Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- UIC School of Law (888)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (279)
- Seattle University School of Law (255)
- Southern Methodist University (127)
- Universitas Indonesia (125)
-
- Santa Clara Law (111)
- DePaul University (110)
- University of Washington School of Law (75)
- University of Richmond (66)
- BLR (39)
- National Law School of India University (32)
- Brooklyn Law School (31)
- University of Georgia School of Law (27)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (26)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (23)
- Duke Law (22)
- American University Washington College of Law (19)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (16)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (16)
- Boston University School of Law (14)
- New York Law School (14)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (14)
- Cleveland State University (13)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (13)
- Pepperdine University (12)
- University of Michigan Law School (12)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (12)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (11)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (11)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (11)
- Keyword
-
- Internet (104)
- Google (96)
- Privacy (81)
- Adwords (75)
- Copyright (56)
-
- Technology (56)
- Computer Law (48)
- Rosetta Stone (45)
- Trademark (45)
- Law and Technology (43)
- Artificial intelligence (38)
- AI (29)
- Social media (29)
- Cyberspace (28)
- Regulation (28)
- Intellectual property (26)
- Law (26)
- Science and Technology (26)
- Intellectual Property Law (25)
- Cybersecurity (24)
- First Amendment (24)
- Data (19)
- Facebook (18)
- Artificial Intelligence (17)
- Corporate (17)
- Communications Law (16)
- Consumer confusion (16)
- Legislation (16)
- Surveillance (16)
- DMCA (15)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (794)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (269)
- Seattle University Law Review (237)
- SMU Science and Technology Law Review (126)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
-
- Rosetta Stone v. Google (Joint Appendix) (111)
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law (81)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (65)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (61)
- UIC Law Review (53)
- Faculty Scholarship (41)
- ExpressO (39)
- Indian Journal of Law and Technology (31)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (28)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (27)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (22)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (20)
- Seattle Journal of Technology, Environmental, & Innovation Law (15)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (14)
- NYLS Law Review (13)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (13)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (13)
- Articles & Book Chapters (12)
- Cleveland State Law Review (12)
- Georgia Law Review (12)
- Scholarly Works (12)
- All Faculty Scholarship (11)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (10)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (9)
- Indiana Law Journal (9)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1261 - 1290 of 2651
Full-Text Articles in Computer Law
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 237 (2014), Adam Florek, Anisha Mehta, Danielle Young, Michael Greene
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 237 (2014), Adam Florek, Anisha Mehta, Danielle Young, Michael Greene
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 251 (2014), Amany Awad, Kelly O'Neill, Arlo Walsman
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 251 (2014), Amany Awad, Kelly O'Neill, Arlo Walsman
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 285 (2014), Sara Schroeder, Austin Hoffman, Becky Fey
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 285 (2014), Sara Schroeder, Austin Hoffman, Becky Fey
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Breach Notification Requirements Under The European Union Legal Framework: Convergence, Conflicts, And Complexity In Compliance, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 317 (2014), Samson Esayas
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
The European Union (EU) legal landscape on data privacy and information security is undergoing significant changes. A prominent legislative development in recent years is the introduction of breach notification requirements within a number of regulatory instruments. In only the past two years, the Community legislator has adopted, and proposed, four different regulatory instruments containing breach notification requirements. There are also existing requirements for the telecom sector. This creates a complex mesh of regulatory frameworks for breach notification where different aspects of the same breach within the same company might have to be dealt with under different regulatory instruments, making compliance …
Beyond Privacy Rights: Crossborder Cyber-Espionage And International Law, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 369 (2014), Stefan Kirchner
Beyond Privacy Rights: Crossborder Cyber-Espionage And International Law, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 369 (2014), Stefan Kirchner
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Cyber-Security Insurance: Navigating The Landscape Of A Growing Field, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 379 (2014), Daniel Garrie, Michael Mann
Cyber-Security Insurance: Navigating The Landscape Of A Growing Field, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 379 (2014), Daniel Garrie, Michael Mann
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
In today‟s marketplace where businesses are constantly being threatened by data breaches and cyber-attacks, it is imperative that a global company obtain cyber-security insurance. The cyber-security insurance market is now the fastest growing segment of the insurance industry as cyber-threats are on the rise and business trade partners and consumers are insisting on safeguards for their confidential and sensitive information. Given how great the potential liability and damages resulting from a data breach can be companies cannot afford to be without cyber-security insurance. As this new form of insurance continues to emerge and develop, it is important for companies to …
Facebook Messenger: Eroding User Privacy In Order To Collect, Analyze, And Sell Your Personal Information, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 393 (2014), Erica Jaeger
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
This comment will examine Facebook‘s new standalone Facebook Messenger app, and review how the Privacy Policy, Data Use Policy, and the list of permissions violate Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. The comment will focus on Facebook Messenger‘s deceptive methods of accessing users‘ personal information and how Facebook uses that personal information. Section II will explain social networking sites and the configuration of Facebook, Facebook Messenger, and Facebook‘ s evolving policies. Section II will also discuss the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Trade Commission Act that was created to protect consumers against unfair, deceptive, or fraudulent practices.15 …
It Is Time For Investment Advisers To Join The Conversation About Social Media, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 423 (2014), Sarah Tanaka
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
Section II will detail the creation of the SEC, including key that shaped the establishment, goals, and mission of the SEC. Furthermore, it will focus on who is an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the controlling legislation on the matter. Section II will also examine the SEC‟s current guidance on investment advisers‟ use of social media and the public policy behind the new provisions. With social media revolutionizing the way individuals communicate and share information, Section III will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the current guidance regarding investment advisers‟ use of social media. It will …
Navigating Cybersquatting Enforcement In The Expanding Internet, 13 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 321 (2014), Jordan A. Arnot
Navigating Cybersquatting Enforcement In The Expanding Internet, 13 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 321 (2014), Jordan A. Arnot
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
It has always been a considerable task to police something as vast at the Internet for trademark violations and abuse. As the Internet develops with the ongoing launch of hundreds of new generic Top-Level Domains, so does the host of enforcement options available to those seeking to protect the value of trademarks and other intellectual property. This article outlines seven criteria to consider when selecting a remedy, or combination of remedies. The traditional cease and desist letter is still a viable and effective option, and so, of course, is litigation. These tools were greatly enhanced in 1999 when the Internet …
Here We Are Now, Entertain Us: Defining The Line Between Personal And Professional Context On Social Media, 35 Pace L. Rev. 398 (2014), Raizel Liebler, Keidra Chaney
Here We Are Now, Entertain Us: Defining The Line Between Personal And Professional Context On Social Media, 35 Pace L. Rev. 398 (2014), Raizel Liebler, Keidra Chaney
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
Social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram allow individuals and companies to connect directly and regularly with an audience of peers or with the public at large. These websites combine the audience-building platforms of mass media with the personal data and relationships of in-person social networks. Due to a combination of evolving user activity and frequent updates to functionality and user features, social media tools blur the line of whether a speaker is perceived as speaking to a specific and presumed private audience, a public expression of one’s own personal views, or a representative viewpoint of an entire …
Speculative Tech: The Bitcoin Legal Quagmire & The Need For Legal Innovation, Paul H. Farmer Jr.
Speculative Tech: The Bitcoin Legal Quagmire & The Need For Legal Innovation, Paul H. Farmer Jr.
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
Intellectual Property Issues In The Network Cloud: Virtual Models And Digital Three-Dimensional Printers, Darrell G. Mottley
Intellectual Property Issues In The Network Cloud: Virtual Models And Digital Three-Dimensional Printers, Darrell G. Mottley
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
Governing, Exchanging, Securing: Big Data And The Production Of Digital Knowledge, Bernard E. Harcourt
Governing, Exchanging, Securing: Big Data And The Production Of Digital Knowledge, Bernard E. Harcourt
Faculty Scholarship
The emergence of Big Data challenges the conventional boundaries between governing, exchange, and security. It ambiguates the lines between commerce and surveillance, between governing and exchanging, between democracy and the police state. The new digital knowledge reproduces consuming subjects who wittingly or unwittingly allow themselves to be watched, tracked, linked and predicted in a blurred amalgam of commercial and governmental projects. Linking back and forth from consumer data to government information to social media, these new webs of information become available to anyone who can purchase the information. How is it that governmental, commercial and security interests have converged, coincided, …
Review And Reflection: Copyright Hearings And Related Discourse In The Nation’S Capital, 13 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 487 (2014), Maria A. Pallante
Review And Reflection: Copyright Hearings And Related Discourse In The Nation’S Capital, 13 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 487 (2014), Maria A. Pallante
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
On February 28, 2014, the Register of Copyrights of the United States and Director of the U.S. Copyright Office Maria A. Pallante delivered a keynote speech on the copyright hearings and related discourse in the nation’s capital. The speech was given at The John Marshall Law School’s 58th Annual Intellectual Property Conference. This article is based on her speech at the Conference.
Aerevolution: Why We Should, Briefly, Embrace Unlicensed Online Streaming Of Retransmitted Broadcast Television Content, 13 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 577 (2014), Bradley Ryba
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The United States has long recognized broadcast television programming’s importance to the public’s information and entertainment needs. Accordingly, Congress has historically offered strong copyright protections for broadcast television networks. Those strong protections allowed broadcast networks to withstand business threats from innovations like cable television and VCRs. However, Congress’ recent silence on DVRs and cloud computing technology has allowed an entrepreneur to create the networks’ next biggest threat, Aereo. The creators of Aereo and similar businesses designed their services specifically around ambiguities within copyright law that could allow them to transmit networks’ content without paying the otherwise necessary consent fees. These …
Cause To Believe What? The Importance Of Defining A Search's Object—Or, How The Aba Would Analyze The Nsa Metadata Surveillance Program, Christopher Slobogin
Cause To Believe What? The Importance Of Defining A Search's Object—Or, How The Aba Would Analyze The Nsa Metadata Surveillance Program, Christopher Slobogin
Oklahoma Law Review
Courts and scholars have devoted considerable attention to the definition of probable cause and reasonable suspicion. Since the demise of the “mere evidence rule” in the 1960s, however, they have rarely examined how these central Fourth Amendment concepts interact with the “object” of the search. That is unfortunate, because this interaction can have significant consequences. For instance, probable cause to believe that a search “might lead to evidence of wrongdoing” triggers a very different inquiry than probable cause to believe that a search “will produce evidence of criminal activity.” The failure to address the constraints that should be imposed on …
Third Party Records Protection On The Model Of Heightened Scrutiny, Marc J. Blitz
Third Party Records Protection On The Model Of Heightened Scrutiny, Marc J. Blitz
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Aba Standards For Criminal Justice: Law Enforcement Access To Third Party Records: Critical Perspectives From A Technology-Centered Approach To Quantitative Privacy, David C. Gray
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ubiquitous Privacy, Thomas P. Crocker
Big Data Distortions: Exploring The Limits Of The Aba Leatpr Standards, Andrew G. Ferguson
Big Data Distortions: Exploring The Limits Of The Aba Leatpr Standards, Andrew G. Ferguson
Oklahoma Law Review
Before moving on to my contribution about how the growing reliance on big data analytics may necessitate a slight modification to the ABA Standards on Law Enforcement Access to Third Party Records (LEATPR Standards), I would like first to pay a few compliments to the drafters of the LEATPR Standards for producing such a systematic, thoughtful, and elegant framework for considering Fourth Amendment freedoms. As anyone who writes about or teaches the Fourth Amendment knows, the doctrine remains a theoretical muddle. Yet, despite a minefield of conflicting precedent, the drafters of the LEATPR Standards have managed to construct a defensible …
Sharing Stupid $H*T With Friends And Followers: The First Amendment Rights Of College Athletes To Use Social Media, Mary Margaret Meg Penrose
Sharing Stupid $H*T With Friends And Followers: The First Amendment Rights Of College Athletes To Use Social Media, Mary Margaret Meg Penrose
SMU Science and Technology Law Review
No abstract provided.
Book Review: Juries In The 21st Century, By Jacqueline Horan, Vanessa Macdonnell
Book Review: Juries In The 21st Century, By Jacqueline Horan, Vanessa Macdonnell
Canadian Journal of Law and Technology
In Juries in the 21st Century, Jacqueline Horan immerses the reader in a discussion of how jury trials operate, how they could be more effective, and how they should adapt to emerging technologies. The book makes three contributions to the existing legal literature. First, it challenges basic assumptions about how juries operate. Horan demonstrates that not all features of modern jury trials are essential or even useful. She argues convincingly that the existing features of the jury system should only be retained if they contribute positively to the process by which the jury arrives at a verdict. This leads Horan …
Cover Letter, Benjamin R. Fox
Cover Letter, Benjamin R. Fox
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present the final issue of the Twentieth Volume. First published in 1995, JOLT isthe world’s first exclusively online law review. JOLT strives to discuss new and emerging issues that fall squarely at the intersection oftechnology and the law. With this goal in mind, we are proud to announce the publication of the following articles.
Cover Letter, Allison F. Rienecker
Cover Letter, Allison F. Rienecker
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present its Annual Survey issue of the 2013-2014 academic year. This issue is published in conjunction with JOLT’s Symposium entitled “Information Governance: A Comprehensive Approach to e-Discovery.” Since its founding in 1995, JOLT has strived to publish relevant legal articles at the forefront of the technological field. With this goal in mind, we are excited to expand JOLT’s respected discussion of e-Discovery to the emerging field of Information Governance.
Cover Letter, Benjamin R. Fox
Cover Letter, Benjamin R. Fox
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present its third issue of the 2013-2014 academic year. First published in 1995, JOLT is the world’s first exclusively online law review. JOLT strives to discuss new and emerging issues that fall squarely at the intersection of technology and the law. With this goal in mind, we are proud to announce the publication of the following articles.
Secondary Liability, Isp Immunity, And Incumbent Entrenchment, Marketa Trimble, Salil K. Mehra
Secondary Liability, Isp Immunity, And Incumbent Entrenchment, Marketa Trimble, Salil K. Mehra
Scholarly Works
More than fifteen years have passed since the two major U.S. statutes concerning the secondary liability of Internet service providers were adopted--the Communications Decency Act and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The statutes have been criticized; however, very little of the criticism has come from Internet service providers, who have enjoyed the benefits of generous safe harbors and immunity from suit guaranteed by these statutes. This Article raises the question of whether these statutes contribute to incumbent entrenchment--solidifying the position of the existing Internet service providers to the detriment of potential new entrants. The current laws and industry self-regulation may …
Finding The Signal In The Noise: Information Governance, Analytics, And The Future Of Legal Practice, Bennett B. Borden, Jason R. Baron
Finding The Signal In The Noise: Information Governance, Analytics, And The Future Of Legal Practice, Bennett B. Borden, Jason R. Baron
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
In the watershed year of 2012, the world of law witnessed the first concrete discussion of how predictive analytics may be used to make legal practice more efficient. That the conversation about the use of predictive analytics has emerged out of the e-Discovery sector of the law is not all that surprising: in the last decade and with increasing force since 2006— with the passage of revised Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that expressly took into account the fact that lawyers must confront “electronically stored information” in all its varieties—there has been a growing recognition among courts and commentators that …
Legislating Trust, John D. Gregory
Legislating Trust, John D. Gregory
Canadian Journal of Law and Technology
As governments in Canada and elsewhere have considered statutes to ensure that electronic communications are legally effective, they have invariably had to face questions about the reliability of those communications. Can we trust electronic messages, documents, and signatures? Are they the same in law as if they were on paper? What conditions should be imposed in order to give us the right assurances that we can trust them? To answer these questions properly, we need to understand the nature of “trust” and the extent to which legislation can be a source of it, and what other sources should be enlisted …
Understanding And Contextualizing Precedents In E-Discovery: The Illusion Of Stare Decisis And Best Practices To Avoid Reliance On Outdated Guidance, Jonathan M. Redgrave, Keltie Hays Peay, Mathea K.E. Bulander
Understanding And Contextualizing Precedents In E-Discovery: The Illusion Of Stare Decisis And Best Practices To Avoid Reliance On Outdated Guidance, Jonathan M. Redgrave, Keltie Hays Peay, Mathea K.E. Bulander
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
But as precedents survive like the clavicle in the cat, long after the use they once served is at an end, and the reason for them has been forgotten, the result of following them must often be failure and confusion from the merely logical point of view.
Cover Letter, Laura M. Bedson
Cover Letter, Laura M. Bedson
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is pleased to present the first issue of the Twenty-First Volume. With its first publication in 1995, JOLT became the world’s first law review to be published exclusively online. It was with that original publication that JOLT established itself as one of the leading publications in the legal technology field. Today, JOLT has continued the bold tradition of publishing articles to further scholarship in areas of new and emerging fields that fall at the intersection of technology and the law.