Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Internet Law (2650)
- Science and Technology Law (2046)
- Privacy Law (1720)
- Intellectual Property Law (1593)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (770)
-
- Computer Sciences (765)
- Information Security (728)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (609)
- Engineering (530)
- International Law (511)
- Legal Studies (506)
- Constitutional Law (488)
- Forensic Science and Technology (478)
- Criminal Law (472)
- Computer Engineering (451)
- Contracts (436)
- Business Organizations Law (430)
- Banking and Finance Law (429)
- Administrative Law (423)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (423)
- Legislation (420)
- Communications Law (411)
- Law and Economics (404)
- Electrical and Computer Engineering (396)
- Human Rights Law (386)
- Torts (386)
- Consumer Protection Law (385)
- State and Local Government Law (383)
- Institution
-
- UIC School of Law (902)
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (711)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (293)
- Seattle University School of Law (266)
- University of Washington School of Law (149)
-
- Santa Clara Law (138)
- Southern Methodist University (131)
- Universitas Indonesia (130)
- University of Richmond (119)
- DePaul University (111)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (90)
- University of Michigan Law School (85)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (71)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (64)
- University of Georgia School of Law (61)
- BLR (58)
- Duke Law (56)
- American University Washington College of Law (48)
- Brooklyn Law School (48)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (42)
- Boston University School of Law (38)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (35)
- National Law School of India University (33)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (33)
- Columbia Law School (32)
- Fordham Law School (32)
- University of Colorado Law School (32)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (32)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (30)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (28)
- Keyword
-
- Privacy (170)
- Internet (163)
- Technology (125)
- Google (120)
- Copyright (108)
-
- Artificial intelligence (101)
- AI (91)
- Computer Law (84)
- Adwords (83)
- Software (79)
- Cybersecurity (71)
- Trademark (61)
- Regulation (58)
- Intellectual property (56)
- Social media (54)
- Rosetta Stone (51)
- Artificial Intelligence (50)
- Data (50)
- Cyberspace (47)
- First Amendment (47)
- Law and Technology (46)
- Digital forensics (44)
- Intellectual Property Law (44)
- Law (44)
- Computers (40)
- Algorithms (39)
- Science and Technology (39)
- Antitrust (37)
- Cybercrime (35)
- Copyright law (33)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (794)
- Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law (526)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (271)
- Seattle University Law Review (245)
- Annual ADFSL Conference on Digital Forensics, Security and Law (182)
-
- Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix) (136)
- SMU Science and Technology Law Review (128)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (122)
- Faculty Scholarship (114)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (105)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (86)
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law (82)
- UIC Law Review (62)
- ExpressO (57)
- Articles (52)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (52)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (44)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (36)
- All Faculty Scholarship (35)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (35)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (33)
- Indian Journal of Law and Technology (32)
- Publications (31)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (30)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (27)
- Fordham Law Review (27)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (23)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (23)
- Military Cyber Affairs (23)
- The University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal (23)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 3001 - 3030 of 4649
Full-Text Articles in Computer Law
Vol. Xxiv, Tab 61 - Ex. 2 - Rosetta Stone's Answers To Google's First Set Of Interrogatories, Rosetta Stone
Vol. Xxiv, Tab 61 - Ex. 2 - Rosetta Stone's Answers To Google's First Set Of Interrogatories, Rosetta Stone
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 37 - Expert Report Of Dr. Kent D. Van Liere, Kent Van Liere
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 37 - Expert Report Of Dr. Kent D. Van Liere, Kent Van Liere
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Vi, Tab 38 - Ex. 29 - Email From Jason Calhoun, Jason Calhoun
Vol. Vi, Tab 38 - Ex. 29 - Email From Jason Calhoun, Jason Calhoun
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 45 - Email From Jason Calhoun (Rosetta Enforcement Manager), Jason Calhoun
Vol. Ix, Tab 46 - Ex. 45 - Email From Jason Calhoun (Rosetta Enforcement Manager), Jason Calhoun
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. 18 - Email From Baris Gultekin And Trademark Report (Google Product Manager Director), Baris Gultekin
Vol. Ix, Tab 41 - Ex. 18 - Email From Baris Gultekin And Trademark Report (Google Product Manager Director), Baris Gultekin
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Vol. Vi, Tab 38 - Ex. 28 - Email From Christopher Klipple, Christopher Klipple
Vol. Vi, Tab 38 - Ex. 28 - Email From Christopher Klipple, Christopher Klipple
Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix)
Exhibits from the un-sealed joint appendix for Rosetta Stone Ltd., v. Google Inc., No. 10-2007, on appeal to the 4th Circuit. Issue presented: Under the Lanham Act, does the use of trademarked terms in keyword advertising result in infringement when there is evidence of actual confusion?
Virtual Rule Of Law, Michael Risch
The End Of The (Virtual) World, Joshua A.T. Fairfield
The End Of The (Virtual) World, Joshua A.T. Fairfield
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Facebook 2 Blackberry And Database Trading Systems: Morphing Social Networking To Business Growth In A Global Recession, Roger M. Groves
Facebook 2 Blackberry And Database Trading Systems: Morphing Social Networking To Business Growth In A Global Recession, Roger M. Groves
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Patent System's Relationship To Digital Entrepreneurship, Mark Chandler
The Patent System's Relationship To Digital Entrepreneurship, Mark Chandler
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Capitalizing On Digital Entrepreneurship For Low-Income Residents And Communities, Janet Thompson Jackson
Capitalizing On Digital Entrepreneurship For Low-Income Residents And Communities, Janet Thompson Jackson
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Data Devolution: Corporate Information Security, Consumers, And Future Of Regulation, Andrea M. Matwyshyn
Data Devolution: Corporate Information Security, Consumers, And Future Of Regulation, Andrea M. Matwyshyn
Chicago-Kent Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trade Secrets, Data Security And Employees, Elizabeth Rowe
Trade Secrets, Data Security And Employees, Elizabeth Rowe
Chicago-Kent Law Review
This essay argues that data security is important to the protection of trade secret information, and that trusted employees on the inside pose the biggest threat to the protection of trade secrets. While investments in technical measures such as firewalls and encryption are important, it is also necessary for companies to consider the internal threats from employees when creating corporate security programs. Ultimately, a more comprehensive approach that includes technical and human elements, as well as consideration of inside and outside threats is likely to be more effective in the battle to secure data.
Patenting Cryptographic Technology, Greg Vetter
Patenting Cryptographic Technology, Greg Vetter
Chicago-Kent Law Review
The policy concerns intersecting patent law and cryptographic technology relate to the technology's beneficial uses in securing information in a commercial and social fabric that increasingly relies on computing and electronic communications for its makeup. The presence of patenting in a technology can impact diffusion of interoperable technology. Standardized embeddable cryptography facilitates its supply. Patent law for several decades has waxed and waned in its embrace of software implemented inventions rooted in abstract ideas such as the mathematics and mathematical algorithms underlying modern cryptography. This article documents the growth of cryptographic patenting. Then, in light of this growth and patent …
The Political Economy Of Data Protection, Peter K. Yu
The Political Economy Of Data Protection, Peter K. Yu
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Information is the lifeblood of a knowledge-based economy. The control of data and the ability to translate them into meaningful information is indispensable to businesspeople, policymakers, scientists, engineers, researchers, students, and consumers. Having useful, and at times exclusive, information improves productivity, advances education and training, and helps create a more informed citizenry. In the past two decades, those who collected or obtained access to a large amount of data began to explore ways to use the collected data as an income stream. Because the then-existing laws did not offer adequate protection for that particular purpose, they actively lobbied for stronger …
Returning To A Principled Basis For Data Protection, Gus Hosein
Returning To A Principled Basis For Data Protection, Gus Hosein
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Society must remain conscious of both pragmatic and principle-based rationales for information security rules. The identity card debate in the United Kingdom provides an example of exactly why a governmental information security approach that is sensitive to civil liberties would be the best approach to data protection. In contrast, we should be cautious of a balancing test that places security in parity with civil liberties and, therefore, erroneously allows pragmatism to triumph over principle.
The Duty Of Care And The Data Control Systems In The Wake Of Sarbanes-Oxley, Michael R. Siebecker
The Duty Of Care And The Data Control Systems In The Wake Of Sarbanes-Oxley, Michael R. Siebecker
Chicago-Kent Law Review
The essay examines the wisdom of exempting small public companies from Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), which requires companies to provide management assessment and external auditing of a company's internal control systems over financial data. In particular, the essay questions whether a fiduciary duty of care might require officers and directors to adopt internal control systems, perhaps substantially similar to those envisioned by SOX, even if small public companies were exempt from the ambit of the statute.
Reasons Why We Should Amend The Constitution To Protect Privacy, Deborah Pierce
Reasons Why We Should Amend The Constitution To Protect Privacy, Deborah Pierce
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Threats to consumer privacy are many, and varied. Some threats come from corporate entities such as data aggregators and social networking sites; while others come from panoptics government surveillance systems such as Secure Flight. Not only can the data be compromised, but consumers may be adversely affected by incorrect information in their files. The time may be right to explicitly protect privacy via a constitutional amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Optimal Hackback, Jay P. Kesan, Ruperto Majuca
Optimal Hackback, Jay P. Kesan, Ruperto Majuca
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Professor Jay Kesan from the University of Illinois College of Law, in joint work with Ruperto Majuca of the University of Illinois Department of Economics, argue in favor of legal rules that allow "hacking [data] back" in certain business circumstances. They analyze the strategic interaction between the hacker and the attacked company or individual and conclude that neither total prohibition nor unrestrained permission of hack-back is optimal. Instead, they argue that when other alternatives such as criminal enforcement and litigation are ineffective, self-defense is the best response to cybercrime because there is a high likelihood of correctly attacking the criminal, …
Coding Privacy, Lilian Edwards
Coding Privacy, Lilian Edwards
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Lawrence Lessig famously and usefully argues that cyberspace is regulated not just by law but also by norms, markets and architecture or "code." His insightful work might also lead the unwary to conclude, however, that code is inherently anti-privacy, and thus that an increasingly digital world must therefore also be increasingly devoid of privacy. This paper argues briefly that since technology is a neutral tool, code can be designed as much to fight for privacy as against it, and that what matters now is to look at what incentivizes the creation of pro- rather than anti-privacy code in the mainstream …
Best Practices And The State Of Information Security, Kevin Cronin
Best Practices And The State Of Information Security, Kevin Cronin
Chicago-Kent Law Review
The forces of globalization, together with widely available industry standards and best practices, and heightened state legislative activity, are driving the U.S. towards a more unified approach to data security. But the success of this unified approach requires more than free market efficiency and innovation. In order to maintain a state of evolutionary equilibrium in the global information economy, the U.S. must move from a fragmented approach towards data security and privacy standards, towards a more comprehensive set of standards with new penalties and effective enforcement, to better reflect the inherent value of personal data in today's global marketplace.