Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (203)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (121)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (100)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (75)
- University of Michigan Law School (75)
-
- Fordham Law School (20)
- University of Miami Law School (17)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (16)
- Pepperdine University (13)
- UIC School of Law (10)
- Columbia Law School (8)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (8)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (7)
- University of Baltimore Law (7)
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (6)
- University of Georgia School of Law (6)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (6)
- American University Washington College of Law (5)
- Duke Law (5)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (5)
- University of Richmond (5)
- Brigham Young University Law School (4)
- Cleveland State University (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (4)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (3)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (3)
- University of Washington School of Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (117)
- Freedom of speech (52)
- Federal Communications Commission (42)
- FCC (34)
- Internet (32)
-
- First amendment (30)
- Media (29)
- Regulation (29)
- Social media (27)
- Communications Law (25)
- Freedom of the press (24)
- Technology (24)
- Censorship (22)
- Defamation (19)
- United States Supreme Court (18)
- Broadcasting (17)
- Privacy (17)
- Journalism (16)
- Law (15)
- Social Media (15)
- Freedom of Speech (14)
- Constitutional Law (13)
- Indecency (13)
- Free speech (12)
- Obscenity (12)
- Section 230 (12)
- Television (12)
- Communications Decency Act (11)
- Criminal law; symposium; communications law; international law; first amendment (11)
- Supreme Court (11)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (192)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (89)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (71)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (53)
- Articles (35)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (30)
- Michigan Law Review (27)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (23)
- Fordham Law Review (17)
- Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (11)
- Pepperdine Law Review (10)
- American Indian Law Journal (9)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (9)
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - ) (9)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (8)
- All Faculty Scholarship (7)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (7)
- Scholarly Works (7)
- Buffalo Law Review (6)
- Indiana Law Journal (6)
- Publications (6)
- UIC Law Review (6)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (6)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (5)
- Cardozo Law Review de•novo (5)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (4)
- Cleveland State Law Review (4)
- Utah Law Review (4)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 301 - 330 of 798
Full-Text Articles in Communications Law
Preservation Requests And The Fourth Amendment, Armin Tadayon
Preservation Requests And The Fourth Amendment, Armin Tadayon
Seattle University Law Review
Every day, Facebook, Twitter, Google, Amazon, ridesharing companies, and numerous other service providers copy users’ account information upon receiving a preservation request from the government. These requests are authorized under a relatively obscure subsection of the Stored Communications Act (SCA). The SCA is the federal statute that governs the disclosure of communications stored by third party service providers. Section 2703(f) of this statute authorizes the use of “f” or “preservation” letters, which enable the government to request that a service provider “take all necessary steps to preserve records and other evidence in its possession” while investigators seek valid legal process. …
Weapons Of Mass Distortion: Applying The Principles Of The Fcc’S News Distortion Doctrine To Undisclosed Financial Conflicts Of Interest In Corporate News Media’S Military Coverage, Charles L. Bonani
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
This Note offers a new conception of news distortion in mass media. It explores the intentions behind the FCC’s News Distortion Doctrine and analyzes its primarily dormant status throughout its existence. This Note then examines televised media coverage of U.S. military actions and identifies undisclosed financial conflicts of interests throughout this coverage. In examining these undisclosed conflicts and the reasons behind them, this Note explains why they constitute news distortion under the FCC’s definition, and why the principles behind the Doctrine are implicated. This Note then proposes the FCC promulgate a disclosure rule to remedy the undisclosed financial conflicts of …
Is There No Way To The Truth? Copyright Liability As A Model For Restricting Fake News [Notes], Michael Goodyear
Is There No Way To The Truth? Copyright Liability As A Model For Restricting Fake News [Notes], Michael Goodyear
Articles & Chapters
A proliferation of fake news has flooded U.S. websites and social media. From misinformation affecting the 2016 election to individuals making profits off of creating false stories, the United States desperately needs a legal response to the fake news crisis. However, U.S. law has effectively forestalled any attempts to bring fake news to heel. The First Amendment has been held to protect fake news. The Communications Decency Act, codified as Section 230, protects online platforms from the remaining potential sources of vicarious liability for fake news. Instead, gradually, self-regulation by websites has started to fill this void.
Proposed solutions have …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Information Hacking, Derek E. Bambauer
Information Hacking, Derek E. Bambauer
Utah Law Review
The 2016 U.S. presidential election is seen as a masterpiece of effective disinformation tactics. Commentators credit the Russian Federation with a set of targeted, effective information interventions that led to the surprise election of Republican candidate Donald Trump. On this account, Russia hacked not only America’s voting systems, but also American voters, plying them with inaccurate data—especially on Internet platforms—that changed political views.
This Essay examines the 2016 election narrative through the lens of cybersecurity; it treats foreign efforts to influence the outcome as information hacking. It critically assesses unstated assumptions of the narrative, including whether these attacks can be …
In A World Of “Fake News,” What’S A Social Media Platform To Do?, Evelyn Mary Aswad
In A World Of “Fake News,” What’S A Social Media Platform To Do?, Evelyn Mary Aswad
Utah Law Review
While the circulation of disinformation and misinformation online can pose a variety of risks to societies around the world, it should also be of concern that overreacting to such false information can undermine human rights, including freedom of expression. The business operations of global social media platforms frequently intersect with this latter concern because of a spike in the adoption of national laws that ban “fake news” as well as their own platform policies to tackle false information. This Essay assesses the corporate responsibility standards afforded by the United Nations’ Guiding Principles on Business & Human Rights as well as …
“Opening The Door” To Presidential Press Conferences: A Framework For The Right Of Press Access, Alexandria R. Taylor
“Opening The Door” To Presidential Press Conferences: A Framework For The Right Of Press Access, Alexandria R. Taylor
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
Since President Donald Trump took office in 2017, there has been tension between the White House and the press. While this tension has been present in prior presidencies, its current manifestation raises important First Amendment issues. This Note discusses the limitations of the President to restrict the press’s right of First Amendment access to presidential press conferences. After delving into the Supreme Court’s development and recognition of the press’s right of access and how the lower courts have interpreted this right, this Note proposes a framework to analyze the press’s right of access and addresses the question of when and …
The Use Of Digital Millenium Copyright Act To Stifle Speech Through Non-Copyright Related Takedowns, Miller Freeman
The Use Of Digital Millenium Copyright Act To Stifle Speech Through Non-Copyright Related Takedowns, Miller Freeman
Seattle Journal of Technology, Environmental, & Innovation Law
In 1998, Congress passed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. This law provided new methods of protecting copyright in online media. These protections shift the normal judicial process that would stop the publication of infringing materials to private actors: the online platforms. As a result, online platforms receive notices of infringement and issue takedowns of allegedly copyrighted works without the judicial process which normally considers the purpose of the original notice of infringement. In at least one case, discussed in detail below, this has resulted in a notice and takedown against an individual for reasons not related to the purpose of …
Does The Press Have A Right To Be Wrong?: Fake News, Press Freedom, And Defamation Law In 2021, Nathan T. Danielson
Does The Press Have A Right To Be Wrong?: Fake News, Press Freedom, And Defamation Law In 2021, Nathan T. Danielson
Journalism
The following study analyzes defamation lawsuits filed against Fox News and its on-air personalities by companies that manufactured and maintained voting machines used in the 2020 US presidential election. Smartmatic and Dominion accused Fox in court of broadcasting debunked allegations that the companies had rigged the election against incumbent president (and longtime Fox viewer) Donald Trump. The size of the sought-after damages, and the size of Fox itself, make this the largest “fake news suit” in history. This study explores the merits of the suits, defenses to defamation (particularly opinion, political speech, and retraction) and the potential ramifications of a …
Executive Authority And Free Speech: An Analysis On The Restraints Of Presidential Power, Leta Lohrmeyer
Executive Authority And Free Speech: An Analysis On The Restraints Of Presidential Power, Leta Lohrmeyer
UNO Student Research and Creative Activity Fair
This analysis examines the implications of social media platforms in connection to free speech and presidential power. Specifically, this study will be drawing on a precedent legal case, Knight First Amendment Inst. v. Trump (2019) along with other cases that are relevant to this paper. This research is contributing to the literature by exploring the topic of how developing technology is influencing political communication. Results support the idea that the definition of public forum needs to be expanded and updated to include social media. Theoretical consequences for the role of social media in connection to executive authority and First Amendment …
Promoting Journalism As Method, Erin C. Carroll
Promoting Journalism As Method, Erin C. Carroll
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The marketplace of ideas has been a centerpiece of free speech jurisprudence for a century. According to the marketplace theory, the vigorous competition of ideas, free from government interference, is the surest path to truth. As our metaphorical marketplace has moved online, the competition has never been so heated. We should be drowning in truth. Yet, in reality, truth has perhaps never been more elusive.
As we struggle to promote democratic debate and surface truth in our chaotic networked public sphere, we are understandably drawn to familiar frames and tools. These include the source of the marketplace of ideas theory—the …
Privacy, Eavesdropping, And Wiretapping Across The United States: Reasonable Expectation Of Privacy And Judicial Discretion, Carol M. Bast
Privacy, Eavesdropping, And Wiretapping Across The United States: Reasonable Expectation Of Privacy And Judicial Discretion, Carol M. Bast
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
One-party consent and all-party consent eavesdropping and wiretapping statutes are two broad pathways for legislation to deal with the problem of secret taping and some states protect conversation under state constitutions. Whether a conversation is protected against being taped as a private conversation is often gauged by the reasonable expectation of privacy standard. Judges in both all-party consent and one-party consent jurisdictions have had to use their leeway under the reasonable expectation of privacy standard to arrive at what at the time seemed to be the most appropriate solution, perhaps in doing so creating a case law exception.
The Second Amendment's Safe Space, Or The Constitutionlization Of Fragility, Mary Anne Franks
The Second Amendment's Safe Space, Or The Constitutionlization Of Fragility, Mary Anne Franks
Articles
No abstract provided.
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth
Seattle University Law Review
Janet Ainsworth, Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law: In Memory of Professor James E. Bond.
Platforms And The Fall Of The Fourth Estate: Looking Beyond The First Amendment To Protect Watchdog Journalism, Erin C. Carroll
Platforms And The Fall Of The Fourth Estate: Looking Beyond The First Amendment To Protect Watchdog Journalism, Erin C. Carroll
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Social Media Platforms And Democratic Discourse, Russell L. Weaver
Social Media Platforms And Democratic Discourse, Russell L. Weaver
Lewis & Clark Law Review
This Essay explores how social media platforms have been catalysts for social and political change but have created numerous societal problems. The Essay traces the development of speech technologies and shows how these platforms have influenced the world. These changes are evident in the events of the Arab Spring in the Middle East and even in U.S. political elections (including those of President Obama and President Trump). At the same time, the internet and social media present immense challenges to the democratic process. They have enabled individuals to infect the public debate with so-called “fake news,” and have enabled foreign …
How The Internet Unmakes Law, Mary Anne Franks
Why A Data Disclosure Law Is (Likely) Unconstitutional, Max I. Fiest
Why A Data Disclosure Law Is (Likely) Unconstitutional, Max I. Fiest
Kernochan Center for Law, Media, and the Arts
Social media platforms have changed the very structure of communication. These platforms exert significant influence over how we get our news, how we form and join political movements, and how we connect with friends and family. But social media platforms are black boxes. Moderation algorithms are opaque--even to the platforms themselves — and attempts by third parties to research these algorithms are often frustrated. Because platforms withhold data necessary for public interest research, Congress might step in and mandate data access for certain researchers and journalists. I conclude that any such effort would (likely) be unconstitutional under the First Amendment. …
Merging The Social And The Public: How Social Media Platforms Could Be A New Public Forum, Amélie P. Heldt
Merging The Social And The Public: How Social Media Platforms Could Be A New Public Forum, Amélie P. Heldt
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Chilling Effect Claims In ‘Zeran V. Aol’, Jonathon W. Penney
The Chilling Effect Claims In ‘Zeran V. Aol’, Jonathon W. Penney
Articles & Book Chapters
No abstract provided.
The Internet As A Speech Machine And Other Myths Confounding Section 230 Reform, Mary Anne Franks, Danielle Citron
The Internet As A Speech Machine And Other Myths Confounding Section 230 Reform, Mary Anne Franks, Danielle Citron
Articles
No abstract provided.
Media In Flux: Does Consolidation Promote The Public Interest?, Simone A. Dvoskin
Media In Flux: Does Consolidation Promote The Public Interest?, Simone A. Dvoskin
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
The note examines the transformative impact of digital platforms on traditional media and the legal challenges arising from this shift, advocating for updated regulations to ensure accessibility, fairness, and public interest. It argues that the rapid evolution of technology has outpaced regulatory frameworks, necessitating reforms to address media consolidation, accessibility for individuals with disabilities, and the role of the FCC in overseeing new media platforms.
Scrolling, Trolling, And Uploading: Youtube's Impact On Modern Public Discourse, Internet Regulation, And Free Speech, Brett Gossett
Scrolling, Trolling, And Uploading: Youtube's Impact On Modern Public Discourse, Internet Regulation, And Free Speech, Brett Gossett
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Internet Architecture And Disability, Blake E. Reid
Internet Architecture And Disability, Blake E. Reid
Publications
The Internet is essential for education, employment, information, and cultural and democratic participation. For tens of millions of people with disabilities in the United States, barriers to accessing the Internet—including the visual presentation of information to people who are blind or visually impaired, the aural presentation of information to people who are deaf or hard of hearing, and the persistence of Internet technology, interfaces, and content without regard to prohibitive cognitive load for people with cognitive and intellectual disabilities—collectively pose one of the most significant civil rights issues of the information age. Yet disability law lacks a comprehensive theoretical approach …
Fixing America's Founding, Maeve Glass
Fixing America's Founding, Maeve Glass
Faculty Scholarship
The forty-fifth presidency of the United States has sent lawyers reaching once more for the Founders’ dictionaries and legal treatises. In courtrooms, law schools, and media outlets across the country, the original meanings of the words etched into the U.S. Constitution in 1787 have become the staging ground for debates ranging from the power of a president to trademark his name in China to the rights of a legal permanent resident facing deportation. And yet, in this age when big data promises to solve potential challenges of interpretation and judges have for the most part agreed that original meaning should …
A Dangerous Inheritance: A Child’S Digital Identity, Kate Hamming
A Dangerous Inheritance: A Child’S Digital Identity, Kate Hamming
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment begins with one family’s story of its experience with social media that many others can relate to in today’s ever-growing world of technology and the Internet. Technology has made it possible for a person’s online presence to grow exponentially through continuous sharing by other Internet users. This ability to communicate and share information amongst family, friends, and strangers all over the world, while beneficial in some regard, comes with its privacy downfalls. The risks to privacy are elevated when children’s information is being revealed, which often stems from a child’s own parents conduct online. Parents all over the …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Facebook V. Sullivan: Public Figures And Newsworthiness In Online Speech, Thomas E. Kadri, Kate Klonick
Facebook V. Sullivan: Public Figures And Newsworthiness In Online Speech, Thomas E. Kadri, Kate Klonick
Articles
In the United States, there are now two systems to adjudicate disputes about harmful speech. The first is older and more established: the legal system in which judges apply constitutional law to limit tort claims alleging injuries caused by speech. The second is newer and less familiar: the content-moderation system in which platforms like Facebook implement the rules that govern online speech. These platforms are not bound by the First Amendment. But, as it turns out, they rely on many of the tools used by courts to resolve tensions between regulating harmful speech and preserving free expression-particularly the entangled concepts …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Policing Hate Speech And Extremism: A Taxonomy Of Arguments In Opposition, Leonard M. Niehoff
Policing Hate Speech And Extremism: A Taxonomy Of Arguments In Opposition, Leonard M. Niehoff
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Hate speech and extremist association do real and substantial harm to individuals, groups, and our society as a whole. Our common sense, experience, and empathy for the targets of extremism tell us that our laws should do more to address this issue. Current reform efforts have therefore sought to revise our laws to do a better job at policing, prohibiting, and punishing hate speech and extremist association.
Efforts to do so, however, encounter numerous and substantial challenges. We can divide them into three general categories: definitional problems, operational problems, and conscientious problems. An informed understanding of these three categories of …