Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Internet Law (27)
- First Amendment (23)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (22)
- Intellectual Property Law (22)
- Administrative Law (20)
-
- Legislation (19)
- Constitutional Law (13)
- Computer Law (12)
- Science and Technology Law (9)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (8)
- Criminal Law (8)
- Privacy Law (7)
- Consumer Protection Law (6)
- International Law (6)
- Law and Economics (5)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (5)
- Communication (4)
- Criminal Procedure (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- National Security Law (4)
- Courts (3)
- Human Rights Law (3)
- International Trade Law (3)
- Marketing Law (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Commercial Law (2)
- Communication Technology and New Media (2)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Institution
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (24)
- UC Law SF (15)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (12)
- University of Michigan Law School (9)
- Pepperdine University (6)
-
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Butler University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of San Diego (1)
- Western University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Internet (11)
- Privacy (10)
- First Amendment (9)
- Facebook (6)
- Freedom of speech (5)
-
- Social media (5)
- Communications (4)
- Information (4)
- Regulation (4)
- Twitter (4)
- Constitutional law (3)
- Federal Communications Commission (3)
- Federal Trade Commission (3)
- Networks (3)
- Telecommunications (3)
- Bullying (2)
- Cable television (2)
- Cell phones (2)
- Citizens united (2)
- Computer (2)
- Constitutional Law -- Right to Privacy (2)
- Copyright (2)
- Digital Millennium Copyright Act (2)
- Editor's Note (2)
- FCC (2)
- FTC (2)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (2)
- Federal agencies (2)
- Game theory (2)
- Indecency (2)
- Publication
-
- Federal Communications Law Journal (20)
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (15)
- Pepperdine Law Review (6)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Cardozo Law Review (3)
-
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (2)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (2)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- Translated Opinions (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Caveat (2)
- American University Business Law Review (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (1)
- CommLaw Conspectus: Journal of Communications Law and Technology Policy (1993-2015) (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- FIMS Presentations (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- IP Theory (1)
- Journal Publications (1)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (1)
- NJTIP Annual Symposium (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 94 of 94
Full-Text Articles in Communications Law
Big Brother Or Little Brother? Surrendering Seizure Privacy For The Benefits Of Communication Technology, José F. Anderson
Big Brother Or Little Brother? Surrendering Seizure Privacy For The Benefits Of Communication Technology, José F. Anderson
All Faculty Scholarship
Over two centuries have passed since Benjamin Franklin quipped that we should defend privacy over security if people wanted either privacy or security. Although his axiom did not become a rule of law in its original form, its principles found voice in the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the Constitution's Bill of Rights. To a lesser extent, provisions against the quartering of troops in private homes found in the Third Amendment also support the idea that what a government can require you to do, or who you must have behind the doors of your home, is an area of grave …
Cartoons Aren't Real People, Too: Does The Regulation Of Virtual Child Pornography Violate The First Amendment And Criminalize Subversive Thought?, Keisha April
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The note argues that the government's regulation of virtual child pornography, particularly under the Obscene Visual Representations of the Sexual Abuse of Children (OVR) provision of the PROTECT Act, raises significant First Amendment concerns. While the provision aims to protect children, it criminalizes depictions that do not involve real children, undermining free expression. The analysis critiques the OVR provision's overbreadth and vagueness, asserting that it chills artistic expression and fails to serve a compelling government interest. The note advocates for narrowing the provision to focus on actual harm rather than fictional depictions.
National Security In The Information Age, Rosa Brooks
National Security In The Information Age, Rosa Brooks
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The information environment has been changing right along with the broader security environment. Today, the information environment connects almost everyone, almost everywhere, almost instantaneously. The media environment has become global, and there’s no longer such thing as “the news cycle” —everything is 24/7. Barriers between US and global publics have virtual disappeared: Everything and anything can “go viral” instantly, and it’s no longer possible to say one thing to a US audience and another thing to a foreign audience and assume no one will ever set the statements side by side. The Pakistani military has a very clear idea of …
Tying And Consumer Harm, Daniel A. Crane
Tying And Consumer Harm, Daniel A. Crane
Articles
Brantley raises important issues of law, economics, and policy about tying arrangements. Under current legal principles, Brantley was on solid ground in distinguishing between anticompetitive ties and those that might harm consumer interests without impairing competition. As a matter of economics, the court was also right to reject the claim that the cable programmers forced consumers to pay for programs the customers didn’t want. The hardest question is a policy one - whether antitrust law should ever condemn the exploitation of market power in ways that extract surplus from consumers but do not create or enlarge market power. I shall …