Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Conflict of Laws Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 31 - 60 of 91

Full-Text Articles in Conflict of Laws

Introduction, Hal Abramson Jan 2019

Introduction, Hal Abramson

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Reference Book focuses on the new Singapore Mediation Convention for enforcing cross-border mediated settlement agreements. It is designed to deliver on its title-as a reference book. We hope that it will inform discussions as states contemplate ratifying the Singapore Convention and will aid users when interpreting the Convention.


The Role Of Empirical Research And Dispute System Design In Proposing And Developing International Treaties: A Case Study Of The Singapore Convention On Mediation, S. I. Strong Jan 2019

The Role Of Empirical Research And Dispute System Design In Proposing And Developing International Treaties: A Case Study Of The Singapore Convention On Mediation, S. I. Strong

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Article seeks to provide insights into the "black box" of early treaty-making processes by undertaking a case study of the development of the United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation, known colloquially as the Singapore Convention on Mediation (Singapore Convention). The discussion focuses on several issues that have seldom been addressed in the legal literature, including the way in which a proposal for an international treaty makes its way to the relevant decision-makers and how those decision-makers determine which of the various alternatives to pursue. The analysis also considers how interested individuals can assist the treaty-proposing …


Report On Empirical Study Of Business Users Regarding International Mediation And Enforcement Mechanisms, David S. Weiss, Michael R. Griffith Jan 2019

Report On Empirical Study Of Business Users Regarding International Mediation And Enforcement Mechanisms, David S. Weiss, Michael R. Griffith

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This report will proceed as follows. Part II describes the methodology of the IMI and NJCU IDR study in conjunction with analyzing the GPC Survey. Part III provides basic information of the demographics of the users, their sectors of business, and other pertinent data that can be useful for further academic scholarly review. Part IV analyzes the user's response to the surveys. Part V will analyze pertinent questions from the GPC Survey. Finally, Part VI provides concluding thoughts on the results of this report.

The responses to the survey questions will be provided if requested with personal identifying information removed …


What's In A Name? The Terms "Commercial" And "Mediation" In The Singapore Convention On Mediation, Ellen E. Deason Jan 2019

What's In A Name? The Terms "Commercial" And "Mediation" In The Singapore Convention On Mediation, Ellen E. Deason

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

One could interpret Shakespeare's famous quote as standing for the proposition that labels do not alter the essence of the thing named. In this article I draw inspiration from the quote to provide a foil for examining the use of the terms "commercial" and "mediation" in the Singapore Convention and Mediation Model Law. I will consider how the terms are framed and defined, the extent to which the names and their associated meanings introduce new ideas, and how their use might matter for the interpretation of important concepts in these instruments. Part I of the article discusses the term "commercial" …


Recognition By Any Other Name: Article 3 Of The Singapore Convention On Mediation, Timothy Schnabel Jan 2019

Recognition By Any Other Name: Article 3 Of The Singapore Convention On Mediation, Timothy Schnabel

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The heart of the Singapore Convention is contained in its third article. Other parts of the treaty's text, such as Article 1 (addressing the scope of the Convention), consumed more hours of the negotiations, and Article 5 (addressing grounds for refusal) will likely be the focus of most of the eventual litigation regarding the Convention's application to particular disputes. Moreover, most of the Convention's fifteen other articles are longer and more detailed than Article 3. Yet only Article 3 imposes affirmative obligations on Parties to the Convention. All other articles merely play supporting roles, such as placing boundaries on the …


Singapore Convention Defences Based On Mediator's Misconduct: Articles 5.1(E) & (F), Michel Kallipetis Jan 2019

Singapore Convention Defences Based On Mediator's Misconduct: Articles 5.1(E) & (F), Michel Kallipetis

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

At the February 2019 ICC Mediation Competition in Paris, Damien Cote from Canada and David Lewis from New York moderated a "debate" on the Singapore Convention. One of the panellists launched into a full-scale attack on the Convention, in which he dismissed it on the basis that the "whole document resembled the New York Convention and was redolent of arbitration rather than mediation." The speaker focused on Article 5 and the Grounds for Refusing Relief, and he was particularly critical of Articles 5.1(e) and (f). He expressed his view that these articles were apposite to the setting aside of an …


The Singapore Convention: Reflections On Articles 1.3 On Scope, 8.1(B) On Reservations, And 12 On Regional Economic Integration Organizations, Norel Rosner Jan 2019

The Singapore Convention: Reflections On Articles 1.3 On Scope, 8.1(B) On Reservations, And 12 On Regional Economic Integration Organizations, Norel Rosner

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The General Assembly of the United Nations adopted on 20 December 2018 the United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (the "Convention"). The Convention opened for signature in Singapore in August 2019. The UN adoption marks the culmination of a process that started in 2014 at the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law ("UNCITRAL"), first with discussions on the proposal to take up this project and then, as of September 2015, on the actual principles, form, and text of the instruments to be drafted. The Convention was drafted in conjunction with a Model. Law that contains …


Reservations In The Singapore Convention-Helping To Make The "New York Dream" Come True, Itai Apter, Coral Henig Muchnik Jan 2019

Reservations In The Singapore Convention-Helping To Make The "New York Dream" Come True, Itai Apter, Coral Henig Muchnik

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Following a brief introduction of the Singapore Convention, this article discusses the concept of reservations in international law and the importance of such mechanisms for facilitating adherence to multilateral treaties. It then focuses on two elements of the reservation mechanism including their drafting history, purposes, and consequences. In the final section of the article, we explain how these reservations will likely constitute a key component to the success of the Singapore Convention.


Choice Of Law And The Right Of Publicity: Rethinking The Domicile Rule, Mary Lafrance Jan 2019

Choice Of Law And The Right Of Publicity: Rethinking The Domicile Rule, Mary Lafrance

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Opening Remarks: The Federalism Dimension Of Constitutional Property, Stewart E. Sterk Jan 2019

Opening Remarks: The Federalism Dimension Of Constitutional Property, Stewart E. Sterk

Articles

No abstract provided.


What's The [Irreparable] Harm?: Incentivizing Creativity Through Preliminary Injunctions In Copyright Law, Arielle Matza Apr 2017

What's The [Irreparable] Harm?: Incentivizing Creativity Through Preliminary Injunctions In Copyright Law, Arielle Matza

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Anchoring More Than Babies: Children's Rights After Obergefell V. Hodges, Susan Hazeldean Apr 2017

Anchoring More Than Babies: Children's Rights After Obergefell V. Hodges, Susan Hazeldean

Cardozo Law Review

The Supreme Court's recent decision upholding a constitutional right to samesex marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges was a huge advance not just for LGBT Americans, but also for children. Obergefefl suggests children have a fundamental right to be raised by their parents without being demeaned or marginalized by the state. This has important implications for other vulnerable children, including U.S. citizen children with undocumented parents. This Article argues that deporting these children's parents contravenes their fundamental right to be raised by a loving parent, to equal protection of the law, and to remain in the United States as U.S. citizens. …


Reasonable Standards For Contract Interpretations Under The Cisg, Donald J. Smythe Oct 2016

Reasonable Standards For Contract Interpretations Under The Cisg, Donald J. Smythe

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The United Nations ("UN") Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Good ("CISG") offers the promise of harmonizing international sales law and facilitating international trade and global commerce. But there is a "homeward trend bias" that may encourage domestic courts to construe the gaps in the CISG broadly and fill them with non-uniform domestic legal rules. Questions about contract interpretation under the CISG raise the same concerns about a homeward trend bias as questions about the interpretation of express CISG provisions. The CISG has express provisions governing contract interpretation but their application may not provide an unambiguous interpretation. This …


A Comparative Study Of Party Autonomy And Its Limitations In International Contracts, Sarah Laval Oct 2016

A Comparative Study Of Party Autonomy And Its Limitations In International Contracts, Sarah Laval

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

No abstract provided.


Customary International Law, The Separation Of Powers, And The Choice Of Law In Armed Conflicts And Wars, John C. Dehn Aug 2016

Customary International Law, The Separation Of Powers, And The Choice Of Law In Armed Conflicts And Wars, John C. Dehn

Cardozo Law Review

After over fourteen years of continuous armed conflict, neither courts nor commentators are closer to a common understanding of how, or the extent to which, international and U.S. law interact to regulate acts of belligerency by the United States. This Article articulates and defends the first normative theory regarding the general relationship of customary international law to the U.S. legal system that fully harmonizes Supreme Court precedent. It then applies this theory to customary international laws of war to articulate the legal framework regulating the armed conflicts of the United States. It demonstrates that the relationship of customary international law …


The Ninth Circuit's Decision In Von Saher V. Norton Simon Museum Of Art At Pasadena: The Invocation Of The Act Of State Doctrine And Its Implications For Future Nazi-Stolen Art Claims, Erica Wolf Jan 2016

The Ninth Circuit's Decision In Von Saher V. Norton Simon Museum Of Art At Pasadena: The Invocation Of The Act Of State Doctrine And Its Implications For Future Nazi-Stolen Art Claims, Erica Wolf

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


When A U.S. Domestic Court Can Enjoin A Foreign Court Proceeding, Samantha Koeninger, Richard Bales Apr 2014

When A U.S. Domestic Court Can Enjoin A Foreign Court Proceeding, Samantha Koeninger, Richard Bales

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

A federal court, at its discretion, may enjoin a parallel proceeding in a foreign court. Currently, there is a split among the federal courts of appeals as to the circumstances under which an anti-suit injunction should be granted. The Fifth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits have adopted the "liberal approach." These courts have found that a court may enjoin a foreign proceeding if the parallel litigation is vexatious and duplicative. In contrast, the First, Second, Third, Sixth, Eighth, and D.C. Circuits have adopted the "restrictive approach." These courts require a higher standard, and have found that if the parallel litigation is …


Transnational Forfeiture Of The Getty Bronze, Derek Fincham Jan 2014

Transnational Forfeiture Of The Getty Bronze, Derek Fincham

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Italy has been engaged in an ongoing fifty-year struggle to recover an ancient Greek bronze. The "Bronze Statue of a Victorious Youth" has a remarkable story. It was lost at sea in the Adriatic in antiquity; found by chance in international waters; smuggled into the Italian seaside village of Fano; hidden first in a bathtub, then a cabbage field; smuggled and hidden in Brazil; later conserved in Germany and London; and ultimately purchased by the Getty Museum only months after the death of the Trust's namesake, J. Paul Getty. Getty refused to allow his museum to purchase the statue during …


Health Exchange Federalism: Striking The Balance Between State Flexibility And Consumer Protection In Aca Implementation, Sam Solomon Jun 2013

Health Exchange Federalism: Striking The Balance Between State Flexibility And Consumer Protection In Aca Implementation, Sam Solomon

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Personal Jurisdiction And Choice Of Law, Stewart E. Sterk Mar 2013

Personal Jurisdiction And Choice Of Law, Stewart E. Sterk

Articles

The article critiques the Supreme Court's recent personal jurisdiction decisions for failing to provide a clear doctrinal framework, arguing that the Court has oscillated between prioritizing state sovereignty and individual liberty without adequately balancing these interests. The author contends that personal jurisdiction doctrine must evolve to address the complexities of modern, interconnected commerce while protecting both state regulatory power and defendants' reliance interests. The analysis emphasizes the need for a coherent approach that integrates fairness, foreseeability, and sovereign authority in jurisdictional determinations.


Arbitration And The Future Of Delaware's Corporate Law Franchise, Brian Jm Quinn Jan 2013

Arbitration And The Future Of Delaware's Corporate Law Franchise, Brian Jm Quinn

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

On September 9, 2011, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. ("Skyworks") and Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporation ("AATI") entered into a merger agreement. The agreement included an uncommon provision with respect to dispute resolution. In part, that provision stated, "the parties hereto agree that any and all disputes arising under or related in any way to this Agreement or the Transactions shall be resolved solely in arbitration before the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. " Until AATI later sought specific performance of the merger agreement via arbitration pursuant to that provision, little notice had been paid by outside observers to the …


Contested States And The Rights And Obligations Of The Jus Ad Bellum, Christian Henderson Jan 2013

Contested States And The Rights And Obligations Of The Jus Ad Bellum, Christian Henderson

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article examines the rights and obligations of contested states under the jus ad bellum, arguing that these entities, despite lacking widespread recognition as states, should be considered international legal persons. It challenges the traditional state-only conception of international personality and advocates for a recognition-based approach, which would extend the prohibition of the use of force and the right to self-defense to contested states. The analysis highlights the complexities and contradictions in applying these principles, particularly regarding collective self-defense, and suggests that a pragmatic interpretation could balance international peace and security with the legal protection of contested states.


Where Corporations Are: Why Casual Visits To New York Are Bad For Business, Jeanne L. Schroeder, David G. Carlson Jan 2013

Where Corporations Are: Why Casual Visits To New York Are Bad For Business, Jeanne L. Schroeder, David G. Carlson

Articles

In this article, we examine the recent case of Hotel 71 Mezz Lender LLC v. Falor (2010), from the New York Court of Appeals. In this case, New York’s highest court held that LLCs are “present” in New York for jurisdictional purposes when the president of the LLC has submitted to New York jurisdiction in an unrelated law suit against him personally, and where the president came to New York for a deposition in that action. This, we claim, was unconstitutional. In addition, the New York Court of Appeals pronounced itself obliged by the United States Constitution to change the …


Defamation And False Rape Claims: Policies, Attitudes, And Suggested Reform In The United States And The United Kingdom, Claire Steinman Jan 2013

Defamation And False Rape Claims: Policies, Attitudes, And Suggested Reform In The United States And The United Kingdom, Claire Steinman

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note examines the legal and societal implications of defamation cases arising from false rape claims in the United States and the United Kingdom. It argues that while U.S. defamation law provides stricter standards for liability, the U.K.'s approach to punishment is more effective in deterring false claims. The optimal solution, the note suggests, is to combine the U.S. legal framework for determining liability with the U.K.'s harsher penalties to protect both the falsely accused and genuine victims.


Guilty Until Proven Innocent: Providing Effective Relief To The Actually Innocent In New York, Steven M. Cytryn Jul 2012

Guilty Until Proven Innocent: Providing Effective Relief To The Actually Innocent In New York, Steven M. Cytryn

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

No abstract provided.


Towards A Concensus On The Treatment Of Multinational Enterprise Groups In Insolvency, Irit Mevorach Apr 2010

Towards A Concensus On The Treatment Of Multinational Enterprise Groups In Insolvency, Irit Mevorach

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

Insolvency of multinational enterprise groups is a complex and difficult process, which is partly why it has, thus far, failed to receive comprehensive treatment in legal regimes, despite its major importance. However, with UNCITRAL Working Group V recently taking this topic on board, this situation may change. The deliberations have now reached the final stages; it is therefore the aim of this paper to evaluate whether the Working Group's current proposals are normatively attractive and whether they are feasible (in terms of being embraced by legal regimes). The paper focuses on the deliberations regarding the international aspects of enterprise groups …


Bargains Bicoastal: New Light On Contract Theory, Geoffrey P. Miller Apr 2010

Bargains Bicoastal: New Light On Contract Theory, Geoffrey P. Miller

Cardozo Law Review

Recent research has shown that large companies select New York law and New York courts to govern disputes under commercial contracts. Because these parties make choice-of-law and forum selection decisions before conflicts arise, there is reason to believe that their preference for New York reflects an effort to select efficient terms. This Article compares New York's contract law with that of its most natural competitor, California. It turns out that New York strictly enforces bargains and displays little tolerance for efforts to rewrite deals ex post. California, in contrast, more willingly reforms contracts for reasons of fairness, equity, morality, or …


"Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Huddled Masses," But Not Your Homosexual Partners: International Solutions To America's Same-Sex Immigration Dilemma, Matthew J. Hrutkay Jan 2010

"Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Huddled Masses," But Not Your Homosexual Partners: International Solutions To America's Same-Sex Immigration Dilemma, Matthew J. Hrutkay

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The note argues that U.S. immigration law, despite its emphasis on family unification, excludes same-sex couples due to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), creating a conflict between policy goals and legal realities. It proposes that international models, such as those from Australia and Canada, offer viable solutions to reconcile this dilemma while addressing conservative concerns about federal recognition of same-sex marriage.


The Third Time Is Not Always A Charm: The Troublesome Legacy Of A Dutch Art Dealer-The Limitation And Act Of State Defenses In Looted Art Cases, Bert Demarsin Jan 2010

The Third Time Is Not Always A Charm: The Troublesome Legacy Of A Dutch Art Dealer-The Limitation And Act Of State Defenses In Looted Art Cases, Bert Demarsin

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


What Can Be Done Against Cyber Hate? Freedom Of Speech Versus Hate Speech In The Council Of Europe, Isabelle Rorive Jul 2009

What Can Be Done Against Cyber Hate? Freedom Of Speech Versus Hate Speech In The Council Of Europe, Isabelle Rorive

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article examines the tension between freedom of speech and the regulation of hate speech on the internet, focusing on the challenges posed by conflicting international laws and jurisdictional issues. It highlights the Council of Europe's efforts to address cyber hate through legal frameworks like the Cybercrime Convention and the Additional Protocol, while discussing the limitations of these measures. The co-regulatory model, combining government oversight with private sector accountability, is presented as a potential solution, though concerns about censorship and free speech remain.