Common Law Commons^™

Abatement And Revival - Exception From Survival Statute Of Actions For Slander As Preventing Survival Of Action For Slander Of Title, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Pending plaintiff's action for slander of title, defendant died. A statute provided that no action should abate by the death of either party thereto except actions for libel, slander, malicious prosecution, nuisance, or actions against a justice of the peace for misconduct in office. Held, the action abated, because, although slander of title was not expressly excepted from the operation of the statute, still the action of slander as specifically excepted by the statute embraces the action of slander of title. Billingsley v. Townsend, 132 Ohio St. 603, 9 N. E. (2d) 690 (1937).

The Power To Carry On The Business Of A Decedent, Harry Adelman

Michigan Law Review

The continuation of a business for the sole purpose of making a profit is clearly beyond the scope of liquidating the estate of a decedent. It is rather a trust of the business, created for the benefit of the creditors of the decedent and persons entitled to share in the distribution of the estate. The business is managed as a normal going concern, on a somewhat permanent basis, rather than as a temporary means of preserving the value for an advantageous sale.

Libel - Right Of Privacy -Auction Sale Of Debts, Gerald M. Stevens

Michigan Law Review

A creditor put his claim into the hands of one Power, who held himself out as an advertiser of accounts for sale. Power threatened several times by letter to advertise the debtor's account for sale at auction unless it was paid immediately. No payment was made; and a "flaming orange handbill" was printed and circulated about the debtor's neighborhood. It offered for sale to the highest bidder the debtor's and twenty-three other accounts. It contained, further, the statement that all accounts were guaranteed correct and undisputed and a solicitation for merchants' accounts to be similarly disposed of. Thereupon the debtor …

Gratuitous Promises-A New Writ?, Warren L. Shattuck

Michigan Law Review

Under the early common law, the fact situations which presented actionable wrongs were limited in number and stereotyped into various writs which issued from the Lord Chancellor. Only as new writs were devised by him was it possible for new fact situations to achieve the dignity of justiciability and so raise legal rights and duties. But with the liberalization of pleading the recognition of new legal rights and duties became a judicial function. In consequence, the constant struggle of new fact patterns for a place in the law is now principally waged before the courts. In this struggle some fail, …

Joint Adventure-Extent To Which Partnership Law Applies, Merwin K. Grosberg

Michigan Law Review

The recent case of Chisholm v. Gilmer, in holding joint adventurers jointly liable on an obligation incurred by all the members thereof through a trustee who acted as agent for all the members, again opened up the problem of the nature of the joint adventure and the rights and liabilities of its members. When, in joint adventure cases, the relationship of the parties is not clearly determined by their contract, the courts have consistently looked to the law of partnership for aid in reaching a result. It is the purpose of this article to indicate the degree to which …

Trusts-Restated And Rewritten, Harry W. Vanneman

Michigan Law Review

Two books were published during the past year which are of the greatest importance to those of the legal profession who are interested in the law of trusts. Professor Bogert's seven volumes appeared first, followed shortly by The Restatement of the Law of Trusts by the American Law Institute, of which Professor Scott, of the Harvard Law School, was the reporter. Professor Bogert, of the University of Chicago Law School, was a member of the Institute's Committee on Trusts. Since 1927, therefore, when the Institute began work on the Restatement of Trusts, Professor Bogert apparently has been working …

Criminal Law And Procedure-Contempt Of Court-Sheriff Allowing Federal Prisoners To Escape From County Jail

Michigan Law Review

Information was filed against a sheriff for contempt in negligently permitting the escape of federal prisoners from his county jail. Held, the sheriff was guilty of contempt of the federal committing court. United States v. Fanning, (D. C. W. Va. 1934) 6 F. Supp. 412. Affirmed, Fanning v. United States, (C. C. A. 4th, 1934) 72 F. (2d) 929.

Declaratory Judgments- Extension Of Protection Against Injuries To Personality

Michigan Law Review

The widespread acceptance of the declaratory judgment as a statutory supplement to common law and equitable remedies has raised some searching questions as to the relation between right and remedy in Anglo-American law. The declaratory judgment can operate in anticipation of specific wrongs that would be a basis for ordinary legal or equitable relief. It does not depend for its efficacy on the use of the familiar remedies of law and equity - that is, on damages, specific restitution in replevin and ejectment, and the injunction and specific enforcement in equity. The question may therefore be asked whether the development …

Trusts - Constructive Trusts - Breach Of Fiduciary Relation Between Husband And Wife With Respect To Oral Agreement Concerning Land

Michigan Law Review

In her last illness, Mrs. Jackson desired to transfer realty to her married daughter, plaintiff herein. To prevent creditors of the daughter's husband from reaching the property, Mrs. Jackson conveyed the land to her husband, Mr. Jackson, with the parol understanding that "he would see that Cora got it." Jackson failed to transfer the land and upon his death it passed under an ante-nuptial settlement to defendant, his second wife. In an action to recover the land, the court stated that defendant was in the position of a bona fide purchaser for value, and held that the statute of frauds …

Rights In Land - Lateral Support - Statute Increasing Common Law Rights And Duties - Constitutionality

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff sued for damages to his building which collapsed during excavating operations on defendant's adjoining land. A Michigan statute makes it the duty of land owners excavating to a depth of 12 feet or more below grade level to furnish sufficient lateral support to protect adjacent land and structures thereon from injury "due to the removed material in its natural state, or due to the disturbance of other existing conditions caused by such excavation," and imposes liability for injuries due to failure to comply with the act. The excavation on defendant's land, reaching a depth of 14 feet below grade …

Foreign Enforcement Of Actions For Wrongful Death, William H. Rose

Michigan Law Review

Actions for wrongful death have a long history in the common law. Homicide was once a private matter giving rise to the blood feud and later to the wergild, whereby a money substitute replaced private warfare. With the development of criminal law the crown took jurisdiction over all killings. At a time when all felonies carried with them the death penalty, forfeiture of chattels and escheat of lands, the right to sue for wrongful death was scarcely of practical importance. This was especially so since felony included negligent killing, and even an accidental killing required the king's pardon if …

Innkeepers - Statutory Construction - Hospital As Hotel

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff hospital claimed a lien upon the personal effects of a deceased patient left in their possession. An Iowa statute defines a hotel, for the purposes of its operator's lien, as including "inn, rooming house, and eating house, or any structure where rooms or board are furnished, whether to permanent or transient occupants." The term "guest" is defined to include "any legal occupant of any hotel as herein defined." Held, that "structure" as used in the statute refers to one used for the entertainment of ordinary individuals, as in the case of the structures enumerated; and that a hospital, …

Alternative Parties And The Common Law Hangover, Dale E. Bennett

Michigan Law Review

Professor Edson R. Sunderland stated in 1920 that a glaring failure chargeable to the legal profession in America was "its ignorance and indifference to improvements in procedural practice developed in other jurisdictions," pointing out that while discoveries by foreign scholars in the field of medicine were eagerly accepted, similar innovations in the field of law were uniformly ignored regardless of merit. Such apathy is largely attributable to the legislatures, but the courts cannot be given an entirely clean bill of health, for attempted procedural reforms have often been nullified, in whole or in part, by technical construction and an attempted …

Contracts - Champerty

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff leased her lands to defendant under a void oil and gas lease. One Johnston induced plaintiff to enter into a contract with him whereby Johnston agreed to pay the costs of a bill to cancel the lease in return for a new lease to himself should the bill be successful. Accordingly, this suit was brought to cancel the lease. The court, agreeing that the existing lease was void, nevertheless dismissed the bill on the ground that the contract between Johnston and plaintiff was void as against public policy, and that plaintiff had no standing in equity. Of the eight …

Limitation Of Actions And The Conflict Of Laws, Edgar H. Ailes

Michigan Law Review

All civilized States, in the interest of an efficient administration of justice, have felt compelled to fix time limits beyond which access to their courts would be denied to aggrieved parties. Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium. This was true even of Roman law in which actions were normally perpetual. Since the limitations enacted by various legislatures differ widely, and since debts are transitory, permitting suit wherever the creditor can find the debtor (at least in countries where the Common Law prevails), it is of the first practical importance that definite rules of Conflict of Laws be evolved to …

Effect Of A Restriction On Assignment In A Contract, Grover C. Grismore

Michigan Law Review

The early common law took a strictly logical view in regard to the assignability of contract rights and duties. Since a contract is essentially a personal relationship voluntarily entered into by the parties to it, it follows as a logical deduction that one of the parties should not be allowed to destroy that relationship by introducing a third person into it in his place without the consent of the other party. This was the view of the early common law. However, in the course of time, as we know, the commercial spirit gradually made inroads into this doctrine until we …

Bills And Notes - Promissory Notes - Negotiability At Common Law

Michigan Law Review

Defendant contractors left a check for materialmen in the hands of a third party who appropriated the check to his own use and then, in lieu thereof, gave his own note to the materialmen who endorsed it to a bank and credited the contractors with the amount of the note. In an action by the materialmen against the contractors for services rendered and materials furnished, held, such acceptance and negotiation constituted a payment of the materialmen's claims. Riedman v. Macht, (Ind. App. 1932) 182 N. E. 87.

Corporations - Right Of Stockholders To Compel Leave To Inspect Books Of A Delaware Corporation

Michigan Law Review

At common law an incident to the ownership of stock in a corporation is the right or privilege to inspect the books or records of the corporation. The right is analogous to that of partners to examine the records and books of the firm. However, it is not an absolute, unqualified right at common law, but one which is conditional on the good faith and proper purposes of the stockholder.

Conflict Of Laws-Judicial Notice Of Foreign Law

Michigan Law Review

Substantively, "the subject of judicial notice . . . belongs where the general topic of legal or judicial reasoning belongs, - to that part of the law which defines among other things, the nature and limitations of the judicial function - it is, indeed, woven into the very texture of this function." Functionally, the subject of judicial notice is that portion of procedural law relating to "Proof'' wherein the ordinary rules of evidence are inapplicable. That is to say, certain propositions, "facta probanda," of a party's case will be taken for true by the tribunal without proof. These are generally …

Crimes-Larceny-By Wife From Husband

Michigan Law Review

A wife was convicted of larceny of her husband's property. Upon appeal from an order denying a new trial, held that the order be reversed: The Married Woman's Act, reading, "every married woman shall receive the same protection of all her rights as a woman which her husband does as a man," does not so change the common law unity of spouses that a wife stealing from her husband is included under the comprehensive terms of the larceny statute. State v. Arnold, 182 Minn. 313, 235 N.W. 373 (1931).

Transfer Of Future Interests, W. Lewis Roberts

Michigan Law Review

In considering to what extent future interests are transferable in this country it is proposed to limit the investigation to those future interests known as contingent remainders, executory devises, and defeasible vested remainders. It has not been deemed necessary to consider vested remainders as they have long been treated by the law in much the same way as present estates have been as far as alienation is concerned.

The Scope Of Judicial Review, Edson R. Sunderland

Michigan Law Review

There was nothing known to the common law which was, or could properly be called, a true appeal from one court to another, and this was so in England until the judicature act of 1873. There were, however, certain imperfect and restricted methods by which some sort of redress could be had for an unjust decision.

Conflict Of Laws: Recent Development Concerning Marriage, Francis Deak

Michigan Law Review

Anglo-American writers on the conflict of laws and Continental writers on private international law emphasize, with equal strength, the importance of the rules regulating marriage. Marriage is the most important of the social institutions; it is, in fact, the very foundation of the present social order. The legal system of civilized states, which is called upon to maintain this social order, contains an elaborate body of rules, protecting the institution of marriage. It is noteworthy, indeed, that mature legal systems secure best interests involved in domestic relations, besides interests of substance such as property and contract. Each legal system developed …

Telegraph, Telephone And Wireless-Tapping

Michigan Law Review

A recent Federal case, Olmstead v. United States, suggests an interesting problem. Evidence obtained by Federal authorities, who tapped private telephone wires, was admitted in a criminal prosecution. It seems to be the general rule that fraudulently, wrongfully, or illegally procured evidence is admissible, if otherwise admissible. And certainly the courts have required telegraph companies to disclose messages to aid criminal prosecutions. Telegraph operators have been compelled to testify. And even where a state statute forbade disclosure of the message by the company, a subpoena duces tecum has compelled the production of a telegram to aid the courts. Testimony …

The Institute's Restatement And The Michigan Law, Herbert F. Goodrich

Michigan Law Review

The task which the American Law Institute has undertaken is to make a statement of the common law, in its various branches. The end in view is not codification; indeed the idea is directly opposed to codification. It is hoped to have, when the work is completed, an accurate statement of existing common law, carefully and systematically made, from which local variations and peculiarities have been ironed out. It is hoped, in other words, to restore both accuracy and continuity to the pattern of the common law fabric as it is woven in our judicial mills.

A Rational Theory For Joinder Of Causes Of Action And Defences, And For The Use Of Counterclaims, William Wirt Blume

Michigan Law Review

In discussing, first, the joinder of actions it will be convenient to consider three groups or classes of cases:

Class I : Where one plaintiff (or joint plaintiffs) unites in a single proceeding two or more causes of action against one defendant (or joint defendants).

Class 2: "Where two or more plaintiffs, each having a cause of action against the same party (or parties), unite their causes of action in one proceeding.

Class 3: Where one plaintiff (or joint plaintiffs) having several causes of action, each against a different party, unites them in one proceeding.

In considering each group or …

Joinder And Splitting Of Causes Of Action, Charles E. Clark

Michigan Law Review

The pleading rules concerning joinder and splitting of causes of action are complements of each other, though designed to achieve different objectives. The joinder rule is that separate causes cannot be "joined" or pleaded in the same suit unless they fall within one of the classes of permissible joinder specified in the codes. The purpose of the rule is to prevent too wide a field of litigation and too diverse issues in a single suit and thus to avoid a case of undue confusion and complexity. The rule against splitting is that a single cause shall not be "split" or …

Arson-Statutory Chance Of Common Law Requisites

Michigan Law Review

At common Jaw, arson was a clearly defined felony, including only certain kinds of burnings. According to Lord Coke, it was the malicious and voluntary burning!' of the house of another by night or by day, 3 INST. 66. There were certain well-understood essentials constituting the crime. The structure must have been a house or an out-house; it must have been the house of another; it must have been inhabited, though not actually occupied, at the time of the burning. The structure must have been a completed one; there must have been an actual burning-at least to the extent of …

Jurisdiction Over Unincorporated Associations Composed Of Nonresidents

Michigan Law Review

New York has a statute which provides for suits against unincorporated associations consisting of seven or more members. It reads as follows: An action or special proceeding may be maintained, against the president or treasurer of such an association, * * * upon any cause of action, for or upon which the· plaintiff may maintain such action or special proceeding, against all the associates * * *· Any partnership; or other company of persons, which has a president or treasurer, is, deemed an association within the meaning of this section." General Associations Law (Consol. Laws of N. Y.), sec. 13. …

The Uniformity Of The Maritime Law, George L. Canfield

Michigan Law Review

In 1871, Richard Henry Dana commenced a masterly article on the "History of Admiralty Jurisdiction in the Supreme Court of the United States,'' by writing, "After seventy yea.rs of baffling winds and cross currents in the region of admiralty jurisdiction, the Supreme Court of the United States has sailed out into deep water." In 1924, Charles Merrill Hough concludes his delightful "Admiralty Jurisdiction-of Late Years," with the statement, "The years since 1906 have not increased the certainty of maritime law, and they have impaired the tradition of enforceable customs of the sea." And others writing in current legal periodicals have …