Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Law (42)
- Constitutional Law (40)
- Jurisprudence (40)
- Law and Society (40)
- International Law (39)
-
- Public Law and Legal Theory (39)
- Courts (37)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (36)
- Contracts (35)
- Law and Politics (35)
- Legislation (35)
- Other Law (35)
- Supreme Court of the United States (35)
- Judges (34)
- Legal History (34)
- Legal Remedies (34)
- Administrative Law (33)
- Business Organizations Law (33)
- Civil Procedure (33)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (33)
- European Law (33)
- Human Rights Law (33)
- Law and Economics (33)
- Legal Writing and Research (33)
- Litigation (33)
- Property Law and Real Estate (33)
- Torts (33)
- Agency (32)
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (30)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Liberty University (2)
-
- National Law School of India University (2)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- American University in Cairo (1)
- Beirut Arab University (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Clark University (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- George Fox University (1)
- Harding University (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Saint Joseph University of Beirut (1)
- Trinity University (1)
- Universitas Indonesia (1)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Biblical worldview (2)
- Constitutional interpretation (2)
- Housing (2)
- National security (2)
- Reform (2)
-
- Supply chain (2)
- Access to justice (1)
- Actio iniuriarum (1)
- Actio legis aquiliae (1)
- Affordable Care Act (1)
- Against the drafter; ambiguity; arbitration; business; California; canon of construction; canon of interpretation; commercial; consumer; contra proferentem; contracts; contracts of adhesion; data; Delaware; drafter; drafting; empirical; insurance; Lamps Plus; negotiation; New York; private ordering; private parties (1)
- Alternative service (1)
- America (1)
- American (1)
- American Healthcare (1)
- Appeals (1)
- Arthur (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
- Attribution (1)
- Ban-the-box (1)
- Ban-the-box laws (1)
- Bauer V. Beamon (1)
- Bitcoin (1)
- Bitcoin mining (1)
- Buckley v. Valeo (1)
- Burial (1)
- Burial wishes (1)
- Burnout (1)
- Calling Devices (1)
- Callister's Web of Beliefs (1)
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (30)
- Northwestern University Law Review (4)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (2)
- Senior Honors Theses (2)
-
- Arkansas Law Notes (1)
- Articles (1)
- BAU Journal - Journal of Legal Studies - مجلة الدراسات القانونية (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (1)
- FIU Law Review (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- Fordham Law Review Online (1)
- Indian Journal of Law and Technology (1)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (1)
- National Law School of India Review (1)
- Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law (1)
- Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe (1)
- Pace Environmental Law Review (1)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Tenor of Our Times (1)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (1)
- Theses and Dissertations (1)
- Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 61 of 61
Full-Text Articles in Common Law
From Myers To Slaughter: A Brief Theory Of The Constitutionalization Of Secondary Sources, Dana Neacsu, Paul D. Callister
From Myers To Slaughter: A Brief Theory Of The Constitutionalization Of Secondary Sources, Dana Neacsu, Paul D. Callister
Faculty Works
For more than two centuries, American constitutional adjudication has relied upon secondary sources. Yet constitutional theory has almost entirely ignored them. Originalism debates constitutional text. Living constitutionalism debates constitutional evolution. Theories of precedent debate judicial authority. None asks a more fundamental question: What role do secondary sources play in constitutional adjudication? This Article argues that the answer has fundamentally changed in the last 100 of years. Chief Justice William Howard Taft's opinion in Myers v. United States (1926) marked a constitutional revolution by transforming secondary authorities from explanatory materials into evidence of constitutional continuity. Exactly one century later, Chief Justice …