Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Internet Law (2650)
- Science and Technology Law (2046)
- Privacy Law (1720)
- Intellectual Property Law (1593)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (770)
-
- Computer Sciences (765)
- Information Security (728)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (609)
- Engineering (530)
- International Law (511)
- Legal Studies (506)
- Constitutional Law (488)
- Forensic Science and Technology (478)
- Criminal Law (472)
- Computer Engineering (451)
- Contracts (436)
- Business Organizations Law (430)
- Banking and Finance Law (429)
- Administrative Law (423)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (423)
- Legislation (420)
- Communications Law (411)
- Law and Economics (404)
- Electrical and Computer Engineering (396)
- Human Rights Law (386)
- Torts (386)
- Consumer Protection Law (385)
- State and Local Government Law (383)
- Institution
-
- UIC School of Law (902)
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (711)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (293)
- Seattle University School of Law (266)
- University of Washington School of Law (149)
-
- Santa Clara Law (138)
- Southern Methodist University (131)
- Universitas Indonesia (130)
- University of Richmond (119)
- DePaul University (111)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (90)
- University of Michigan Law School (85)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (71)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (64)
- University of Georgia School of Law (61)
- BLR (58)
- Duke Law (56)
- American University Washington College of Law (48)
- Brooklyn Law School (48)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (42)
- Boston University School of Law (38)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (35)
- National Law School of India University (33)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (33)
- Columbia Law School (32)
- Fordham Law School (32)
- University of Colorado Law School (32)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (32)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (30)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (28)
- Keyword
-
- Privacy (170)
- Internet (163)
- Technology (125)
- Google (120)
- Copyright (108)
-
- Artificial intelligence (101)
- AI (91)
- Computer Law (84)
- Adwords (83)
- Software (79)
- Cybersecurity (71)
- Trademark (61)
- Regulation (58)
- Intellectual property (56)
- Social media (54)
- Rosetta Stone (51)
- Artificial Intelligence (50)
- Data (50)
- Cyberspace (47)
- First Amendment (47)
- Law and Technology (46)
- Digital forensics (44)
- Intellectual Property Law (44)
- Law (44)
- Computers (40)
- Algorithms (39)
- Science and Technology (39)
- Antitrust (37)
- Cybercrime (35)
- Copyright law (33)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (794)
- Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law (526)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (271)
- Seattle University Law Review (245)
- Annual ADFSL Conference on Digital Forensics, Security and Law (182)
-
- Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix) (136)
- SMU Science and Technology Law Review (128)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (122)
- Faculty Scholarship (114)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (105)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (86)
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law (82)
- UIC Law Review (62)
- ExpressO (57)
- Articles (52)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (52)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (44)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (36)
- All Faculty Scholarship (35)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (35)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (33)
- Indian Journal of Law and Technology (32)
- Publications (31)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (30)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (27)
- Fordham Law Review (27)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (23)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (23)
- Military Cyber Affairs (23)
- The University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal (23)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2221 - 2250 of 4649
Full-Text Articles in Computer Law
Brief Of Amici Curiae Law, Business, And Economics Scholars In Alice Corp. V. Cls Bank, No. 13-298, Jason Schultz, Brian Love, James Bessen, Michael J. Meurer
Brief Of Amici Curiae Law, Business, And Economics Scholars In Alice Corp. V. Cls Bank, No. 13-298, Jason Schultz, Brian Love, James Bessen, Michael J. Meurer
Faculty Scholarship
The Federal Circuit’s expansion of patentable subject matter in the 1990s led to a threefold increase in software patents, many of which contain abstract ideas merely tethered to a general-purpose computer. There is little evidence, however, to suggest this expansion has produced an increase in software innovation. The software industry was highly innovative in the decade immediately prior to this expansion, when the viability of software patentability was unclear and software patents were few. When surveyed, most software developers oppose software patenting, and, in practice, software innovators tend to rely on other tools to capture market share such as first-mover …
Snopa And The Ppa: Do You Know What It Means For You? If Snopa (Social Networking Online Protection Act) Or Ppa (Password Protection Act) Do Not Pass, The Snooping Could Cause You Trouble, Angela Goodrum
Journal of Public Law and Policy
This article discusses the importance of passing the Social Networking Online Protection Act and the Password Protection Act to afford vital protection against discrimination in hiring and admission decisions. Existing laws fail to adequately provide protection against discrimination after the advent of social media. Furthermore, failure to provide to provide protection via federal laws will create a disparity in the protection afforded individuals across the United States.
Social media has introduced a new world of opportunities for sharing, networking, but it has also created ample opportunities for others to snoop around, discriminate, and base their hiring or admission decisions, in …
How To Avoid The Death Of Your Case By Two Billion Paper Cuts: Encouraging Arbitration As An Alternative Way To Resolve Costly Discovery Disputes, Tzipora Goodfriend-Gelernter
How To Avoid The Death Of Your Case By Two Billion Paper Cuts: Encouraging Arbitration As An Alternative Way To Resolve Costly Discovery Disputes, Tzipora Goodfriend-Gelernter
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
This article analyzes the costly effect of electronic information on discovery practice and advocates for the arbitration of discovery disputes. Part II discusses the background of electronic discovery, the evolution of our reliance on ESI (electronically stored information) as part of our modern day discovery practice, and the benefits and detriments of electronic discovery. Part III discusses the effects of our reliance on electronic discovery and the implications of those effects on litigating parties. It examines how the increasingly computer-based world of discovery has increased the cost of litigation disputes significantly and proposes using the patent arbitration model as a …
Online Terms Of Service: A Shield For First Amendment Scrutiny Of Government Action, Jacquelyn E. Fradette
Online Terms Of Service: A Shield For First Amendment Scrutiny Of Government Action, Jacquelyn E. Fradette
Notre Dame Law Review
Part I of this Note will canvas popular opinions and perceptions about First Amendment rights on the Internet using examples of public outcry over recent instances of speech limitation. It will also discuss the state action doctrine generally and how the presence of this doctrine most likely renders certain popular public constitutional intuitions about the First Amendment erroneous.
Part II will provide an overview of how courts have taken an expansive and protective view of private ordering between online parties. It will discuss how courts have developed a robust freedom to contract jurisprudence in the Internet context. Because courts essentially …
Aaron Swartz’S Fbi Files
United States Department of Justice: Publications
Aaron Hillel Swartz (November 8, 1986 – January 11, 2013) was an American computer programmer, writer, political organizer and Internet Hacktivist.
Swartz was involved in the development of the web feed format RSS, the organization Creative Commons, the website framework web.py and the social news site, Reddit, in which he became a partner after its merger with his company, Infogami. Swartz's later work focused on sociology, civic awareness and activism.
He helped launch the Progressive Change Campaign Committee in 2009 to learn more about effective online activism. In 2010 he became a research fellow at Harvard University's Safra Research Lab …
Aaron Swartz’S Secret Service Files
Aaron Swartz’S Secret Service Files
United States Department of Justice: Publications
These documents concern the indictment in Massachusetts for downloading JSTOR content from MIT library network.
Parts 1 & 2 are included in the main document.
Additional files are linked below, as follows:
Part 3 (3 files) -- 379 pages, 4067 pages (spreadsheet), & 190 pages (photos)
Part 4 -- 1 page
Part 5 -- 1 page
Part 6 -- 1 page
Part 7 -- 7 pages
Part 8 -- 237,397 pages (yes)
Part 9 -- 90 pages
Part 10 -- 259 pages
Part 11 -- 17 pages
Part 12 -- (not released as of 9/29/2014)
Part 13 -- 254 pages …
Setting Parental Controls: Do Parents Have A Duty To Supervise Their Children’S Use Of The Internet?, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 309 (2014), Alberto Bernabe
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
“Bring Your Own Glass”: The Privacy Implications Of Google Glass In The Workplace, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 607 (2014), Anisha Mehta
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Near-Field Communication Technology: Regulatory And Legal Recommendations For Embracing The Nfc Revolution, Allan Richarz
Near-Field Communication Technology: Regulatory And Legal Recommendations For Embracing The Nfc Revolution, Allan Richarz
Canadian Journal of Law and Technology
Despite its ease and convenience, NFC technology raises a number of privacy issues. Chief among these concerns are the collection, retention, and usage of personally-identifying information contained within NFC-enabled devices by both private and public entities. Within that category, the most pressing privacy issues inherent in the collection and usage of such information relate to real-time tracking or after-the-fact habit profiling and identity theft. As well, privacy issues persist around the means used, if any, to secure and protect that information from unauthorized third parties both at the end-user and systemic database levels.
In light of these concerns, it is …
Policing The Social Media Water Cooler: Recent Nlrb Decisions Should Make Employers Think Twice Before Terminating An Employee For Comments Posted On Social Media Sites, Eric Raphan, Sean Kirby
Policing The Social Media Water Cooler: Recent Nlrb Decisions Should Make Employers Think Twice Before Terminating An Employee For Comments Posted On Social Media Sites, Eric Raphan, Sean Kirby
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
E-Discovery: Reasonable Search, Proportionality, Cooperation, And Advancing Technology, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 433 (2014), Steven Bennett
E-Discovery: Reasonable Search, Proportionality, Cooperation, And Advancing Technology, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 433 (2014), Steven Bennett
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
Rule 26(g)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the “Federal Rules”) requires that an attorney responding to a discovery request verify by signature, after “reasonable inquiry,” that the disclosure is, to the best of the attorney’s knowledge, “complete and correct.” In a digital environment, with masses of data in multiple formats and locations, the determination of whether a “reasonable” effort to meet the completeness requirement has occurred may turn on an assessment of the practices used to conduct a search of electronic materials. Those practices, in turn, must be judged on a standard of “proportionality” (i.e., that the effort …
From Morris To Nosal: The History Of Exceeding Authorization And The Need For A Change, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 465 (2014), Vasileios Karagiannopoulos
From Morris To Nosal: The History Of Exceeding Authorization And The Need For A Change, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 465 (2014), Vasileios Karagiannopoulos
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
This Article discusses and examines the various cases that pertain to the issue of exceeding authorized access throughout the years from United States v. Morris to the recent United States v. Nosal. Further, this Article thoroughly examines the Ninth Circuit’s approach regarding the issue of exceeding authorization; specifically, the need for the Ninth Circuit’s narrower interpretation in United States v. Brekka and Nosal. Finally, this Article proposes an alternative phrasing for the term “exceeding authorization,” and a revised interpretation of the phrase and the relevant offenses under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. This recommended interpretation suggests establishing different degrees …
Cloud Computing, Regulatory Compliance, And Student Privacy: A Guide For School Administrators And Legal Counsel, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 511 (2014), Steve Mutkoski
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
Rapid change in the technology landscape has resulted in the introduction of a range of new technologies into the classroom. But unlike the past use of technology in schools, many of these new products and services introduce two new dynamics that school counsel (and the teachers and administrators they support) need to understand fully. First, many of these new products and services are run “in the cloud” by a third party service provider as opposed to on servers operated by the school’s information technology (IT) staff. This third party operation and control can raise important new regulatory compliance issues, including …
Bitcoins: Technological Innovation Or Emerging Threat?, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 535 (2014), R. Joseph Cook
Bitcoins: Technological Innovation Or Emerging Threat?, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 535 (2014), R. Joseph Cook
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Problems With Prism: How A Modern Definition Of Privacy Necessarily Protects Privacy Interests In Digital Communications, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 571 (2014), Adam Florek
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Right To Travel And Privacy: Intersecting Fundamental Freedoms, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 639 (2014), Richard Sobel
The Right To Travel And Privacy: Intersecting Fundamental Freedoms, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 639 (2014), Richard Sobel
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
As a fundamental right inherent in American citizenship and the nature of the federal union, the right to travel in the United States is basic to American liberty. The right precedes the creation of the United States and appears in the Articles of Confederation. The U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court recognize and protect the right to interstate travel. The travel right entails privacy and free domestic movement without governmental abridgement.
In the era of surveillance, the imposition of official photo identification for travel, watchlist prescreening programs, and invasive airport scans and searches unreasonably burden the right to travel. They undermine …
Uncle Sam Knows What’S In Your Medicine Cabinet: The Security And Privacy Protection Of Health Records Under The Hitech Act, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 667 (2014), Ranjit Janardhanan
Uncle Sam Knows What’S In Your Medicine Cabinet: The Security And Privacy Protection Of Health Records Under The Hitech Act, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 667 (2014), Ranjit Janardhanan
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Control Over Personal Data, Privacy And Administrative Discretion In Europe And The Usa: The Paradox Of Italian “Data Protection Authority”, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 721 (2014), Marco Quiroz Vitale
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Online Gun Marketplace And The Dangerous Loophole In The National Instant Background Check System, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 757 (2014), Ann Daniels
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Where Has Privacy Gone? How Surveillance Programs Threaten Expectations Of Privacy, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 795 (2014), Michael Greene
Where Has Privacy Gone? How Surveillance Programs Threaten Expectations Of Privacy, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 795 (2014), Michael Greene
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Now You See It, Now You Don’T . . . Or Do You?: Snapchat’S Deceptive Promotion Of Vanishing Messages Violates Federal Trade Commission Regulations, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 827 (2014), Danielle Young
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
This Comment will explore the recently popular application Snapchat, and discuss the ways in which the app's privacy policy has violated FTC regulations, responding to a recent complaint filed by The Electronic Privacy Center. Particularly, this Comment will focus on Snapchat's deceptive promotion of "disappearing" photographs and videos. Section II will illustrate the basic structure of Snapchat, detailing various illustrations of its use. Section II will also examine the regulations set forth by the FTC that Snapchat is required to follow. Section III will discuss possible methods that the average user can do in order to bypass the very thing …
Canada’S Anti-Spam Legislation: A Constitutional Analysis, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 1 (2014), Emir Crowne, Stephanie Provato
Canada’S Anti-Spam Legislation: A Constitutional Analysis, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 1 (2014), Emir Crowne, Stephanie Provato
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
On December 15th, 2010, the Government of Canada agreed to Bill C-28, the Fighting Internet and Wireless Spam Act, with the intent to “deter the most damaging and deceptive forms of spam… from occurring in Canada and to help to drive out spammers.” Canada‟s Anti- Spam Legislation (“CASL”) was born. Although CASL has only been in force since July 1st, 2014, we argue that the Act may not survive constitutional scrutiny as it unduly restricts freedom of speech.
The Policing Of Religious Marriage Prohibitions In Israel: Religion, State, And Information Technology, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 23 (2014), Akiva Miller
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
The State of Israel applies religious law in all matters of marriage and divorce. For the Jewish population of Israel, the law of marriage includes religious prohibitions on certain kinds of marriages, most notably the prohibition against intermarriage and the prohibition against marrying a mamzer. Over the years, Israel‘s state-religious authorities have adopted a variety of methods and practices for policing these prohibitions. These include stringent procedures for premarital registration inquiries; use of databases for collecting information on prohibited persons; recording the possibility of mamzer status of newborn children; special Beit Din proceedings for handling cases of possible marriage prohibitions; …
California’S Eavesdropping Law Endangers Victims Of Domestic Violence, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 57 (2014), John E.B. Myers
California’S Eavesdropping Law Endangers Victims Of Domestic Violence, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 57 (2014), John E.B. Myers
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Ethical Implications Of Cloud Computing For Lawyers, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 71 (2014), Stuart Pardau, Blake Edwards
The Ethical Implications Of Cloud Computing For Lawyers, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 71 (2014), Stuart Pardau, Blake Edwards
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
This paper aims to isolate the pertinent ethical issues of cloud computing and chart a sensible path forward for lawyers. Part II briefly introduces the concept of cloud computing. Part III discusses the lawyer‟s duties of confidentiality, of competence, to protect client property, and to oversee non-lawyers who are providing assistance. Part III also examines the application of these duties by the various state bar associations to the problem of cloud computing. Part IV looks at sample terms of use of some of the more popular vendors. Part V suggests that securing informed consent, employing specialty cloud providers, and purchasing …
Shutting Down The Ex Parte Party: How To Keep Bittorrent Copyright Trolls From Abusing The Federal Court’S Discovery System, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 105 (2014), Jennifer L. Hunter
Shutting Down The Ex Parte Party: How To Keep Bittorrent Copyright Trolls From Abusing The Federal Court’S Discovery System, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 105 (2014), Jennifer L. Hunter
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Right To Be Forgotten: Forced Amnesia In A Technological Age, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 133 (2014), Robert Bolton
The Right To Be Forgotten: Forced Amnesia In A Technological Age, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 133 (2014), Robert Bolton
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
In the modern era, the connection between technology and one’s personal life has increased the number of moments recorded for posterity. While in many circumstances this is an ideal opportunity for fond recollection, it has the downside of displaying for others our less flattering moments. Because the Internet has such a wide scope, once something has entered its domain, it is virtually impossible to permanently remove. With a public increasingly perceiving this winnowing of privacy as a negative tendency, legislators both at home and abroad have made proposals that attempt to place restrictions on what content social media is allowed …
Eyes On The Road Program In Taiwan―Information Privacy Issues Under The Taiwan Personal Data Protection Act, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 145 (2015), Chen-Hung Chang
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Bulk Telephony Metadata Collection And The Fourth Amendment: The Case For Revisiting The Third-Party Disclosure Doctrine In The Digital Age, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 191 (2014), Timothy Geverd
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
This Article argues that federal courts should seize the opportunity presented by the Snowden leaks to reexamine the continued vitality of the current third-party disclosure doctrine in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. Specifically, this Article argues that Smith v. Maryland simply cannot continue to act as the “North Star” for judges navigating the “Fourth Amendment waters” of the digital age, and that instead, Smith should apply more narrowly in the digital age. In so arguing, this Article advocates that courts apply a modified, twostep test to evaluating third-party disclosures rather than applying the traditional binary rubric that courts have drawn from Smith …
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 237 (2014), Adam Florek, Anisha Mehta, Danielle Young, Michael Greene
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 237 (2014), Adam Florek, Anisha Mehta, Danielle Young, Michael Greene
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.