Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (186)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (31)
- Fordham Law School (15)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (15)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (10)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (9)
- BLR (9)
- University of Georgia School of Law (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
- University of Mississippi (5)
- Brooklyn Law School (4)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- New York Law School (3)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (3)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (2)
- University of San Diego (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- U.S. Naval War College (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- International Law (17)
- Communications Law (16)
- Law (15)
- Privacy (13)
- Criminal law; symposium; communications law; international law; first amendment (11)
-
- Telecommunications (10)
- First Amendment (8)
- Regulation (8)
- Technology (8)
- International Trade (7)
- Internet (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (6)
- Diversity (6)
- ESG (6)
- Evidence (6)
- Human Rights Law (6)
- International law (6)
- Law and Economics (6)
- Air and Space Law (5)
- Artificial intelligence (5)
- Conflict of Laws (5)
- Constitution (5)
- Courts (5)
- Dispute Resolution (5)
- Education Law (5)
- Intellectual Property Law (5)
- Jurisdiction (5)
- Labor Law (5)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (185)
- Fordham Law Review (14)
- Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (13)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (9)
- ExpressO (9)
-
- Federal Communications Law Journal (8)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (7)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (6)
- Cardozo Law Review (5)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Journal of Space Law (4)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (3)
- Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (2)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- San Diego International Law Journal (2)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (2)
- American University International Law Review (1)
- American University National Security Law Brief (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 211 - 240 of 333
Full-Text Articles in Communications Law
Time For Change: How Google's Anticompetitive Conduct Reveals The Deficiencies Of Modern Antitrust Regulation, Benjamin Clay Hughes
Time For Change: How Google's Anticompetitive Conduct Reveals The Deficiencies Of Modern Antitrust Regulation, Benjamin Clay Hughes
Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
The note examines the divergent approaches of U.S. and EU antitrust regulations in addressing anticompetitive conduct by tech giants, such as Microsoft and Google. It highlights how the EU has adopted a more aggressive and proactive stance in enforcing antitrust laws, whereas the U.S. has taken a more cautious approach. The analysis underscores the challenges of regulating digital platforms and the need for streamlined procedures to address anticompetitive practices effectively.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Privacy In The Digital Age: Is Our Data Safe?, Ezra Wolfson
Privacy In The Digital Age: Is Our Data Safe?, Ezra Wolfson
Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
The note examines the Cambridge Analytica scandal and its implications for digital privacy, advocating for enhanced regulatory frameworks to protect user data. It draws parallels with the Enron scandal, suggesting that similar legislative responses, such as the proposed Social Media Transparency Act, are necessary to ensure corporate accountability and user protection in the digital age. The note also explores the potential adoption of GDPR-like regulations in the U.S. and discusses the concept of digital data as property, advocating for compensation for data breaches.
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
Seattle University Law Review
Janet Ainsworth, Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law: In Memory of Professor James E. Bond.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
The Eu-U.S. Privacy Shield: An Uncertain Future, Catherine Read
The Eu-U.S. Privacy Shield: An Uncertain Future, Catherine Read
Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
The note examines the challenges facing the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield due to the renewal of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and the U.S. government's uneven implementation of Privacy Shield recommendations. It argues that without reforms, such as incorporating Presidential Policy Directive-28 (PPD-28) protections into Section 702, maintaining a fully staffed Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB), and enforcing stricter compliance measures, the future of the Privacy Shield and transatlantic data flows remains uncertain.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Indecency Regulation Of The Fcc And Censorship Law In Republic Korea: Comparison And Contrasts, Min-Soo "Minee" Roh
Indecency Regulation Of The Fcc And Censorship Law In Republic Korea: Comparison And Contrasts, Min-Soo "Minee" Roh
Upper Level Writing Requirement Research Papers
Regulating music on radio or television is not a straightforward process, as the music is comprised of lyrics of words. On top of the lyrics, any music performance has an additional layer of choreography and dress code. If any individual elements or combined elements is obscene or indecent, the government attempts to regulate broadcasting both music and performance. This leads to regulating general speech on communications and it requires this paper to look into regulation of broadcasting in general and specific examples of music broadcasting regulation on radio and television, particularly, in the United States (“States”) and in Republic of …
Social Media Platforms: Preserving Evidence Of International Crimes, Samantha Greenfield
Social Media Platforms: Preserving Evidence Of International Crimes, Samantha Greenfield
Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
The note argues that social media platforms should bear legal responsibility for preserving video evidence of international crimes, as such evidence is crucial for prosecuting genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. The author emphasizes that while these platforms effectively remove harmful content, their current practices risk losing critical evidence necessary for justice, necessitating a legal framework to ensure preservation.
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Legalizing Intelligence Sharing: A Consensus Approach, Brian Mund
Legalizing Intelligence Sharing: A Consensus Approach, Brian Mund
American University National Security Law Brief
No abstract provided.
Speech Across Borders, Jennifer Daskal
Speech Across Borders, Jennifer Daskal
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
As both governments and tech companies seek to regulate speech online, these efforts raise critical, and contested, questions about how far those regulations can and should extend. Is it enough to take down or delink material in a geographically segmented way? Or can and should tech companies be ordered to takedown or delink unsavory content across their entire platforms—no matter who is posting the material or where the unwanted content is viewed? How do we deal with conflicting speech norms across borders? And how do we protect against the most censor-prone nation effectively setting global speech rules? These questions were …
Privacy And Security Across Borders, Jennifer Daskal
Privacy And Security Across Borders, Jennifer Daskal
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
Three recent initiatives -by the United States, European Union, and Australiaare opening salvos in what will likely be an ongoing and critically important debate about law enforcement access to data, the jurisdictional limits to such access, and the rules that apply. Each of these developments addresses a common set of challenges posed by the increased digitalization of information, the rising power of private companies delimiting access to that information, and the cross-border nature of investigations that involve digital evidence. And each has profound implications for privacy, security, and the possibility of meaningful democratic accountability and control. This Essay analyzes the …
Emoji: The Other Tech Monopoly, Edward T. Brawley
Emoji: The Other Tech Monopoly, Edward T. Brawley
Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
No abstract provided.
China's Anti-Corruption Crackdown And The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Daniel C.K. Chow
China's Anti-Corruption Crackdown And The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Daniel C.K. Chow
Texas A&M Law Review
China’s highly publicized crackdown on corruption may affect the type and number of cases in China that arise under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), but it should not be assumed that the crackdown will necessarily lead to fewer FCPA prosecutions. Although there is some overlap of the goals of China’s corruption crackdown and the goals of the FCPA, China’s crackdown also serves important goals of the ruling Communist Party. The main goal of the current crackdown is to reinforce the Party’s power by targeting enemies and rivals of the current leadership. The crackdown is not aimed at prohibiting bribes …
Rape In Context: Lessons For The United States From The International Criminal Court, Caroline Davidson
Rape In Context: Lessons For The United States From The International Criminal Court, Caroline Davidson
Cardozo Law Review
The law of rape is getting a rewrite. Domestically and internationally, major efforts are underway to reform rape laws that have failed to live up to their promises of seeking justice for victims and deterring future sexual violence. The cutting edge of international criminal law on rape eschews inquiries into consent and instead embraces an examination of coercion or a coercive environment. By contrast, in the United States, rape reform discussions typically center on consent. The American Law Institute's proposed overhaul of the Model Penal Code's provision on sexual assault carves out a middle ground and introduces, in addition to …
Alexa, Who Owns My Pillow Talk? Contracting, Collaterizing, And Monetizing Consumer Privacy Through Voice-Captured Personal Data, Anne Logsdon Smith
Alexa, Who Owns My Pillow Talk? Contracting, Collaterizing, And Monetizing Consumer Privacy Through Voice-Captured Personal Data, Anne Logsdon Smith
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
With over one-fourth of households in the U.S. alone now using voice-activated digital assistant devices such as Amazon’s Echo (better known as “Alexa”) and Google’s Home, companies are recording and transmitting record volumes of voice data from the privacy of people’s homes to servers across the globe. These devices capture conversations about everything from online shopping to food preferences to entertainment recommendations to bedtime stories, and even phone and appliance use. With “Big Data” and business analytics expected to be a $203 billion-plus industry by 2020, companies are racing to acquire and leverage consumer data by selling it, licensing it, …
Fair Use & Fair Play: Olympic Marketing In The Information Age, Alex Locke
Fair Use & Fair Play: Olympic Marketing In The Information Age, Alex Locke
Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
The note critiques the overreach of intellectual property protections surrounding the Olympics, which have led to hyperlitigation, stifled public engagement, and disproportionately harmed smaller entities while benefiting large corporations. It proposes reforming the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act by incorporating a fair use framework, modeled after the Copyright Royalty Board, to balance intellectual property enforcement with public participation and transparency. This approach aims to address the challenges posed by ambush marketing and sponsorship protection in the modern media landscape while ensuring equitable opportunities for all stakeholders.
Not Forgetting Just Obscuring: American And European Attempts To Maintain Privacy In The Digital Age, John Corrado
Not Forgetting Just Obscuring: American And European Attempts To Maintain Privacy In The Digital Age, John Corrado
Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
The note explores the concept of the right to obscurity as a subset of privacy rights, distinguishing it from the right to be forgotten. It examines how this right is addressed in E.U. and U.S. law, highlighting the E.U.'s robust framework under the GDPR and the more limited, sector-specific protections in the U.S. The analysis emphasizes the importance of balancing individual privacy rights with freedom of expression and the public interest, advocating for a proactive approach to data control rather than retroactive deletion.
The Unexpected Scope Of The Cfaa: And How Netflix Users Could Be Committing A Federal Crime, Michael Levy
The Unexpected Scope Of The Cfaa: And How Netflix Users Could Be Committing A Federal Crime, Michael Levy
Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
The Ninth Circuit's broad interpretation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) in United States v. Nosal II criminalizes everyday activities like password sharing, undermining the Act's original purpose to prevent hacking. The court ruled that accessing a computer after authorization has been revoked constitutes a violation, even if the access is for innocuous purposes. This interpretation disproportionately benefits large service providers, allowing them to suppress legitimate user claims and exposing millions of Americans to potential prosecution for common online practices.
User-Generated Evidence, Rebecca Hamilton
User-Generated Evidence, Rebecca Hamilton
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
Around the world, people are using their smartphones to document atrocities. This Article is the first to address the implications of this important development for international criminal law. While acknowledging the potential benefits such user-generated evidence could have for international criminal investigations, the Article identifies three categories of concern related to its use: (i) user security; (ii) evidentiary bias; and (iii) fair trial rights. In the absence of safeguards, user-generated evidence may address current problems in international criminal justice at the cost of creating new ones and shifting existing problems from traditional actors, who have institutional backing, to individual users …
Microsoft Ireland, The Cloud Act, And International Lawmaking 2.0, Jennifer Daskal
Microsoft Ireland, The Cloud Act, And International Lawmaking 2.0, Jennifer Daskal
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
On March 23, President Trump signed the CLOUD Act, 1 thereby mooting one of the most closely watched Supreme Court cases this term: the Microsoft Ireland case. 2 This essay examines these extraordinary and fast-moving developments, explaining how the Act resolves the Supreme Court case and addresses the complicated questions of jurisdiction over data in the cloud. The developments represent a classic case of international lawmaking via domestic regulation, as mediated by major multinational corporations that manage so much of the world's data.
What About Small Businesses? The Gdpr And Its Consequences For Small U.S.-Based Companies, Craig Mcallister
What About Small Businesses? The Gdpr And Its Consequences For Small U.S.-Based Companies, Craig Mcallister
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Fast-approaching changes to European data privacy law will have consequences around the globe. Historically, despite having dramatically different approaches to data privacy and data protection, the European Union and the United States developed a framework to ensure that the highspeed freeway that is transatlantic data transfer moved uninterrupted. That framework was overturned in the wake of revelations regarding U.S. surveillance practices, and amidst skepticism that the United States did not adequately protect personal data. Further, the European Union enacted the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a sweeping overhaul of the legal data protection landscape that will take effect in May …
Free Speech And The Confluence Of National Security And Internet Exceptionalism, Alan K. Chen
Free Speech And The Confluence Of National Security And Internet Exceptionalism, Alan K. Chen
Fordham Law Review
In this Article, I argue that, notwithstanding these contemporary developments, the Court got it mostly right in Brandenburg. Or, I want to at least suggest that it is premature to reconstruct the Brandenburg test to address perceived changes in our global environment. For the most part, Brandenburg has succeeded in mediating the balance between protecting political or ideological advocacy and enabling the government to regulate actual incitement, even in the contemporary era. Moreover, I argue that society should be especially wary of calls to narrow Brandenburg’s speech-protective standard because such changes might be significantly influenced by the confluence of two …
The Role Of Internet Intermediaries In Tackling Terrorism Online, Raphael Cohen-Almagor
The Role Of Internet Intermediaries In Tackling Terrorism Online, Raphael Cohen-Almagor
Fordham Law Review
Gatekeeping is defined as the work of third parties “who are able to disrupt misconduct by withholding their cooperation from wrongdoers.”1 Internet intermediaries need to be far more proactive as gatekeepers than they are now. Socially responsible measures can prevent the translation of violent thoughts into violent actions. Designated monitoring mechanisms can potentially prevent such unfortunate events. This Article suggests an approach that harnesses the strengths and capabilities of the public and private sectors in offering practical solutions to pressing problems. It proposes that internet intermediaries should fight stringently against terror and further argues that a responsible gatekeeping approach is …
Social Media Accountability For Terrorist Propaganda, Alexander Tsesis
Social Media Accountability For Terrorist Propaganda, Alexander Tsesis
Fordham Law Review
Terrorist organizations have found social media websites to be invaluable for disseminating ideology, recruiting terrorists, and planning operations. National and international leaders have repeatedly pointed out the dangers terrorists pose to ordinary people and state institutions. In the United States, the federal Communications Decency Act’s § 230 provides social networking websites with immunity against civil law suits. Litigants have therefore been unsuccessful in obtaining redress against internet companies who host or disseminate third-party terrorist content. This Article demonstrates that § 230 does not bar private parties from recovery if they can prove that a social media company had received complaints …
Free Speech And National Security Bootstraps, Heidi Kitrosser
Free Speech And National Security Bootstraps, Heidi Kitrosser
Fordham Law Review
It is troubling that courts treat administrative designations—specifically, both FTO determinations and information classification—as bootstraps by which to yank speech restrictions from the clutches of probing judicial scrutiny. This Article builds on existing scholarly critiques to identify and examine the common thread of national security bootstrapping that runs through both sets of cases. The hope is that in so doing, some greater light may be shed both on the cases themselves and, more broadly, on the costs and benefits of judicial deference to executive national security claims where civil rights and civil liberties are at stake.
Government Speech And The War On Terror, Helen Norton
Government Speech And The War On Terror, Helen Norton
Fordham Law Review
This Article examines how the government’s speech in the War on Terror can threaten free speech, equal protection, and due process values. It focuses primarily on the constitutional harms threatened by the government’s speech itself (what some call a form of “soft law”), rather than on situations in which the government’s speech may be evidence of a constitutionally impermissible motive for its “hard law” actions.
Terrorizing Advocacy And The First Amendment: Free Expression And The Fallacy Of Mutual Exclusivity, Martin H. Redish, Matthew Fisher
Terrorizing Advocacy And The First Amendment: Free Expression And The Fallacy Of Mutual Exclusivity, Martin H. Redish, Matthew Fisher
Fordham Law Review
Traditional free speech doctrine is inadequate to account for modern terrorist speech. Unprotected threats and substantially protected lawful advocacy are not mutually exclusive. This Article proposes recognizing a new hybrid category of speech called “terrorizing advocacy.” This is a type of traditionally protected public advocacy of unlawful conduct that simultaneously exhibits the unprotected pathologies of a true threat. This Article explains why this new category confounds existing First Amendment doctrine and details a proposed model for how the doctrine should be reshaped.
Terrorist Incitement On The Internet, Alexander Tsesis
Terrorist Incitement On The Internet, Alexander Tsesis
Fordham Law Review
I organized this symposium to advance understanding of how terrorist communications drive and influence social, political, religious, civil, literary, and artistic conduct. Viewing terrorist speech through wide prisms of law, culture, and contemporary media can provide lawmakers, adjudicators, and administrators a better understanding of how to contain and prevent the exploitation of modern communication technologies to influence, recruit, and exploit others to perpetrate ideologically driven acts of violence. Undertaking such a multipronged study requires not only looking at the personal and sociological appeals that extreme ideology exerts but also considering how to create political, administrative, educational, and economic conditions to …