Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (43)
- Intellectual Property Law (31)
- First Amendment (16)
- Legislation (13)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (9)
-
- Internet Law (7)
- Consumer Protection Law (4)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- International Law (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Contracts (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- International Trade Law (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Air and Space Law (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Government Contracts (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Institution
-
- UC Law SF (31)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (26)
- New York Law School (10)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (10)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (5)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Telecommunications Act of 1996 (13)
- Federal Communications Commission (9)
- FCC (8)
- First Amendment (5)
- Competition (4)
-
- Internet (4)
- Communications Decency Act (3)
- Masthead (3)
- Pornography (3)
- Technology (3)
- Communications Act (2)
- Communications Law (2)
- Editor's Note (2)
- FCC Licenses (2)
- FOIA (2)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (2)
- Freedom of Information Act (2)
- Indiana University School of Law (2)
- Interconnection (2)
- Krattenmaker Dean Collection (2)
- Media (2)
- Mergers (2)
- Politics (General) (2)
- Public policy (2)
- Regulation (2)
- Telecommunications (2)
- Telecommunications Industy (2)
- Telephone companies (2)
- 1992 Cable Act (1)
- 47 U.S.C Sec.325(b) (1)
- Publication
-
- UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal (31)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (24)
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - ) (10)
- Media Law and Policy (10)
- Articles (4)
-
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Law Review (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- CommLaw Conspectus: Journal of Communications Law and Technology Policy (1993-2015) (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (1)
- Oregon Law Institute, 1996 (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (1)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1)
- Washington Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 103 of 103
Full-Text Articles in Communications Law
Indecent Proposals: Reason, Restraint And Responsibility In The Regulation Of Indecency, Allen S. Iv Hammond
Indecent Proposals: Reason, Restraint And Responsibility In The Regulation Of Indecency, Allen S. Iv Hammond
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court Turns Its Back On The First Amendment, The 1992 Cable Act And The First Amendment: Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. V. Fcc, Holli K. Sands
The Supreme Court Turns Its Back On The First Amendment, The 1992 Cable Act And The First Amendment: Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. V. Fcc, Holli K. Sands
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
The Fcc, Indecency, And Anti-Abortion Political Advertising, Lili Levi
The Fcc, Indecency, And Anti-Abortion Political Advertising, Lili Levi
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
Metropolitan Council Of Naacp Branches V. Fcc: Isolated Instance Or De Facto Elimination Of The Cross-Ownership Ban, John E. Schadl
Metropolitan Council Of Naacp Branches V. Fcc: Isolated Instance Or De Facto Elimination Of The Cross-Ownership Ban, John E. Schadl
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
Regulating Indecent Broadcasting: Setting Sail From Harbors Or Sunk By The V-Chip?, Brett Ferenchak
Regulating Indecent Broadcasting: Setting Sail From Harbors Or Sunk By The V-Chip?, Brett Ferenchak
University of Richmond Law Review
"Family values" has become a familiar phrase in all arenas of American life. As a result of the increasing concern over family values in broadcasting, the religious right, as well as the liberal left, have tried to stay the progression of moral decadence in our youth. The concerns have been directed towards violent, sexual and vulgar content in radio, television, and films.
The O.J. Simpson Verdict: A Lesson In Black And White, Christo Lassiter
The O.J. Simpson Verdict: A Lesson In Black And White, Christo Lassiter
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
This article is an attempt to analyze the O.J. Simpson verdict and the press coverage of it, to suggest ways not only of improving criminal justice in a diverse community, but also of improving press coverage of criminal justice in a diverse community. Part Two of this essay is subdivided into two sections. The first section surveys the op-ed pages of major newspapers to evaluate the analysis of, and the commentary on, the O.J. Simpson verdict. The second section deconstructs the press' spin on the verdict. Part Three of this article discusses the role of a jury and proof beyond …
Copyright: From Stone Age Caves To The Celestial Jukebox, Nick Allard
Copyright: From Stone Age Caves To The Celestial Jukebox, Nick Allard
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Foreign Ownership Of Broadcasting: The Telecommunications Act Of 1996 And Beyond, W. Scott Hastings
Foreign Ownership Of Broadcasting: The Telecommunications Act Of 1996 And Beyond, W. Scott Hastings
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
In an increasingly global market, severe restrictions upon foreign investment in broadcasting companies have enabled them to remain primarily domestic entities. This Note reviews these restrictions and advocates reforming the world-wlde system of broadcasting ownership regulation. This author discusses the major policies underlying the current regulations and demonstrates their implications by looking at several hypothetical regulatory schemes. The Note then focuses upon regulatory systems that are currently being used, as well as a hypothetical system based upon reciprocity. In the process, the author reviews the ownership restrictions of the United States, Canada, Australia, the European Community, and several lesser-developed markets. …
Blocking Preemption: Convergence, Privacy, And The Fcc's Misguided Regulation Of Caller Id, Laura V. Eng
Blocking Preemption: Convergence, Privacy, And The Fcc's Misguided Regulation Of Caller Id, Laura V. Eng
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Civil Defamation Law And The Press In Russia: Private And Public Interests, The 1995 Civil Code, And The Constitution, Part Two, Peter Krug
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Telecommunications Act Of 1996, Thomas G. Krattenmaker
The Telecommunications Act Of 1996, Thomas G. Krattenmaker
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Responses, Thomas G. Krattenmaker
The Once And Future Property-Based Vision Of The First Amendment, John O. Mcginnis
The Once And Future Property-Based Vision Of The First Amendment, John O. Mcginnis
Articles
The growth of the information superhighway depends not only on technological developments, but also on our society's commitment to the free flow of information. Paradoxically, however, as the digital revolution in telecommunications is bringing the information superhighway into sharp focus, the justifications for contemporary First Amendment jurisprudence are becoming blurred.