Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Communications Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Torts

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 271 - 300 of 307

Full-Text Articles in Communications Law

Shnitzer V. Chief Military Censor, Aharon Barak, Yaakov Melitz, Shulamit Wallenstein Jan 1989

Shnitzer V. Chief Military Censor, Aharon Barak, Yaakov Melitz, Shulamit Wallenstein

Translated Opinions

[This abstract is not part of the Court's opinion and is provided for the reader's convenience. It has been translated from a Hebrew version prepared by Nevo Press Ltd. and is used with its kind permission.] 

This petition concerns the decision by the First Respondent to prohibit, under its authority according to Regulation 87(1) of the Defense Regulations (State of Emergency) 1945, the publication of a newspaper article criticizing the functioning of the Director of the Institute for Intelligence and Special Operations (the “Mossad”,) while noting the upcoming change in Mossad directors. After submitting to the First Respondent different versions …


The Full Court Press: Sacrificing Vital Privacy Interests On The Altar Of First Amendment Rhetoric, Irwin R. Kramer Jan 1989

The Full Court Press: Sacrificing Vital Privacy Interests On The Altar Of First Amendment Rhetoric, Irwin R. Kramer

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Public Officials And Libel: In Defense Of New York Times Co. V. Sullivan, Marc A. Franklin Jan 1986

Public Officials And Libel: In Defense Of New York Times Co. V. Sullivan, Marc A. Franklin

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Responses To Professor Franklin, Dan M. Burt, Phyllis W. Beck, Norman Pearlstine Jan 1986

Responses To Professor Franklin, Dan M. Burt, Phyllis W. Beck, Norman Pearlstine

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Information Law Overview, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 815 (1985), George B. Trubow Jan 1985

Information Law Overview, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 815 (1985), George B. Trubow

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.


There Is Tort Liability For Negligent Programming, Harvey L. Zuckman Jan 1983

There Is Tort Liability For Negligent Programming, Harvey L. Zuckman

Scholarly Articles

No abstract provided.


The Involuntary Public Figure Class Of Gertz V. Robert Welch: Dead Or Merely Dormant?, Dale K. Nichols Oct 1980

The Involuntary Public Figure Class Of Gertz V. Robert Welch: Dead Or Merely Dormant?, Dale K. Nichols

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This article does not resolve the debate over involuntary public figures but argues instead that in light of the Court's pronouncements in Firestone, Hutchinson and Walston, the involuntary class should be abolished. Part I briefly traces the evolution and significance of public figure status in defamation law, and reviews various interpretations of the involuntary public figure references in Gertz. Part II examines the status of the involuntary class after Firestone, Hutchinson and Walston, and discusses the extent to which future use of the class remains logically consistent with those decisions. Finally, the article considers the merits of …


Judge Gurfein And The Pentagon Papers, James L. Oakes Jan 1980

Judge Gurfein And The Pentagon Papers, James L. Oakes

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.


Zacchini V. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1976

Zacchini V. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Tort Liability Of A University For Libelous Material In Student Publications, Michigan Law Review Apr 1973

Tort Liability Of A University For Libelous Material In Student Publications, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

While attention will occasionally be drawn to the impact of the New York Times privilege, this Note largely assumes that a defamed plaintiff is capable of overcoming the constitutional barriers imposed by New York Times and its progeny. In other words, the assumption is made that libelous statements either fall outside the constitutional privilege or that the plaintiff can demonstrate actual malice in the student authors or editors. The Note will analyze the traditional theories which may be invoked to establish the university's liability for defamatory material in student publications. First, a range of student newspaper-university relationships will be examined …


Television, Tort Law, And Federalism, Robert M. O'Neil Jan 1965

Television, Tort Law, And Federalism, Robert M. O'Neil

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.


Advertising And The Right Of Privacy, Nicholas C. Bozzi Jan 1964

Advertising And The Right Of Privacy, Nicholas C. Bozzi

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.


Negligence - Breach Of Duty - Liability Of Telephone Company For Failure To Relay Fire Alarm, Cyril Moscow S.Ed. Dec 1956

Negligence - Breach Of Duty - Liability Of Telephone Company For Failure To Relay Fire Alarm, Cyril Moscow S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Upon discovering a fire within his business building, plaintiff immediately went to the telephone and dialed the operator. After telling her his address and requesting that she call the fire department, he left the telephone to fight the fire. The message was not transmitted. When the fire department finally arrived in response to an alarm by a neighbor, the fire was out of control and the entire building was destroyed. Plaintiff sought damages, alleging that the telephone company held itself out to the public as willing to convey messages in case of emergency, and that failure to transmit his message …


Torts - Nuisance - Personal Annoyance As Sole Injury, Michael Scott Dec 1956

Torts - Nuisance - Personal Annoyance As Sole Injury, Michael Scott

Michigan Law Review

Several thousand sales slips, mistakenly printed to bear plaintiff's telephone number, were supplied to the defendant store and were circulated widely by the latter's employees incident to normal sales transactions. Calls from defendant's customers soon burdened plaintiff's telephone, and despite numerous complaints by plaintiff over a two-year period, defendant refused or neglected to terminate use of the incorrect slips. On appeal from judgment for plaintiff in a suit for damages, held, affirmed. Defendant's acts resulted in an actual invasion of plaintiff's right to enjoy her property without unreasonable interference. Damages for personal annoyance and inconvenience alone are allowable in …


Television Tort, Burt Derieux May 1952

Television Tort, Burt Derieux

Mercer Law Review

Our new medium of television has opened up entirely new vistas of entertainment, news coverage, and advertising. Though this medium is somewhat like radio and somewhat like that of the motion picture, the resulting combination of the two physical attributes of those two mediums, plus the factor of network-wide publication of events at the time those events are happening, has had unprecedented appeal to the public resulting in a stupendous increase in the number of television receivers in all parts of this country within range of television transmitters.


Torts-Liability Of Radio Station For Defamation Broadcast By Lessee Of Its Facilities Sep 1949

Torts-Liability Of Radio Station For Defamation Broadcast By Lessee Of Its Facilities

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.


Right Of Privacy-Protection Against Publication Of News-Worthy Information [Sidis V. F-R Publishing Co., C. C. A. 2d, 1940]. Sep 1940

Right Of Privacy-Protection Against Publication Of News-Worthy Information [Sidis V. F-R Publishing Co., C. C. A. 2d, 1940].

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.


Telegraphs And Telephones-Qualified Privilege Of Telegraph Company To Transmit Defamatory Messages Where Sender Is Not Privileged [O'Brien V. Western Union Telegraph Co., C. C. A. Ist, 1940] Sep 1940

Telegraphs And Telephones-Qualified Privilege Of Telegraph Company To Transmit Defamatory Messages Where Sender Is Not Privileged [O'Brien V. Western Union Telegraph Co., C. C. A. Ist, 1940]

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.


Torts- Death As A Result Of Worry Over Libel-Survival Of Actions - Legal Cause, Edmund R. Blaske Apr 1940

Torts- Death As A Result Of Worry Over Libel-Survival Of Actions - Legal Cause, Edmund R. Blaske

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff, administratrix of her husband's estate, brought an action against defendant newspaper to recover damages for the death of her husband, which she claimed resulted from worry over an alleged libel that defendant published. The trial court sustained defendant's demurrer to the declaration and plaintiff appealed. Held, since the "survival statute" does not preserve actions affecting character, the libel abated with the husband's death; and since mental anguish, worry, fear and loss of health are the several results of the wrongful act of libel, they cannot be made the basis of a new cause of action. Judgment for defendant …


Libel And Slander - Charging Physician With Lack Of Skill In Particular Case, Michigan Law Review Apr 1940

Libel And Slander - Charging Physician With Lack Of Skill In Particular Case, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff, a practicing physician, sued to recover damages for an alleged libel committed when defendant falsely published in its newspaper an article stating that plaintiff examined a prisoner in the city jail, diagnosed his condition as "alcoholic paralysis," and ordered his removal to a city hospital, and that a post mortem disclosed that the prisoner's neck was fractured. Held, that to charge a physician with having made a wrong diagnosis in a particular case is not actionable per se, and since there is no allegation of special damage, there can be no recovery. Blende v. Hearst Publications, Inc., …


Torts - Right Of Privacy - Radio Broadcasting, Michigan Law Review Mar 1940

Torts - Right Of Privacy - Radio Broadcasting, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff, a chauffeur, had been the victim of a hold-up and shooting, suffering serious injury. Defendant sponsored a radio broadcast in which plaintiff's name was used dramatizing the affair. On hearing the broadcast, plaintiff sued in tort alleging that he suffered mental anguish and physical shock which resulted in impairing his ability to drive and caused him to be discharged from his job. Held, defendant's motion to dismiss denied, as plaintiff had stated a cause of action for invasion of a right of privacy. Mau v. Rio Grande Oil, Inc., (D. C. Cal. 1939) 28 F. Supp. 845.


Libel And Slander - Defamation By Radio - Absolute Liability Of Broadcasting Company, Michigan Law Review Jan 1940

Libel And Slander - Defamation By Radio - Absolute Liability Of Broadcasting Company, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

The defendant broadcasting company leased its facilities to a commercial advertising corporation for the transmission of a series of sponsored radio programs. During the course of one of these broadcasts a comedian, employed by the advertiser, suddenly interpolated an extemporaneous remark, "That's a rotten hotel," in reference to plaintiff's hotel. A script for each program was prepared in advance, submitted to the defendant for approval, and followed exactly by the performers. The interjection in question did not appear in the script and had not been made at rehearsal. Plaintiff brought trespass for defamation, and from a judgment on a verdict …


Torts - Unauthorized Publication Of Photograph - Invasion Of Right Of Privacy, James W. Mehaffy Nov 1938

Torts - Unauthorized Publication Of Photograph - Invasion Of Right Of Privacy, James W. Mehaffy

Michigan Law Review

Defendant newspaper published an advertisement containing a picture of plaintiff, a radio artist, in a bathing suit, under the mistaken belief that it was a picture of a member of a vaudeville troupe whose name appeared in the advertisement, and who was described as an "exotic red-haired Venus" who endorsed a certain brand of whole-wheat bread as a means of "keeping that sylph-like figure." Plaintiff alleged that the vaudeville act was a "sensual performance or sex parade" and was composed of the "cheapest class of chorus girls." Held, that the advertisement was an invasion of plaintiff's right of privacy …


Wills - Probate - Deletion Of Libelous Matter, Michigan Law Review Mar 1937

Wills - Probate - Deletion Of Libelous Matter, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

In propounding the will of the testator for probate, the executor petitioned the surrogate court to exclude from probate certain non-dispositive matter therein, which if published during the testator's lifetime, would have supported an action for libel. Held, that the court had power to exclude the objectionable matter from probate, since it was not properly a part of the will. In re Draske's Will, 290 N. Y. S. 581 (Surr. Ct. 1936).


Negligence- Liability Of Telephone Company For Failure To Complete Subscriber's Call, Michigan Law Review Jan 1937

Negligence- Liability Of Telephone Company For Failure To Complete Subscriber's Call, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff, father and administrator of the estate of a seven year old child, brought suit, under the Death Act, alleging that defendant's negligent failure to connect him with the family physician was the proximate cause of the death of the child. Held, by a majority of the court, that there was no liability, because the deceased, had she lived, would have had no cause of action on these facts. Emery v. Rochester Telephone Corporation, 271 N. Y. 306, 3 N. E. (2d) 434 (1936).


Torts - Right Of Privacy - Newsreel As Violation Of, Royal E. Thompson Jan 1937

Torts - Right Of Privacy - Newsreel As Violation Of, Royal E. Thompson

Michigan Law Review

Section 51 of the New York Civil Rights Law provides that: "Any person whose name, portrait or picture is used . . . for advertising purposes or for the purposes of trade without the written consent first obtained . . . may maintain an equitable action . . . to prevent and restrain the use thereof; and may also sue and recover damages for any injuries sustained by reason of such use . . . . " Held, publication by defendant of a newsreel showing plaintiff and other stout women exercising in a gymnasium with the aid of unique …


Declaratory Judgments- Extension Of Protection Against Injuries To Personality Nov 1935

Declaratory Judgments- Extension Of Protection Against Injuries To Personality

Michigan Law Review

The widespread acceptance of the declaratory judgment as a statutory supplement to common law and equitable remedies has raised some searching questions as to the relation between right and remedy in Anglo-American law. The declaratory judgment can operate in anticipation of specific wrongs that would be a basis for ordinary legal or equitable relief. It does not depend for its efficacy on the use of the familiar remedies of law and equity - that is, on damages, specific restitution in replevin and ejectment, and the injunction and specific enforcement in equity. The question may therefore be asked whether the development …


Torts - Libel By Talking Pictures - Rasputin Case May 1934

Torts - Libel By Talking Pictures - Rasputin Case

Michigan Law Review

The motion picture production of "Rasputin The Mad Monk" portrayed an episode in which Rasputin seduced a young lady of the Russian court. Alleging that the character of the seduced was patterned after her own so that she had been defamed, the plaintiff brought an action of libel against the producers. Held, the plaintiff was entitled to damages of what, in this country, would amount to about one hundred and twenty-six thousand dollars. Youssoupov. v. M-G-M Pictures, England (1934).


Torts - Libel Per Se - Liability Of Newspaper For Republication Feb 1934

Torts - Libel Per Se - Liability Of Newspaper For Republication

Michigan Law Review

A news item published in a newspaper owned by the .defendant stated falsely that the plaintiff was being held in jail on a charge of forgery. From a judgment for plaintiff the defendant appealed. Held, the defamatory statement was "libellous per se," and the defendant was liable though the information was received through a reliable news-gathering agency and was printed without malice. Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. Givens, (C. C. A. 10th, 1933) 67 F. (2d) 62.


Libel And Slander-Liability Of A Telegraph Company For The Transmission Of A Defamatory Message Jan 1931

Libel And Slander-Liability Of A Telegraph Company For The Transmission Of A Defamatory Message

Michigan Law Review

It is surprising that despite the tremendous number of messages handled, covering almost every conceivable subject, the question of the liability of a telegraph company for the transmission of a defamatory message has arisen in but half a dozen jurisdictions. The earliest reported case, decided in 1858 when the law as to the tort liability of a corporation was still in the formative period, asserted the liability of the telegraph company on the sole ground that a corporation could be guilty of malice. Following a series of cases arising in the state and federal courts of Minnesota, a modern rule …