Conflict of Laws Commons^™

Dissell V. Trans World Airlines: Constitutional Limitations On The Workers' Compensation Commission's Subject-Matter Jurisdiction, Patricia A. Nelson-Reade

Maine Law Review

To rule upon a workers' compensation claim, the Maine Workers' Compensation Commission must determine that it has both personal and subject-matter jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction is determined by applying Maine's "long-arm" statute. Subject-matter jurisdiction derives from the Commission's status as an administrative agency authorized to administer the Maine Workers' Compensation Act (MWCA). Although subject-matter determination generally involves a choice-of-law issue, in a workers' compensation claim having extraterritorial aspects, the Commission is not free to apply the compensation acts of other states that have contacts with the claim. Rather, the Commission may determine only if it has authority under the MWCA to …

From Natural Law To Legal Realism: Legal Philosophy, Legal Theory, And The Development Of American Conflict Of Laws Since 1830, Bruce Wardhaugh

Maine Law Review

There has been an alleged "revolution” in American conflict of laws during the past sixty or so years. Yet, like most revolutions in intellectual pursuits, this revolution did not arise ex nihilo. Indeed, the revolution can be correlated with a change in the manner in which both law and legal reasoning have come to be viewed by members of the legal profession in the twentieth century. It is this correlation that the present article explores. In particular, this article demonstrates the effect that the legal realist movement has had in the way conflict of laws problems have come to be …

Community Property And Conflict Of Laws: A Cacophony Of Cases, Karen Boxx

Articles

Justice Cardozo is reported to have said that "the average judge, when confronted by a problem in the conflict of laws, feels almost completely lost, and, like a drowning man, will grasp at a straw." Conflict of laws can be vexing, but the resolution of a controversy involving multiple states' marital property systems can quickly become impenetrable. This is in part due to the fundamental conceptual differences between community property and common law marital property paradigms, the inconsistencies in the use of similar terms in the different systems, and the significant differences among the laws of the community property states …

How To Survive The Culture Wars: Conflict Of Laws Post-Dobbs, Roger Michalski

American University Law Review

Abortion is the latest flashpoint in the culture wars. Post-Dobbs, red and blue states are hard at work codifying different approaches within their boundaries. However, pills, women, transactions, medical services, and information will cross those boundaries. Both sides already fight about who gets to regulate such boundary-crossing activity with each accusing the other of trespassing on the regulatory space of their disagreeing neighbors.

This is dangerous terrain. A house divided against itself needs tools to mediate and constructively tackle conflict. Without such tools, divisions will deepen and provide an endless stream of incidents to further divide the country. The choice …

Choice Of Law And The Preponderantly Multistate Rule: The Example Of Successor Corporation Products Liability, Diana Sclar

Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)

Most state rules of substantive law, whether legislative or judicial, ordinarily adjust rights and obligations among local parties with respect to local events. Conventional choice of law methodologies for adjudicating disputes with multistate connections all start from an explicit or implicit assumption of a choice between such locally oriented substantive rules. This article reveals, for the first time, that some state rules of substantive law ordinarily adjust rights and obligations with respect to parties and events connected to more than one state and only occasionally apply to wholly local matters. For these rules I use the term “nominally domestic rules …

Preemption: Executive Order By The Governor To Ensure A Safe & Healthy Georgia, Marisa P. Ahlzadeh, Fanny Chac

Georgia State University Law Review

The doctrine of preemption expresses the idea that “a higher authority of law will displace a lower authority of law when the two authorities come into conflict.” Preemption exists on both the federal and state level. According to the Georgia Constitution, local laws are permissible if they do not conflict with the state law on the subject. During a Public Health State of Emergency, the Governor of Georgia maintains certain expanded powers to take necessary action for the health and safety of the public. On April 2, 2020, Governor Brian Kemp (R) used these expanded powers to enact an Executive …

Discordant Environmental Laws: Using Statutory Flexibility And Multi-Objective Optimization To Reconcile Conflicting Laws, Mary Jane Angelo

UF Law Faculty Publications

The current morass of federal environmental laws has led to significant conflicts among statutes and the manner in which agencies implement them. In recent years, this quagmire of environmental laws has hindered the progress of a number of high-profile environmental regulatory programs and restoration projects. Neither the Courts nor legal scholars have developed approaches to resolving conflicts in a manner that harmonizes environmental statutes while at the same time protecting the most critical environmental resources. A standard methodology that optimizes the multiple objectives of environmental statutes and their implementing programs would greatly enhance decision-making and ensure that the most salient …

Geolocation, Geoblocking, And Private International Law, Marketa Trimble

Boyd Briefs / Road Scholars

Prof. Marketa Trimble delivered her lecture Geolocation, Geoblocking and Private International Law on October 6, 2016 to students attending the Law School of Masaryk University in the Czech Republic.

Advancing Ip Policy Through Conflict Of Laws Rules, Marketa Trimble

Boyd Briefs / Road Scholars

Prof. Marketa Trimble gave her presentation Advancing IP Policy through Conflict of Laws Rules at the IP Scholar Conference held August 8-9, 2013 at Cardozo School of Law.

Conflict Of Laws In Massachusetts, Part I: Current Choice-Of-Law Theory, Joseph W. Glannon, Gabriel H. Teninbaum

Suffolk University Law School Faculty Works

This article is a survey of conflict of laws principles in Massachusetts. It explains the historical and current Massachusetts approach to conflict of laws issues, and then applies that methodology to a variety of substantive and procedural topic areas. It concludes with recommendations for ways that Massachusetts courts can improve their analysis of these problems to promote fair and consistent outcomes.

Conflict Of Law And Surreptitious Taping Of Telephone Conversations, Carol M. Bast

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

Conflict Of Laws In Massachusetts, Part Ii: Related Problems In Selecting The Applicable Law, Joseph W. Glannon, Gabriel H. Teninbaum

Suffolk University Law School Faculty Works

This article is a survey of conflict of laws principles in Massachusetts. It explains the historical and current Massachusetts approach to conflict of laws issues, and then applies that methodology to a variety of substantive and procedural topic areas. It concludes with recommendations for ways that Massachusetts courts can improve their analysis of these problems to promote fair and consistent outcomes.

On Preemption, Congressional Intent, And Conflict Of Laws, Mary J. Davis

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

Conflicts scholars and jurists for centuries have sought an answer to the question of "what law controls?" by balancing a number of considerations. Chief among those considerations are the legitimate political and policy concerns of conflicting sovereigns. This article analyzes the Supreme Court's recent preemption decisions with an understanding of these theories and their underlying considerations. That analysis reveals that the Court's recent preemption decisions incorporate two modem conflict of laws theories: Governmental Interest Analysis and its corollary, Comparative Impairment. Each of these theories builds on the notion that a choice of law analysis should be motivated by selecting the …

Interest Groups, Contracts And Interest Analysis, Erin O'Hara O'Connor, Larry E. Ribstein

Scholarly Publications

No abstract provided.

Wallis V. Mrs. Smith's Pie Co., Carolyn Brack Armbrust

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Case Comments, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Conflict of Laws--Workmen's Compensation--Forum's Use of Foreign State's Tort Law for Recovery Against Third Party Does Not Require Forum's Use of Foreign State's Election Provision in Workmen's Compensation Suit

==============================

Constitutional Law--Advertising-Statute Restricting Size,Number, and Location of Gasoline Price Signs Is Unconstitutional

===============================

Evidence-Attorney--Client Privilege--Applicability When a Corporation Is the Client

===============================

Evidence--Attorney-Client Privilege-Doctor's Report to Attorney on Condition of Client Is Within Privilege

===============================

Federal Jurisdiction--In Federal Question Action Federal Court Is Competent To Exercise In Personam Jurisdiction Over Corporation if It Has Sufficient Contacts With United States

===============================

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure--Counterclaim Not Compulsory in First Suit …