Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (856)
- Seattle University School of Law (192)
- University of Michigan Law School (38)
- DePaul University (26)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (23)
-
- Vanderbilt University Law School (22)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (10)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (10)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (9)
- BLR (8)
- Fordham Law School (8)
- Duke Law (7)
- University of Georgia School of Law (6)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Brooklyn Law School (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- The University of Akron (4)
- University of Maine School of Law (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- Association of American Law Schools (3)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (3)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (3)
- Pepperdine University (3)
- UIC School of Law (3)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (41)
- Conflict of laws (26)
- Constitutional Law (23)
- Jurisdiction (20)
- Federalism (19)
-
- Constitution (18)
- Law (18)
- Conflict of Laws (17)
- Due process (14)
- Supreme Court (14)
- Evidence (12)
- Courts (10)
- Criminal law (10)
- International law (10)
- Copyright (9)
- International Law (8)
- Legislation (8)
- Religion (8)
- Contracts (7)
- Regulation (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Securities Law (7)
- Supreme court (7)
- Abortion (6)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Corporations (6)
- ESG (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Full Faith and Credit Clause (6)
- Indonesia (6)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (734)
- Seattle University Law Review (192)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (122)
- Michigan Law Review (38)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (26)
-
- Vanderbilt Law Review (20)
- Touro Law Review (19)
- Faculty Scholarship (16)
- ExpressO (8)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (6)
- Faculty Working Papers (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- Akron Law Review (4)
- Articles (4)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design (4)
- Maine Law Review (4)
- Northwestern University Law Review (4)
- Supreme Court Case Files (4)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (4)
- American University Law Review (3)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (3)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (3)
- Florida State University Law Review (3)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (3)
- Journal of Legal Education (3)
- Pepperdine Law Review (3)
- UIC Law Review (3)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- BYU Law Review (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 1231 - 1260 of 1326
Full-Text Articles in Conflict of Laws
A Real World Perspective On Choice Of Law, Robert A. Sedler
A Real World Perspective On Choice Of Law, Robert A. Sedler
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Romer V. Evans And The Constitutionality Of Higher Lawmaking, Anthony M. Dillof
Romer V. Evans And The Constitutionality Of Higher Lawmaking, Anthony M. Dillof
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Equitable Remedies And Other Types Of Non-Money Judgments In United States And French Courts: A Comparative Analysis, Noele Sophie Rigot
The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Equitable Remedies And Other Types Of Non-Money Judgments In United States And French Courts: A Comparative Analysis, Noele Sophie Rigot
LLM Theses and Essays
Courts of industrialized nations are often faced with adjudication of cases which involve foreign components. It is common for those courts to be asked by individuals or legal entities from a transnational environment to adjudicate with regard to some elements already adjudged in a different legal system as if it were a local judgment. The question that arises is how effects should be given when dealing with prior adjudications. Most countries agree to recognize some effects determined by foreign jurisdictions, as long as those determinations meet standards that guarantee proper integration of the foreign decision into the domestic setting. These …
Tragic Irony Of American Federalism: National Sovereignty Versus State Sovereignty In Slavery And In Freedom, The Federalism In The 21st Century: Historical Perspectives, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Tragic Irony Of American Federalism: National Sovereignty Versus State Sovereignty In Slavery And In Freedom, The Federalism In The 21st Century: Historical Perspectives, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Faculty Scholarship
A plurality on the Supreme Court seeks to establish a state-sovereignty based theory of federalism that imposes sharp limitations on Congress's legislative powers. Using history as authority, they admonish a return to the constitutional "first principles" of the Founders. These "first principles," in their view, attribute all governmental authority to "the consent of the people of each individual state, not the consent of the undifferentiated people of the Nation as a whole." Because the people of each state are the source of all governmental power, they maintain, "where the Constitution is silent about the exercise of a particular power-that is, …
Judicial Jurisdiction In The Conflict Of Laws Course: Adding A Comparative Dimension, Linda J. Silberman
Judicial Jurisdiction In The Conflict Of Laws Course: Adding A Comparative Dimension, Linda J. Silberman
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
In this Article, Professor Silberman suggests that comparative law materials can usefully be introduced in the conflict of laws course. She proposes the subject of adjudicatory jurisdiction as a good place to start. She argues that a comparison of the U.S. approach with the English and European approaches (particularly under the Brussels Convention) is evidence of the desirability of a jurisdictional system grounded more on rules and/or discretion rather than on a constitutional standard of reasonableness. She takes issue with the contention of her colleague Professor Andreas Lowenfeld that "reasonableness" has been accepted as an international standard for the assertion …
A Conflict Of Laws And Morals: The Choice Of Law Implications Of Hawaii's Recognition Of Same-Sex Marriages, Joseph W. Hovermill
A Conflict Of Laws And Morals: The Choice Of Law Implications Of Hawaii's Recognition Of Same-Sex Marriages, Joseph W. Hovermill
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interstate Preemption: The Right To Travel, The Right To Life, And The Right To Die, Lea Brilmayer
Interstate Preemption: The Right To Travel, The Right To Life, And The Right To Die, Lea Brilmayer
Michigan Law Review
State laws differ, and they differ on issues of tremendous importance to the ways that we conduct our lives. Abortion and the right to die are two issues on which state law intersects with deeply held moral convictions, and on which state laws vary. With so much hanging in the balance, it is not surprising that those who find themselves outvoted or outmaneuvered in local political processes sometimes seek a legal climate more compatible with their beliefs about human decency and dignity. The right to "vote with one's feet" - to travel or move to another state and trade a …
"But Whoever Treasures Freedom…": The Right To Travel And Extraterritorial Abortions, Seth F. Kreimer
"But Whoever Treasures Freedom…": The Right To Travel And Extraterritorial Abortions, Seth F. Kreimer
Michigan Law Review
In a prior article, I addressed the problem of extraterritorial abortions under the assumption that the federal constitutional right of reproductive choice would be repudiated by the Supreme Court on Justice Scalia's theory that such rights lack sufficiently deep roots in the history and traditions surrounding the framing of the Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment. I argued there that a constitutional methodology that relied on traditions and expectations of the Framers would provide a strong basis for concluding that the Constitution imposes severe limits on states' power to project their moralities extraterritorially. If Justice Scalia is serious about a regard …
Conflict Of Constitutions? No Thanks: A Response To Professors Brilmayer And Kreimer, Gerald L. Neuman
Conflict Of Constitutions? No Thanks: A Response To Professors Brilmayer And Kreimer, Gerald L. Neuman
Michigan Law Review
This colloquy was organized around the unpleasant hypothesis that the Supreme Court would overrule Roe v. Wade and that Congress would not fill the resulting void with federal legislation. The abortion debate would then move to the states, where local majorities could enact their own resolutions. If the local majorities were large enough, they could even write their local resolutions into their state constitutions. The contrasting state constitutions that could result might then replicate the comparativists' current juxtaposition between the U.S. Constitution and the constitutions of Germany and Ireland. In some states, prohibition of abortion would be constitutionally required, while …
Identifying, Protecting And Preserving Individual Rights: Traditional Federal Court Functions, Roger J. Miner '56
Identifying, Protecting And Preserving Individual Rights: Traditional Federal Court Functions, Roger J. Miner '56
Constitutional Law
No abstract provided.
Historical Framework For Reviving Constitutional Protection For Property And Contract Rights , James L. Kainen
Historical Framework For Reviving Constitutional Protection For Property And Contract Rights , James L. Kainen
Faculty Scholarship
Post-New Deal constitutionalism is in search of a theory that justifies judicial intervention on behalf of individual rights while simultaneously avoiding the charge of "Lochnerism."' The dominant historical view dismisses post-bellum substantive due process as an anomalous development in the American constitutional tradition. Under this approach, Lochner represents unbounded protection for economic rights that permitted the judiciary to read laissez faire, pro-business policy preferences into the constitutional text. Today's revisionists have mounted a substantial challenge to the dismissive views of traditionalists. Indeed, some claim Lochner reached the right result, but for the wrong reason. The revisionists characterize substantive due process …
Imbalance Of Powers: Can Congressional Lawsuits Serve As Counterweight?, Carlin Meyer
Imbalance Of Powers: Can Congressional Lawsuits Serve As Counterweight?, Carlin Meyer
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Faculty Scholarship
The exclusionary evidence rules derived from the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments continue to play an important role in constitutional criminal procedure, despite the intense controversy that surrounds them. The primary justification for these rules has shifted from an "imperative of judicial integrity" to the "deterrence of police conduct that violates... [constitutional] rights." Regardless of the justification it uses for the rules' existence, the Supreme Court continues to limit their breadth "at the margin," when "the acknowledged costs to other values vital to a rational system of criminal justice" outweigh the deterrent effects of exclusion. The most notable limitation on …
Carnegie-Mellon University V. Cohill: The United States Supreme Court Upholds The Authority Of Federal Courts To Remand Properly Removed Pendent Jurisdiction Claims, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 389 (1988), William Barrett
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Enforcement Provisions Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1866: A Legislative History In Light Of Runyon V. Mccrary, The Review Essay And Comments: Reconstructing Reconstruction, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Enforcement Provisions Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1866: A Legislative History In Light Of Runyon V. Mccrary, The Review Essay And Comments: Reconstructing Reconstruction, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Faculty Scholarship
The purpose of this Comment is to examine the history of the enactment and early enforcement of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 from the perspective of the remedies Congress sought to provide to meet the problems that necessitated the legislation. Its main foci are the statute's enforcement provisions and their early implementation, an aspect of the history of the statute that has not been fully considered in relation to section one, the provision that has received the most scholarly attention. The occasion of this study is the Supreme Court's reconsideration of Runyon v. McCrary' in Patterson v. McLean Credit …
Response, Lea Brilmayer
Response, Lea Brilmayer
Florida State University Law Review
Professor Brilmayer responds to the commentaries of Professors Laycock, Tushnet, and George.
Asking The Right Questions, Lawrence C. George
Asking The Right Questions, Lawrence C. George
Florida State University Law Review
Professor George analyzes what he sees as Professor Brilmayer's major thesis: that neither modern choice of law nor equal protection principles provide a sound basis for jurisdictional doctrine. Concluding that she has failed to consider a possible Critical Legal Studies approach to the problems she poses, he suggests one.
Equality And The Citizens Of Sister States, Douglas Laycock
Equality And The Citizens Of Sister States, Douglas Laycock
Florida State University Law Review
Professor Laycock's commentary is written in response to Lea Brilmayer's article in this edition. Brilmayer and Laycock agree that states owe equal treatment to citizens of sister states, and that the obligation does not extend to the exercise of government power. But Laycock would derive these rules from constitutional text and structural needs of the federal union. He think that Brilmayer's broader political theory is only marginally relevant to their shared conclusion.
Interstate Federalism, Lea Brilmayer
Equal Protection Limitations On Choice Of Law Decisions, Anne-Marie Witters
Equal Protection Limitations On Choice Of Law Decisions, Anne-Marie Witters
LLM Theses and Essays
In this paper, the author seeks to clarify the implications of contemporary Fourteenth Amendment theory for state autonomy in deciding conflict cases, concentrating on state discrimination against non-residents and aliens. The author argues that laws which distinguish locals from residents of other states should be reviewed under strict scrutiny, just as laws that discriminate against aliens. Also U.S. choice of law methodologies from both past and present are discussed, with the conclusion that modern theories violate the Equal Protection Clause of their systematic preference for forum residents and parochial results. After a review of the European conflicts system, the choice …
Interest Analysis As Constitutional Law, Gene R. Shreve
Interest Analysis As Constitutional Law, Gene R. Shreve
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Criminal Evidence And The Ear Of The Law, Daniel H. Derby
Criminal Evidence And The Ear Of The Law, Daniel H. Derby
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Revolutionary Constitutionalism In The Era Of The Civil War And Reconstruction , Robert J. Kaczorowski
Revolutionary Constitutionalism In The Era Of The Civil War And Reconstruction , Robert J. Kaczorowski
Faculty Scholarship
The meaning and scope of the fourteenth amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 remain among the most controversial issues in American constitutional law. Professor Kaczorowski contends that the issues have generated more controversy than they warrant, in part because scholars analyzing the legislative history of the amendment and statute have approached their task with preconceptions reflecting twentieth century legal concerns. He argues that the most important question for the framers was whether national or state governments possessed primary authority to determine and secure the status and rights of American citizens. Relying on records of the congressional debates as …
Duties And Powers Respecting Foreign Crimes, Daniel H. Derby
Duties And Powers Respecting Foreign Crimes, Daniel H. Derby
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Nevada V. Hall, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Through A Glass Darkly: Equal Protection For Home Rule Units In Illinois – Urbana V. Houser, Daniel H. Derby
Through A Glass Darkly: Equal Protection For Home Rule Units In Illinois – Urbana V. Houser, Daniel H. Derby
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Foley V. Connelie, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1975-1976, Lloyd George Jackson Ii, John Burdick Koch, Alan Dale Moats, Thomas A. Vorbach
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1975-1976, Lloyd George Jackson Ii, John Burdick Koch, Alan Dale Moats, Thomas A. Vorbach
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Examining Board Of Engineers V. Flores Deotero, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Examining Board Of Engineers V. Flores Deotero, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Zicarelli V. New Jersey State Commission Of Investigation, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Zicarelli V. New Jersey State Commission Of Investigation, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.