Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Fifth Amendment (2)
- Army Corps of Engineers (1)
- Buy Indian Act (1)
- Commerce Clause (1)
- Developers (1)
-
- Enforceability (1)
- Equitable servitudes (1)
- Executory promise (1)
- Federal Property and Administrative Service Act of 1949 (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Interrogation (1)
- Justice and Fairness (1)
- Marina (1)
- Servitudes (1)
- Touch and concern (1)
- U.S. Department of Interior (1)
- Washington (1)
- Zoning Ordinances (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Construction Law
Andus V. Allard, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Kaiser Aetna V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Kaiser Aetna V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Agins V. City Of Tiburon, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Agins V. City Of Tiburon, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Rhode Island V. Innis, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Rhode Island V. Innis, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Enforceability Of Land Use Servitudes Benefiting Local Government In Washington, Stephen Phillabaum
Enforceability Of Land Use Servitudes Benefiting Local Government In Washington, Stephen Phillabaum
Seattle University Law Review
Washington courts are free to enforce publicland use servitudes. Of the elements required for a servitude to run with the land, form, notice, and touch and concern on the burden side do not bar running. Only the touch and concern element applied on the benefit side is a potential bar. Washington conceivably could allow public land use servitudes to run with the land by following the minority position of not requiring touch and concern on the benefit side. A less stringent theory, however, is available to enforce public land use servitudes. Washington has not adopted a rule that public servitudes …