Communications Law Commons^™

Trademark Battles In A Barbie-Cyber World: Trademark Protection Of Website Domain Names And The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, Kiran Nasir Gore

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Mattel's Barbie doll is more than just a trademarked toy produced for child consumption-Barbie has entered public discourse and taken on a life of her own as a cultural phenomenon. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has referred to Mattel's Barbie doll as "possibly the most famous toy in history." With this popularity, also comes unwanted attention. She has become an American icon and taken on additional meanings and status at a societal level; attracting the attention of artists, writers, academics, and commentators in a way that is beyond the scope of Mattel's trademark property rights. The tension between Mattel's …

The Friends Creative Exemption: How Stereotypes Play A Role In Objectivity Standards, Jessica N. Leal

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The recent, controversial California Supreme Court holding in Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television Productions is illustrative of whether the pervasiveness of sexually explicit conduct is insufficient as a matter of law or should be sent to the trier of fact. The court held that a former writer's assistant for the popular, adult-oriented television show Friends failed to establish actionable harassment under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA"). According to the court, the circumstances did not establish a prima facie case of hostile workplace environment sexual harassment, even though there was no dispute that sexually coarse and vulgar language …

Campaign Finance Regulation: The Resilience Of The American Model, William Araiza

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Parental Rights In Myspace: Reconceptualizing The State's Parens Patriae Role In The Digital Age, Sheerin N. S. Haubenreich

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Generally, parents have a great deal of leeway in their childrearing decisions, including choices in the content of their children's internet use. But there is a harm about which many parents and state and federal governments are unaware: reputational harm. Children and teenagers' current internet use puts them at risk of permanently harming their reputations, and there are no protective measures in place, whether educational or regulatory. They are posting personal information on the internet at an alarming rate mostly via social networking sites like MySpace.com and Facebook.com without an awareness of the present and long-term consequences, such as the …

I'M A Highway Star: An Outline For A Federal Right Of Publicity, Sean D. Whaley

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The federal government has failed to codify a federal publicity right. This has caused numerous problems recently, as varying state laws unevenly restrain the commercial speech of many actors in interstate commerce. However, the nature of the publicity right as a property right and its essential function in interstate commerce calls for Congress to adopt a federal publicity right. Similar to the dual system of trademark protection, a federal publicity right will not preempt such rights at the state level. Rather, establishing such a right will detail proper justification and contours of the right. By establishing a federal right, the …

The Supreme Court As The Grand Mediator In Social Regulation Of The Media - De Gustibus Non Disputandum Est: Or Are They, Richard J. Hunter, Ann M. Mayo, Hector R. Lozada

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This article presents a study of administrative and statutory schemes designed to regulate various aspects of the media in considering broad questions of indecency, obscenity, and societal and parental controls over content in various forms of media broadcasting. The article then provides an important historical back-drop by referencing Burstyn v. Wilson (a 1950s case involving an alleged "secular sacrilege") and Pacifica Foundation (the George Carlin "Filthy Words" monologue case). It then turns to a discussion of the litigation and controversy spurred by passage of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 and the Child Online Protection Act of 1998 as the …

Licensed Anarchy: Anything Goes On The Internet - Revisiting The Boundaries Of Section 230 Protection, Thomas D. Huycke

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Actual Interpretation Yields Actual Dissemination: An Analysis Of The Make Available Theory Argued In Peer-To-Peer File Sharing Lawsuits, And Why Courts Ought To Reject It, Shana Dines

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The Recording Industry Association of America has sued thousands of individuals for peer-to-peer file sharing in an attempt to save the failing music industry and resist new technology. The lawsuits rely on an interpretation of copyright law that making a work available to the public is an infringement of the distribution right. The recording industry has vigorously argued this "make available" theory because it is easy to prove, given the limited evidence obtainable in peer-to-peer file sharing cases. However, the district courts in various federal circuits are split on accepting this theory, some holding that actual dissemination is required to …

Mobile Messaging Making E-Discovery Messy: Mobile Messaging And Electronic Discovery, Daniel B. Garrie, Maureen Duffy-Lewis, Richard L. Gillespie, Mari Joller

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Mobile e-discovery spans the globe and creates a multitude of issues for litigants and the courts. The issue of privacy, jurisdiction, privilege, and consent intersect in the mobile space with users sending text messages, twittering, posting notes and videos on-line, and sharing pictures all in the span of a work day. Of course this is further complicated by the integration of the 24/7 workplace and the electronic discovery issues of retention, preservation, and production of the data that mobile devices create. This article examines these issues and provides an overview of some of the more common underlying mobile telecommunication technologies.

Avatar Rights In A Constitutionless World, Tiffany Day

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Courts will face novel issues in constitutional law when the virtual world begins to resemble the real world. Virtual world platforms, such as Second Life, offer a glimpse into the problems that online players face, as well as a look at how some of these problems can be handled in real life. While courts have largely ignored in-game legal issues and have left game creators with the power to decide punishment and distribution of rights, as online commerce and business models begin to grow these issues become more relevant to today's society.

This Note examines the various theories of player …

When Sex And Cell Phones Collide: Inside The Prosecution Of A Teen Sexting Case, Robert D. Richards, Clay Calvert

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The high-tech phenomenon of teen "sexting," which is now garnering mainstream media attention, is pushing and straining traditional legal notions of what constitutes child pornography. As teens take sexually provocative photos of themselves and send them off to other teens via cell phones, some prosecutors are charging them as child pornographers. This article pivots on an exclusive, in-person interview conducted in Florida by the authors in May 2009 with attorney Lawrence Walters and his client Phillip Alpert, who sexted a nude photo of his girlfriend when he was 18 years old. Alpert was charged under child pornography laws and, today, …

"It's Third And Eight!": The Third Circuit Adopts An Eight-Factor Test For Likelihood Of Confusion In False Enforcement Cases And Flags Related Defenses In Facenda V. Nfl Films, Justin Kerner

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Due to the increased importance of celebrity in American culture, the volume of false endorsement claims under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act has risen steadily in the last twenty years. In the third circuit, courts have adopted a three-element test for false endorsement cases: plaintiffs must prove that (1) the mark in question is valid and legally protectable; (2) the plaintiff owns the mark; and (3) the defendant's use of the mark will likely create confusion. In Facenda v. NFL Films, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals adopted a eight-factor test for the third element, likelihood of confusion. This …

Extraterritorial Electioneering And The Globalization Of American Elections, Zephyr Teachout

Faculty Scholarship

This Essay explores a fascinating new truth: because of the Internet, governments, corporations, and citizens of other countries can now meaningfully participate in United States elections. They can phone bank, editorialize, and organize in ways that impact a candidate's image, the narrative structure of a campaign, and the mobilization of base support. Foreign governments can bankroll newspapers that will be read by millions of voters. Foreign companies can enlist employees in massive cross-continental email campaigns. Foreign activists can set up offline meetings and organize door-to-door campaigns in central Ohio. They can, in short, influence who wins and who loses. Depending …

Fcc Jurisdiction Over Isps In Protocol-Specific Bandwidth Throttling, Andrew Gioia

Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review

Over the past decade, the Internet has matured from its dial-up infancy into the nation's dominant communications infrastructure. Such rapid growth and accessibility--while fostering free speech and innovation like nothing before--has nonetheless created complex regulatory and policy questions for both the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the cable companies providing the nation's broadband Internet access. For instance, Comcast, one such Internet provider, has recently brought to the fore the question of how, and to what extent, the FCC can ensure an open and accessible Internet through the company's recent actions in selectively targeting and interfering with the connections of certain …

Wireless Net Neutrality Regulation And The Problem With Pricing: An Empirical, Cautionary Tale, Babette E.L. Boliek

Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review

I present here a unique empirical analysis of the consumer welfare benefits of prior regulation in the mobile telecommunications industry. In particular, I analyze the relative consumer benefits of state rate regulation and federal entry regulation. The institution of filing requirements and FTC review and approval of various consumer pricing regimes is highly analogous to the consumer price controls imposed by various state level public utility commissions in the past. Furthermore, the imposition of a zero-price rule is analogous to past rate regulation; in particular it is similar to past wholesale regulation with its underlying principles of open access and …

The Failure Of Sexting Criminalization: A Plea For The Exercise Of Prosecutorial Restraint, Robert H. Wood

Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review

The purpose of this Essay is to explore the various legal approaches to the sexting phenomenon through an analysis of a decision by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, which granted a temporary restraining order enjoining the prosecution of sexting teens on constitutional grounds, and an examination of current and pending legislative attempts to deal with the sexting phenomenon. Section I describes the facts leading up to the district court decision and its subsequent holding. Section II examines the approaches to sexting prosecution and legislation taken by other states. Section III analyzes the legal issues …

Regulating Robocalls: Are Automated Calls The Sound Of, Or A Threat To, Democracy, Jason C. Miller

Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review

African-American voters receive a phone message implying that they are not registered to vote. Others hear "an almost threatening male voice," a "fake New York accent," factual distortions about legislation, false endorsements from controversial groups, calls promoting one candidate claiming to be from his opponent, and a constant barrage of annoying phone calls designed to make voters think a different candidate was sponsoring them. These messages were delivered through automated political telephone calls, also known as robocalls. Robocalls are cheap and efficient--one can deliver a pre-recorded message through 100,000 automated phone calls in one hour for only $2000. Consequently, robocalls …

Lessons Learned From The Spectrum Wars: Views On The United States Effort Going Into And Coming Out Of A World Radiocommunication Conference, Donna Coleman Gregg

Scholarly Articles

No abstract provided.

Toward A Broadband Public Interest Standard, Anthony E. Varona

Articles

No abstract provided.

The Fourth Amendment's New Frontier: Judicial Reasoning Applying The Fourth Amendment To Electronic Communications, Amanda Yellon

Journal of Business & Technology Law

No abstract provided.

Viewpoint Diversity And Media Consolidation: An Empirical Study, Daniel E. Ho, Kevin M. Quinn

Faculty Articles

One of the central predicates of legal regulation of media ownership is that ownership consolidation reduces substantive viewpoint diversity. Appellate courts and, in turn, the Federal Communications Commission have increasingly demanded evidence for this convergence hypothesis, but extant empirical measures of viewpoint diversity sidestep the problem, ignoring diversity, viewpoints, or both. Our Article develops and offers a finely tuned, time-varying statistical measure of editorial viewpoint diversity, based on a new database of over 1600 editorial positions in twenty-five top newspapers from 1988-2004. Using this new measure, we assess the validity of the convergence hypothesis by examining the evolution of editorial …

Toward A Broadband Public Interest Standard, Anthony E. Varona

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

Although they emerged seven decades apart, commercial broadcasting and the Internet were greeted with similar excited declarations of their potential to transform American democracy by hosting an electronic free marketplace of ideas that would inform and enlighten citizens and catalyze discussion on issues of public importance. The federal government played a central role in the initial development and proliferation of both technologies, but then assumed very different regulatory orientations to the two industries once they were commercialized. In broadcasting, the government took on an interventionist posture promoting civic republican First Amendment values by means of a variety of public interest …

The Facebook Frontier: Responding To The Changing Face Of Privacy On The Internet, Samantha L. Millier

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Conflict Of Law And Surreptitious Taping Of Telephone Conversations, Carol M. Bast

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Contemporary Guide To Negotiating The Author-Publisher Contract, Martin P. Levin

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

Cartoon Network Lp, Lllp V. Csc Holdings, Inc., Marc Miller

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

Over And Out: Examining How Cognitive Radio Will Affect First Amendment Restrictions On Broadcast Media, Theresa Skonicki

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )

No abstract provided.

Federal Regulation Of Fios And Lightspeed: A Tale Of Two Jurisdictional Dilemmas, Michael Botein

Articles & Chapters

No abstract provided.

Cell Phones Pose A Distraction To Drivers But Legislative Ban Is Not The Answer, Annie Barret Wallin

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Inter-American System, Claudia Martin

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

No abstract provided.