is confused, perhaps irreparably, and that this confusion often results in the imposition of excessive liability on manufacturers. The authors begin by exposing basic errors resulting from courts' confusion over whether to apply a strict liability or a negligence standard of care in failure-to-warn cases. Having determined that negligence is the appropriate standard, they then examine more substantial and …

Brief For Petitioner, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 955 (1988), L. Lee Byrd, Yvonne T. Griffin, G. Rodney Young

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Brief For Respondent, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 983 (1988), Matthew W. Nakon, Laura J. Steffe, Steven R. Yoo

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Sadat V. American Motors Corporation: Limiting Consumer Remedies Under Magnuson-Moss And The New Car Buyer Protection Act, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 163 (1985), Mark D. Roth

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

In Defense Of Process, Aaron Twerski, Alvin S. Weinstein, William A. Donaher, Henry R. Piehler

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Products Liability, Whitmore Gray

Book Chapters

The choice of "product liability" as a topic for the Tenth International Congress of Comparative Law was most appropriate. At the present time the legal periodicals are full of articles on this topic, the courts (not only in the United States) are handling an increasing load of these cases, the First World Congress on Product Liability has been held (London, 1977), and unification and harmonization work is already well advanced.

At the time of the First International Comparative Law Congress in 1934 it would have been hard to predict the development of this area of the law out of the …

Vindicating The Public Interest Through The Courts: A Comparativist's Contribution, Mauro Cappelletti

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Use And Abuse Of Warnings In Products Liability -- Design Defect Litigation Comes Of Age, Aaron Twerski, A. S. Weinstein, W. A. Donaher, H. R. Piehler

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Design Defect Litigation Revisited, James A. Henderson Jr.

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Product Liability: A Study Of The Interaction Of Law And Technology, Aaron Twerski, Alvin S. Weinstein, Henry R. Piehler, William A. Donaher

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.