Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Communications Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 2221 - 2250 of 4056

Full-Text Articles in Communications Law

Brief Of Amicus Curiae – American Association Of Retired Persons Jan 2004

Brief Of Amicus Curiae – American Association Of Retired Persons

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

AARP is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with more than 35 million members aged 50 and older. As the largest membership organization representing the interests of older Americans, AARP has a longstanding interest and involvement in combating telemarketing abuses and educating consumers about dealing with unwanted sales calls. While AARP’s concerns about telemarketing arose due to widespread fraudulent practices that targeted older persons (and those concerns continue), these initial concerns led to an expanded focus on effective means to reduce numerous, repeated intrusions into people’s homes by callers trying to sell myriad products and services. AARP thus has devoted significant resources …

Go to article

Telemarketing Sales Rule Comment For 16 Cfr Part 310 — American Association Of Retired Persons, David Certner Jan 2004

Telemarketing Sales Rule Comment For 16 Cfr Part 310 — American Association Of Retired Persons, David Certner

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

AARP appreciates this opportunity to comment on the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to amend the Telemarketing Sales Rule (the Rule). AARP’s interest in the Telemarketing Sales Rule and concerns about telemarketing abuses are long- standing. Seven years ago we were active participants in the original rulemaking proceeding. Since the adoption of the Rule in 1995, AARP has dedicated signi cant resources to educating consumers about telemarketing fraud and to working with federal, state and local law enforcement agencies to combat it. We have also worked with state legislatures to enact state telemarketing legislation. The existing Rule …

Go to article

Telemarketing Sales Rule Commentary — Cox Enterprises, Inc. Jan 2004

Telemarketing Sales Rule Commentary — Cox Enterprises, Inc.

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

Cox Enterprises, Inc. (“CEI” or “Cox”) hereby submits these comments in response to the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking relating to the proposed amendment of the Telemarketing Sales Rule (the “TSR” or “Rule”). Cox welcomes this opportunity to comment on the proposed amended Rule, and strongly supports the efforts of the FTC to protect consumers from fraudulent and deceptive telemarketing.

Go to article

“Do-Not-Call-List” Testimony: Before The Senate Committee On Commerce, Science, And Transportation, Lee Hammond Jan 2004

“Do-Not-Call-List” Testimony: Before The Senate Committee On Commerce, Science, And Transportation, Lee Hammond

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

My name is Lee Hammond and I am a member of AARP’s Board of Directors. On behalf of AARP and its thirty- ve million members, thank you for inviting us here this morning to discuss the importance of implementing and enforcing the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) national Do Not Call registry. AARP’s members have been among the millions of Americans who have taken the initiative to place their phone numbers into the Registry in an effort to reduce the amount of unwanted telemarketing calls. We share your indignation over recent court decisions to stymie this effort and we are here …

Go to article

“Do-Not-Call-List” Testimony: Before The Senate Committee On Commerce, Science, And Transportation, Timothy J. Muris Jan 2004

“Do-Not-Call-List” Testimony: Before The Senate Committee On Commerce, Science, And Transportation, Timothy J. Muris

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

As you know, the Commission adopted the Registry as one of the amendments to the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) announced December 18, 2003, and formally promulgated in the Federal Register on January 29, 2003. On March 11, 2003, President Bush signed into law the Do Not Call Implementation Act (DNCIA), which provides for the FTC to collect fees from sellers and telemarketers to fund the establishment and maintenance of the National Do Not Call Registry. Congress enacted this legislation, and provided complementary appropriations, to support the FTC’s decision to establish such a Registry (conditioned on funding) as part of its …

Go to article

“Do-Not-Call-List” Testimony: Before The Senate Committee On Commerce, Science, And Transportation, Rodney Smolla Jan 2004

“Do-Not-Call-List” Testimony: Before The Senate Committee On Commerce, Science, And Transportation, Rodney Smolla

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

I wish to thank the Committee for this opportunity to present testimony on the issues implicated by recent judicial rulings concerning the national telemarketing “Do Not Call” registry, developed by both the Federal Trade Commission and Federal Communications Commission.

Go to article

“Do-Not-Call-List” Testimony: Before The Senate Committee On Commerce, Science, And Transportation, Gerald Cerasale Jan 2004

“Do-Not-Call-List” Testimony: Before The Senate Committee On Commerce, Science, And Transportation, Gerald Cerasale

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

Good morning, Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee. I thank you for the opportunity to appear before your Committee as it examines the issues surrounding the national Do-Not-Call Registry. I am Jerry Cerasale, Senior Vice President for The Direct Marketing Association, Inc. (“The DMA”).

Go to article

“Do-Not-Call-List” Testimony: Before The Senate Committee On Commerce, Science, And Transportation, Tim Searcy Jan 2004

“Do-Not-Call-List” Testimony: Before The Senate Committee On Commerce, Science, And Transportation, Tim Searcy

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

Senators, thank you for giving me this opportunity to testify before you today, on a matter of great importance to U.S. consumers, and business alike: the formation of a federal Do Not Call Registry. I am the Executive Director of the American Teleservices Association, which is the largest and only association dedicated exclusively to the interests of the teleservices industry. We are enjoying our twentieth anniversary this year, and represent approximately 650 rms involved in the teleservices industry. Our membership is tremendously diverse, and encompasses all aspects of telemarketing, customer service, market research, political calling, non- profit fundraising and technical …

Go to article

“Do-Not-Call List” Testimony: Before The House Committee On Energy And Commerce, Timothy J. Muris Jan 2004

“Do-Not-Call List” Testimony: Before The House Committee On Energy And Commerce, Timothy J. Muris

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

Mr. Chairman, I am Timothy J. Muris, Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission.1 I am pleased to appear today, on behalf of the Commission, to provide the Committee with information about our recently-announced amendments to the Telemarketing Sales Rule (“TSR” or “Rule”). In particular, you have asked about our request for authority to collect fees to offset the costs of implementing the “do-not-call” amendments to the TSR. Our testimony provides an overview of the TSR amendment process, discussion of the do-not-call provisions, and an examination of the funding request. The do-not-call registry is an important aspect of the Commission’s ongoing …

Go to article

Unleashing Instant Messaging From Regulatory Oversight, Fernando Laguarda Jan 2004

Unleashing Instant Messaging From Regulatory Oversight, Fernando Laguarda

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

INTRODUCTION: { 1 } America Online, Inc. ("AOL") and Time Warner Inc. announced their intention to merge on January 10, 2000.' At that time, there was a great deal of excitement about combining these two companies and harnessing the power of an increasingly broadband Internet. In addition to the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") and Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"), more than one thousand local communities conducted their own reviews of the merger. The FTC identified "open access" to the Time Warner Cable platform as an issue meriting specific relief {2} The FCC, for its part, specifically identified "instant messaging" ("IM") as …

Go to article

Plaintiff’S Reply Brief — Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc., Tmg Marketing, Inc. And American Teleservices Association Jan 2004

Plaintiff’S Reply Brief — Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc., Tmg Marketing, Inc. And American Teleservices Association

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

The government’s assumption that commercial speech restrictions should be judged by the same standard as time, place or manner restrictions fails to accurately set forth the relevant burden of proof articulated in more recent commercial speech cases.

Go to article

Brief Of Amicus Curiae — U.S. States Jan 2004

Brief Of Amicus Curiae — U.S. States

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

America is frustrated with telemarketing. To help individuals reclaim a measure of peace and privacy in their homes, the States and, later, the federal agencies had to step in. On behalf of the fifty-one million individuals who have registered on the national do-not-call (“DNC”) list, Amici Curiae California, Colorado, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, …

Go to article

Brief Of Amici Curiae – Representatives W.J. “Billy” Tauzin And John D. Dingell And Certain Other Members Of The House Of Representatives Of The United States Jan 2004

Brief Of Amici Curiae – Representatives W.J. “Billy” Tauzin And John D. Dingell And Certain Other Members Of The House Of Representatives Of The United States

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

In 1995, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) promulgated telemarketing rules that prohibit “a seller or telemarketer [of goods or services] from calling a consumer who has previously asked not to be called by or on behalf of that seller.” Earlier this year, the FTC amended its rules to make it easier for consumers to avoid telemarketing calls. Under the revised rule, commonly known as the “Do Not Call” rule, individuals can choose to prohibit all commercial telemarketing calls to their homes or cellular phones, with a limited exception for calls made pursuant to an established business relationship. The revised FTC …

Go to article

Not If, But When?: Dismantling The Florida Adoption Act Of 2001, Andrew T. Binstock Jan 2004

Not If, But When?: Dismantling The Florida Adoption Act Of 2001, Andrew T. Binstock

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note critiques the notice provision of the Adoption Act of 2001, arguing that it unjustly required single mothers to publish personal details in newspapers, violating privacy rights under the Due Process Clause and the Florida Constitution. The provision was ultimately invalidated by the Fourth District Court of Appeals, reflecting a broader tension between protecting fathers' rights and safeguarding mothers' privacy. The legislature's repeal of the notice requirement and the establishment of a voluntary putative father registry marked a shift toward balancing these interests while respecting reproductive autonomy.

Go to article

Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Edwin E. Wallis Iii Jan 2004

Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Edwin E. Wallis Iii

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

On behalf of the 2003-2004 Editorial Board, I would like to welcome you to the fourth issue of the Richmond Journal of Law & Technology’s 2003-2004 publication term! Issue 4 is the world’s rst collection of Do Not Call List materials compiled in a single law review issue. Issue 4 contains several preexisting materials, including Congressional testimony, party briefs, and amicus briefs for the Do Not Call List appeal before the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, in additional to original scholarly articles prepared speci cally for the Journal.

Go to article

Plaintiff’S Brief — Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc., Tmg Marketing, Inc. And American Teleservices Association Jan 2004

Plaintiff’S Brief — Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc., Tmg Marketing, Inc. And American Teleservices Association

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

This case is a cautionary tale about what happens when federal agencies allow perceived political imperatives to override legal and constitutional concerns.

Go to article

Defendant’S Reply Brief — Federal Trade Commission Jan 2004

Defendant’S Reply Brief — Federal Trade Commission

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

The do-not-call registry is the product of concerted, measured efforts by Congress and two agencies over more than a decade. When Congress passed the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), it recognized that the nature and volume of unwanted telemarketing had created significant intrusions into residential privacy that individuals were powerless to combat. Congress authorized creation of a do-not-call registry at that time, but gave the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) latitude to consider other options, such as requiring telemarketers to keep their own do-not-call lists.

Go to article

Brief Of Amici Curiae — United States Senate Committee On Commerce, Science, And Transportation Jan 2004

Brief Of Amici Curiae — United States Senate Committee On Commerce, Science, And Transportation

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

This Amicus Curiae Brief is respectfully filed by the undersigned members of the United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation (“Committee”). Acting in our capacity on behalf of the United States government, we may file this Brief pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 29(a). The Committee exercises oversight responsibility for both the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”). With the respect owed to a co-equal branch of government, we file this Brief to share with the Court our strongly-held views regarding the constitutional law issues in contest in this appeal and the vital public …

Go to article

Brief Of Amici Curiae — Aca International Jan 2004

Brief Of Amici Curiae — Aca International

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

ACA International (“ACA”), formerly known as the American Collectors Association, Inc., is the international trade association for credit and collection professionals. ACA’s members provide a wide variety of accounts receivable management services. Headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, ACA represents the interests of approximately 5,300 third-party collection agencies, attorneys, credit grantors and vendor affiliates.

Go to article

“Do-Not-Call-List” Testimony: Before The Senate Committee On Commerce, Science, And Transportation, Michael K. Powell Jan 2004

“Do-Not-Call-List” Testimony: Before The Senate Committee On Commerce, Science, And Transportation, Michael K. Powell

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

Good morning, Mr. Chairman and distinguished members of the Committee. It is my pleasure to come before you today with my colleague Federal Trade Commission Chairman Tim Muris to discuss the implementation of the national Do-Not-Call Registry.

Go to article

Mmorpg's In The College Classroom, Aaron Delwiche Jan 2004

Mmorpg's In The College Classroom, Aaron Delwiche

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

Go to article

In Opposition To The Proposed Media Marketing Accountability Act Of 2001, Angela M. Papalaskaris Jan 2004

In Opposition To The Proposed Media Marketing Accountability Act Of 2001, Angela M. Papalaskaris

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

The Free Speech Coalition & Adult Entertainment: An Inside View Of The Adult Entertainment Industry, Its Leading Advocate & The First Amendment, Clay Calvert, Robert Richards Jan 2004

The Free Speech Coalition & Adult Entertainment: An Inside View Of The Adult Entertainment Industry, Its Leading Advocate & The First Amendment, Clay Calvert, Robert Richards

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

The Unusual Suspects: Unscrambling Satellite Piracy, David V. Lampman Ii Jan 2004

The Unusual Suspects: Unscrambling Satellite Piracy, David V. Lampman Ii

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

As Seen On Tv: The Normative Influence Of Syndi-Court On Contemporary Litigiousness, Kimberlianne Podlas Jan 2004

As Seen On Tv: The Normative Influence Of Syndi-Court On Contemporary Litigiousness, Kimberlianne Podlas

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Go to article

The Do-Not-Call List’S Big Hang-Up, Jared Strauss Jan 2004

The Do-Not-Call List’S Big Hang-Up, Jared Strauss

Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

On October 1, 2003, the Federal Trade Commission’s National Do- Not-Call Registry was supposed to go into effect. By forbidding companies and telemarketers from making unsolicited calls to anyone who had registered their phone number on the list three months prior, this program culminated a decade’s worth of efforts to alleviate consumer frustration with unwanted sales calls. However, on September 27, 2003, the District of Colorado derailed the registry, holding that the rule made an unconstitutional distinction between commercial and noncommercial speech by covering commercial calls and exempting calls for charitable, religious, or political organizations.

Go to article

The Thin State In Thick Globalism: Sovereignty In The Information Age, Adeno Addis Jan 2004

The Thin State In Thick Globalism: Sovereignty In The Information Age, Adeno Addis

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Looking at the astonishing technological developments in mass communication over the past several decades, Professor Addis explores whether and how the resulting communication revolution has undermined the notion of territorial sovereignty. Specifically, he argues that (1) although the territorial state has faced serious challenges from the communication revolution, the question is not whether state sovereignty will survive, but how thick or thin that sovereignty will (or should) be; (2) even if it were true that the territorial state is giving way to other institutional arrangements, those arrangements may not be a decentralized system of governance in that the communication revolution …

Go to article

Shock And Awe: Does The First Amendment Protect A Media Right Of Access To Military Operations?, Karen C. Sinai Jan 2004

Shock And Awe: Does The First Amendment Protect A Media Right Of Access To Military Operations?, Karen C. Sinai

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Changing Channels And Bridging Divides: The Failure And Redemption Of American Broadcast Television Regulation, Anthony E. Varona Jan 2004

Changing Channels And Bridging Divides: The Failure And Redemption Of American Broadcast Television Regulation, Anthony E. Varona

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

In Changing Channels and Bridging Divides: The Failure and Redemption of American Broadcast Television Regulation Professor Varona analyzes how the Supreme Court, Congress and the FCC have defined the legal duties of commercial broadcasters throughout the maturation of the television industry. First, he shows how the public trustee doctrine has failed, with broadcasters today airing very little 'public interest' programming. Second, he examines how and why the FCC has failed to effectively elucidate and enforce the public trustee doctrine, focusing on the irreconcilable First Amendment and commercial tensions inherent in the public trustee doctrine since its inception and the 'capture' …

Go to article

Introduction To Symposium On Integrating New Economic Learning With Antitrust Doctrine, Jonathan Baker Jan 2004

Introduction To Symposium On Integrating New Economic Learning With Antitrust Doctrine, Jonathan Baker

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.

Go to article

First Prev Next Last