Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- UIC School of Law (888)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (279)
- Seattle University School of Law (255)
- Southern Methodist University (127)
- Universitas Indonesia (125)
-
- Santa Clara Law (111)
- DePaul University (110)
- University of Washington School of Law (75)
- University of Richmond (66)
- BLR (39)
- National Law School of India University (32)
- Brooklyn Law School (31)
- University of Georgia School of Law (27)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (26)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (23)
- Duke Law (22)
- American University Washington College of Law (19)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (16)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (16)
- Boston University School of Law (14)
- New York Law School (14)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (14)
- Cleveland State University (13)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (13)
- Pepperdine University (12)
- University of Michigan Law School (12)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (12)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (11)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (11)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (11)
- Keyword
-
- Internet (104)
- Google (96)
- Privacy (81)
- Adwords (75)
- Copyright (56)
-
- Technology (56)
- Computer Law (48)
- Rosetta Stone (45)
- Trademark (45)
- Law and Technology (43)
- Artificial intelligence (38)
- AI (29)
- Social media (29)
- Cyberspace (28)
- Regulation (28)
- Intellectual property (26)
- Law (26)
- Science and Technology (26)
- Intellectual Property Law (25)
- Cybersecurity (24)
- First Amendment (24)
- Data (19)
- Facebook (18)
- Corporate (17)
- Artificial Intelligence (16)
- Communications Law (16)
- Consumer confusion (16)
- Legislation (16)
- Surveillance (16)
- DMCA (15)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (794)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (269)
- Seattle University Law Review (237)
- SMU Science and Technology Law Review (126)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
-
- Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix) (111)
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law (81)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (65)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (61)
- UIC Law Review (53)
- Faculty Scholarship (41)
- ExpressO (39)
- Indian Journal of Law and Technology (31)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (28)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (27)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (22)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (20)
- Seattle Journal of Technology, Environmental, & Innovation Law (15)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (14)
- NYLS Law Review (13)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (13)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (13)
- Articles & Book Chapters (12)
- Cleveland State Law Review (12)
- Georgia Law Review (12)
- Scholarly Works (12)
- All Faculty Scholarship (11)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (10)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (9)
- Indiana Law Journal (9)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 961 - 990 of 2650
Full-Text Articles in Computer Law
The Itunes Of Downloadable Guns: Firearms As A First Amendment Right, Sandra Sawan Lara
The Itunes Of Downloadable Guns: Firearms As A First Amendment Right, Sandra Sawan Lara
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
As society becomes more technology driven, legal issues continue to arise around the world. From privacy to national security, technology develops at a rate the law simply cannot keep up with. In the United States, one of the biggest legal issues is how the new risks technology brings will interfere with our individual liberties.
Technologies like three-dimensional (“3D”) printing have transformed everything from lifesaving surgeries to gun manufacturing. This technology has led to a whole new way of communicating via computer coding, with the online open source movement leading innovation by allowing for the sharing and editing of files freely. …
Merging Sports Gambling And Technology: What’S Really Going To Happen?, Tucker Davison
Merging Sports Gambling And Technology: What’S Really Going To Happen?, Tucker Davison
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Case For Dhs To Classify The Internet Of Things As Critical Infrastructure In The United States, Jessica G. Martz
The Case For Dhs To Classify The Internet Of Things As Critical Infrastructure In The United States, Jessica G. Martz
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gotta Catch ‘Em All! The Rise Of Esports And The Evolution Of Its Regulations, Elizabeth Chung
Gotta Catch ‘Em All! The Rise Of Esports And The Evolution Of Its Regulations, Elizabeth Chung
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
No abstract provided.
Agriculture & Blockchain: Identifying Liability And Guaranteeing Quality, Morgan Crider
Agriculture & Blockchain: Identifying Liability And Guaranteeing Quality, Morgan Crider
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
No abstract provided.
Regulations For Smart Mobility: Proceed With Caution, Connor Saenz
Regulations For Smart Mobility: Proceed With Caution, Connor Saenz
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
No abstract provided.
From Innovation To Abuse: Does The Internet Still Need Section 230 Immunity?, Benjamin Volpe
From Innovation To Abuse: Does The Internet Still Need Section 230 Immunity?, Benjamin Volpe
Catholic University Law Review
In 1996, Congress passed the Communications Decency Act to allow the screening of offensive material from the internet, while preserving the continued development of the internet economy without burdensome regulation. However, for years, online intermediaries have successfully used the Act as a shield from liability when third parties use their online services to commit tortious or criminal acts. This Comment argues that a wholly-unregulated internet is no longer necessary to preserve the once-fledgling internet economy. After evaluating various approaches to intermediary liability, this Comment also argues that Congress should take a more comprehensive look at consumer protection online and establish …
Creating A National Data Privacy Law For The United States, Shaun G. Jamison
Creating A National Data Privacy Law For The United States, Shaun G. Jamison
Cybaris®
No abstract provided.
Right To Privacy, A Complicated Concept To Review, Ali Alibeigi, Abu Bakar Munir, Md Ershadul Karim
Right To Privacy, A Complicated Concept To Review, Ali Alibeigi, Abu Bakar Munir, Md Ershadul Karim
Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal)
The Concept and definition of the privacy has been changed during the time affecting by different factors. At the same time, the boundaries of privacy may differ from one place to another affecting by the culture, religion, etc. Nonetheless, there is not a unique general accepted definition for the privacy. Privacy has been considered from different disciplines like sociology, psychology, law and philosophy. It is a multidisciplinary domain, having an easy concept but difficult to define. However, by reviewing all different viewpoints, it can be concluded that privacy is an individual tendency, wish and natural need to be away from …
Lessons From Literal Crashes For Code, Margot Kaminski
Lessons From Literal Crashes For Code, Margot Kaminski
Publications
No abstract provided.
Privacy Spaces, Bert-Jaap Koops
Privacy Spaces, Bert-Jaap Koops
West Virginia Law Review
Privacy literature contains conceptualizations of privacy in relation to role-playing and identity construction, and in relation to access control and boundary-management. In this paper, I combine both strands to introduce the concept of privacy spaces: spaces in which you can play, in your own way, the relevant role(s) you have in social life. Drawing from privacy conceptions in legal scholarship, philosophy, sociology, anthropology, human geography, and psychology, a systematic overview of traditional privacy spaces is offered, including mental bubbles, the body, personal space, personal writings, the home, private conversation space, cars, stalls, intimacy bubbles, professional black boxes, coffee house spaces, …
Better Late Than Never: Bringing The Data Security Regulatory Environment Into The Modern Era, Jacob Holden
Better Late Than Never: Bringing The Data Security Regulatory Environment Into The Modern Era, Jacob Holden
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dialing It Back: Why Courts Should Rethink Students’ Privacy And Speech Rights As Cell Phone Communications Erode The ‘Schoolhouse Gate’, Nicholas J. Mcguire
Dialing It Back: Why Courts Should Rethink Students’ Privacy And Speech Rights As Cell Phone Communications Erode The ‘Schoolhouse Gate’, Nicholas J. Mcguire
Duke Law & Technology Review
The ubiquity of cell phones in today’s society has forced courts to change or dismiss established, but inapplicable analytical frameworks. Two such frameworks in the school setting are regulations of student speech and of student searches. This Article traces the constitutional jurisprudence of both First Amendment off-campus speech protection and Fourth Amendment search standards as applied to the school setting. It then analyzes how the Supreme Court’s ruling in Riley v. California complicates both areas. Finally, it proposes a pragmatic solution: by recognizing a categorical First Amendment exception for “substantial threats” against the school community, courts could accommodate students’ constitutional …
Bazaar Transnational Drafting: An Analysis Of The Gnu Public License Version 3 Revision Process, Christopher M. Dileo
Bazaar Transnational Drafting: An Analysis Of The Gnu Public License Version 3 Revision Process, Christopher M. Dileo
San Diego International Law Journal
This Article will step through the drafting process and compare bazaar and cathedral modes of drafting to determine if a bazaar mode can efficiently produce a legal instrument that crosses legal regimes. As the title suggests, the bazaar process analysis case will be the GNU General Public License version 3 (the GPLv3) Revision Process. A comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the bazaar mode of drafting to the cathedral mode of drafting will hopefully demonstrate the overall value of a transnational bazaar process like the GPLv3 Revision Process.
Keynote Address, Ryan Calo
Keynote Address, Ryan Calo
Seattle University Law Review
Transcript of the keynote address at the 2018 Seattle University School of Law symposium “Singularity: AI and the Law.” The keynote address is presented by Ryan Calo and discusses the current status of artificial intelligence learning, and how this current status is moving toward robotic singularity.
Robotic Speakers And Human Listeners, Helen Norton
Robotic Speakers And Human Listeners, Helen Norton
Seattle University Law Review
This article discusses protected First Amendment speech and how this protection should be applied to robotic speech. Robotic speech is that created by automated means, currently “bots” but the producers of automated speech are evolving. The article further differentiates between rights of the producers of this speech and listeners or consumers of the speech, and the impact of First Amendment protections on each group.
Panel 2: Accountability For The Actions Of Robots, Ryan Calo, Howard Jay Chizeck, Elizabeth Joh, Blake Hannaford
Panel 2: Accountability For The Actions Of Robots, Ryan Calo, Howard Jay Chizeck, Elizabeth Joh, Blake Hannaford
Seattle University Law Review
Transcript of the panel discussion at the 2018 Seattle University School of Law symposium “Singularity: AI and the Law” discussing human control and Artificial Intellegence learning. The panel participants are Ryan Calo, Howard Jay Chizeck, Elizabeth Joh, and Blake Hannaford.
Panel 1: Robotic Speech And The First Amendment, Bruce E. H. Johnson, Helen Norton, David Skover
Panel 1: Robotic Speech And The First Amendment, Bruce E. H. Johnson, Helen Norton, David Skover
Seattle University Law Review
Transcript of the panel discussion at the 2018 Seattle University School of Law symposium “Singularity: AI and the Law.” The panel is moderated by Seattle University School of Law Professor Gregory Silverman, and discusses the forthcoming book Robotica, by David M. Skover and Ronald K. L. Collins. The panelists are Bruce E. H. Johnson, Helen Norton, and David M. Skover.
Virtual Ethics And The Creeper Act, Justin Tiehen
Virtual Ethics And The Creeper Act, Justin Tiehen
Seattle University Law Review
A legal and moral discussion of the development of child sex bots (CSB), childlike sex dolls, comparing society-at-large’s general squeamishness of the area, and attempts to regulate (for example, the CREEPER Act) with the prophylactic therapeutic benefits of these robots.
Artificial Intellegence And Policing: First Questions, Elizabeth E. Joh
Artificial Intellegence And Policing: First Questions, Elizabeth E. Joh
Seattle University Law Review
Artificial intelligence is playing an increasingly larger role in all sectors of society, including policing. Many police departments are already using artificial intelligence (AI) to help predict and identify suspicious persons and places.1 Increased computational power and oceans of data have given rise to inferences about violence and threats.2 AI will change policing just as it will healthcare, insurance, commerce, and transportation. But what questions should we ask about AI and policing?
Ethical Machines?, Ariela Tubert
Ethical Machines?, Ariela Tubert
Seattle University Law Review
This Article explores the possibility of having ethical artificial intelligence. It argues that we face a dilemma in trying to develop artificial intelligence that is ethical: either we have to be able to codify ethics as a set of rules or we have to value a machine’s ability to make ethical mistakes so that it can learn ethics like children do. Neither path seems very promising, though perhaps by thinking about the difficulties with each we may come to a better understanding of artificial intelligence and ourselves.
Introduction, Annette Clark
Introduction, Annette Clark
Seattle University Law Review
Introductory remarks given by Dean Annette Clark at the 2018 Seattle University School of Law symposium “Singularity: AI and the Law.”
Control On Blockchain Network, Aleksei Gudkov
Nova Law Review Full Issue Volume 42, Issue 3
Annual Report, 2018, University Of Washington School Of Law
Annual Report, 2018, University Of Washington School Of Law
Tech Policy Lab
The Tech Policy Lab at the University of Washington has become an indispensable source for tech policy research, education, and local, national, and international thought leadership. The Lab has worked directly with policymakers, published research and guides on emerging technologies, and provided opportunities for the public to learn from experts.
Biotechnology's Great Divide: Strengthening The Relationship Between Patent Law And Bioethics In The Age Of Crispr-Cas9, Hannah M. Mosby
Biotechnology's Great Divide: Strengthening The Relationship Between Patent Law And Bioethics In The Age Of Crispr-Cas9, Hannah M. Mosby
Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology
No abstract provided.
Emerging Technologies Challenging Current Legal Paradigms, W. Keith Robinson
Emerging Technologies Challenging Current Legal Paradigms, W. Keith Robinson
Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology
No abstract provided.
Rise Of The Intelligent Information Brokers: Role Of Computational Law Applications In Administering The Dynamic Cybersecurity Threat Surface In Iot, Eran Kahana
Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology
No abstract provided.