Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (74)
- Administrative Law (69)
- Civil Law (69)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (69)
- Business Organizations Law (68)
-
- Human Rights Law (67)
- International Law (67)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (66)
- International Trade Law (66)
- Law and Politics (66)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (65)
- First Amendment (65)
- Internet Law (65)
- Law and Economics (65)
- State and Local Government Law (65)
- Workers' Compensation Law (65)
- Contracts (64)
- Estates and Trusts (64)
- Intellectual Property Law (64)
- Labor and Employment Law (64)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (64)
- Legal Profession (64)
- Supreme Court of the United States (64)
- Commercial Law (63)
- Government Contracts (63)
- Housing Law (63)
- Law and Society (63)
- Nonprofit Organizations Law (63)
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (56)
- DePaul University (6)
- Universitas Indonesia (5)
- University of Maine School of Law (5)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (4)
-
- American University in Cairo (1)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (1)
- Liberty University (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Purdue University (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- University of Central Florida (1)
- University of Nebraska at Omaha (1)
- University of South Florida (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Law (12)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Diversity (5)
- Conflict of laws (3)
-
- Federalism (3)
- Supreme Court (3)
- Choice of law (2)
- Conflict of law (2)
- Corporate Governance (2)
- Corporate Law (2)
- Corporate law (2)
- ESG (2)
- Education (2)
- Equality (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Justice (2)
- Negligence (2)
- SEC (2)
- Securities (2)
- Securities Law (2)
- Stakeholder Governance (2)
- Workers' compensation (2)
- A History of Securities Law in the Supreme Court (1)
- A.C. Pritchard (1)
- AI (1)
- Academic (1)
- Academic Resources (1)
- Academic freedom (1)
- Acceptance (1)
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (56)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (6)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (5)
- Maine Law Review (5)
- 2024 Event Invitations (1)
-
- 2024–2025 Flyers (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (1)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (CJCR) Blog (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Honors Undergraduate Theses (1)
- Journal of African Conflicts and Peace Studies (1)
- Marquette Law Review (1)
- Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business (1)
- Publications and Research (1)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (1)
- Senior Honors Theses (1)
- The Journal of Purdue Undergraduate Research (1)
- Theses and Dissertations (1)
- Theses/Capstones/Creative Projects (1)
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (1)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (1)
- Washington Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 92 of 92
Full-Text Articles in Conflict of Laws
Students For Fair Admissions: Affirming Affirmative Action And Shapeshifting Towards Cognitive Diversity?, Steven A. Ramirez
Students For Fair Admissions: Affirming Affirmative Action And Shapeshifting Towards Cognitive Diversity?, Steven A. Ramirez
Seattle University Law Review
The Roberts Court holds a well-earned reputation for overturning Supreme Court precedent regardless of the long-standing nature of the case. The Roberts Court knows how to overrule precedent. In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (SFFA), the Court’s majority opinion never intimates that it overrules Grutter v. Bollinger, the Court’s leading opinion permitting race-based affirmative action in college admissions. Instead, the Roberts Court applied Grutter as authoritative to hold certain affirmative action programs entailing racial preferences violative of the Constitution. These programs did not provide an end point, nor did they require assessment, review, periodic expiration, or revision for greater …
Anglo-Saxon Res Judicata Culture For Civil Law Systems, Cesare Cavallini
Anglo-Saxon Res Judicata Culture For Civil Law Systems, Cesare Cavallini
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
One traditional aspect distinguishing the common law system from the civil law one lies in the perceived disparities in the inspiration of the law-making process. The Anglo-Saxon system typically grounds its rules in explicit and discernible policies spanning social, anthropological, and economic realms directly relevant to the circumstances. In contrast, the civil law tradition frequently necessitates a fixed conceptual framework, sometimes detached from the practical needs of society. Or, at least, this dynamic persisted until recent changes prompted by the “doing business” model, which has timidly ascended to the forefront of the State agenda, particularly across Europe, notably in Italy. …