Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- "cybersquatting" (1)
- 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1)
- ADMINISTRATIVE LAW (1)
- AWCPA (1)
- American Institute of Architecture (1)
-
- Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act (1)
- Architectural copyright (1)
- Architectural work (1)
- Attorney's fees (1)
- Blogs (1)
- Blueprint infringement (1)
- CONTRACTORS (1)
- Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act (1)
- Communication technologies (1)
- Constitutional cases (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
- Constitutional torts (1)
- Construction (1)
- Construction defect (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Copyright Office (1)
- Copyright protection (1)
- De facto class action (1)
- Defect (1)
- Defendant-oriented injunction (1)
- Derivative works (1)
- Election law (1)
- Farrar v. Hobby (1)
- Federal Elections Campaign Act of 1971 (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Construction Law
Dykema V. Del Webb Communities, Inc., 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 82 (Dec. 29, 2016), Christopher Giddens
Dykema V. Del Webb Communities, Inc., 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 82 (Dec. 29, 2016), Christopher Giddens
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined that a notice of completion’s recording date—not the date on which the notice is signed and notarized—signifies when the notice is “issued” to trigger “substantial completion” under NRS 11.2055(1)(b) for NRS Chapter 11’s construction defect statutes of repose.
A New Sentencing Blueprint: The Third Circuit Allows Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Fraud Convictions To Be Offset By Construction Contract Performance In United States V. Nagle, Christopher C. Reese
A New Sentencing Blueprint: The Third Circuit Allows Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Fraud Convictions To Be Offset By Construction Contract Performance In United States V. Nagle, Christopher C. Reese
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Construction Law, Frank O. Brown Jr.
Construction Law, Frank O. Brown Jr.
Mercer Law Review
This Article focuses on noteworthy opinions by Georgia appellate courts between June 1, 2015 and May 31, 2016 relevant to the practice of construction law and on an important amendment to Official Code of Georgia Annotated (O.C.G.A.) section 13-8-2,1 expanding its anti-indemnity provisions.
Under Construction: The Past, Present, And Future Of Chapter 40, Nevada's Construction-Defect Laws, Stephen A. Davis
Under Construction: The Past, Present, And Future Of Chapter 40, Nevada's Construction-Defect Laws, Stephen A. Davis
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Virtual Politics And The 2000 Election: Does First Amendment Protection Extend To Political Speech On The Internet?, Amity Hough Farrar
Virtual Politics And The 2000 Election: Does First Amendment Protection Extend To Political Speech On The Internet?, Amity Hough Farrar
Georgia Journal of Law & Technology
No abstract provided.
The Constitution And Enforceable Natural Law, Karl Deuble
The Constitution And Enforceable Natural Law, Karl Deuble
The Review: A Journal of Undergraduate Student Research
No abstract provided.
The Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act At Twenty: Has Full Protection Made A Difference?, David E. Shipley
The Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act At Twenty: Has Full Protection Made A Difference?, David E. Shipley
Georgia Journal of Law & Technology
No abstract provided.
De Facto Class Actions? Plaintiff- And Defendant-Oriented Injunctions In Election Law, Voting Rights And Other Constitutional Cases, Michael T. Morley
De Facto Class Actions? Plaintiff- And Defendant-Oriented Injunctions In Election Law, Voting Rights And Other Constitutional Cases, Michael T. Morley
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Tom V. Innovative Home Systems, Llc, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 15 (Mar. 10, 2016), Adrienne Brantley
Tom V. Innovative Home Systems, Llc, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 15 (Mar. 10, 2016), Adrienne Brantley
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determine that the decision of the State Contractors’ Board closing homeowners’ complaint and directing contractor to make repairs to residence was not a final decision resolving a contested case, as required to preclude a homeowner from relitigating whether contractor was required to have an electrical license. The Court also determine that genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether the contractor needed an electrical license and genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether the contractor completed its contractual obligations to homeowner.
Attorney’S Fees, Nominal Damages, And Section 1983 Litigation, Thomas A. Eaton, Michael Wells
Attorney’S Fees, Nominal Damages, And Section 1983 Litigation, Thomas A. Eaton, Michael Wells
Scholarly Works
Can plaintiffs recover attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 when they establish constitutional violations but recover only nominal damages or low compensatory damages? Some federal appellate courts have concluded that no fee, or a severely reduced fee, should be awarded in such circumstances. This position, which we call the “low award, low fee” approach, rests primarily on the Supreme Court’s 1992 opinion in Farrar v. Hobby.
We argue that a “low award, low fee” approach is misguided for two main reasons. First, the majority opinion in Farrar is fragmented and the factual record is opaque regarding what and how …
Ahead Of The Curve: Promoting Land Tenure Security In Sub-Saharan Africa To Protect The Environment, Andrew R. Falk
Ahead Of The Curve: Promoting Land Tenure Security In Sub-Saharan Africa To Protect The Environment, Andrew R. Falk
Seattle Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
The 'Press,' Then & Now, Sonja R. West
The 'Press,' Then & Now, Sonja R. West
Scholarly Works
Does the First Amendment’s protection of freedom of “the press” simply mean that we all have the right to use mass communication technology to disseminate our speech? Or does it provide constitutional safeguards for a particular group of speakers who function as government watchdogs and citizen surrogates? This question defines the current debate over the Press Clause. The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, along with recent work by Michael McConnell and Eugene Volokh, suggests the answer is the former. This article pushes back on that view.
It starts by expanding the scope of the relevant historical evidence. Discussions about the …