Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- International Law (74)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (14)
- Courts (12)
- Constitutional Law (10)
- Jurisdiction (10)
-
- Legal History (6)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (6)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (6)
- Transnational Law (6)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (5)
- Contracts (4)
- Human Rights Law (4)
- Law and Politics (4)
- Legal Studies (4)
- Legal Theory (4)
- Admiralty (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Commercial Law (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Family Law (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- International Relations (2)
- International Trade Law (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Legal Remedies (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Institution
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (42)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (9)
- Duke Law (6)
- Pepperdine University (3)
- Southern Methodist University (2)
-
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Association of American Law Schools (1)
- BLR (1)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Nova Southeastern University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Working Papers (39)
- Faculty Scholarship (9)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (8)
- Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
-
- Boyd Briefs / Road Scholars (2)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (2)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (2)
- Book Chapters (1)
- ExpressO (1)
- Faculty & Staff Scholarship (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Journal of Legal Education (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Pace International Law Review (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 81
Full-Text Articles in Conflict of Laws
International Arbitration And Conflicts Of Law: Three Hard Questions For Symeon, Peter B. Rutledge
International Arbitration And Conflicts Of Law: Three Hard Questions For Symeon, Peter B. Rutledge
Scholarly Works
The presence of a foreign element in a legal relationship inevitably introduces intricate choice-of-law issues. This postulate holds especially true in the context of international arbitration. Arbitration involves an exceptional degree of procedural freedom (including over the choice of the applicable law) and a distinctive conflict-of-laws regime that may be unbound from a particular national legal system. This article examines several choice-of-law issues arising in the context of international arbitration. In particular, Section I of this article addresses whether the United Nations Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, otherwise known as the New York Convention, is selfexecuting …
Silencing Jorge Luis Borges The Wrongful Suppression Of The Di Giovanni Translations, Wes Henricksen
Silencing Jorge Luis Borges The Wrongful Suppression Of The Di Giovanni Translations, Wes Henricksen
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
(Not) Right On Time: Interpretation Of "Pertinent Time" For Bancec Alter Ego Analysis And Its Effect On Attaching Foreign Sovereign Assets, James Hardman
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments In American Courts And The Limits Of The Law Market Model, Michael E. Solimine
Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments In American Courts And The Limits Of The Law Market Model, Michael E. Solimine
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
The law market model posits that the most appropriate resolution of choice of law disputes in private international law is to permit individuals to choose ex ante the law that applies to them. This is contrasted to the public law model where courts choose law based on the perceived interests of, or the parties’ connections with, the states or nations involved. The law market model envisions that consumer choice will lead to a healthy competition among jurisdictions to supply the most efficient law. This model has been followed in several areas, most notably in the widespread enforcement, at least within …
The Rise Of Transnational Commercial Courts: The Astana International Financial Centre Court, Ilias Bantekas
The Rise Of Transnational Commercial Courts: The Astana International Financial Centre Court, Ilias Bantekas
Pace International Law Review
The proliferation of international commercial courts aims to boost income from legal services and serve as a catalyst for newly found rules of law and thus attract investor confidence. The latter is the underlying purpose for the creation of the Astana International Financial Centre (AIFC) and its Court. The Court’s legal framework is set out in the tradition of its competitors in the Gulf and similarly employs an impressive lineup of former senior judges from the United Kingdom. It is a unique experiment because it strives to create a balance between maintaining a judicial institution of the highest caliber while …
An International Approach To Maritime Conflicts Of Law, Anthony J. Colangelo
An International Approach To Maritime Conflicts Of Law, Anthony J. Colangelo
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This Essay seeks to answer two interrelated questions about regnant maritime choice of law analysis in the United States: Does it descriptively capture international law as the United States claims? And, if so, is such an approach a good one? In so doing, it aims principally to provide national and international decision makers with a robust and fresh resource for resolving these disputes in a manner, I argue, beneficent to overall social welfare and peaceful relations among states. For only by analyzing the United States’ claim can we tell whether it is true and thus, whether it needs to be …
What Is Foreign Relations Law?, Curtis A. Bradley
What Is Foreign Relations Law?, Curtis A. Bradley
Faculty Scholarship
This draft first chapter of The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Foreign Relations Law considers what is potentially encompassed by the term “foreign relations law,” and what it might mean to think about it as a distinct field of law that can be compared and contrasted across national jurisdictions. The chapter begins by outlining some differences between foreign relations law and international law. It then describes the development of foreign relations law as a field of study within the United States and considers why, at least until recently, it has not been treated as a field in most other countries. Finally, …
The Supreme Court As A Filter Between International Law And American Constitutionalism, Curtis A. Bradley
The Supreme Court As A Filter Between International Law And American Constitutionalism, Curtis A. Bradley
Faculty Scholarship
As part of a symposium on Justice Stephen Breyer’s book, “The Court and the World,” this essay describes and defends the Supreme Court’s role as a filter between international law and the American constitutional system. In this role, the Court ensures that when international law passes into the U.S. legal system, it does so in a manner consistent with domestic constitutional values. This filtering role is appropriate, the Essay explains, in light of the different processes used to generate international law and domestic law and the different functions served by these bodies of law. The Essay provides examples of this …
The Conflicts Restatement And The World, Ralf Michaels
The Conflicts Restatement And The World, Ralf Michaels
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Comparative Law And Private International Law, Ralf Michaels
Comparative Law And Private International Law, Ralf Michaels
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Wächter, Carl Georg Von, Ralf Michaels
Wächter, Carl Georg Von, Ralf Michaels
Faculty Scholarship
Carl Georg von Wächter (1797-1880) was once considered 'one of the greatest German jurists of all times’, but was all but forgotten in the 20th century, despite an excellent dissertation on his work in private international law by Nikolaus Sandmann. In private international law, he is known mainly for his critique of earlier theories, in particular the theory of statutes. Positively, Wächter is mainly (and not accurately) known as a proponent of a strong preference for the lex fori and as such mainly presented in opposition to Friedrich Carl von Savigny’s theory (Savigny, Friedrich Carl von). Only recently has there …
Extraterritorial Enforcement Of National Laws In Connection With Online Commercial Activity, Marketa Trimble
Extraterritorial Enforcement Of National Laws In Connection With Online Commercial Activity, Marketa Trimble
Boyd Briefs / Road Scholars
Professor Marketa Trimble displayed this slideshow during her presentation at the Fifth Annual Internet Law Works-in-Progress conference, held at Santa Clara Law on March 7, 2015.
Limits Of Procedural Choice Of Law, S. I. Strong
Limits Of Procedural Choice Of Law, S. I. Strong
Faculty Publications
Commercial parties have long enjoyed significant autonomy in questions of substantive law. However, litigants do not have anywhere near the same amount of freedom to decide procedural matters. Instead, parties in litigation are generally considered to be subject to the procedural law of the forum court.
Although this particular conflict of laws rule has been in place for many years, a number of recent developments have challenged courts and commentators to consider whether and to what extent procedural rules should be considered mandatory in nature. If procedural rules are not mandatory but are instead merely “sticky” defaults, then it may …
Introduction - Papers From The 2013 American Society Of Comparative Law Annual Meeting, Kenneth S. Gallant, Sarah Howard Jenkins
Introduction - Papers From The 2013 American Society Of Comparative Law Annual Meeting, Kenneth S. Gallant, Sarah Howard Jenkins
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction-Papers From The 2013 American Society Of Comparative Law Annual Meeting, Sarah Howard Jenkins, Kenneth S. Gallant
Introduction-Papers From The 2013 American Society Of Comparative Law Annual Meeting, Sarah Howard Jenkins, Kenneth S. Gallant
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
What Is Extraterritorial Jurisdiction?, Anthony J. Colangelo
What Is Extraterritorial Jurisdiction?, Anthony J. Colangelo
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
The phenomenon of extraterritorial jurisdiction, or the exercise of legal power beyond territorial borders, presents lawyers, courts, and scholars with analytical onions comprising layers of national and international legal issues; as each layer peels away, more issues are revealed. U.S. courts, including the Supreme Court, have increasingly been wrestling this conceptual and doctrinal Hydra. Any legal analysis of extraterritorial jurisdiction leans heavily on the answers to two key definitional questions: What do we mean by “extraterritorial”? And, what do we mean by “jurisdiction”? Because the answer to the first question is often conditional on the answer to the second, the …
Global Patents: Limits Of Transnational Enforcement, Marketa Trimble
Global Patents: Limits Of Transnational Enforcement, Marketa Trimble
Boyd Briefs / Road Scholars
Professor Marketa Trimble presented these materials at the University of Macerata on November 6, 2013. The presentation discussed the increase in transnational patent litigation and what governments must do to protect patent owners in a globalized economy.
The United States Government As Defendant - One Example Of The Need For A Uniform Liability Regime To Govern Outer Space And Space-Related Activities, Joseph A. Bosco
The United States Government As Defendant - One Example Of The Need For A Uniform Liability Regime To Govern Outer Space And Space-Related Activities, Joseph A. Bosco
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Kiobel V. Royal Dutch Petroleum: The Alien Tort Statute's Jurisdictional Universalism In Retreat, Kenneth Anderson
Kiobel V. Royal Dutch Petroleum: The Alien Tort Statute's Jurisdictional Universalism In Retreat, Kenneth Anderson
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum (Shell), a long-running Alien Tort Statute (ATS) case brought by Nigerian plaintiffs alleging aiding and abetting liability against various multinational oil companies for human rights violations of the Nigerian government in the 1990s, including a non-US Shell corporation, first came before the US Supreme Court in the 2011-2012 term, following a sweeping Second Circuit holding that there was no "liability for corporations" under the ATS. In oral argument, however, several Justices asked a different question from corporate liability: noting that the case involved foreign plaintiffs, foreign defendants, and conduct taking place entirely on foreign sovereign …
Private Lawyer In Disguise? On The Absence Of Private Law And Private International Law In Martti Koskenniemi’S Work, Ralf Michaels
Private Lawyer In Disguise? On The Absence Of Private Law And Private International Law In Martti Koskenniemi’S Work, Ralf Michaels
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Filling The Gap Between Morality And Jurisprudence: The Use Of Binding Arbitration To Resolve Claims Of Restitution Regarding Nazi-Stolen Art , Rebecca Keim
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
Recognizing the gaps in existing legislation, this article will argue that disputes arising between claimants and museums regarding the repatriation of Nazi-looted artwork should be decided by binding arbitration rather than litigation. To facilitate such arbitration, international law should support the creation of an arbitration commission, which would provide the most efficient and consistent way to resolve claims. Moreover, a neutral forum with clear rules of law and procedure capable of resolving claims would not only be more fair to claimants, but also to museums and personal collectors. This article will first discuss the severity and magnitude of Nazi looting …
The Institutional Role In Arbitrating Patent Disputes, Murray Lee Eiland
The Institutional Role In Arbitrating Patent Disputes, Murray Lee Eiland
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
This paper will address, in particular, the nature of an international patent dispute and how the rules of the main arbitral institutions influence the unfolding arbitration. The main issue considered here is if institutional rules address the particular needs of patent disputes. Arbitral institutions are prepared to resolve many kinds of disputes, but because they operate under different rules, some may be more or less prepared for the special nature of IP. Patent related disputes are even more specialized. Even small differences in institutional rules can have a large impact upon the unfolding arbitration. After a brief consideration of arbitrability, …
Discovery In A Global Economy, Maurice Stucke
The Penalties For Piracy: An Empirical Study Of National Prosecution Of International Crime, Eugene Kontorovich
The Penalties For Piracy: An Empirical Study Of National Prosecution Of International Crime, Eugene Kontorovich
Faculty Working Papers
This Article examines the sentences imposed by courts around the world in prosecutions of Somali pirates captured on the high seas. Somali piracy has become perhaps the highest-volume area of international criminal law by national courts. As with other international crimes, international law is silent on the subject of penalties. The large number of parallel prosecutions of offenders from a single international "situation" offers an empirical window into the interactions between international and national law in municipal courts; into factors affecting punishment for international crimes and the hierarchy of international offenses; and of course into potential concerns with the current …
The Multiple Roles Of International Courts And Tribunals: Enforcement, Dispute Settlement, Constitutional And Administrative Review, Karen J. Alter
The Multiple Roles Of International Courts And Tribunals: Enforcement, Dispute Settlement, Constitutional And Administrative Review, Karen J. Alter
Faculty Working Papers
This chapter is part of an upcoming interdisciplinary volume on international law and politics. The chapter defines four judicial roles states have delegated to international courts (ICs) and documents the delegation of dispute settlement, administrative review, enforcement and constitutional review jurisdiction to ICs based on a coding of legal instruments defining the jurisdiction of 25 ICs. I show how the design of ICs varies by judicial role and argue that the delegation of multiple roles to ICs helps explain the shift in IC design to include compulsory jurisdiction and access for nonstate actors to initiate litigation. I am interested in …
Partisan Conflicts Over Presidential Authority, Jide Okechuku Nzelibe
Partisan Conflicts Over Presidential Authority, Jide Okechuku Nzelibe
Faculty Working Papers
A prevailing view in the legal and political science literature assumes that power holders seek to expand or contract their constitutional authority based on incentives that are intrinsic to the logic of the institutional offices they occupy. For instance, it is generally assumed that Presidents are empire builders who will almost always prefer maximum flexibility in shaping their policy objectives, whereas members of Congress may sometimes shirk their institutional prerogatives because of electoral incentives or collective action problems. A similar institutional logic underpins the view that federal courts will often seek to expand their interpretive authority in constitutional controversies at …
A Unified Theory Of International Law, The State, And The Individual: Transnational Legal Harmonization In The Context Of Economic And Legal Globalization, James D. Wilets
Faculty Scholarship
This Article presents an original theory of international law which reconciles the norm-making processes occurring at the international, state, and individual levels. It is the central thesis of this paper that economic globalization is not happening in a vacuum, but it is rather engendering legal globalization, much in the way that centralized regulation followed trans-state economic globalization within the United States and Europe.
Traditional definitions of international law do not address this phenomenon and consider these new forms of transnational norm creation as simply exceptions to the general rule that international law is created by nation-states within the framework of …
It's A Bird, It's A Plane, It's Jus Cogens!, Anthony D'Amato
It's A Bird, It's A Plane, It's Jus Cogens!, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
What we require—like the third bowl of soup in the story of the three bears—is a theory of jus cogens that is Just Right. I do not know if such a theory is possible. I don't even know if one is conceivable. But if someone conceives it, that person deserves the very next International Oscar. To qualify for the award, the theory must answer the following questions:
Whales: Their Emerging Right To Life, Anthony D'Amato, Sudhir K. Chopra
Whales: Their Emerging Right To Life, Anthony D'Amato, Sudhir K. Chopra
Faculty Working Papers
We have contended in this article that the evolution of the opinio juris of nations has encompassed five, and perhaps six, inexorable qualitative stages: free resource, regulation, conservation, protection, preservation and entitlement. We have argued that assigning whales an entitlement to life is the consequence of an emerging humanist right in international law — an example of the merging of the "is" and the "ought" of the law in the process of legitimization
Israel's Air Strike Against The Osiraq Reactor: A Retrospective, Anthony D'Amato
Israel's Air Strike Against The Osiraq Reactor: A Retrospective, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
Solarz argued that Israel's air strike "must be considered an understandable and legitimate act of self-defense." The point is that if a war exists between Iraq and Israel, Israel's bombing of the Osiraq nuclear reactor is just a normal and legitimate part of the general conduct of war. Whether or not Israel or Iraq, or both, regarded themselves as being in a state of war, any hostilities between them would amount to separate breaches of the peace in the eyes of the international community and would subject either country to forcible intercession by the U.N. Security Council. I quoted the …