Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Jurisprudence (10)
- Legal History (6)
- Courts (5)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (4)
- Constitutional Law (3)
-
- Contracts (3)
- Intellectual Property Law (3)
- International Law (3)
- Judges (3)
- Legislation (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Torts (3)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (2)
- Civil Law (2)
- International Trade Law (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Labor and Employment Law (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Legal Writing and Research (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Agriculture Law (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Asian Studies (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (8)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (4)
- Singapore Management University (3)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Duke Law (2)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- West Chester University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Common law (8)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- American Law Institute (ALI) (2)
- Common Law (2)
- Copyright Act (2)
-
- Judicial review (2)
- Restatement of the Law (2)
- Stare decisis (2)
- ATS (1)
- Administrative courts (1)
- Administrative decision-making (1)
- Administrative hearing (1)
- Adverse interest exception (1)
- Agency (1)
- Agriculture Law (1)
- Albert Packaging (1)
- Alien Tort Statute (1)
- Ambiguity in statutes (1)
- Ann Nowak (1)
- Applying mathematical set theory (1)
- At will (1)
- Bacon (Francis) (1)
- Bailey (1)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly (1)
- Bias (1)
- Book Review (1)
- Bruhn Newtech Ltd. v. Datanetex Ltd. (1)
- Business ethic (1)
- Bystander (1)
- CDPA (1)
- Publication
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (7)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (2)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (2)
-
- University of Colorado Law Review (2)
- 2013 Jones Day Professorship of Commercial Law Lecture (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Cardozo Law Review de•novo (1)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- IP Theory (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (1)
- Maryland Journal of International Law (1)
- Maryland Law Review Online (1)
- Pace International Law Review Online Companion (1)
- Pitzer Senior Theses (1)
- Political Science Faculty Publications (1)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 37
Full-Text Articles in Common Law
The Evolution Of The Common Law And Efficiency, Nuno Garoupa, Carlos I. Gómez Ligüerre
The Evolution Of The Common Law And Efficiency, Nuno Garoupa, Carlos I. Gómez Ligüerre
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Saving The Trees One Constitutional Provision At A Time: Judicial Activism And Deforestation In India, Lennon Banks Haas
Saving The Trees One Constitutional Provision At A Time: Judicial Activism And Deforestation In India, Lennon Banks Haas
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Criminal Forfeiture And The Sixth Amendment: The Role Of The Jury At Common Law, Richard E. Finneran, Steven K. Luther
Criminal Forfeiture And The Sixth Amendment: The Role Of The Jury At Common Law, Richard E. Finneran, Steven K. Luther
Cardozo Law Review
Throughout its recent jurisprudence after Apprendi v. New Jersey, the Supreme Court has emphasized that its analysis of the Sixth Amendment jury trial right centers upon the historical role of the jury at common law. Just last year, in Southern Union Co. v. United States, the Court extended the Sixth Amendment jury trial right to criminal fines after concluding that the jury's verdict determined the maximum fine that could be imposed at common law. The Court remained silent, however, with regard to another financial penalty commonly applied in the federal system: criminal forfeitures. Given that the Supreme Court …
Illegitimate Children And Constitutional Review, Clayton W. Plotkin, John Vodonick
Illegitimate Children And Constitutional Review, Clayton W. Plotkin, John Vodonick
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Unwritten Law And Its Writers, Frederick J. Moreau
The Unwritten Law And Its Writers, Frederick J. Moreau
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dirt Lawyers And Dirty Remics, Bradley T. Borden, David J. Reiss
Dirt Lawyers And Dirty Remics, Bradley T. Borden, David J. Reiss
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Is The Rule Of Necessity Really Necessary In State Administrative Law: The Central Panel Solution, Arnold Rochvarg
Is The Rule Of Necessity Really Necessary In State Administrative Law: The Central Panel Solution, Arnold Rochvarg
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
The rule of necessity is a judicial doctrine that permits a judge or agency decision maker to decide a case even if he or she would ordinarily be disqualified due to bias or prejudice . The rationale of the doctrine is that if there is no other person who can make the decision, let the biased person decide the case rather than have no decision made at all. The rule of necessity has been used in state administrative proceedings liberally despite the fact that it is widely recognized as unfair. This article analyzes current approaches to the doctrine, and after …
Rubin And New Cap: Foreign Judgments And Insolvency, Adrian Briggs
Rubin And New Cap: Foreign Judgments And Insolvency, Adrian Briggs
2013 Jones Day Professorship of Commercial Law Lecture
The decisions of the UK Supreme Court in 2012 in Rubin and New Cap, and of the Singapore High Court in 2013 in Beluga Chartering, raise in acute form the question of how far the common law of international insolvency and of the recognition of foreign judgments can go when a local court is asked by a court in another country to render particular forms of assistance in relation to an insolvency administration which is taking place there. It asks how the instinct to give assistance for the ultimate benefit of creditors needs to be balanced by the …
Legal Rhetoric And Social Science: A Hypothesis For Why Doctrine Matters In Judicial Decisionmaking, Brett Waldron
Legal Rhetoric And Social Science: A Hypothesis For Why Doctrine Matters In Judicial Decisionmaking, Brett Waldron
Pace International Law Review Online Companion
In the realm of American jurisprudence, little draws more excitement or controversy than investigating the role of federal judges in our constitutional order. Yet, at the same time, the scholarly literature has not settled upon a singular descriptive device to explain how federal judges actually carry out this role. In broad strokes, current academic commentary appears to be divided on the issue of whether fidelity to the law or fidelity to political ideology largely determines how judges decide cases. This division, however interesting it may be, should not be afforded the luxury of being examined on a level playing field. …
A Decade Of Registered And Unregistered Design Rights Decisions In The Uk: What Conclusions Can We Draw For The Future Of Both Types Of Rights?, Estelle Derclaye
A Decade Of Registered And Unregistered Design Rights Decisions In The Uk: What Conclusions Can We Draw For The Future Of Both Types Of Rights?, Estelle Derclaye
IP Theory
No abstract provided.
Congressional Policy For Work Product Protection In Congressional Investigations, Jay Brody
Congressional Policy For Work Product Protection In Congressional Investigations, Jay Brody
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The note examines the conflict between congressional investigative powers and the work product doctrine, advocating for a balanced approach that considers the nature of the investigation. It argues that the type of congressional investigation—legislative, oversight, or investigative—should determine the level of work product protection applied, ensuring both effective governance and legal fairness.
Rubin And New Cap: Foreign Judgments And Insolvency, University Of Oxford; Visiting Faculty, Singapore Management University
Rubin And New Cap: Foreign Judgments And Insolvency, University Of Oxford; Visiting Faculty, Singapore Management University
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
The decisions of the UK Supreme Court in 2012 in Rubin and New Cap, and of the Singapore High Court in 2013 in Beluga Chartering, raise in acute form the question of how far the common law of international insolvency and of the recognition of foreign judgments can go when a local court is asked by a court in another country to render particular forms of assistance in relation to an insolvency administration which is taking place there. It asks how the instinct to give assistance for the ultimate benefit of creditors needs to be balanced by the …
Presidential Pardon In Singapore: A Comment On Yong Vui Kong V Ag, Shubhankar Dam
Presidential Pardon In Singapore: A Comment On Yong Vui Kong V Ag, Shubhankar Dam
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
This paper critically analyses the decision of the Singapore Court of Appeal in Yong Vui Kong v Attorney-General in relation to presidential pardon. Two questions were central to the case. First, is the President bound by the decision of the Cabinet in pardon-related matters? Secondly, are decisions regarding pardon—whether made by the Cabinet or President—subject to judicial review? In relation to the first question, the Court based its reasoning on Singapore's political system being a Westminster-inspired model and, therefore, that the President generally undertakes the same functions as the British monarch. However, this paper identifies the unique features of Singapore's …
Statutes In Common Law Courts, Jeffrey A. Pojanowski
Statutes In Common Law Courts, Jeffrey A. Pojanowski
Journal Articles
The Supreme Court teaches that federal courts, unlike their counterparts in the states, are not general common law courts. Nevertheless, a perennial point of contention among federal law scholars is whether and how a court’s common law powers affect its treatment of statutes. Textualists point to federal courts’ lack of common law powers to reject purposivist statutory interpretation. Critics of textualism challenge this characterization of federal courts’ powers, leveraging a more robust notion of the judicial power to support purposivist or dynamic interpretation. This disagreement has become more important in recent years with the emergence of a refreshing movement in …
Hubbard V. Boelt: The Fireman's Rule Extended , Marty K. Deniston
Hubbard V. Boelt: The Fireman's Rule Extended , Marty K. Deniston
Pepperdine Law Review
The California Supreme Court, in Hubbard v. Boelt, extended the reach of the fireman's rule to bar a suit brought by a policeman who was injured by the willful and wanton conduct of a speeding motor is while pursuing that motorist. This is an important development in tort law because, traditionally, the fireman's rule had only been applied to bar suits by firemen and policemen who were injured by the negligent conduct of another which was the cause of their presence at the scene. This author suggests that the majority's rationale underlying this extension was flawed because of the fundamental …
Constitutionalism Ancient And Early Modern: The Contributions Of Roman Law, Canon Law, And English Common Law, Janelle Greenberg, Michael J. Sechler
Constitutionalism Ancient And Early Modern: The Contributions Of Roman Law, Canon Law, And English Common Law, Janelle Greenberg, Michael J. Sechler
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nlra Preemption Of State Common Law Wrongful Discharge Claims: The Bhopal Brigade Goes Home , Joseph R. Weeks
Nlra Preemption Of State Common Law Wrongful Discharge Claims: The Bhopal Brigade Goes Home , Joseph R. Weeks
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Duty To Rescue: The Good, The Bad And The Indifferent—The Bystander's Dilemma, Claire Elaine Radcliffe
A Duty To Rescue: The Good, The Bad And The Indifferent—The Bystander's Dilemma, Claire Elaine Radcliffe
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Restatement (Second): Its Misleading Quality And A Proposal For Its Amelioration, W. Noel Keyes
The Restatement (Second): Its Misleading Quality And A Proposal For Its Amelioration, W. Noel Keyes
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Restatement (Second): A Tribute To Its Increasingly Advantageous Quality, And An Encouragement To Continue The Trend, John W. Wade
The Restatement (Second): A Tribute To Its Increasingly Advantageous Quality, And An Encouragement To Continue The Trend, John W. Wade
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Innovation In China: Fragmentation, Structured Uncertainty, And Technology Standards, Michael Murphree, Dan Breznitz
Innovation In China: Fragmentation, Structured Uncertainty, And Technology Standards, Michael Murphree, Dan Breznitz
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
This Article discusses the history of China’s attempts to develop indigenous technology standards. A case study is presented on China’s attempts to develop digital optical storage media standards, the failure of which we attribute to fragmentation of production and structured uncertainty in China’s economy. Despite the market failures of China’s domestic standards development efforts, we conclude by highlighting some of the appurtenant benefits they produce for Chinese manufacturers.
Dreading He Knew Not What: Masculinities, Structural Spaces, Law And The Gothic In The Castle Of Otranto, Pride And Prejudice, And Wuthering Heights, Samantha E. Morse
Dreading He Knew Not What: Masculinities, Structural Spaces, Law And The Gothic In The Castle Of Otranto, Pride And Prejudice, And Wuthering Heights, Samantha E. Morse
Pitzer Senior Theses
This essay investigates the integral linkages between Gothic spaces and Gothic masculinities in three texts: Horace Walpole’s The Castle of Otranto (1764), Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice (1813), and Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights (1847). At the core of this examination is architecture, or more specifically, the physical constructions and built environments that comprise a man’s property. I explore how a man uses his property to construct, legitimize, and perform his identity. In the Female Gothic, the home is a place of anxiety for women, where patriarchal dominance and violence reign to constrain female agency. I argue that the home is …
Imputation, The Adverse Interest Exception, And The Curious Case Of The Restatement (Third) Of Agency, Mark J. Loewenstein
Imputation, The Adverse Interest Exception, And The Curious Case Of The Restatement (Third) Of Agency, Mark J. Loewenstein
University of Colorado Law Review
The imputation doctrine in the common law of agency provides that knowledge of an agent acquired in the course of the agency relationship is imputed to the principal. An important exception to the imputation doctrine, known as the adverse interest exception, provides that knowledge is not imputed if it is acquired by the agent in a course of conduct that is entirely adverse to the principal. These doctrines play an important role in sorting out liability when senior management of a corporation engages in a financial fraud that harms the company. Typically, new management is brought in and it sues …
Jacques De Werra (Ed.), Research Handbook On Intellectual Property Licensing, Lucie Guibault
Jacques De Werra (Ed.), Research Handbook On Intellectual Property Licensing, Lucie Guibault
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
In the laws of most jurisdictions in the world, IP licenses are an unnamed form of contract, most often of a hybride nature, for which no specific legal framework exists, save for rare exceptions. As a result, the formation, content and interpretation of IP licences call for the application of relevant norms from numerous other fields of the law, such as contract law, property law, commercial law, consumer law etc. Despite efforts of harmonisation at the international and regional levels, these related areas of the law remain to a large extent nationally determined, influenced by the legal tradition of each …
The Necessary Opportunism Of The Common Law First Amendment, Chris Stangl
The Necessary Opportunism Of The Common Law First Amendment, Chris Stangl
Political Science Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Death Of The Common Law: Judicial Abdication And Contributory Negligence In Maryland, Donald G. Gifford
The Death Of The Common Law: Judicial Abdication And Contributory Negligence In Maryland, Donald G. Gifford
Maryland Law Review Online
The issue of how to handle a victim’s own contributory negligence that combines with the negligence of a tortfeasor in causing harm is one of the most important, if not the most important, issue in all of tort law. Forty-six states now apply some version of comparative fault that holds the defendant liable for its negligence even when the plaintiff is also careless, but reduces the award in proportion to the plaintiff’s degree of fault when compared with that of the defendant. In contrast, the Maryland Court of Appeals in Coleman v. Soccer Association of Columbia recently refused again to …
Past The Pillars Of Hercules: Francis Bacon And The Science Of Rulemaking, Daniel R. Coquillette
Past The Pillars Of Hercules: Francis Bacon And The Science Of Rulemaking, Daniel R. Coquillette
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The parallels between Bacon's career and that of Edward H. Cooper are, of course, obvious. Bacon was one of the great legal minds of his day. Unlike the common-law judges who formed the law by deciding cases, Bacon expressed his greatness in writing brilliant juristic treatises and, as Lord Chancellor, drafting one of the first modern rule systems, the Ordinances in Chancery (1617-1620). Indeed, my thesis is that Bacon invented modern, scientific rulemaking by fusing his new theories of inductive, empirical research with the traditions of equitable pleading and is, in fact, the intellectual forbearer of the likes of Charles …
Remedies Reveals The Seamless Web, Candace Kovacic-Fleischer
Remedies Reveals The Seamless Web, Candace Kovacic-Fleischer
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
INTRODUCTION: Remedies is a course that consolidates many of the concepts learned in the first year of law school and some from the second. A typical Remedies course will reintroduce principles from constitutional law, compare and contrast torts and contracts, and apply criminal concepts in civil contexts. Teaching Remedies can be both challenging and rewarding. Challenging because it crosses a wide variety of subject areas. Rewarding because it weaves a variety of subject areas into the "seamless web" of the law, eliciting from students an occasional "aha." Early classes in law school tend to separate courses into discrete subject areas, …
Kiobel V. Royal Dutch Petroleum: A Practitioner's Viewpoint, Marco Simons
Kiobel V. Royal Dutch Petroleum: A Practitioner's Viewpoint, Marco Simons
Maryland Journal of International Law
No abstract provided.
The Role Of Unfair Competition In The Common Law, Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Gideon Parchomovsky
The Role Of Unfair Competition In The Common Law, Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Gideon Parchomovsky
Faculty Scholarship
Does the idea of “unfair competition” present the law with a viable alternative to thinking about the regulation of information and informational resources, independent of the traditional categories of the common law (e.g., property/tort) and the assumptions that these categories entail? In this chapter, we argue that, although the answer to that question is no, unfair competition nevertheless plays an important role in complementing the categories of property and torts as they apply to competitive settings. Specifically, unfair competition allows courts to both broaden and narrow the traditional notions of property and torts – especially as they apply to the …