Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (33)
- Intellectual Property Law (30)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (12)
- Internet Law (11)
- Legislation (11)
-
- First Amendment (10)
- Administrative Law (9)
- Constitutional Law (9)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (7)
- Commercial Law (5)
- Jurisdiction (5)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Consumer Protection Law (2)
- International Law (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Tax Law (2)
- Torts (2)
- Agency (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Computer Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Institution
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (39)
- UC Law SF (26)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (7)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
-
- New York Law School (2)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Kennesaw State University (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- Wayne State University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Federal Communications Commission (7)
- FCC (6)
- Internet (6)
- Regulation (5)
- Telecommunications Act of 1996 (5)
-
- Constitutionality (3)
- Editor's Note (3)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Indiana University School of Law (3)
- Masthead (3)
- Administrative law (2)
- Advertising (2)
- Assisted suicide (2)
- Cell phones (2)
- Child Online Protection Act (2)
- Communications Decency Act (2)
- Diversity (2)
- Email (2)
- Initiatives (2)
- Investments (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Media (2)
- Michigan (2)
- Minority Media Ownership (2)
- Minority-Owned Media (2)
- Monopoly (2)
- Oregon (2)
- Public opinion (2)
- State agencies (2)
- Publication
-
- Federal Communications Law Journal (39)
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (26)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (4)
- Articles (3)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (2)
- William & Mary Law Review (2)
- CommLaw Conspectus: Journal of Communications Law and Technology Policy (1993-2015) (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - ) (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Publications (1)
- Translated Opinions (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 95 of 95
Full-Text Articles in Communications Law
The Voyeurism Value In First Amendment Jurisprudence, Clay Calvert
The Voyeurism Value In First Amendment Jurisprudence, Clay Calvert
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
"Chevron," Cooperative Federalism, And Telecommunications Reform, Philip J. Weiser
"Chevron," Cooperative Federalism, And Telecommunications Reform, Philip J. Weiser
Vanderbilt Law Review
In this Article, Professor Weiser argues that the advent of cooperative federalism statutes, like the Telecommunications Act of 1996, calls for a new conception of federal court review of state agency decisions. In particular, Professor Weiser suggests that federal statutes that invite state agencies to interpret federal law subject only to federal court review should be interpreted as calling for a deferential standard of review. Such a standard, to be sure, would allow cooperative federalism statutes to mean different things in different states. But as Professor Weiser illustrates with reference to the Telecommunications Act, the very nature of cooperative federalism …
Defusing New York's 120-Day Time Bomb: The Meaning Of New C.P.L.R. 306-B, Brian A. Waldbaum
Defusing New York's 120-Day Time Bomb: The Meaning Of New C.P.L.R. 306-B, Brian A. Waldbaum
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
So Much For Savages: Navajo 1, Government 0 In Final Moments Of Play, Eben Moglen
So Much For Savages: Navajo 1, Government 0 In Final Moments Of Play, Eben Moglen
Faculty Scholarship
Dame i gospodo, uvaˇzene kolege, poˇcastvovan sam vaˇsim pozivom da prisustvujem ovom znaˇcajnom skupu. Danas ´cu govoriti o ograniˇcenjina baziranim na ustavnim pravima regulacije naˇse komunikacije, od strane vlade, a u interesu signorsti. Ali na kraju, kao ˇsto ´cete i vi sami shvatiti nemo puno toga da se kaˇze, samo na osnovu toga ˇsto je na´cin komunikacije nov. Pre svega treba se reˇsiti pitanje jezika. After all, every act of linguistic communication occurs in a social context. And the single most important choice that we make when we communicate with one another is the choice of the language in which …
Why Did Voters Reject Michigan's Physician-Assisted Suicide Initiative?, Yale Kamisar
Why Did Voters Reject Michigan's Physician-Assisted Suicide Initiative?, Yale Kamisar
Articles
In November 1997, when Oregon voters reaffirmed their support for doctor-assisted suicide, some commentators called it a turning point for the "right to die" movement. But the lopsided defeat of a similar proposal in Michigan is a better barometer: in general, assisted suicide continues to fare badly in the political arena.