Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- International Law (8)
- Jurisdiction (8)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (6)
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Law and Society (6)
-
- Civil Procedure (4)
- Contracts (4)
- Courts (4)
- Rule of Law (4)
- Civil Law (3)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (3)
- Internet Law (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Other Law (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Supreme Court of the United States (3)
- Transnational Law (3)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Commercial Law (2)
- Common Law (2)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (2)
- Family Law (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Law and Race (2)
- Institution
-
- Duke Law (3)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (3)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (2)
- Marquette University Law School (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
-
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- Singapore Management University (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Maine School of Law (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- University of Montana (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Conflict of laws (4)
- Sovereignty (4)
- Choice of law (2)
- Federal government (2)
- Intellectual property (2)
-
- Jurisdiction (2)
- 1866 Civil Rights Act (1)
- 1922 Compact (1)
- 1964 Decree (1)
- 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1)
- 523; 523(a)(2)(A); Bankruptcy Code; Debtors; Discharge Debt; Debt; Fraud; False Pretenses; False Representation; 523(a)(2)(B); Lamar (1)
- Adjudicative authority (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Archer & Cofrin; Single Asset; Bankruptcy Law; Title 11; Circuit Split; In re Appling (1)
- Arizona (1)
- Atlantic Marine (1)
- Birth control--Law and legislation (1)
- Boulder Canyon Project Act (1)
- Bremen (1)
- Chemerinsky (1)
- Child custody (1)
- Choice of court (1)
- Choice-of-law (1)
- Civil remedies (1)
- Colorado River Basin (1)
- Commercial disputes (1)
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services et al (1)
- Community property regime (1)
- Compensation (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Texas A&M Law Review (3)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (2)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (2)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (2)
-
- Akron Law Review (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (1)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (1)
- Cornell International Law Journal (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Georgia Law Review (1)
- Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design (1)
- Journal of Legislation (1)
- Maine Law Review (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Nevada Law Journal (1)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (1)
- Notre Dame Law Review (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (1)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 31 of 31
Full-Text Articles in Conflict of Laws
How To Fill A Procedural Loophole: Re-Evaluating The Ragan And Walker Analysis In Light Of Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 4(M), Holly M. Boggs
How To Fill A Procedural Loophole: Re-Evaluating The Ragan And Walker Analysis In Light Of Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 4(M), Holly M. Boggs
Georgia Law Review
Legislatures implement statutes of limitations to
protect defendants from being brought into lawsuits for
incidents long past. However, a proceduralloophole in
the Georgiafederal court system could permit plaintiffs
to disregardstatutes of limitations and wait as long as
they please to notify a defendant of a pending claim.
The loophole exists because federal courts in Georgia
must defer to state law governing the tolling of statutes
of limitations, and that state law is procedurally
incompatible with the federal court's system. In order
to fill the procedural loophole, this Note argues that the
Eleventh Circuit should apply the federal rule-rather
than Georgia's …